Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Moshi
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question | — |
Serve images with file extensions I've noticed that images uploaded to Codidact don't retain any meta information. That is, they don't keep either the name of the image or the image extension. While the former isn't that bad (alt text or just plain explanation is probably better if information about the image is needed), the latte... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278102 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Only send one notification per comment In my notifications box, I had two notifications: Notifications screenshot > You were mentioned in a comment > > mark unread and > New comment on Should we show tags before the body, to provide context for reading the question? > > mark unread The problem is, both of them refer to... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278074 |
@ShowMeBillyJo I'm sure novices could be interested in many things they don't understand. My point was, Monica didn't even know what the question was about, even after looking at the tags - . Like I said in my post, "sure, you might now know how to fix a click signal not being received by the main wi... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277949 |
@aCVn I think that the "complexity outweighs the value" can only be decided by the devs. Downvoting a feature request for that is stopping it from happening before problems with it are found. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278088 |
Could you clarify what you mean by this? Are you suggesting that the unclickable (disabled) buttons should be more obvious? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278084 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278074 |
@MonicaCellio the QT library isn't a web client library though? It's a GUI library/application framework. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278074 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should we show tags before the body, to provide context for reading the question? I think that questions should be able to stand on their own without the use of tags, and so tags should be unnecessary to display at all. Not to say they have no use - it's helpful if you want to know some information about a question at a glance, such as when looking at the feed - but if you need to... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278073 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277949 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278059 |
Reproduced on Edge (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278059 |
Post edited: Added relevant post link |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278050 |
Obviously there should be a reasonable limit. I just don't think that limit should be *1*.
Design and implementation-wise, you could take a page off how other sites do it - another site that I'm on allows users to define arbitrary "name: address" rows on their profile page. (ex. Twitter: @username... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277949 | Post undeleted | — | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278037 |
@DonielF Yeah, that sounds better. Toggling the children on the hierarchy page is much more intuitive to me than just hiding them and leaving it to the user to open each individual tag page. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278037 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278036 |
There actually used to be a forum, but it was abandoned in favor of Meta and chat. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278037 |
Sort by hierarchy does exactly what id expect, it shows the tags and what children they have. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278030 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Automatically clean up tags with zero posts There are currently seven tags with zero posts associated with them in the Meta Q&A category[^1] (excluding tags like TibetLhasatourpackage which have deleted posts associated with them.) These tags are kind of annoying since they clog up the suggested tags list (and the tags page when sorting by hie... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277015 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278004 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278004 |
Can reproduce on Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge (Chromium browsers) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278020 |
Post edited: Clarified the title |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278020 |
Post edited: [asking] tag doesn't add anything |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277991 |
Post edited: oops left a half written edit in there |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277991 |
Post edited: Got rid of the salty footnote |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277993 |
Also, I actually think that separating bug reports into it's own category would be immensely helpful - those reports tend to get buried beneath all the new stuff, since they are rarely updated, and it'll be much easier to find previous reports once search by catagory is implemented. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277993 |
To be entirely honest, I wish people would just post bug reports on github as a new issue so it'd all be gathered in one place, but I can't expect everyone to have a github account. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277993 |
I personally think workarounds should just be edited into the post itself, or left as comments. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277015 |
Post edited: merging [post] and [posts] (deleted title and body tags because they are pretty useless and there is a 5 tag limit) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277015 |
Post edited: merging [post] and [posts] |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276900 |
Post edited: merging [post] and [posts] |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276650 |
Post edited: Accidentally saved before adding the tags |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276650 |
Post edited: merging [post] and [posts] |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276871 |
Post edited: merging [post] and [posts] |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277991 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Should we use the Article type for bug reports? I've recently been looking through the [[bug] tag](https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3/tags/394), and one thing stood out to me. Every bug post either has no answers, or one answer that just says, "The bug has been fixed" (or some variation thereof). Even that one answer is unnecessary anyway sinc... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277960 |
Post edited: fixed grammatical errors |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277949 | Post deleted | — | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277949 |
@Olin Lathrop Might be obvious to you, but to me disagreement means "*This feature shouldn't be implemented*" (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277960 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Suggestion for allowing to mark answers as "accepted", "outdated" or "dangerous" I would like this functionality to extend to 'questions' as well as answers. This was influenced by the post I cannot understand the meaning of some downvotes > In my opinion, downvoting some kinds of posts is meaningless. > > For example, why should anyone downvote a bug report, like this ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277954 |
I did explicitly say that it was an option to just put it in the profile text. However, the functionality of having links in the sidebar is there already, so why no extend it? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277949 |
Down voters please explain? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277949 |
@Dani 1. I did explicitly say that it was an option. 2. I had no idea about linktree, and I doubt many people do either. Besides, using linktree just sems like a workaround, being able to do it here would be preferrable. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277949 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Allow users to link more than one website in their profile. Currently, users can only add their twitter handle and one other website to their profile. I find this kind of limiting since someone might want to add more to their profile. Say for instance they want to put a link to both their blog and their professional website; right now, they have no way of doi... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |