Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Moshi‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #291043 Maybe we could have it so that when users create their first post, there is a prompt asking them whether they would like to enable email notifications
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #290850 This is more or less what I wrote in my post, yeah. The review queue is entirely public; just click the [Edits tab in the category](https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3/suggested-edits)
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #277426 Users are always notified for answers to their questions through the Codidact notification system (the little inbox icon).
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #289986 This has been asked for before, though it was somewhat controversial and hasn't been implemented: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276818
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #289632 I hadn't posted it as an answer since this solution is kind of a pain and not really something I would really want to force normal users who just want a resized image to have to resort to, but I guess it technically answers the question asked.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #289632 You could try doing it manually with HTML, but it's not exactly an approachable method. ```html <img src="https://codidact.com/community-assets/meta/logo-large.png" alt="Codidact logo" width="100px"> <img src="https://codidact.com/community-assets/meta/logo-large.png" alt="Codidact logo" width...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #289582 There's currently an open PR that I think addresses the issue: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/1175
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #289449 > On a more general note, a dollar sign is a questionable choice for triggering alternate syntax, since it's likely to come up in normal text. It may be questionable, but it *is* the de-facto standard in this case, so I doubt that changing it is worthwhile (at least if we still want SE compatibili...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #289173 As a hack on top of this hack, I've added this to try to restore images back to some semblance of what they were ```css img { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(0.5turn) contrast(125%); background-color: black; } ```
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289412 I can't reproduce this https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/fd8k0qe3f44b6cxvybv14169ihh3 (Images don't work in comments apparently) They are two separate tags. This is also the case when going to the relevant tag pages (https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3/tags/5761 and https://meta.codidact....
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289367 @#52991 > Moreover we have a public "moderation" area (community-specific meta), where problems could be brought up (does Wiktionary have this?). https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Community_Portal Every page also has a public "discussion" section
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289367 Feel free to make a post on the resources category :) It's not just for external links; we'd be glad to host user-made resources there as well
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289367 You mention that Wikipedia exists but isn't organized like a dictionary, so I'm wondering if you're aware of Wiktionary. The coverage there is also not great for highly specific/technical terminology though.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289324 Same basic issue as https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278294 but this one is definitely more detailed
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289288 Fair enough on the 1, I was just throwing it out there as a consideration.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289288 I'm pretty sure I've forgotten more of my reactions than I've ever placed, even though I'm more or less active. My old reactions wouldn't be marked as stale under this system. This probably won't be an uncommon scenario for other people either, so I'm not sure whether this is really helpful. I'd r...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #285658 Spaces were supported. They are rejected for non-technical reasons (which afaik were never explained beyond just saying that tags should not have spaces, [and should be all lowercase](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277449))
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #288947 [*Is there a way to subscribe to a single question?*](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/75060)
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288674 Old issue: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281824 It was marked as completed/fixed, but I guess it's popped up again.
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288657 https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/326 One day this will be fixed (maybe)
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288647 Related: [Serve images with file extensions](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278103)
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288267 This looks like an interesting idea, though my gut reaction is "are we turning into social media?" due to it being essentially the same type of recommendation algorithm that those kinds of platforms use. I don't really have a strong opinion either way; it would certainly be *different*, but I thin...
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #288268 Yes, I do. Like I said in my answer, it helps to show community consensus, which in turn helps in ordering the answers here (granted, mine is the only one right now, but the point still stands)
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #288268 It *also* mentions there > If you downvote something, and there isn't already a comment that covers your objection, please consider leaving feedback for the author. Focus on things the author can address: explaining something more clearly, showing an example, citing a source, and so on. Don't comm...
