Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Display post titles instead of the URL for internal links

Parent

Display post titles instead of the URL for internal links

+4
−0

Currently, when pasting a link to somewhere on Codidact, into posts or comments, the link is rendered in the output the same way it's written in the post source; that is, the URL. The parser should output the title of the page it's linking to.

The same can be achieved manually, by visiting the page linked to, copying its title from the page, and then using the Markdown formatting:

[<title>](<url>)


This feature request is constrained to internal links only.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
Post
+1
−0

A step toward this: if you choose "copy link" on a top-level post, you now have two options, the raw link and a Markdown version. The Markdown version uses the post title as the link text. So it's not automatic -- if you paste a URL in from your browser you'll get a naked link -- but it's possible to get the friendly version without having to go collect the title manually.

"Copy link" on an answer doesn't populate the link text, so you still have to fill that in. Would it be better or worse if we filled it with something like "answer to (Title)"? If you wanted to say something more specific like "the answer suggesting jQuery" you'd have to edit out what we generated and then add your text. On the other hand, you'd always get something.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Copying link from answer (1 comment)
Not sufficient (1 comment)
Copying link from answer
Michael‭ wrote 10 months ago

Would it be better or worse if we filled it with something like "answer to (Title)"?

I think I'd prefer the "answer to $title" version. Easier to delete than to click back and forth another time.