Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Canina
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #74965 |
It doesn't invalidate your concern, but note that Codidact also supports two-factor authentication (2FA), which should make an account compromise much more difficult for the attacker. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74966 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Posts should have a visible indication whether they've been edited, and when the last edit was made Currently, each post is visibly tagged with a timestamp that indicates when it was posted, as well as by whom. Also, of course, posts can be edited; both by the original poster, and by other users. Editing a post bumps the associated question to the top of the front page, ideally with a correct... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74964 |
Definitely relevant, perhaps even a duplicate? [Spread the word - SE meta information page?](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/74781) (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74929 |
@MonicaCellio A short domain name is nice. A *descriptive* (or, for that matter, easy to remember) domain name is, I think, even nicer. Short and descriptive is best, but if going for short means we lose out on descriptiveness or specificity, I think I'd rather have a slightly longer but otherwise be... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74951 |
@ArtOfCode Yes, I'm thinking of bringing the post to the top of the RSS feed, in much the same way it's brought to the top of the "active" tab on the site. I was referring to prepending text to the entry content. Also, having had a few minutes to think about it, using the answer permalink for the fee... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74951 |
I'm not saying the RSS feed needs to actually feature *the content of the answer* per se, in case of new answers; I just want the feed to reflect the fact that something material has happened to the question, and because one is interested enough to follow the RSS feed for the category in the first pl... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74951 |
@luap42 I haven't checked the RSS/Atom specs, but I'm pretty sure that's what the `<entry> <id></id>` is for. If it's the same as an already seen ID, it's an update; if it's an unseen one, it's a brand new entry. Alternatively, in case of answers, the ID (`<entry> <id></id>`) could be set to the answ... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74929 |
I agree with @HDE 226868 that "what-if" feels like it invites the wrong kind of content. Is there a particular reason why we wouldn't want something very similar to speculative-science.codidact.com (assuming we settle on calling the site Speculative Science)? Sure, it's perhaps slightly on the long s... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74943 |
@Mithrandir24601 It's also worth remembering that, in addition to bulk import, if you've asked a question on WB nothing really prevents you from simply re-asking it on a Codidact site, as well as the possibility of pulling in additional, specific questions that @Monica Cellio mentioned. It gets sligh... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74951 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Category RSS feeds should feature a post when an answer is posted The category RSS feeds (for example https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3/feed.rss) are a nice touch for being able to follow what's going on on a site (or in a favorite category) without having to check in manually. However, there's a discrepancy between the category "activity" tab on the web si... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74897 |
Throwing this out in response: How about one category "Dungeons & Dragons" and one category "Other Systems"? (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74887 |
Basically, what is gained by focusing on the "minimalism" part, as opposed to the overarching subject matter? (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74887 |
I didn't downvote this, but I'm still struggling to understand what would be gained by bringing together diverse "minimalist" groups, as opposed to having "minimalist" subgroupings within other communities. Examples: why can't "minimalist writing" questions be asked on Writing, "minimalist camping" o... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74847 |
I don't see how just "minimalist" is broadly applicable enough, yet *specific* enough, to have a large following. For example, minimalist camping questions would probably get better answers from the enthusiasts at [The Great Outdoors](https://outdoors.codidact.com/) than from, say, a "minimalist prog... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #39448 |
As Sampo Sarrala said, reputation score (as a single number) alone doesn't really mean much. SE tied a lot of things to reputation; I think Codidact can do better. Reputation score really just means you've posted content others in the community have thought was useful. While that's worth rewarding in... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |