Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for trichoplax
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edit | Post #293541 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | 1 day ago |
Comment | Post #293538 |
I find myself holding conflicting opinions on this, so I've posted both as separate answers to see what voting and further discussion leads to. (more) |
— | 1 day ago |
Edit | Post #293541 | Initial revision | — | 1 day ago |
Answer | — |
A: How should the "all communities" profile tab handle deleted profiles on other communities? Keep it simple To keep things simple, deleted community users should not show up for anyone on the "All Communities" tab. For global moderators and global admins, separate tools can be made for tracking deleted community users, rather than trying to force the "All Communities" tab to serve an additi... (more) |
— | 1 day ago |
Edit | Post #293540 | Initial revision | — | 1 day ago |
Answer | — |
A: How should the "all communities" profile tab handle deleted profiles on other communities? Until the system has a way to distinguish between the different reasons for deletion, we should ensure we consider users who have done nothing wrong, and have a strong reason for concealing that they ever (potentially accidentally) had a profile on a community that they have since been deleted from. ... (more) |
— | 1 day ago |
Comment | Post #293486 |
I like the idea of the moderator help pages being open. This gives users some expectations of how they can expect to be treated in different situations. It also may lead to more volunteers for communities that need more moderators.
Maybe individual articles in the moderator help page could be mark... (more) |
— | 15 days ago |
Edit | Post #293281 | Initial revision | — | about 2 months ago |
Question | — |
Incorrect raw JSON failure message on posting a comment In a Codidact community where I have not yet earned the "Participate Everywhere" ability, I am unable to comment except on my own posts and answers to my own posts. This is as intended. I attempted to post a comment in an existing comment thread on an answer to my own question on Electrical Engine... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293277 |
I relate. I learned to program in BASIC, back when the line numbers were part of the code. They would default to 10, 20, 30 so at first adding lines in between was fine, but eventually I'd be trying to guess where to leave space (should I make this new line 25, or 23 because I'm more likely to add fu... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293277 |
I hadn't realised moderators could change the sequence. That sounds like a good start already.
Even if we leave gaps in the initial numbering, the addition of new links with arbitrary numbers means there may need to be renumbering at some point. The problem of renumbering to make room for a new li... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293277 |
What would be most useful in terms of hierarchy?
I can imagine a single link that goes to a page containing more specific links.
I can also imagine a single link that shows those more specific links below it (perhaps as indented bullet points) so you don't have to follow the first link to find ... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293215 |
Thank you both. That rules out a known Firefox bug, so we'll investigate it as a Codidact specific bug. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293237 |
I've just seen [confirmation of this happening on Chrome too](https://meta.codidact.com/comments/thread/10468#comment-26318), so the Codidact problem is unlikely to be Firefox related. I don't know how that affects the Mozilla bug. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293275 | Initial revision | — | about 2 months ago |
Question | — |
Help page: call for improvement suggestions At the top right of each page is a link to Help. > The help center, showing a variety of help articles If you want a specific help article to be edited or added, please raise that on your community specific Meta so that a moderator can make those changes for you. This question is instead about ... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293237 |
Thanks very much for mentioning this. I was indeed using Firefox, so I've edited to mention this, and to mention your link. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293237 |
Post edited: Mention Firefox issue from comment |
— | about 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293237 |
Post edited: Mention similar problem |
— | about 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293215 |
Post edited: Mention browser and OS and similar problem |
— | about 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293237 |
Post edited: Mention browser and OS |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293215 |
@#36396 @#8046 since you've both noticed this, would you mind sharing which browser and operating system you were using to narrow things down?
I was using Firefox 134.0 on Fedora 40 (Linux). (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293270 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | about 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293270 | Initial revision | — | about 2 months ago |
Question | — |
More visibly non-profit There is a box in the right hand panel of most Codidact pages showing information related to Codidact: The Codidact box from the right hand panel, showing various links The first paragraph says: > This community is part of the Codidact network. We have other communities too — take a look! ... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293269 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
Question | — |
Visual bug during image upload Minor visual bug (no effect on usage). When uploading an image during editing or creating a post, the page is greyed out while the "Image upload" modal is showing (as intended). However, 2 of the input fields (Tags and License) remain white, making them stand out and look broken: (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293268 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Draft of previous edit (including edit comment) loaded for new edit I'm not sure if the underlying cause is related, but I've seen a similar problem for drafting a new post. I just pressed "Ask Question" to post a new Meta question, and the text of this question (that I'm now answering) was loaded as a saved draft, despite this question already having been posted. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293214 |
Yes it's just the wording from my first answer (which works when there's no redirect). (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293214 |
I suppose this does make the "and try again" redundant, as signing in does that automatically. Should we just say
> Search results for `user:me` can only be displayed when signed in. Please [sign in](https://codegolf.codidact.com/users/sign_in).
rather than
> Search results for `user:me` can... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293213 |
Thanks very much for implementing the extra optional answer too! This is more than I was expecting and is working well for me. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293214 |
Although it's not immediately obvious from the [code changes](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/1506/files), the fix also includes the suggestions from [my other answer about my ideal solution](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/293213/293216#answer-293216) (which I wasn't expecting to be implemen... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293237 |
Post edited: Be more specific |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293237 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
Question | — |
Draft of previous edit (including edit comment) loaded for new edit After making an edit to an answer (in this case an answer of my own on Collab) I pressed Edit to make a further edit and the Edit Comment field was populated with the comment of my immediately previous edit. I changed this to describe my current edit and saved. I then pressed Edit to make a third edi... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293215 |
Thanks for pointing that out. I've edited to mention it. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293215 |
Post edited: Link to old issue |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293219 |
(So in short, yes i like your suggestion but let's not assume people will know when to copy from the URL bar and when to use the link button next to the results.) (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293219 |
I can imagine cases where someone might desire either of:
- "me" continues to mean the sending user
- "me" means the receiving user
Should we give the user both options at the point that they copy the link? Maybe in a similar user interface for links to posts, which offer both raw and markdown l... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293214 |
For me personally, I'd rather be shown no results and an explanation of why, than some results that I might go straight into looking through without noticing the message that warns me about them being different from expected. I'd like to avoid that potential for wasting the user's time.
Perhaps we... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #293215 |
Thank you both for the extra examples. It sounds like it was already happening before the recent improvements to drafts then. Mentioning in case that's relevant to anyone who investigates this. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293216 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: 500 error page for user:me when not signed in My ideal solution would be to inform the user that search results for `user:me` require a signed in user in order to know who `me` refers to, and then show a sign in page that will automatically redirect to the search results once the user has finished signing in. I understand this would be more d... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293215 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
Question | — |
Draft not discarded after posting an answer Old issue: Posting sometimes doesn't clear the saved post Moshi's comment points out that this old issue (closed in 2021) describes the same problem, so this may be a regression. Other comments suggest at least 3 people have seen this over the last year. During writing an answer, a draft is... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293214 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: 500 error page for user:me when not signed in One option would be to display a message along the lines of: > Search results for `user:me` can only be displayed when signed in. Please sign in and try again. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #293213 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
Question | — |
500 error page for user:me when not signed in When searching, a user can be specified by including `user:X` in the search term, where `X` is the user id of the relevant user. You can also search for your own posts by specifying `user:me`. If you share a link to search results based on `user:me` then the recipient of the link will see results ... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |