I have published here maybe about 140 questions spanning about 84% of the communities, most of them are well received by the community or at least not-badly-received by the community.

I personally don't use caching in my smartphone's browser at all and generally won't use it, which would obligate me to mentally recall a "long" password for my Codidact account, something I don't want to do.

• From my experience, in StackExchange it works fine.

Due to these data, I downvoted.

deleted user I wasn't aware that this question was about implementing anonymous posting (without logging in) only for you. Perhaps you could somehow make that more explicit in your proposal?

No, seriously. You are an anecdote. You could be the most exemplary person in the world. But that doesn't matter one iota. I don't care about you here. Nothing in my answer is about you. If something like what you propose, namely allowing people to post unaccountably and anonymously (because there would be nothing tying a post back to an identity, even a pseudonym) is implemented, then that feature would be equally available to everyone because pretty much by definition there would be nothing to differentiate one person using it from another who does. Therefore, we should consider what a random person, perhaps one with evil intent, could do with the proposed feature.

And that picture does not look pretty.

Canina‭ I am not an anecdote, I gave one...

I didn't say unaccountably, and, anonymously doesn't necessarily mean "unnamed", in StackExchange I can choose a new name any time I post, this name is based on a randomly generated machine name and it is even obligatory.

Such posting is always heavily monitored by automatic mechanisms aimed to prevent vandalism such as time limit between posts, time limit after a few down votes, IP blocks, browser cookie limits (flushing all caches will require creating a new temporary_account --- in that browser, etc.), closed records of mods about specific trolls and more.

Olin Lathrop‭ you cherry pick this scientific speculation community out of others in which I got quite good question receiving such as Software development, Languages and Linguistics, Cooking, Photography, Physics, and even your self-moderated Electrical engineering.

About the last part of your reply, your wild imagination about me is something I don't care about, nor should it bother anyone in this community I believe, and because it's disgustingly anti-communal I should of course flag it and encourage mods to block your profile.

One could probably make it work. By allowing anonymous questions (mobile or desktop doesn't matter, the content license doesn't require a logged in user) but sending them to a special review queue before and only making them visible to others if they are vetted. This would circumvent abuse and would give people the freedom to not sign up, albeit at the drawback that content wouldn't immediately be visible. However, it would probably add something to the platform (in case somebody doesn't want to reveal his/her identity legitimately). Does anyone want to write a feature request about it? If not, I could. But I would not see it as high priority. Maybe something for the future, when more pressing matters are solved.

Trilarion‭ At which point one can just as well type up the question elsewhere and then copy and paste it into the submission interface when logged in whenever convenient, like I suggested in my answer, because then the question won't appear immediately anyway. Composing a post doesn't have to happen at the same time as posting it.

Actually, let's not forget that for a long time, unless one had institutional access to the Internet (for example through a university), to read and compose messages offline and then batch submit them for delivery was the norm. It also had the side benefit of encouraging putting some extra time in to ensure clarity, because depending on timing any misunderstandings due to lack of clarity could easily waste a few days if one was unlucky.