Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for laserkittens‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #285576 I only recently learned about this post from Discord. This is a great idea!
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #285741 They are still missing for me on Apple iOS 15.3.1 and it doesn't seem to matter what browser I use (tested Safari, Chrome, and Firefox on mobile).
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #285741 Post edited:
12 months ago
Edit Post #285741 Post edited:
about 1 year ago
Edit Post #285741 Post edited:
about 1 year ago
Edit Post #285741 Initial revision about 1 year ago
Question Footnote numbers not displayed on mobile
UPDATE: It isn’t just footnotes. It affects bulleted lists also. Footnotes work fine in my desktop browsers.[^1] But on mobile, I see this: Missing footnote numbers The footnote numbers are not displayed (the ones within the body are, but not the numbers in the footnotes themselves). O...
(more)
about 1 year ago
Question Strikethrough markdown not working
Strikethrough text doesn't appear to work using Markdown notation: This is supposed to have strikethrough text And it works in the preview, but not in the actual post. Now using the `` html tag: This is supposed to have strikethrough text
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278946 Consider expanding this broader to Information Security, which includes these areas but has additional areas. How we, if more interested in the legal and regulatory aspects, perhaps consider a Law site since this is just one area of law.
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278967 I did it again two more times. See steps to duplicate: https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278977
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278977 BTW the last sentence is hyperlinked. Bug duplicated again even in this post.
(more)
about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278977 Initial revision about 2 years ago
Answer A: Possible Markdown rendering issue
I seem to be able to consistently reproduce the issue. Steps taken: Type (don’t copy a paste) a single sentence into an answer. End the sentence with punctuation (I’ve so far duplicated with a period and a question mark). Select the last few words of the sentence including punctuation. ...
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278976 I can do this pretty consistently now
(more)
about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278976 Initial revision about 2 years ago
Answer A: Possible Markdown rendering issue
Can I do it again with a question mark?
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278970 It’s weird for sure
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278969 Here @Monica (let me know if this is not what you meant): https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278975
(more)
about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278975 Initial revision about 2 years ago
Answer A: Possible Markdown rendering issue
Test cases (all look fine in the preview): Link text edited to include period. Link text contains no punctuation. Other punctuation too? What about comma, or exclamation point! -- Copying text from the other answer to see if who posts it makes a difference (I sure hope not): Th...
(more)
about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278908 Post edited about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278969 Same bug shown above (don’t edit!)
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278967 I managed to do it again: https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278969
(more)
about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278969 Initial revision about 2 years ago
Answer A: Possible Markdown rendering issue
This post is a test to see if I can duplicate it.
(more)
about 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #278908 Suggested edit:
Added myself as casual contributor
(more)
helpful about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278967 Post edited:
about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278967 Initial revision about 2 years ago
Question Possible Markdown rendering issue
I identified a possible Markdown rendering error. In this post, I hyperlinked the last few words. This renders correctly in the preview but not in the actual post. I’ve tested in a few browsers with same results. For example, this is supposed to be a link.
(more)
about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278966 Initial revision about 2 years ago
Answer A: Site for office suites
I think the best place for questions about Office Suites would be under a Power User site (with a bit broader scope) such as in this proposal.
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278765 Thanks, ghost-in-the-zsh, Bit Chaser, and TRiG! Added.
(more)
about 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
added new users from comments
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #278840 Here’s an actual example of a good question for this site: https://software.codidact.com/q/278899
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278884 That’s why I think a Christianity site with a different approach will work better based on my experience with the users such sites attract. With that said, I still participate on BH.SE and this is not a drop-in replacement by any means. These would be distinct communities with their own emphases. But...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278884 BTW for reference on this idea/approach, see https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/a/886/ only this site would allow any combination of those modes. The reality is that hermeneutics are inherently theological, which is something BH.SE tries to bracket (rather unsuccessfully in my opinion—and th...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278884 This is up for discussion and I have a Google Doc I can share with you with more info if you email me at dan _at_ my Codidact username _dot_ com.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278884 Great questions, curiousdannii (and hello!). The proposal I’ve made, which isn’t currently shown, is to have some set of required tags to indicate the “domain(s)” of each question (which, for textual questions, would indicate which “modes of discourse” the OP is seeking to hear from, including theolo...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278764 @Nathaniel some of the conversation is in DMs on Twitter, and there is a collaborative document on Google Docs I've shared with some folks and would love to share with you (I actually wanted to share with you weeks ago but could not find your email address through your SE profile unfortunately). Plea...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278765 Thanks @Nathaniel (and good to hear from you!). :)
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
Added Nathaniel
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278833 +1 for Power User.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278764 Well said, @Mithrandir24601. I am also “hesitant to define the scope of a site before we have a real community to say what they do and don't want.”
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278764 On this site, I suspect that would be off topic, but I'd rather let the community discuss _why_ it's off topic and such on meta than declare anything by fiat during this early phase haha
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278764 @Lundin we'll have to consider that. Currently Christianity.SE and Hermeneutics.SE somewhat subdivide topics related to the biblical texts. The former requires a specific question and it must specify a perspective it wants an answer from, and the latter requires questions to start from a specific tex...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278765 Thanks, @mbomb007, added.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
updated with new user
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
Removed no longer needed instruction given that comments leave username automatically
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #277185 Post edited over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #277185 Suggested edit:
Added myself as casual participant
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
Collapsed info on participants by default
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278770 No worries! Thanks for the update!
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
grammar
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
fancy pants
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278770 Thanks for the update, Monica!
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278765 Thanks Sigma! I added you to the post.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
added user
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #277948 I [posted this related question](https://meta.codidact.com/q/278770) (before I realized this exists) which now contains an explicit link to this.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278764 There are also areas the community will need to discuss early on as to how to handle, such as how to handle philosophical questions asking about "the Truth" (e.g., "is X a sin?"), questions about the boundaries of Christianity itself (e.g., "who's in or out?"). In the past, other communities tend to ...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278764 With that said, some stuff we've discussed as clearly being off topic would be questions seeking personalized pastoral advice or counseling, answers from perspectives that can't be independently verified or falsified (e.g., "God revealed to me that the locusts are alien spaceships and that this will ...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278764 Good questions, Peter. I've included a broad summary of what would be on topic in the above post, but haven't elaborated much on what would be off topic because I think that will be hashed out more by the community. I also have come to "see the light" on a moderation philosophy that focuses on findin...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278770 Initial revision over 2 years ago
Question Cancelling / discarding a comment edit
See also the related question about canceling writing a comment: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277948 When editing a comment, there is no option to cancel the edit without refreshing the page. There is a "Post" button but no way to discard the edit and return to the standard view without...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
removed domains
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278765 Thanks, ‭Mithrandir24601‭! I've added you to the post.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
added tallies
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
clarified
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
clarified domains
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278764 Peter, that's a great point and definitely something we'd need to further consider (including making the language more agreeable and accessible). I went ahead and removed the stuff about tags so as to not "muddy the waters" of the proposal itself. All of this kind of stuff is best discussed in meta o...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #278765 Thanks for expressing your interest, Peter! I've added you to the post.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
added peter cooper comment into post
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
Added categories section
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
clarified my role
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278765 Initial revision over 2 years ago
Answer A: A Christianity community
Right now Codidact doesn't have a dedicated way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278764 Initial revision over 2 years ago
Question A Christianity community
Update: launched. I propose a community centered on Christianity. This is a collaborative effort. With assistance and guidance from Monica Cellio, a few current and former users (and moderators) of another Christianity community and of a related community about the interpretation of biblic...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #276995 Suggested edit:
Added my name and summary
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago