Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for KingDukenâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #279654 |
I just ran into this issue. This happens when I enter a post where I have created a question or I created an answer and I am not being able to expand the notification inbox. (Using FireFox myself) Other posts, I am able to expand the notification inbox. So for instance, I able to expand the notificat... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278266 |
Unless you suggest that Codidact can have a wave of sponsors like StackExchange, I don't expect anyone to make a salary on this website. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278132 |
@monica Hmm actually, I just now tried different pictures. That seemed to work... That's really odd. They're both pictures of the same file type... I don't understand why I can do other pictures but not the one I was trying to do. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278132 |
@manassehkatz I've tried this on other internet browsers like Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer (so the OS is Windows 10). Same results. Using the latest version of Firefox (no beta builds). Picture is a 14kB .jpg file. File name was "Capture.jpg" because I was simply using the snipping tool and t... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275969 |
@Olin , you could tag this as a `feature-request` and perhaps they could implement something like this. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74991 |
@Monica So..... what's next other than getting the word out? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275837 |
I think "EENG" might be good. That was the suffix for electrical engineering courses at my university. I think long URL names like "electricalengineering.codidact...." aren't entirely necessary. If we do expand for more engineering types, mechanical engineering could be MENG, civil CIENG, aerospace A... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275808 |
Interestingly enough, as Dave mentioned LaTeX (but not necessarily relevant to Mathjax), there is a [package called "CircuiTikz"](https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/CircuiTikz_package). That would be an interesting tool to utilize in lieu of Circuitlab but probably would take far more effort, thoug... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275808 |
@Monica correct. If we can not have Circuitlab, users can upload a photo. The reason why Circuitlab was a good tool is because it allowed other people to modify it and/or simulate it and, as Dave mentioned, provided someone to quickly upload a diagram if that was not in the OP's disposal. I wouldn't ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275776 |
There's also a meta post on EE.SE on them [announcing the implementation](https://electronics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/963/embedding-a-schematic-editor/2708#2708) of this service. Perhaps that can help. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275776 |
@Monica , frankly I don't know. I remember one time I was [troubleshooting why schematic upload from this website wasn't working](https://electronics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/7012/is-there-a-problem-with-circuitlab-save-and-insert-today/7013#7013) to which a former SE employee explained what ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275776 |
@Monica We also had a website called [Circuitlab](https://www.circuitlab.com/) that was a website plugin to EE.SE. Mathjax would be nice as well. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275776 |
Well, well, well... I haven't seen you in a long time, Olin :) (talking about from the EE.SE website of course) I have proposed a [general engineering](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/74999) website. Do you believe that we should have dedicated engineering websites instead? I'll be more than happ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #75006 |
Fair enough! :) (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74995 |
Yes. You're right. Perhaps I should tone down the amount of potential topics. Maybe we can have a separate website for more general engineering. Good idea :) I'll edit the question and topics. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74996 |
@Monica Cellio, yes, I would agree that I would make this more hardware oriented and less about open source. I removed the part in the OP about "open source". And thanks, I just edited to include the `proposal` tag. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74996 |
Thanks for the feedback. I would like to see this website focus more on hardware and "do it yourself" projects, things that could move with software. I wouldn't mind people asking about things they need help with their Arduino script, etc. (See my answer about what could be on topic). I'd just rather... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74991 |
Hmm... Can't seem to answer my own question. Says `Tags must contain at least one required tag (proposal, idea)` even though I clearly have the `idea` tag... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |