Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Moshi
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #291043 |
Maybe we could have it so that when users create their first post, there is a prompt asking them whether they would like to enable email notifications (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #290850 |
This is more or less what I wrote in my post, yeah.
The review queue is entirely public; just click the [Edits tab in the category](https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3/suggested-edits) (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #277426 |
Users are always notified for answers to their questions through the Codidact notification system (the little inbox icon). (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #289986 |
This has been asked for before, though it was somewhat controversial and hasn't been implemented: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276818 (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #289632 |
I hadn't posted it as an answer since this solution is kind of a pain and not really something I would really want to force normal users who just want a resized image to have to resort to, but I guess it technically answers the question asked. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #289632 |
You could try doing it manually with HTML, but it's not exactly an approachable method.
```html
<img src="https://codidact.com/community-assets/meta/logo-large.png" alt="Codidact logo" width="100px">
<img src="https://codidact.com/community-assets/meta/logo-large.png" alt="Codidact logo" width... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #289582 |
There's currently an open PR that I think addresses the issue: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/1175 (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #289449 |
> On a more general note, a dollar sign is a questionable choice for triggering alternate syntax, since it's likely to come up in normal text.
It may be questionable, but it *is* the de-facto standard in this case, so I doubt that changing it is worthwhile (at least if we still want SE compatibili... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #289173 |
As a hack on top of this hack, I've added this to try to restore images back to some semblance of what they were
```css
img {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(0.5turn) contrast(125%);
background-color: black;
}
``` (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #289412 |
I can't reproduce this
https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/fd8k0qe3f44b6cxvybv14169ihh3
(Images don't work in comments apparently)
They are two separate tags. This is also the case when going to the relevant tag pages (https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3/tags/5761 and https://meta.codidact.... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #289367 |
@#52991
> Moreover we have a public "moderation" area (community-specific meta), where problems could be brought up (does Wiktionary have this?).
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Community_Portal
Every page also has a public "discussion" section (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #289367 |
Feel free to make a post on the resources category :) It's not just for external links; we'd be glad to host user-made resources there as well (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #289367 |
You mention that Wikipedia exists but isn't organized like a dictionary, so I'm wondering if you're aware of Wiktionary. The coverage there is also not great for highly specific/technical terminology though. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #289324 |
Same basic issue as https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278294 but this one is definitely more detailed (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #289288 |
Fair enough on the 1, I was just throwing it out there as a consideration. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #289288 |
I'm pretty sure I've forgotten more of my reactions than I've ever placed, even though I'm more or less active. My old reactions wouldn't be marked as stale under this system. This probably won't be an uncommon scenario for other people either, so I'm not sure whether this is really helpful.
I'd r... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #285658 |
Spaces were supported. They are rejected for non-technical reasons (which afaik were never explained beyond just saying that tags should not have spaces, [and should be all lowercase](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277449)) (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #288947 |
[*Is there a way to subscribe to a single question?*](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/75060) (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #288674 |
Old issue: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281824
It was marked as completed/fixed, but I guess it's popped up again. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #288657 |
https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/326
One day this will be fixed (maybe) (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #288647 |
Related: [Serve images with file extensions](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278103) (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #288267 |
This looks like an interesting idea, though my gut reaction is "are we turning into social media?" due to it being essentially the same type of recommendation algorithm that those kinds of platforms use.
I don't really have a strong opinion either way; it would certainly be *different*, but I thin... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
Comment | Post #288268 |
Yes, I do. Like I said in my answer, it helps to show community consensus, which in turn helps in ordering the answers here (granted, mine is the only one right now, but the point still stands) (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
Comment | Post #288268 |
It *also* mentions there
> If you downvote something, and there isn't already a comment that covers your objection, please consider leaving feedback for the author. Focus on things the author can address: explaining something more clearly, showing an example, citing a source, and so on. Don't comm... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
Comment | Post #288235 |
There are some very old discussions on decentralization, take a look here:
https://github.com/codidact/core/issues/3
https://forum.codidact.org/t/decentralized-website/96 (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
Comment | Post #287691 |
Whoops, you're entirely right. I can't repro it now either, so I guess this can just be closed or something (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
Comment | Post #287718 |
They use the same renderer. In actuality, only the client renders the post, then sending it to the server. However, in addition to the client renderer, there is also an HTML scrubber for security purposes on the server side.
