Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for MathPhysics
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278364 |
@Moshi Is there a specific reason that you did not quote the whole sentence? The sentence is "**If you want me to find them**, you should first appoint me as Codidact chief executive officer." Do you know how one can find out the meaning of a conditional sentence? Do you know that the consequent of a... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278364 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
@Moshi It is **obvious** to **all** that I never said "why not just let me do it?" nor meant that; I explicitly stated in my answer that I can find other unpaid employees to manage Codidact. I am never interested in such positions. I can assure you the community team are aware of the mentioned post a... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278364 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
I cannot understand the meaning of disrespectful. (Please note that I write this post only for the record. I personally do not hope that some changes will be made.) I have been informed of some contradictory policies (attitudes), which I personally do not care, but they may cause some abuses threatening the Codidact future. They are not disres... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278313 |
@FoggyFinder Sorry, I cannot accept your implication. Let us allow the author of the post clarify what they meant.In fact, the clause after "too busy",which can be easily understood from the rest of the text, was ellipted.The sentence without any ellipsis is :"they are too busy to consider Codidact a... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278313 |
@FoggyFinder (Continued) Please see some comment under the below answer: "The post is however classic internet trolling: not interested in contributing constructively but posting for the sole reason to cause conflict and drama." Such a comment has not been considered as *disrespectful*; then, my sent... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278313 |
Thirdly, the sentence you quoted is a professional advice to the community team. I reread it many times, and I **cannot** find any disrespect in it. Some of the community team stated somewhere in my thread that they are busy and they can devote only their free time to Codidact, so I advised them eith... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278313 |
@FoggyFinder Firstly, you do not need to ask for my permission to advise me; even, any offensive disrespectful nonconstructive criticism would be welcomed. Secondly, my last paragraph is the most important part of my answer; I would not have posted my answer if that part had not been to be put. By th... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278339 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Why not have a physics community for physics enthusiasts? Update Jan 4, 2021: launched []()Although I still believe that launching new communities should be postponed and that a math & physics community is a better choice for the current state of Codidact, since a separate math community has been launched, let us have a physics community. Physic... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278266 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278266 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278313 |
"You should all step down and give me complete power" is another false claim; I never said that. I only mentioned a sentence **in parentheses** stating that **if** you are unable to find unpaid employees, I can do that in case I have some authority. I mentioned such a statement **only** because of pr... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278313 |
"The answer, especially in the broader context of the question (from the same author) and other activity, came across as disrespectful bordering on personal attack" is obviously a false claim. I always use respectful language in my posts, which is completely clear in my posts on Meta. Some community ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278304 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278304 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278304 | Post undeleted | — | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278304 | Post undeleted | — | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278304 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Voluntariness vs. Responsibility, which of them should be considered as a priority for the community team? Since the other answers did not satisfactorily address my concerns, I'll post my answer to the question. If we want to have a successful community, then its community managers (team) should work as paid staff do. There is a (somewhat harsh to some people) fact stating: If you want to have a succe... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278287 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Informing community users of new permissible features It seems that permissible features which are voted up considerably will be added to a community. By "permissible" I mean those features which are not rejected by the community team due to some policies or technical considerations. However, as we know well, only a small part of any community member... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278266 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Voluntariness vs. Responsibility, which of them should be considered as a priority for the community team? Before starting the concern, I want to appreciate and acknowledge the community team for their volunteer efforts to run Codidact and handle its issues as far as they can. When I sometimes talk to some people about the state of some unhandled issues, I am answered explicitly or implicitly that "the... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278229 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278229 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
What are the close reasons on Codidact? In my opinion the following should be the only default close reason for any Codidact community: - CoC (without the problematic sentence) violation - obvious spam, like posting nonsense things or promoting - (obviously) off-topic post - too vague such that no one can answer - (exactly) duplica... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278228 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Codidact is a Q&A platform or a teaching community? The following is an excerpt from this community staff's answer: > I definitely didn't thought of the CoC-version of "Not Constructive" when I added the "Not Constructive"-close reason. The intention was to catch posts, which aren't helpful to anyone (What's 1+1? rather than How to add two numbers?... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278214 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278214 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Let us have a transparent review system. Issue According to the answers provided by the community staff to this post, I conclude that one of the Codidact policies is empowering moderators to take some required actions in some situations and allowing users to request the community team or a "Review Panel" to review the token actions. H... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278181 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278183 |
Thanks for your answer. Although I still believe that using the word "constructive" in the code of conduct is not *constructive* (because it is highly subjective and in practice no one can question any of its interpretations), I prefer to trust your answer because it has good intentions. Please also ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278181 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
To be constructive, or not to be constructive, that is the question. After reading this answer, I have concluded that any post and any behavior satisfying the Code of Conduct are welcomed in any Codidact Community. The Code of Conduct has been written well, and all things are clear in it except the following vague sentences: > We're deliberately not setting out ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278006 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278008 |
Thanks for your answer. I have updated my post. Can you please update your answer to cover my updated points? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278007 |
Thanks for your answer. I have updated my post. Can you please update your answer to cover my updated points? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278013 |
Thanks for your answer. I have updated my post. Can you please update your answer to cover my updated points? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278010 |
Thanks for your answer. I have updated my post. Can you please update your answer to cover my updated points? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278006 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278006 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Why prefer Codidact to Stack Exchange? As I explained in this post and some community staff confirmed, Codidact is almost a miniature version of SE. In fact, I see no radical difference between them. As we know, almost all (in my opinion, all without exception) people coming to Codidact are already familiar with SE. So, why should we e... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277379 |
I already sent the required screenshot to the community developer through chat. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277917 |
Thanks for your answer. Can I conclude from your answer that the Codidact community team prefer to preserve the basic features of the SE model, which is a successful one, and try to improve them, rather than risk testing a novel idea? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277913 |
@Zerotime I think it is clear enough. For example, the design of the website, the existing features such as flagging, closing, deleting, editing, voting, ... posts, using tags, reputation and privileges model, and so on. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277913 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Does Codidact have to be too similar to SE? Examining Codidact communities, one can easily find out that Codidact is almost a duplicate of SE I know that many Codidact users (or maybe all of them) are current or former SE users, so it was expectable that the Codidact community team, who have gotten into the habit of using SE networks, would... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |