Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Comments on Why is there a rep system in Codidact?
Parent
Why is there a rep system in Codidact?
I had visited Codidact quite some time ago when it was still being built. At that time, there weren't many talks about having the reputation system built on this site.
Partly, The reason why Slack communities and Discord communities are so easy-going and helpful has something in common between them both - the lack of any actual rep points.
You don't need a number to show your expertise - your arguments should do that. Treating everyone on an even playing field produces a much more productive debate than any other measure.
I am going to be brutally honest here - I was initially interested because Codidact seemed something new, but now it's another StackExchange in the making.
The rep system is completely useless and negatively affects the flow of debate:
-
Your arguments should be your support in a constructive debate, not reputation
-
Trust Levels seem to be a better way (established by upvoted answers and the like) but showing a title rather than a flashy number.
-
Making it a rep game would lead to lower quality answers and questions as the primary aim would be points, not for spreading knowledge.
-
People who want to answer questions (and are knowledgable) really need no 'fake internet points' as an incentive - having a trust system would work pretty well giving them extra privileges, while not signifying that they are all-knowing.
Simply put, there is no amount of reasons or arguments that can offset an actual real-life example - StackOverflow has already become what it was always destined for, and now is the last chance for Codidact.
Either you have a smaller range of numbers (1-10) to denote their moderation powers, or you take trust levels. That would be the closest simulation to Slack and Discord while working far better than both by having a formal framework.
Please don't spell death for this forum!
We didn't set out to have a reputation stat, but because we started by adapting code that had it, we started out that wa …
3y ago
I largely agree with the answer of Olin Lathrop, but I'd like to put things in a slightly different perspective. We n …
3y ago
Part of this question is about making Codidact more Like Slack and Discord, which are not even question and answer sites …
3y ago
Actually Codidact should support rep better than it does now. Most of the dislike of rep seems to come from a misunders …
3y ago
I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in general and at least in the long …
3y ago
What is repo/reputation? Reputation is just number. Any user can know how active you are in Codidact by seeing your r …
3y ago
Post
We didn't set out to have a reputation stat, but because we started by adapting code that had it, we started out that way. When we brought up removing it, a few people objected strongly. (See, for example, this discussion.)
We've "nerfed" reputation; unlike on SO, reputation doesn't affect your abilities. It's just a number. Abilities are instead governed by specific, related activity; for example, you earn the privilege of editing directly by having enough of your suggested edits accepted.
We've also made the "usercard", the stats that accompany your name and avatar on posts and in the users list, configurable. A community that feels strongly that rep is important can show it; a community that wants to downplay it can remove rep from that block of stats. I now realize that might be a good thing to try here on Meta; I'll discuss that with the team.
We don't yet have a way to show you which of your posts have gotten recent voting. We've kept the rep number in the header (when you're logged in) so that, as a poor substitute, you might at least notice when that number changes. We do intend to do better there; it's on our list, but we're a small team and we haven't done that yet.
Some say that the reputation number is a measure of expertise. Maybe an average rep per post would be, but the total alone doesn't tell you whether the person has a few good posts, a bunch of mediocre ones, or a single hit. On The Workplace over on SE, we often saw a snarky answer on a hot network question skyrocket for the entertainment value. That someone has a couple thousand rep from that single answer doesn't actually indicate any expertise -- but, if people are evaluating posts based on author rep, that person's next answer would look stronger than it should. This is why, in the "usercard", we show the number of posts (by broad type). One of my early designs of that blob of stats showed more of a breakdown, something like "41 answers (39 positive)", but it was cluttered and we decided we needed to look for another approach.
1 comment thread