Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for luap42
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278289 |
We can feature stuff network-wise (as the Abilities thing currently) if they are super-important. Also, we also look at per-Community metas and don’t miss discussions there. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278274 |
Yeah. I was the one adding the tag and declining the flag. As you said, I saw the one part as a "request/suggestion" rather than discussion, which could be status-declined. Also, I added the tag to make the answer more "official Codidact reply"-like. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278234 |
And about comments: The rate limits can be edited by per-site. So we can react to sites where comments-as-answers are a problem. I'd leave the limit at 0 for now and revisit this later when we have actual data to verify. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278234 |
@PeterTaylor you make a good point about tag management. Our idea was "editing posts" < "editing tags" (and both with "editing"), but this can be changed. We can require successful posts, suggested edits and flags as possible criteria for abilities. What would you suggest (currently it could be calle... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278234 |
@Lundin We'll need to discuss what rep should become (or how it should be replaced) separately. We'll start a discussion about this in a few days including some suggestions what user cards should look like. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278266 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278272 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Voluntariness vs. Responsibility, which of them should be considered as a priority for the community team? tl,dr: No. I'm sorry, but this just isn't possible. First of all, we all are people with a real life. We all have full-time responsibilities in real life. These responsibilities are unquestionable more important than running a virtual community. For example, I'll have a major change in my ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278241 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278264 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Mathematics isn't listed in the site footer or on codidact.com This has been fixed. Math had already been added to our list and I have just run a deploy, which should add it to the footer and codidact.com (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278234 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Article | — |
Coming soon: new abilities system and changes to reputation One of our longstanding design goals is to grant privileges based on people's activity and not just based on a reputation number. We think it's better if you gain abilities based on your track record in related areas, and not because one of your answers hit the Reddit jackpot. We're finally almost ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278230 |
FWIW this is going to be fixed really soon. And stay tuned for an announcement in a few hours, which the fix belongs to... 🤞 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278226 |
Closure as duplicate wanted by OP -- See: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/278230 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278226 | Question closed | — | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278230 |
@Wikis can you show a screenshot of the full close dialog? Can you click F12, then something like "Network" (maybe in a "..." menu?). Then make the close request and then there should be a "403" request in the list. Click there and copy the "server response". (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278233 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What are the close reasons on Codidact? CoC violations and spam shouldn't be closed, but deleted IMO. But that aside, the current close system will be overhauled in the future, when the devs have come around to it. In the mean time, all close reasons are editable per-site and any community can change them if wanted (mods should be able ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278226 | Question reopened | — | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278230 |
No repro from me. I’ll reopen and can you look at the network requests (there should be a page in the F12 dev tools, ping me if you need more assistance) what’s returned here? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278226 | Question closed | — | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278231 |
Close reasons can be fully customized, including renaming, editing, adding new and deactivating old. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278215 |
@Mithrandir24601 right now no quorum is in the rules, except for the majority rules. There are replacement rules for revising partial members, but they aren’t “general cases” IMO. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278214 |
(And adding: If you have critique points or suggestsions *to those rules*, please post them as an answer there) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278214 |
Are these concerns still existent when you read through the [proposed governing rules](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277346) of the Panel? Your suggestion looks to me more like a way to cause drama in most situations rather than a promising solution. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278195 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: To be constructive, or not to be constructive, that is the question. (from now deleted comments, with some changes, on request from the asker) In addition to what Monica said, it may be more clear to say, that the CoC isn't intended to be a full "penal code", which names all possible "crimes" and threatens penalties, but more something like a "social contract", acc... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277162 |
@FoggyFinder yeah. I know what the bug is and have fixed it already in the codebase (too greedy "Search & Replace"), but the deploy tool is currently offline, so I can't deploy the changes. I hope to be able to publish the fix later today. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277157 |
@MonicaCellio likely the same issue as https://meta.codidact.com/questions/278166 (see "Ooooooooooooops." there) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278170 |
Normally we try to add the tags as soon as they are fixed, but there are two possible exceptional conditions: (1) many easy fixes rolled out at one end. what should be done here else? and (2) adding status tags to older, “forgotten” requests. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278166 |
Ooooooooooooops. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278139 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Images are stretched, not scaled, on narrow browsers Oh yeah right, that bug, since Art just put a status-completed tag on it, I could also take my time and reply with what the issue is, because it's quite interesting (and this is also a good mental note for next time a similiar issue appears). It turns out, that mobile iOS browsers don't like image... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278102 |
Also on Judaism Meta: https://judaism.codidact.com/questions/276877 (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278096 |
Hm. No repro for me on mobile iOS Chrome, but will look later for W10 Chrome. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276798 |
@jrh I'd personally say comments expressing their (dis-)agreement for a specific reason are okay (unlike pure "I agree" comments). Rate limits are currently being revised and I'll take your feedback re "initial votes" into account. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278036 |
@MonicaCellio yeah, sure. I was just thinking that the forum is already set up. And I'm not really a fan of having a "fun site" kept directly within the other "less fun" sites and would rather favor it being a bit different, but you are right that this needs to be decided after we know what is needed... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278036 |
I mean... we could likely remove/hide all posts from the old forum mentioned by Moshi and Monica and allow continued use (still moderated, but not continuously observed) if there were a group of users interested in maintaining it... I would apply similiar criteria to creating a new site, but otherwis... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278042 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278042 |
Nothing yet exists, but I'll add to my list to add a way to turn it off via some preference-kind-of-thing. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278023 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Overflowing text in answer This issue has been completed. Thanks Art. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277487 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278015 | Question reopened | — | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278015 |
Post edited: Please don't alter your question like that. If you have a new question, ask a new question. |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278020 |
This is... the old page, right @ArtOfCode? You shouldn't be seeing this page anywhere else IIRC... (not even with correct data). (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278014 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What should I know when coming here from Stack Exchange? Welcome to Codidact! This is mostly a Q&A community, as you likely know from Stack Exchange already. However, I only said "mostly", because there are some differences you should know: Codidact is more community-centered Community is central to Codidact. In fact, we couldn't exist without com... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277997 |
Obviously, the last part isn’t *at all* our motivation for fixing bugs... ;) (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |