Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Moshi
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #285245 |
Post edited: Retagged |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285227 |
What do you mean by "After 2 exists"? If you mean after the feature is implemented, why not just aim for that in the first place? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285202 |
@#54706 there are certain things the make sense to be on global meta since they affect every site, mainly feature requests for, bugs in, and questions about the Codidact software itself (qpixel), and support for questions about the Codidact organization. Those wouldn't make sense to ask about on indi... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279076 |
@#54706
> Often enough I first write a preliminary title, then the body and finally return to the title and adapt it.
That's actually the kind of thing that we wanted to avoid users doing. As you say, even you go back to the title to adapt it once you write the body; this is just the softwar... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285146 |
Post edited: feature-request and support should be used for Codidact features and questions; changed mentions of "Wiki" to "Wikipedia" |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285128 |
To be fair, we already have the Native filter that is grouped with the sorting tabs. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285128 |
Post edited: Thinking more, "Hot" is kind of a terrible name for it |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285128 |
I'm a fan of descriptive names so I don't really like calling it "default", but I wouldn't be opposed if that's what you want to name it. But yeah, thinking harder about it, I think "Hot" isn't a good name for it, I think I'll just remove it. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285128 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should we modify the default (front) page for anonymous visitors? How about having another tab (next to "Activity", "Age", "Score", "Random") in the category listing called "Positive", that would be the new default? When listing by that tab, it would show only positively scored posts. Users could have a new setting, "Default category sort", where they can choose... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285076 |
What I'm getting from this is that we need to "beta" our sites, similar to SE. I completely agree, actually, but also for another reason: expectation management. Users who come to a site with low activity feel like asking and sticking around isn't beneficial. Users who come to a *beta* site feel like... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285097 |
Post edited: Added GitHub link |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284971 |
Post edited: English please |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284725 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Where can I report private issues Sometimes, there are issues that should not be made public (for instance, issues relating to security or privacy) and as such should not be posted here on Meta. Given the potential severity of those issues though, it is important to be able to notify Codidact in some way. Where can users privately... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284720 |
Post edited: Tagged |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284494 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Implement reactions for top level posts Reiterating my request on the original reactions proposal, please allow the ability to set up reactions for top level posts as well. Quoting from that request, > If reactions are able to be added to these sort of 'questions', we can have "Reproduced"/"Not Reproduced" for bug reports instead of the... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284332 |
@#53452 Perhaps if that situation occurs, a little notice telling you something like "this question has been answered by a user you have blocked" when starting to write your own answer. That way, it's out of the way until it's actually useful. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284425 |
I see what you're getting at, but we do still want to correctly attribute all changes to posts. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284169 |
Other than the small section at the end, I don't see any mention of it. Say a question was closed as a duplicate. Accordingly, there is a disagree button that people can click on. Is there a threshold amount of disagree votes that need to be cast after which it is reopened? Given it seems like disagr... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284169 |
> The author is given specific editing guidance (or can accept a dupe suggestion). If the author edits in response to the dupe suggestion, and has the Edit ability, we (initially) trust that the edit resolved the issue -- clear the dupe suggestions, record everything in the history, and otherwise res... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284169 |
Can one disagree with a duplicate suggestion while the duplicate suggestion is pending? From the overview, it seems like it should be so, but the functional specification does not say that it is possible - is this an oversight? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284105 |
Post edited: Made a mistake |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284105 |
@#53922 Just saw your answer, you're right, it's on editing, my bad. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284105 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Mention is red when comment is edited I noticed that after you edit a comment mentioning someone, the comment has the mention marked in red, indicating that the mention failed, instead of the proper blue color. Refreshing fixes it, but it's a bit confusing. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284083 |
@#8176 No, I start at the beginning and move as far right (even past the visible end of the title)
What browser are you using? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284083 |
Copy pasting doesn't give a space for me (though inspect element does show a space - odd) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284005 |
Post edited: Changed the title to the actual question |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283984 |
Post edited: Tagged |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283928 |
You say that the only function closing has is preventing a post from being answered, but the duplicate and superceded close reasons help show intent and link to another post. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283920 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Closing Articles I noticed that there isn't a way to close Article type posts. While some of the close reasons might not be very applicable to Articles, I think that at least the off-topic, outdated, and duplicate closures would be useful. Could the ability to close Articles be added? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283801 |
Post edited: Editing again since I was sniped |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283801 |
The minimum length for a title is 15 characters. It could theoretically be raised, but that doesn't really help with the problem of forgetting to finish the title. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283801 |
Post edited: Tagged |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283764 |
Reputation was recalculated due to Sandbox posts no longer giving reputation. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283668 |
Relevant Github Issue: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/619 (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283632 |
Post edited: Clarify title; retag |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283572 |
See for example https://meta.codidact.com/posts/283569, and try hovering over the (at time of commenting) "<i class="fa fa-pencil-alt"></i> 2m ago by Istiak"; it doesn't work. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283528 |
@#54243 The point is that there's nothing to protect against. There's simply no way to harm using just Unicode. After all, it is ultimately just text. At most, they can create funny looking text, but that's the extent of it. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283545 |
Post edited: Clarity |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283545 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Difficulties with mentioning non-ASCII usernames I realize that some usernames are very difficult to mention due to the way that the current system works. Currently, you have to type in at least three characters after the `@` before the list of mentionable users shows up. As this user mentions (and demonstrates), users with non-ASCII usernames a... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283318 |
We don't even have such a thing as an accepted answer here, so I don't think this can apply here. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283234 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Don't put "last activity" on new posts When a new post appears in the category, it has both "posted ..." and "last activity ..." on it. It's a minor annoyance, but I feel like there shouldn't be a duplicate notice. posted 1m ago by Moshi · last activity 1m ago by Moshi (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283233 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
"posted <time> ago by <user>" doesn't appear on Articles Basically the title. In category feeds containing Articles (e.g. Meta Blog or the Code Golf Sandbox), Articles don't have the "posted \ ago by \" as with Q&A posts. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |