Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for trichoplax
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edit | Post #287378 |
Post edited: Link to related Meta post on Collab |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289600 |
Post edited: Add `https://` to link as it was previously being treated as internal, giving a 404 error |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289600 |
[Codidact Collab - should it be listed?](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/287378) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289600 |
[Add proposals to Codidact.com](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/289609) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289587 |
Having said this, I don't believe the reference to English as a first language was intended with malice. Only Olin can know this for certain, but my impression is that it was intended to soften the English usage advice, by indicating understanding. It appears to have had the opposite effect, which I'... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289587 |
I have 2 issues with the mention of English in this answer:
1. We don't have a requirement that a post's English have any particular minimum quality. We have the ability to edit each other's posts so that we can each add our own respective strengths.
2. English being an author's second language i... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289590 |
My main aim with this answer is to avoid losing your future contributions. People don't generally rant about things unless they care.
Although your first set of suggestions was rushed and ranty and turned out to have already been discussed, I'm still hoping you'll stick around to make further sugg... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289590 |
Your rant wasn't without reason. Even though things have been discussed before, most people arriving new won't know that, and may have similar frustrations to yours. It might be useful as a signpost to existing discussions.
It's up to you whether to delete, edit, or leave it as is. I don't persona... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289590 |
Post edited: Use exact wording of link mentioned in right hand panel |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289590 |
Post edited: Edit to reflect edited question |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289585 |
Post edited: Typos and tidying, hopefully without changing the author's intent. |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289590 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Problems i have encountered/seen in the last week > I am a new user to Codidact that just migrated from StackOverflow and there are some things I would like to get across. Welcome to Codidact! Thank you for sharing your suggestions for improvement. One of the differences with Codidact is that the code is open source, so anyone who wants to can co... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289567 |
Post edited: Add heading for workaround |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289567 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Comment flagging broken on mobile portrait mode From a comment thread page, pressing "flag" on a comment results in a pop up panel with a text input and a "Flag" button. On mobile, in portrait mode, this pop up panel overlaps the left hand edge of the screen so that the flag message being typed and the "Flag" button are obscured: Flag pop up pa... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289565 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Users with multiple Codidact accounts Are there any rules about a user having multiple Codidact accounts (sometimes known as sockpuppet accounts)? What should a user do if they suspect another user has multiple accounts? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289520 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289520 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
The posts list for a tag suggests each post has only that tag Clicking on a tag takes you to a page showing the details of the tag, followed by a list of posts bearing that tag. However, each of these posts is shown with only that tag. All other tags on each post are omitted: > Posts tagged bug, each showing only the bug tag This can be confirmed as a bug... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289479 |
I like the idea of the labels "Question" and "Answer" (or "Article" - there are a few post types) being at the top of the individual search result.
How would you feel about these only showing in mixed search results? That is, they could be hidden in search results for a specific post type (so if I... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289451 |
Could there be a default MathJax help article that switches on and off when MathJax is enabled or disabled? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289449 |
I recently [posted on Codidact Proposals](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/289268) mentioning similar problems, including a link to an example post on the development server with more examples of raw text and rendered results.
Mentioning here as further evidence that avoiding accidentally trig... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289173 |
Post edited: How to make exceptions for images |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289173 |
The images were what I was most dissatisfied with. This is a big improvement - thank you. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289391 |
This answer covers everything except the mention of a preview while editing comments. Even the standard comment editing interface does not yet show a preview, but there is a Meta feature request for one: [Can we have a preview pane for comments?](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/289248). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289394 |
Post edited: Tidying |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289394 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Editor preview for comments Comments allow some Markdown features such as numbered and bullet point lists, code blocks, and quote blocks. They also allow MathJax in communities for which it is enabled. A rendered comment can therefore look very different from the raw text. Could a preview be added to the comment drafting/edi... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289367 |
Post edited: Replace "give for granted" with English idiom "take for granted" |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289381 |
That's an interesting point about service tags. If there are more than one kind of tag maybe we could have tag categories.
For example:
- Topic tags show on a row of their own and can be applied by anyone
- Status tags show on a row of their own and can only be applied by moderators
Tags like... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289366 |
There are a few cases where the number of tags is not the problem, just being at the limit is a problem (as it prevents adding a moderator-only tag, a proposal tag, or undeleting a tag). Maybe it would be sufficient to just have a limit for users, and an exception for those 3 cases. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289366 |
So there is not necessarily a tag limit per post, but there is a tag limit per user per post. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289366 |
Would it help to have a slowly increasing limit like a trust level?
So for example, when a new user joins they can only add 5 tags, but after they gain trust over time they can add 10, and if they don't misuse that they later get 20. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289366 |
I can't think of an example of a problem that could arise if there were no tag limit. What sort of abuse were you expecting? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289353 |
I've edited my answer to try and make it more clear and to include the examples (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289353 |
Post edited: Link to 5 tag limit Meta post |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289353 |
Post edited: Clarify that this wouldn't mean trusting everyone |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289353 |
I wasn't suggesting relaxing the trust requirements entirely.
I wouldn't want to give arbitrary abilities to everyone as soon as they join a community. I was thinking that some actions could be trusted to slightly more people than currently (as the question suggests, but with undo allowing taking ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289353 |
I've raised a separate [discussion on the 5 tag limit](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/289364). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289364 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Assessing the 5 tag limit We currently have a limit of 5 tags per question. Should we keep this the same or would any changes be of benefit? For example: - Should the limit be higher or lower? - Should there be different limits for different contexts: - Different communities? - Different categories? - Differe... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289353 |
It's interesting that we're both using the same argument (reduce administrative burden) for opposite opinions. Sounds like this would need careful discussion before deciding where to have undo and where to avoid it.
Note that I'm not suggesting the undo functionality be implemented any time soon. ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289353 |
Post edited: Fine tuning |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289353 |
Post edited: Improve structure |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289353 |
Post edited: Add subheadings for ease of reference |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289353 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Proposal to ease tag maintenance This is perhaps a longer term solution, with slightly broader scope than the question, but I'm mentioning it for consideration since the question made me think of it. It still makes sense to implement the more specific changes suggested in the question in the meantime. Trust, but implement undo ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289341 |
Post edited: Mention list is non-exhaustive |
— | over 1 year ago |