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #288235 There are some very old discussions on decentralization, take a look here: https://github.com/codidact/core/issues/3 https://forum.codidact.org/t/decentralized-website/96
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #287691 Whoops, you're entirely right. I can't repro it now either, so I guess this can just be closed or something
(more)
12 months ago
Comment Post #287718 They use the same renderer. In actuality, only the client renders the post, then sending it to the server. However, in addition to the client renderer, there is also an HTML scrubber for security purposes on the server side. Honestly, the way we do post rendering and validation in general has a lo...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287624 Threads are not auto-deleted, but auto-archived. It used to be that there was a separate "archived" tab, but it's just put into "older threads" now.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287622 > A Discord channel would allow notification of new answers, but I don't know if it's possible to set that up in a Discord thread. Maybe it would be useful to have a way of following new answers on a specific question (I couldn't see a way for new answers, only for new comment threads). I don't ...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287622 > However, comment threads don't have the ability to reply to a specific comment (only to a specific user). Long conversations could get confusing. I find comment threads work very well for short targeted queries, but they don't seem well suited to ongoing discussion. This is a planned feature, th...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287545 Adding to the above, [Why prefering Codidact to Stack Exchange?](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278006 ) [Is the Codidact community the same as Stack Overflow?](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286221) [What should I know when coming here from Stack exchange?](https://meta.codidact.com/post...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287466 https://github.com/codidact/co-design/issues/72
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287250 Codidact isn't a forum; it is a Q&A (question and answer) site. A user should expect that the first thing they see is The Answer - not the first answer, but the best answer, which here is determined by voting. Think StackExchange, Quora, Alternative.to, etc. Further, many popular forums sort by "B...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287190 It's probably impossible. The previous searches popup is a browser functionality, nothing to do with Codidact itself. I'll defer to the actual tech team though to confirm.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287189 See here: https://meta.codidact.com/users/53196/posts Instead of linking "Total" to the search page, it might be better to link to the above
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #286827 We have a [dedicated site](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/280447) for questions about hosting your own instance, including setup guides and debugging help.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #286757 Since this would be another filter, I don't think having the view changes is much of an issue: after all, it's natural for the "Positive" tab and the "All" tab to have differences, isn't it? Also, like I mentioned on my previous answer, "Positive" could be set as the default, making it even more m...
(more)
almost 2 years ago
Comment Post #286753 Perhaps I was thinking too much of it being *notes* on a user, rather than a *log*. The latter should obviously be immutable, while I was thinking of the former more like a shared space for moderators
(more)
almost 2 years ago
Comment Post #286486 > In case I don't remember, I have to open the question in a separate page to read it, then go back to the previous page to comment. I'm a bit confused. Why do you need to go to a separate page to read what you've written? The post is on the thread page as well.
(more)
almost 2 years ago
Comment Post #286486 > you sometimes (upon following a comment notification) have to view the post and its related comments in separate windows, I thought that comment threads always have the post they are attached to (and the parent post to that, if applicable) on the page as collapsible sections? If there is a case ...
(more)
almost 2 years ago
Comment Post #286445 https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277349/285281#answer-285281 (I assume by Main site you mean the Q&A category)
(more)
almost 2 years ago
Comment Post #286438 Downvotes on this answer or the question being discussed? Personally, I don't agree with Olin's vote, but I respect that he considers it a valid downvote and overall, I agree with this answer. That's what *votes* are for, after all; they get summed up so that the community as a whole comes to a conse...
(more)
almost 2 years ago
Comment Post #286332 Probably a dupe of https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277522, but since this one has better answers maybe this one should be the dupe target.
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #286243 Well, archiving is there and I feel like this is more or less the idea situation for it. Also, perhaps someone would want to contest the change, and keeping the old thread around can provide more context for why it happened / provide a place to continue discussing the change, if archived and not lock...
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #285694 What would this add in addition to user profiles? You say that it would complement profiles, but what could a user use such a feature for that would be different from just putting it in their profile itself?
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285658 @#8046 given that tags are pretty clearly delimited in the editor, I don't think that there would be much confusion. @#54706 we could technically have that (in fact, we used to before the no-spaces rule was put in place) but for whatever reason that got removed (I forgot why since it was some time...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285280 If there exists an acceptable answer to your question elsewhere, it is fine to self-answer with a link and some quotations of that answer. That way, others who find the question on Codidact have a direct link to the answer. If the answer truly does solve the problem effectively and clearly, then it's...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285249 I can confirm that it's a coincidence. L&L's stats are similarly weird, but are different Questions 97 Answers 68 Comments 178 **Categories** Q&A 272 Resources 7 Meta 65
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285227 What do you mean by "After 2 exists"? If you mean after the feature is implemented, why not just aim for that in the first place?
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285202 @#54706 there are certain things the make sense to be on global meta since they affect every site, mainly feature requests for, bugs in, and questions about the Codidact software itself (qpixel), and support for questions about the Codidact organization. Those wouldn't make sense to ask about on indi...
(more)
over 2 years ago