Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for qohelet
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #285576 |
I only recently learned about this post from Discord. This is a great idea! (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285741 |
They are still missing for me on Apple iOS 15.3.1 and it doesn't seem to matter what browser I use (tested Safari, Chrome, and Firefox on mobile). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285741 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285741 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285741 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285741 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Footnote numbers not displayed on mobile UPDATE: It isn’t just footnotes. It affects bulleted lists also. Footnotes work fine in my desktop browsers.[^1] But on mobile, I see this: Missing footnote numbers The footnote numbers are not displayed (the ones within the body are, but not the numbers in the footnotes themselves). O... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Strikethrough markdown not working Strikethrough text doesn't appear to work using Markdown notation: This is supposed to have strikethrough text And it works in the preview, but not in the actual post. Now using the `` html tag: This is supposed to have strikethrough text (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278946 |
Consider expanding this broader to Information Security, which includes these areas but has additional areas. How we, if more interested in the legal and regulatory aspects, perhaps consider a Law site since this is just one area of law. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278967 |
I did it again two more times. See steps to duplicate: https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278977 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278977 |
BTW the last sentence is hyperlinked. Bug duplicated again even in this post. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278977 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Possible Markdown rendering issue I seem to be able to consistently reproduce the issue. Steps taken: Type (don’t copy a paste) a single sentence into an answer. End the sentence with punctuation (I’ve so far duplicated with a period and a question mark). Select the last few words of the sentence including punctuation. ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278976 |
I can do this pretty consistently now (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278976 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Possible Markdown rendering issue Can I do it again with a question mark? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278970 |
It’s weird for sure (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278969 |
Here @Monica (let me know if this is not what you meant): https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278975 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278975 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Possible Markdown rendering issue Test cases (all look fine in the preview): Link text edited to include period. Link text contains no punctuation. Other punctuation too? What about comma, or exclamation point! -- Copying text from the other answer to see if who posts it makes a difference (I sure hope not): Th... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278908 | Post edited | — | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278969 |
Same bug shown above (don’t edit!) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278967 |
I managed to do it again: https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278969 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278969 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Possible Markdown rendering issue This post is a test to see if I can duplicate it. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #278908 |
Suggested edit: Added myself as casual contributor (more) |
helpful | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278967 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278967 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Possible Markdown rendering issue I identified a possible Markdown rendering error. In this post, I hyperlinked the last few words. This renders correctly in the preview but not in the actual post. I’ve tested in a few browsers with same results. For example, this is supposed to be a link. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278966 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Site for office suites I think the best place for questions about Office Suites would be under a Power User site (with a bit broader scope) such as in this proposal. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks, ghost-in-the-zsh, Bit Chaser, and TRiG! Added. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278765 |
Post edited: added new users from comments |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278840 |
Here’s an actual example of a good question for this site: https://software.codidact.com/q/278899 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
That’s why I think a Christianity site with a different approach will work better based on my experience with the users such sites attract. With that said, I still participate on BH.SE and this is not a drop-in replacement by any means. These would be distinct communities with their own emphases. But... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
BTW for reference on this idea/approach, see https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/a/886/ only this site would allow any combination of those modes. The reality is that hermeneutics are inherently theological, which is something BH.SE tries to bracket (rather unsuccessfully in my opinion—and th... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
This is up for discussion and I have a Google Doc I can share with you with more info if you email me at dan _at_ my Codidact username _dot_ com. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
Great questions, curiousdannii (and hello!). The proposal I’ve made, which isn’t currently shown, is to have some set of required tags to indicate the “domain(s)” of each question (which, for textual questions, would indicate which “modes of discourse” the OP is seeking to hear from, including theolo... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
@Nathaniel some of the conversation is in DMs on Twitter, and there is a collaborative document on Google Docs I've shared with some folks and would love to share with you (I actually wanted to share with you weeks ago but could not find your email address through your SE profile unfortunately). Plea... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278765 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks @Nathaniel (and good to hear from you!). :) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278765 |
Post edited: Added Nathaniel |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278833 |
+1 for Power User. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
Well said, @Mithrandir24601. I am also “hesitant to define the scope of a site before we have a real community to say what they do and don't want.” (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
On this site, I suspect that would be off topic, but I'd rather let the community discuss _why_ it's off topic and such on meta than declare anything by fiat during this early phase haha (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
@Lundin we'll have to consider that. Currently Christianity.SE and Hermeneutics.SE somewhat subdivide topics related to the biblical texts. The former requires a specific question and it must specify a perspective it wants an answer from, and the latter requires questions to start from a specific tex... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks, @mbomb007, added. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278765 |
Post edited: updated with new user |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278765 |
Post edited: Removed no longer needed instruction given that comments leave username automatically |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277185 | Post edited | — | about 4 years ago |