Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for user53100
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278671 |
@dzaima Thinking over this, I think I will be satisfied with an option to hide votes on answers (which I believe has already been proposed before for all the network), with the addition of a language-based sorting option, so that they can both coexist. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278671 |
@PeterTaylor Thank you for pointing this flaw with my answer, I haven't thought of a replacement (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278671 |
Post edited: clarified english |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278671 |
@Quintec I disagree with "This is one of the things that has worked well on SE", when I have more time I might expand on my view (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278671 |
@dzaima Fun can still be had by allowing multiple answers to a challenge. Maybe we can include a sort option to alphabetically/randomly sort the languages and sort answers in each language by byte count? or somehow still group submissions in the same language together (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278671 |
@moony I only meant to remove voting for code golf submissions, not for submissions to other challenge types as I hoped to convey in the parenthesis, but looks like I may have messed up my English (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278671 |
@dzaima I intended intra-language competition. But as you say, at times the shortest solution in a language is not as interesting as a longer one in the same language; in such cases both could coexist as separate submissions to the challenge and the author can always explain what makes that submissio... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278671 |
Post edited: +lang |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278671 |
Post edited: grammar, i think, am not sure |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278671 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Site suggestion - Code Golf Remove votes on code golf submissions I believe votes have no place in code golf, only the language and byte counts of submissions should matter. (My point does not stand for challenges nor for submissions to other challenge types, like King of the Hill). (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278004 |
@MonicaCellio Yes, the formatting is still mangled for that comment (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278004 |
Huh, I looked at it again and it is normal now. It was on Firefox 80.0.1 for macOS, for what it's worth. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278004 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Off formatting in comment ending in text in a RTL script In the first comment (by msh210) to this answer, the comment content is intermingled with the text containing the author and age of the comment. A screenshot demonstrating the issue is below. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277487 |
It seems fixed now? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277549 |
@Sigma Computer science, sure, I expected CS to be a part of the scope on this mathematics site (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277549 |
Perhaps clichéd, but for the logo I suggest $P\lor\neg P$, i.e. P∨¬P, a reference to both the law of the excluded middle as well as the P vs NP problem. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277245 | Post edited | — | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277258 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Medical science site Is sports science included into the scope? I imagine questions of the sort, "How to detect if you're overpronating/oversupinating while running?", "Proper posture for X without hurting Y", "What food should I bring on an marathon?" My opinion is the affirmative. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277245 |
I've suggested an edit adding some computer science topics; I believe CS should be a part of the scope. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #277245 |
Suggested edit: added some computer science fields (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277130 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Hot Posts link to Blog leads to 404 Clicking on "Help us help you: please show your support for site proposals" under "Hot Posts" leads to https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277072, a 404, instead of to https://meta.codidact.com/articles/277072. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74861 |
There's https://languages.codidact.com/ now (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277114 |
I agree that we need some medical professionals. Zerotime's comment suggests expertise, let's see if there are others who join. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277105 |
My opinion would be that these subjects are on-topic as long as they are relevant to human biology/health. So questions on reactions/enzymes would be on-topic if they take place in humans (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277114 |
'there will be the endless "What's wrong with me?" questions' → 'It should be no site where diagnoses or professional advice are offered.', thus making such questions off-topic. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276997 |
I would participate casually too. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277007 |
I'd be somewhere in between casual user and enthusiast, tending more towards the former. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276865 |
@msh210 I think the connection of linguistics to "languages" is stronger than languages to "language", but maybe that's just me. Either way, I have no strong preference for either (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276798 |
@Marco13 If you haven't seen it yet, this issue has been answered in a comment to this question https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276923 (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276780 |
@Mithrandir24601 Ah, I see, yes, that's a good idea. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276780 |
Regarding translation questions, if we are going to have them, are we going to accept translation attempts on arbitrarily long text? If not, what should be be the cut-off? A "paragraph", or just a sentence maximum? I'm leaning towards the latter because this can perhaps reduce low-effort homework que... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276780 |
@Mithrandir24601 I assume by linking you mean having it as a part of an answer, and not letting the entire answer be the linked dictionary entry? If so sure, we can even have a "community-wiki" question with answers for each language which each give links to online dictionaries, so future questions a... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276866 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Languages 'supersite' Site name suggestion: Languages and Linguistics I believe there is little overlap in expertise of the two, so both terms should be included. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276865 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Languages 'supersite' URL suggestion: languages.codidact.com Adding "linguistics" will make it too long. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276855 |
I agree with Zerotime's comment in that at minimum a translation should be provided if not entirely in English. However, as mentioned in your Area51 proposal, once a language sub-site has graduated non-English posts (for that language) should be allowed. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276778 |
I am inclined to believe questions asking for resources should be on-topic. From the categories in your list, I'd say the physiology of language is definitely off-topic. I wrote a comment regarding translation on Sigma's answer (is there a way to link comments yet?). Now for identification (assuming ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276780 |
My opinion is that language learning, acquisition resources and the like would be on-topic. As for translation, I am not sure, I can see a place for questions on the translation/meaning of idioms or "untranslatable" words and the like, but straightforward dictionary definitions should not be on-topic... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276701 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Languages 'supersite' Update: launched A Q&A for all languages, both natural languages and constructed languages (not programming languages though). Because of the potential overlap with linguistics, linguistics can be included in the scope of the site. The idea for this is inspired by the Languages.SE proposal ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |