Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Can we allow answerers to see if asker upvoted them?

Parent

Can we allow answerers to see if asker upvoted them?

+6
−11

When someone takes the time to answer a question, it's nice for that person to feel recognized and that they were helpful. While seeing upvotes is a good indication that the answer was helpful to the community in general, there's not any indication that the answer was specifically helpful to the person who originally asked it, as the asker's upvotes are just mixed in with the rest of the community's.

I certainly think that it's fine for there to be no concept of a single "accepted answer" controlled by the asker. However, I think that there should be some sort of way for the asker to recognize and thank the people who wrote helpful answers for me. This leads me to a bit of a conundrum:

  1. Should it be correct etiquette for the asker to leave a comment saying "Thanks" or the like on helpful answers? This was certainly discouraged on other Q&A sites I know of, though maybe it's the right answer here?
  2. Or, should there be some way for people (maybe just the specific answerer, or maybe for everyone) to see that the person who originally asked upvoted their answer?

I could brainstorm some other thoughts too like some dedicated "thank you" button or the like, but what makes the most sense in my first pass at the idea anyway is just adding some indication next to one's own answers that the asker upvoted it, and maybe some notification which could end up being some sort of standardized "thank you" for the experts who write the answers in a community.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+6
−1

Should it be correct etiquette for the asker to leave a comment saying "Thanks" or the like on helpful answers? This was certainly discouraged on other Q&A sites I know of, though maybe it's the right answer here?

No.

Leaving comments that contain stuff like "Thank you", "Thanks", "Worked for me" is unhelpful, Since there is replacement for it, Which is Upvoting (Voting in general) is a very good replacement to it. If someone want to thank you or your answer worked for someone, so they can upvote and this will mean that you have helped someone.

Or, should there be some way for people (maybe just the specific answerer, or maybe for everyone) to see that the person who originally asked upvoted their answer?

New Feature.

As far as my information, The Codidact team is working on Reactions feature which means if the Asker want to thank you or the answer worked for the asker, so they can react with "Worked for me" reaction and their name will appear there. But Of Course, the Asker may Upvote and don't reaction, it is the Asker Opinion. At all, the feature didn't release yet and may not release and may release it and it won't success. so, it depends on the future. That is all.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Reaction is similar to thanks, but voting is very different than thanks. (1 comment)
General Comments (3 comments)
Reaction is similar to thanks, but voting is very different than thanks.
Quasímodo‭ wrote almost 2 years ago

The helped D says "thanks" to the helper R because D wants to demonstrate his acknowledgement, appreciation and thankfulness for R's help and time.

Voting is anonymous, so it fails to demonstrate that.

Reactions, as implemented by Codidact, are a much better solution to that as they are not anonymous and are therefore similar to saying thanks. I say similar because the green check mark could be understood as nothing more than it is, namely a utilitarian "this works" stamp, and that is still different than showing appreciation, even though acknowledgement that "this solves my problem" and thankfulness usually go hand in hand.