Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Actively investing in non niche network websites

Parent

Actively investing in non niche network websites

+2
−8

I think that the website must have some new communities in "piquant" topics to survive (to become enough well-known and contributed in the next say, 50 years).

"piquant" topics would be in my opinion (just examples, no connection to existing site proposals):

  • Cosmetics
  • Chemistry
  • Biology
  • Finance
  • Accounting

The last website added to the network is about tabletop games and barely has any posts in it (it doesn't have a pager); I think it was a too of a "niche" choice and the owners of the network should actively seek website ideas in fields that may be less interesting for them personally.

The aims for this post are to:

  1. Suggesting to community managers to consider replacing the current mechanism for community proposal (for example, allow just one person to start a community given relevant background in the field and in moderation)
  2. Suggesting to community members to further emphasis non niche topics so to prefer creating communities primarily on general audience topics
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

How are these topics piquant? (2 comments)
Post
+7
−1

(Please note that at the time this answer was posted, revision 4 of the question was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the website must have about 5 more new communities in "piquant" topics to become more well-known and contributed." followed by a list of the below five subject areas.)


At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.

If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then you should focus your effort on those proposals rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

This is a message to the community owners; the current proposal mechanism is something I won't take p... (5 comments)
This is a message to the community owners; the current proposal mechanism is something I won't take p...
deleted user wrote about 3 years ago

This is a message to the community owners; the current proposal mechanism is something I won't take part on because I think it's done ineffectively.

Canina‭ wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago

(1) I fail to see why you bring that up in response to my answer.

(2) If that's how you feel, then I suggest that you propose either changes to the current method, or an entirely different method, of solving the problem that the site proposal process aims to solve; which is unrelated to any particular site proposal, and thus appears to me to be out of scope of this Meta question of yours.

deleted user wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago

Canina‭

You shouldn't fail, I wrote this to you because I thought you misinterpreted my message as a whole and your answer distorts from the original aim of my "question" post which is to suggest the community to change both how new communities are suggested and how the community itself creates new communities.

Lundin‭ wrote about 3 years ago

deleted user Who are the "community owners"? This is a non-profit open-source platform managed by volunteers. It is explicitly designed so that no single person or private company owns it. If you don't like how something is done, then the solution is gather community consensus with a lot of other people agreeing about a constructive and well-considered proposal.

deleted user wrote about 3 years ago

Lundin‭ I don't understand in "these things" of non-profit organizations / funds ; practically there are "highest managers" somewhere... To that I meant...