Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for sau226
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #287893 |
Post edited: edited tags |
— | 8 months ago |
| Edit | Post #287893 |
Post edited: edited tags |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287893 |
We've since created GitHub issue #1115 to track this request (https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/1115). A PR was also submitted to fix this issue.
As the PR has been merged, and the issue closed, we've updated the tag on this post to status-planned pending code deployment.
Thanks for rep... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Edit | Post #287865 |
Post edited: Change wasn't deployed yet |
— | 12 months ago |
| Edit | Post #287865 |
Post edited: Add liveness comment |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287893 |
From a technical standpoint, this behavior occurs because we create a "post history" event for the "initial revision" of every post, and that table pulls post history events.
We could conceivably add an additional filter to the relevant queries, which would hide the initial revision altogether as ... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287883 |
Post edited: Spelling fix |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287776 |
Post edited: This was resolved by merging PR #985 |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287830 |
Post edited: PR #1002 or a like change will fix this issue in the forseeable future |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287865 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Edit activity show, but not allowed to approve Thank you for raising this feature request. We've created PR #1002 to fix this issue by gating the edit indicator behind an ability check, so only users with the edit ability will see it going forward. This issue has been marked status-planned until that PR is merged and deployed, or a change w... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #277057 |
Post edited: remove accidental link tag |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277057 |
Post edited: edited tags |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277057 |
Sorry for not picking up this request earlier. I've opened https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/812 to get this request assessed and potentially implemented.
In the meantime, I'll tag this post as status-deferred. This is probably a nitpick that would be nice for us to fix, but ultimately is ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286674 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Please build inline editing functionality Right now, if a user tries to click the "edit" button on a post, they get taken to a separate page where they can make changes to it. After the changes are made, the user is redirected back to the original post. I understand that at the "Somewhere Else" so many of our users are familiar with, ther... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279705 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279704 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286192 |
Post edited: edited tags |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #286192 |
We currently have 3 things that need to occur before this goes live:
** A dev needs to release the design system NPM package. The code is already sitting in the repo, but this step has not been taken yet
** A PR which bumps the design system NPM package (already created) will need to be merged ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286669 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Remove separate search page and put a search textbox directly in the top bar Thanks for reporting this, and sorry for the long time you waited to have us update this post. We fixed this well back in December 2020 (according to the Recent feature changes post: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/39539). As you can tell from the hash at the bottom of the site, we have definitely... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #275804 |
Post edited: edited tags: this was done in Dec. 2020 per /posts/39539 |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286650 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
| Article | — |
Building Codidact: Inside our Atlassian stack A while ago, we mentioned that Codidact has been improving its own infrastructure. However, the post only mentioned infrastructure in very broad terms and did not really go into details about planned tool improvements. In the interests of community transparency, we are now sharing some more informati... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #286374 |
Re your comment above, see my reply below:
* I agree that unless we make a change that could be classified as "administrative" or "required by law/to be in compliance with law", a notice period would be useful for a change. Unfortunately we don't have that technology yet, so I offered the model clau... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286374 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286374 |
Post edited: I forgot the severability provision |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286374 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Deficiencies in the Terms of Service I took a look at our Terms of Service, and it seems like we are missing a provision on modifying them, a severability clause and a clause incorporating the Privacy Policy into the Terms. This can potentially be serious, as it may not be legally justifiable or may be too risky to not explicitly sta... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #286332 |
Point 1: You don't "own" your account per se, you are using an external service, so you are granted a license to use that service. We are not as legally wordy as most services are, but most larger sites only grant you a revocable license to use their site. If the site revokes your license to use it, ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285097 |
Post edited: edited tags |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286263 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: "You need to select a reaction type." But I see no reaction? Thanks for reporting the issue and sorry we kept you waiting! We haven't quite mastered how to update on-site topics related to a GitHub issue yet, so it took us a while to route back and update this. We deployed a fix via commit e95bebb, which was released to production within the last month (of ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #285097 |
Suggested edit: edited tags (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285470 |
We got upgraded to GitHub Team plan a while back, so I guess we can configure autolinking for our main repo.
See https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/managing-repository-settings/configuring-autolinks-to-reference-external-resources for configurat... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285449 |
Post edited: edited tags |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285449 |
We moved the dashboard link to the header with commit c10970d, however for various reasons this only was deployed a day or two ago.
Sorry for the wait! (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #285449 |
Suggested edit: edited tags (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280350 |
Post edited: Add December 2021 release notes |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #39539 |
Post edited: Update year for feature update thread |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286060 |
Post edited: Fixed in commit c4e4367, deployed to production today |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #286060 |
We've fixed this in commit c4e4367, which was deployed along with other changes today. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #39539 |
Suggested edit: Update year for feature update thread (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286235 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Recent feature changes to the Codidact software November 2022 We've deployed a large backlog of changes made to the code since March: - Post lists now show a question preview. We're aware that this might require some further adjustments. Preview length can be set per-community if desired (0 to disable). - When editing a post, you can now ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #286060 |
Suggested edit: Fixed in commit c4e4367, deployed to production today (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #280350 |
Suggested edit: Add December 2021 release notes (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285822 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
What should we do to facilitate sharing/recognition of Codidact content? For context, 'sharing' means sharing to an external website, such as Reddit/Twitter/other sites relevant to a community (e.g. for a writing site, a site frequented by writers). Right now, sharing content from Codidact means copying a URL from a site, switching to the relevant external website and ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |