Unique favicons for each site

Multiple favicon is an awesome idea for people participating in multiple sites.

However it has a very important disadvantage of diluting the platform image (the book) when being reached by newcomers.

For that reason, for the time being it shouldn't be a mandatory change, but rather an option and very importantly disabled by default.

posted over 2 years ago

CC0

.                                                .‭

8 15 32 22

What about as a compromise using the book as favicon but colored in the color of the corresponding sub domain?

posted 11 months ago

CC BY-SA 4.0

Trilarion‭

7 19 88 55

The idea is pretty nice. This post of mine has become a duplicate of this one, which has the same premise as this.

And as I love the idea, I actually made (kinda crappy)^[1] icons for these existing sites. Also in chat (Discord), some of these icons I created became the basis of newer emojis:

^[2]

These are most likely the icons to be put in place when we think we should get a favicon for a site. It's not mandatory, as they say, but if a bunch support it, then they'll get what they want. A site without a favicon will have the default Codidact logo.

Notes:

• ^{[1]: In "kinda crappy", I mean that some of these images on the repo are quite blurry since the softwares I use for making them caused some weird stuff.}
• ^{[2]: The first 4 emojis are not logos of the communities, except for the default Codidact logo. 101, amen, and the Codidactyl are not logos of the sites.}

posted about 1 year ago

CC BY-SA 4.0

1y ago

General Sebast1an‭

13 6 36 60