Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Moshi
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #281610 |
If its really such an issue, the easy solution is just to make so that "minor edits" are restricted to those with the Edit privilege, who we already trust not to make bad edits @Sigma (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281610 |
@OlinLathrop Well, the edit approval process exists for a reason... (if they are editng their own post with bad intent, well, they're only sabotaging themselves). (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281610 |
@Sigma To answer your question, it would be a human marking it. I don't think it's feasible for there to be a system for it. As for the good faith thing... I'm sorry, I still don't understand what the concern is. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281610 |
@OlinLathrop I'm not sure what you mean by that. How exactly could one abuse this feature? The only difference between a "minor" edit and a non-minor one would be whether it bumps the post. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281610 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Could we have a way to edit without bumping posts? Whenever a post is edited, the question is automatically bumped to the top of the category post list. This is useful for major changes to posts because people can see that something has changed. However, it is a slight annoyance when the edit is extremely minor, such as changing the tags of a ques... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281577 |
Post edited: Tagged |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #281577 |
Suggested edit: Tagged (more) |
helpful | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281507 |
Tags aren't used in isolation. If something is tagged both "feature-request" and "planned", and further, is on the Meta for that site, I think people can reasonable infer that yes, it means that the feature is planned, not that the feature is *about* "planned".
Somewhat of an aside, but you don't di... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281505 |
Post edited: Deleted extra 'usually' |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281507 |
"The "status-" is part of the name to avoid having only one type of "encoding"; somebody who can't see the colors can still tell the difference" Is there some reason there needs to be a difference? The colors, IMO, are decorative, not informative. If the tag was just named "completed", its still obvi... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281505 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Let's revamp our status tags I'm all for changing the colors - usually, red is a negative indicator, which IMO doesn't fit with [status-completed] or [status-planned] or even [status-deferred] Purple would be a nice color, but it's unfortunately not on the official Co-design color list, which is used to style everything on Co... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277424 |
Post edited: Updated list of allowed tags and attributes |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281410 |
"perhaps the totals include deleted posts that are not displayed" Yes, the prime example is probably the ever-humorous [TibetLhasatourpackage](https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3/tags/3030) (In the tag list, it shows there exists one (deleted) post). @FoggyFinder is also correct, though even in th... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #277424 |
Suggested edit: Updated list of allowed tags and attributes (more) |
helpful | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281146 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Long text overflows in post history In this post history, a very long link greatly overflows the width of the diff box. Overflowing text in post history You can see there is a tail peeking out from the right side, and a horizontal scrollbar at the bottom of the page. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280993 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Do I need to conceal or blur brand names? Tl;dr, as long as you state any affiliation, you're fine Refer to the promotional content guidelines Reproduced here: > - You must explicitly state your affiliation. If you're linking your dragon-riding place, please just include a disclaimer that clearly states how you're connected with it.... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280973 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280973 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Ad templates don't work with Articles Ad templates (which community ads use) don't give an image for Article type posts. For example, for this promoted post, the image url that is used in the sidebar is https://languages.codidact.com/ca/posts/277380.png which gives a 500 server error and so appears as a dead image icon. This also a... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280962 |
I'm not sure if you're asking Codidact to start a new "Engineering" community (in which case this should be moved to Site Proposals) or if you want the current EE community to broaden (in which case it should be brought up on EE Meta, not here) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280874 |
Authors already are notified about suggested edits, so that's one thing checked off (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280879 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Community ad replaces characters with question marks Recently, I saw this community ad: Question marks replace unknown characters in community ad The actual title is 'Caution' and 'cautious' with ʃ or ʒ? The IPA characters seem to be unknown to whatever is rendering the ad, and so they were replaced by question marks. This is bad for obvious reas... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280861 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Cancelation prompt is unintuitive After hitting the "Cancel" button when writing or editing a post, a prompt shows up that says > Any unsaved changes will be lost. Are you sure? > > [Okay] [Cancel] Hitting [Okay] will kick you out of the editor (as expected). However, hitting [Cancel] will also kick you out of the editor, ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280846 |
Post edited: Edited error with exact text |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280846 |
@MonicaCellio I've updated the post (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280846 |
Post edited: Updated to clarify some things |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280846 |
@MonicaCellio I've successfully nominated other articles, so that's not the problem (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280846 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Unable to nominate post for promotion When trying to nominate this post for promotion, it didn't work. Clicking the nomination button did nothing. Checking the console, I believe this is likely a client script error rather than a server error, as the following TypeError appears on the page for that post but not on other posts (where I... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280689 |
Can't reproduce, maybe it's been changed? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280779 |
Post edited: Tagged |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #280779 |
Suggested edit: Tagged (more) |
helpful | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280789 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Add a way to change the flag reasons for a community In the mod tools, we can change the close reasons. This is helpful when a community possibly needs more or less than normal. However, there isn't a way to change the flags, which means that we might close reasons that don't have a relevant flag to them. Of course, the "other" flag exists, but it w... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280723 |
Is there a way to change the flag reasons? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280723 |
Is there a way to change the maximum number of tags per post? (Either per category or community-wide) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280722 |
Post edited: Retagged |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #280722 |
Suggested edit: Retagged (more) |
helpful | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280631 |
Post edited: Retagged |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280632 |
As for the fourth point, that comment was in the context of lacking underlining capabilities. We can totally underline stuff here, so there's no reason to resort to coloring (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280632 |
The main concern here would be accessibility, I think. I for one already have some difficulty with some links here since they aren't visually distinct from the surrounding text other than a slightly different color. (As an aside, could you reformat your post to add context to your points? E.g. point ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #280631 |
Suggested edit: Retagged (more) |
helpful | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280602 |
Post edited: Retagged (technically this would apply to any type of post, so removed the specific question tag) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #280602 |
Suggested edit: Retagged (technically this would apply to any type of post, so removed the specific question tag) (more) |
helpful | about 3 years ago |