Honestly, the way we do post rendering and validation in general has a lo... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287624 |
Threads are not auto-deleted, but auto-archived. It used to be that there was a separate "archived" tab, but it's just put into "older threads" now. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287622 |
> A Discord channel would allow notification of new answers, but I don't know if it's possible to set that up in a Discord thread. Maybe it would be useful to have a way of following new answers on a specific question (I couldn't see a way for new answers, only for new comment threads).
I don't ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287622 |
> However, comment threads don't have the ability to reply to a specific comment (only to a specific user). Long conversations could get confusing. I find comment threads work very well for short targeted queries, but they don't seem well suited to ongoing discussion.
This is a planned feature, th... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287545 |
Adding to the above,
[Why prefering Codidact to Stack Exchange?](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278006 )
[Is the Codidact community the same as Stack Overflow?](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286221)
[What should I know when coming here from Stack exchange?](https://meta.codidact.com/post... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287466 |
https://github.com/codidact/co-design/issues/72 (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287250 |
Codidact isn't a forum; it is a Q&A (question and answer) site. A user should expect that the first thing they see is The Answer - not the first answer, but the best answer, which here is determined by voting. Think StackExchange, Quora, Alternative.to, etc.
Further, many popular forums sort by "B... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287190 |
It's probably impossible. The previous searches popup is a browser functionality, nothing to do with Codidact itself. I'll defer to the actual tech team though to confirm. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #287189 |
See here: https://meta.codidact.com/users/53196/posts
Instead of linking "Total" to the search page, it might be better to link to the above (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286827 |
We have a [dedicated site](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/280447) for questions about hosting your own instance, including setup guides and debugging help. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286757 |
Since this would be another filter, I don't think having the view changes is much of an issue: after all, it's natural for the "Positive" tab and the "All" tab to have differences, isn't it?
Also, like I mentioned on my previous answer, "Positive" could be set as the default, making it even more m... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #286753 |
Perhaps I was thinking too much of it being *notes* on a user, rather than a *log*. The latter should obviously be immutable, while I was thinking of the former more like a shared space for moderators (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #286486 |
> In case I don't remember, I have to open the question in a separate page to read it, then go back to the previous page to comment.
I'm a bit confused. Why do you need to go to a separate page to read what you've written? The post is on the thread page as well. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #286486 |
> you sometimes (upon following a comment notification) have to view the post and its related comments in separate windows,
I thought that comment threads always have the post they are attached to (and the parent post to that, if applicable) on the page as collapsible sections? If there is a case ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #286445 |
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277349/285281#answer-285281
(I assume by Main site you mean the Q&A category) (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #286438 |
Downvotes on this answer or the question being discussed? Personally, I don't agree with Olin's vote, but I respect that he considers it a valid downvote and overall, I agree with this answer. That's what *votes* are for, after all; they get summed up so that the community as a whole comes to a conse... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #286332 |
Probably a dupe of https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277522, but since this one has better answers maybe this one should be the dupe target. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #286243 |
Well, archiving is there and I feel like this is more or less the idea situation for it. Also, perhaps someone would want to contest the change, and keeping the old thread around can provide more context for why it happened / provide a place to continue discussing the change, if archived and not lock... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285694 |
What would this add in addition to user profiles? You say that it would complement profiles, but what could a user use such a feature for that would be different from just putting it in their profile itself? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285658 |
@#8046 given that tags are pretty clearly delimited in the editor, I don't think that there would be much confusion.
@#54706 we could technically have that (in fact, we used to before the no-spaces rule was put in place) but for whatever reason that got removed (I forgot why since it was some time... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285280 |
If there exists an acceptable answer to your question elsewhere, it is fine to self-answer with a link and some quotations of that answer. That way, others who find the question on Codidact have a direct link to the answer. If the answer truly does solve the problem effectively and clearly, then it's... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285249 |
I can confirm that it's a coincidence. L&L's stats are similarly weird, but are different
Questions 97
Answers 68
Comments 178
**Categories**
Q&A 272
Resources 7
Meta 65 (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285227 |
What do you mean by "After 2 exists"? If you mean after the feature is implemented, why not just aim for that in the first place? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285202 |
@#54706 there are certain things the make sense to be on global meta since they affect every site, mainly feature requests for, bugs in, and questions about the Codidact software itself (qpixel), and support for questions about the Codidact organization. Those wouldn't make sense to ask about on indi... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |