Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Moshi
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #277948 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277943 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277943 |
Post edited: Added Monica's suggestion for tag name |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277943 |
@Monica Cellio Oh, that sounds much better than my suggestions. I'll put that in the post. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277943 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Add a [status-pending] or similar tag My other Meta post n the usage of status tags pointed out a pretty big gap to me. Namely, we don't have a tag to signify that something is being actively worked on. While we currently use either [status-completed] (for things that are done developing but not yet launched) or [status-planned] to this ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277936 |
Post edited: Update |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277941 |
@MonicaCellio I would agree with you, but the questions they copied over had no answers at all. When you are the only answerer for the question, I feel like it's more than just a kindness to give them at least a link to the answer. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277941 |
If you went through the trouble of answering the question, can't you have a bit of decency and give the answer to the person who asked for it? (generic you here) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277941 |
What I was worried about is that they seemed to only be crossposting for the sake of having questions for themselves to answer here - which I still wouldn't take offence to, but they didn't bother to answer the *asker*, which just feels... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277936 |
Post edited: Update |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277936 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
What is the policy on importing questions by simply quoting the question over here? Recently, three questions were "imported" from StackOverflow: https://software.codidact.com/q/277934, https://software.codidact.com/q/277930, https://software.codidact.com/q/277932 I put "imported" in quotes, because they weren't actually imported. The user just quoted the respective StackOverflo... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277926 |
@pnuts I was less worried about how minor it was than about how confusing it was. When I saw that it was marked "completed", I was actually going to post a bug report since the change didn't show up for me (but thankfully when I was linking the post in the report I saw the clarification that it wasn'... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277926 |
@Olin Lathrop are you fine with "a little delay" of a couple days? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277923 |
Post edited: Fixed typo in title |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277924 |
Sorry, but I disagree. status-completed implies that users will actually see the change, and it is is confusing in the interim between the "completion" and the "deploy" times. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277923 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Should [status-completed] be used before the changes are live? As of the time of writing, this request has the [status-completed] tag despite the change not being live yet. It is completely developed, sure, but since it is not yet deployed, should the request be marked completed? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276818 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277918 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
If a user is not able to directly edit the post, allow the edit to be suggested I attempted to edit this post, but couldn't because I was attempting to change "moderator-only" tags. > The following errors prevented this post from being saved: > > - You don't have permission to change moderator-only tags. If a user is unable to edit a post because of permissions, could t... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74966 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74966 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277015 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277887 |
@pnuts Actually, the time when someone suggests an edit also shows up in user activity as "Suggested Edit" and also says whether the edit was "helpful" (accepted) or "declined". The existence of the latter information makes the "Edit" activity for when the edit was accepted kind of pointless imo (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277887 |
Post edited: Added [post-history] & [activity], removed [editing-posts], since that tag is for the edit process itself, while this is an issue with the edit history |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277904 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: The site claims I made edits to post while I was offline The timestamp for edits is when the post is changed. Notably, that means that the time does not correspond to the time when an edit was suggested. This is your edit suggestion, which was approved while you were asleep: https://electrical.codidact.com/posts/suggested-edit/11 The site should prob... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277890 |
There are bugs for me, and it lacks the functionality I want, so please work on that instead of other things (launching new communities) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277890 |
I didn't close it because I thought it was opinion based - You're free to suggest whatever you want (and posts tagged with [discussion] are naturally opinion based anyway.) I closed it because, as the close reason says, "It's not possible to learn something from possible answers, except for the solut... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277890 |
As the one who closed it, I feel like I should offer my reason. The way I read it, it was basically a rant: "an unfortunate thing for this community is that when you report some bug on Meta, you are not usually received any response". Both of the examples you listed 1. are your own, which to me was a... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277886 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Add the staff badge to the user list Currently, the user list displays the Administrator (☗) and Moderator (☖) badges on users, but not the staff badge that displays when you go to the user's profile. For consistency, could you have the staff badge show up on the user list as well? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277884 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Second Iteration of Drafting the Codidact Arbitration & Review Panel Does the Panel's jurisdiction extend to chat? Over on the discord server, the topic of chatroom moderation came up. If a chatroom mod does something that one could consider an abuse of power or generally incorrect, is the Panel allowed to step in? Keep in mind that although the site mods and th... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277487 |
@Alexei that would totally work, since the issue is due to the word-wrap not being set to wrap long 'words' (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277875 |
*a [ref] (short for reference) button or a button with the icon used in email clients for reply (left arrow)*
Something like ⮪ or ⮌ ? (I'm aware you were just listing possible examples, just was curious what you envisioned) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277875 |
In all seriousness though, your suggestions are good. I wasn't really thinking about space, since blockquotes don't add much height anyway and I basically assumed that the height would be constrained by the hiding-extra-comments mechanic that we already have. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277875 |
*Showing line-related comments inline by adding a small comments icon.*
Oh, so Wattpad XD (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277868 |
@Olin Lathrop Well, it's sort of also a notice to users that the function is *there*, since the "draft saved" notice comes and goes really quickly and isn't really noticeable unless you look out for it. And it's also for a bit of peace of mind, instead of relying on some timer to save your work, you ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277872 |
@Olin Lathrop ah, that does seem like a good workaround. I'll probably use that for now. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277365 |
@pnuts really? downvoting just because "it's not important"? Important stuff will be upvoted more anyway. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277487 |
Post edited: Updated image & added cause |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277873 |
"Since this is the only instance I have noticed this behaviour, I assume it is related to the answer content itself (contains Chinese characters)."
It's actually not that; It's because of the really long string of text without spaces which doesn't properly word-wrap. It pushes the sides of the answe... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277873 | Question closed | — | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277872 |
Dang, people *really* don't want to have blockquotes in comments for some reason... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277872 |
Post edited: Expanded a bit |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277365 |
Post edited: Added design tag |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277872 |
@msh210 comments are meant to be, well, comments. Constructive comments to improve a question/answer, or like you just did, comments to state why you disagree with something. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |