Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Moshi
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278406 |
There is a `code` element inside of a `pre` element. The `code` element has a horizontal scrollbar, while the `pre` element has a vertical scrollbar. This means that the horizontal scrollbar, as part of the inner `code` element, can be scrolled out of view. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278406 |
@Monica Can't say this is exactly what @Canina is seeing, but I would say so given their screenshot. The scrollbar is there alright, but you have to scroll down to see it because of how the page is layed out. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278406 |
Post edited: Retagged |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278412 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
What languages have syntax highlighting support? Users can specify the language of a code block by adding it after the first set of triple backticks. For example, this question over on Software Dev uses it for C. What programming languages are supported by the syntax highlighter? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278377 |
Post edited: Syntax highlighting |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277355 |
Post edited: Added a notice to direct people to the newer, more active discussion |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278386 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278386 |
@Dani https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277355 ? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
Finally, even if being offensive wasn't the intention, you should still apologize for essentially saying that the staff are irresponsible and don't have the ability to run Codidact. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
2. "I can assure you the community team are aware of the mentioned post." Being aware does not equate to immediately taking action. They have to decide *what* to do with that post. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
@MathPhysics "It is obvious to all that I never said 'why not just let me do it?' nor meant that" 1. You did say that. It's right there in the post history. Not those exact words, but you did say "you should first appoint me as Codidact chief executive officer." And no, just because it is in parenthe... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278374 |
Post edited: added mod tools tag |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278371 |
Oh it fixed itself (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
"Attributing offensive words such as "troll", "stupid", "absurd", ... to a specific user or their actions is not an example of disrespectfulness?"
I don't believe any mod said that. Moderations takes *time*, and while not taking action can be seen as implicit allowance, they probably just haven't go... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
I won't say that your paragraph was to the same degree, but it really does come across as "If you're too busy to run Codidact, then why not just let me do it?" *Also*, you stated that the staff members are too busy as a fact. If you claim that the staff members are too busy, then claim IF the staff m... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
"As you can see, no offensive word was used in the paragraph." Imagine if someone were to say, "I don't believe your mental capacities to be enough to post here," and then say it's not offensive since no offensive words were used in that sentence, and it's clearly just an opinion since they said "bel... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278356 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How should staff deal with posts critical of themselves that they want deleted? Follow normal procedures. > If there's a post attacking a particular user or group of users, the appropriate thing to do is to flag and let one of the mods/staff deal with it. If someone disagrees with the mod(s)/staff's actions, they can take it up with the Arbitration & Review Panel or ask a que... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278300 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278300 |
Tables are not currently permitted; see https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277420#answer-277424 and a related issue, https://meta.codidact.com/questions/75005
Consistency between client preview and server rendering is currently being worked on. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278234 |
"For example, someone that has read and answered a lot of questions should know how to tell good from bad questions. In fact, they are probably better at it than someone that had a few close/reopen/delete flags accepted." On the other hand, someone who knows how to tell good from bad questions should... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278234 |
@OlinLathrop "it seems like the metric of generally writing well-received answers is getting lost except for the first ability you mention" ... 3 of the 5 unlockable abilities rely partially on well received posts though? (Participate Generally, Vote on Holds, Curate) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278276 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What is clicking the inbox icon in the top bar actually supposed to do? It is supposed to open the notifications inbox. My notifications However, due to a bug, https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/162, this will fail under certain conditions. When this happens, your notifications will be marked read without the notifications showing up. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278273 |
I assume it is because of the poster's implicit request that Codidact volunteers work like paid workers, which is certainly something that can be declined. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278236 |
#1 is probably this bug: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277092 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277092 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278236 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278229 |
Post edited: changed [close] to the pre-existing [close-question] tag |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278225 |
@Alexei I just edited your post and only added the [tags] tag, so it seems that it either doesn't affect either me or it doesn't affect Meta. Could you try editing the post, or a different post, and see if it happens again? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278225 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278200 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278200 |
..."Other comments" (The tour ends abruptly, Letting people choose roles, the -0 should be hidden, etc.)
This makes it easier for people to answer specific questions rather than forcing them to consider the whole chunk you just dropped on them. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278200 |
By the way, I'd suggest grouping related questions under a heading, ex.
"How should we guide new/unregistered users?" (peer production, orientation, first impressions, is there a quickstart/intro guide)
"How and where can I contribute to the project?" (GitHub, [feature-request]s, What feedback ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278200 |
I'll have to agree with 8063, this is probably *way* too many questions for one post. While the Q&A format allows for multiple answers, it's not exactly great for answering multiple questions since they all get mixed together. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277162 |
@FoggyFinder this answer was for the original bug two months ago (look at the timestamp) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278171 |
Could it be related to this issue? https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/162
(Despite being closed, it hasn't actually been fixed yet) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277157 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277157 |
Post edited: issue reappeared |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278181 |
@Mithrandir24601 There was a lot of confusion in chat. Someone clarified that non-constructive posts are not the same as non-constructive in the sense of the CoC, but then it became confusing what *either* meant. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278169 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
[status-completed] posts bury everything else At the time of writing, there is a big chunk of (around 15) [status-completed] and [status-declined] posts in the Q&A category feed, burying the open posts. Since open posts are much more important than completed ones, I think that this situation should be avoided. I suggest either: 1. Add an ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278159 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278074 |
@ShowMeBillyJo Providing context is solving the knowledge gap of knowledge of context. However, readers still have to have to be able to understand the context, and if they do then tags should be unnecessary for them anyway. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278096 |
@msh210 what does the stuff at the end mean? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278096 |
Post edited: Clarified the title, added user-interface tag |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278103 |
@ArtOfCode I thought as much, since the image is on the amazon aws domain instead of the codidact domain. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277949 |
@aCVn Oh, I hadn't noticed that post. If you want to close as dupe of that, I don't mind. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278103 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |