Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Blog
Q&A
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Numbering Display Bug

Parent

Numbering Display Bug

+5
−0

I think there is a bug with a final text numbering not matching the numbering in the preview.

I recently posted this answeron meta. When I edit the question the preview of the text displays correct numbering but once the edit is saved the numbering is displayed incorrectly (possibly connected to this older bug?)

Here is a picture showing the error. The first half is the display when the post is being edited, and the second half when the answer is posted:

example of bug where the first half is the display when it is being edited, and second half when the answer has been posted.

bug status-completed editor posts editor-preview
posted about 4 years ago
4y ago by 10 Rep‭
user card
1muflon1‭
1 1 14 9
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (7 comments)
Post
+1
−1

This is a test with known input.

  1. First entry in ordered list.
  2. Second ordered list entry.
    • First entry in subordinate list under point 2.
    • Second unordered list entry.
  3. Third entry in outer ordered list.
  4. Outer list entry 4.
  1. First entry in second ordered list.
  2. Outer list 2, entry 2.
    1. Entry 1 of subordinate list in outer list 2, entry 2.
    2. Second entry of subordinate ordered list.
  3. Back to outer list 2. This should be entry 3.

All the above looks correct in the preview. Using HTML <ol>, <ul>, and <li> tags.

posted almost 4 years ago
user card
Olin Lathrop‭
46 122 342 122
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (5 comments)
General comments
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote almost 4 years ago
copy link

The above looks as expected. The example above therefore does not reproduce the bug.

1muflon1‭ wrote almost 4 years ago
copy link

Thanks, for your answer. I think that in the mean time the bug got fixed. The screenshots above showcase the bug but I just tried to edit my post today and the bug is no longer present. I guess the bug got fixed and nobody just took time to post answer to this question.

1muflon1‭ wrote almost 4 years ago · edited almost 4 years ago
copy link

I also noticed that now my question has status completed tag - did not realized that it got new tags I thought I would get some notification for that

Monica Cellio‭ wrote almost 4 years ago
copy link

@1muffon1 I didn't realize that a tag-only edit didn't generate a notification. Sorry! Yes, we found and fixed this bug recently. (That's the exclusive "we"; I didn't do anything except convey the news. The actual credit goes to others.)

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote almost 4 years ago · edited almost 4 years ago
copy link

@Monica: I didn't notice until now that the question is 3 months old. When you folks fix something, it would be worth adding and answer, even if all it says it "Fixed". Tags are easy to not notice. I guess it was the addition of the tag that got this post bumped so that I noticed it.