Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for DonielF
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #277859 |
@pnuts Fair point about the homework questions, and I completely agree with your definition of "maths" — just wanted to throw it out there for the community to vote on. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277859 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277859 |
A quick search for the names of the equations I mentioned _should_ get you the relevant Wiki pages. It's just too annoying to work with them without MathJax. Please make sure to include that when the site is launched. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277859 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Need a mathematics Q&A site Sample question set A: 1. A box of mass 40.0 kg and measuring 1.0m on all edges is placed in a pool of water. At what depth will the box be perfectly suspended? 2. A current with voltage 1.0V, with respect to the hydrogen standard electrode, is run through 1.0L of water exactly filling an isolate... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277841 |
Pardon my ignorance: what’s the difference between a database and a JSON or XML or XLS or the like, in terms of maintenance? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277007 |
Any updates on this project? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277841 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Arranging footer "other codidact sites" list alphabetically rather than chronologically In the footer, the sites are currently arranged as: - Writing - Outdoors - Photography - Sci Spec - Cooking - Electrical Engineering - Judaism - L&L - Software Dev - Meta With the exclusion of setting Meta apart, can the remaining sites be rearranged so as to be in alphabetic... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277346 |
Whoa, whoa, whoa, slow down, you can make collapsable sections? Tell me that if posts support any form of HTML coding, that at least CSS and JS are screened so that users can't just arbitrarily execute code on the browser page. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277290 |
@luap I've been able to make it work for questions, but I can't figure out the syntax for answers, where the answer itself is already an anchor. No matter how I phrase it, I keep getting the redirect to `/q/123#answer-124`. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277290 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277290 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Request: Headings and footnotes act as link anchors Inspired by the change log but certainly not limited to that one post. Many times I find myself writing an answer which goes on for quite a bit, and I find it natural to break it up with `# Headers`. Sometimes I find that what I wrote on question A contains material which is helpful for question B... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276997 |
I'm still confused, even after reading the Meta threads on the topic. Is there a Magic Number™ at which we say "there's clearly an interested community, let's go to launch"? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277253 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277253 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Drafting the Codidact Arbitration & Review Panel Article 1 discusses each appointee's vote scores. When trust levels are rolled out, will this clause be affected as well to instead reference the appointees with the lowest trust levels? Additionally, until TLs are rolled out, what happens in the case of a tie? What about if appointees differ by only... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277182 |
@Lundin Maybe? If and when this gets off the ground that’s certainly something to consider, and we can always play it by ear (pun absolutely intended). (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277186 |
I think a reasonable benchmark would be not just “is it reasonable to expect that someone who knows about music would be qualified to answer the question,” but also “is it reasonable to expect that _specifically_ someone who knows about music would be qualified to answer.” There’s no reason I would t... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277182 |
FTR: I sing and play 8 instruments at various skill levels; my main instrument is piano, which I've been playing for almost literally my entire life. I compose my own music and write arrangements of songs as well. As the president of my college's music club, a position which involves arranging both m... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277182 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Music site, for both fans and musicians Update 30-12-2020: launched Intial proposal taking inspiration from MusicFans.SE and Music.SE. The idea for the site is a place for music fans, composers, and artists to gather to discuss music. As a starting point for topics: - Technique: guidance on practicing or performing music - ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277180 |
Background post on the rationale behind the current system: https://meta.codidact.com/q/277015 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276998 |
Happy to participate, but not sure how much I'd be able to contribute by way of meaningful answers. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277106 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Factual History Site Scope question: Asking "what if X happened" would be considered too general; would asking "if X happened, is it plausible that Y would be its outcome" be in-scope? (Not sure whether a subject being on-topic on spec sci should influence any scope decisions here.) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277105 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Medical science site Sort of a niche interest: Would subjects like biochemistry be considered on-topic on such a site? Perhaps orgo in general? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277072 |
@Olin How is your proposal any different from the current voting system in place? Voting on Meta is an expression of "I agree/disagree" as it is. To the contrary, I think leaving site proposals as a q/a format is better, since it encourages expression of ideas on the proposal. There's a lot more to t... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277072 |
Thank you for your continued support for new sites! I've already commented on some of these but may write something a bit more involved when I have some time later. (NB: Any work on getting L&L in the footer?) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277007 |
I'd be interested in participating as well. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276997 |
At this stage I would participate casually – I just don't know that much on the topic yet. My ability to write useful answers would increase as I work through college. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277012 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277012 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277012 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Announcing featured links Thank you for the quick turnaround and the intuitive controls! 1. I can’t tell if I just used post ID improperly or if that override doesn’t work, but using a name and link to a post works like a charm. 2. One request I have is that you clarify on "event end date" that it's until but not includi... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276954 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Allow moderators to pin posts to that site's sidebar, individually or by seasonal event Featured Posts One neat feature on SE was that mods could mark posts as [featured], and any such-tagged post would appear in a special sidebar widget. That way meta posts which the per-site mods felt deserved individual attention could be pinned for people to see (often community events and site p... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276871 |
Are the downvotes reflecting a non-consensus that this type of content should be filtered, or that not _all_ of this type of content should be filtered? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276871 |
@Zerotime If "nudes and images of extreme violence should be (and are) forbidden" I'd like to see that reflected in either the ToS or CoC, if only to prevent any potential issues down the road. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276871 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
NSFW Content Filter According to the Terms of Service, >You agree not to use the Service to [...] violate any applicable law or regulation; [...] post content that is hateful, discriminatory, harmful, illegal, or otherwise objectionable [...] For some definition of "objectionable" which does not necessarily includ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276796 |
For the purposes of making sure the system's actually working properly – which site did you get this notification on? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276778 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276778 |
@msh210 Re omissions: Phonology I'd throw in with phonetics; like I said, the list's not complete. Re the others I'm editing to clarify, and for now I think I'll take out the categories section and focus on scope. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276751 |
Or maybe just a color coding: red for 0-20%, orange for 20-40%, grey for 40-60%, blue for 60-80%, and green for 80-100%. You got a chuckle for the Wi-Fi symbol, but I think that'd be more confusing than anything. I give you a two-headed grey arrow for your other suggestion. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276752 |
Wilson Score isn't *that* complicated. If you enjoy math and statistics you might have some fun with figuring out how the score is calculated, but I think just telling people that 50% is neutral, higher is good, lower is bad is enough if it needs to be employed at all. (FWIW I used to use [this users... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276778 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276778 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →