Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Activity Pub Support

Parent

Activity Pub Support

+9
−3

With Stack Exchange's apparent move towards accepting generative AI in the answers, people might be looking for alternatives. I, personally, recommend Codidact to people regularly.

I tried to determine if ActivityPub was supported, but didn't find anything in the roadmap or issues on Github. I'm wondering if adding ActivityPub support would be viable? It would be great if Codidact were one of the top Fediverse choices for StackExchange alternatives.

It seems to me that adding Fediverse support might draw in more developer support as well.

I'm not certain whether federation fits with the community goals or not, but wanted to broach the topic.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

4 comment threads

Some thoughts (2 comments)
Undefined terms (1 comment)
Can you say more about how this might work? (1 comment)
Some old discussions (1 comment)
Post
+8
−0

I'm not sure if this is actually an answer or not, but as suggested in a comment thread, I'll put it out there and see what happens.

My understanding is that Fediverse / ActivityPub support doesn't necessarily have to be both ways. Bidirectional federation is definitely more useful, but there can be some value even in read-only feeds.

Therefore, how about as a first step, in much the same way as with the RSS/Atom feeds, publishing ActivityPub feeds but not implementing support for federation input?

I see this being primarily useful for categories and users; at least on Mastodon, this would map nicely to how people can follow either a hashtag or a user. Since ActivityPub supports threads and sub-threads, follow-up posts to a top-level post could map to replies referencing the original post likely to a largely arbitrary depth. (For example, a question could have its answers and comments, and answers to a question could have their comments, as replies.)

Starting out with read-only (export) federation should avoid many of the issues raised in the previous answer while allowing Codidact/QPixel to at least dip its toes into the Fediverse by letting people follow Codidact communities from and easily share Codidact posts within the Fediverse.

Do note that there may be technical reasons which I am simply unaware of why read-only/export-only ActivityPub support is not feasible or meaningful. If there are, then that would invalidate this suggestion.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Following a user (1 comment)
Following a user

Following a user’s activity can be useful for bots on the network, such as monitoring for spam and abuse. But do we really want people on social media to be following user accounts on Codidact? I don’t think so. Since we’re not a social media, it’s not the user that matters to the network, but the content they provide. And we really should let people contribute content here on the network, without being stalked online.