Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for trichoplax‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #289200 It might help to also have more fine grained options: do I want to be contactable only in rooms I have already participated, or from any room?
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289200 I recall SE chat only allowing pinging a user if they have been active in a recent period of time. If implementing it here, I'd prefer to have a user not contactable until they choose to opt in to chat, but then continue to be contactable indefinitely until they choose to opt out.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289200 In the same way that not everyone is on Discord, there may be people who do not want to be on our own chat system. I'd like to see us implement a chat system, and remove the dependency on Discord, but I would still want it to be opt in. Not everyone who wants to participate in Q&A wants to be cont...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289202 This would be aligned with the way moderator flags are currently handled - you don't see which moderator handled it.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289202 The difference between Discord and a built in "contact a moderator" button is that on Discord you would be sending a direct message to a specific person who you know is a moderator, whereas the built in button would put you in touch with whichever moderator responds first. On Discord you would know w...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289173 The developer window has a tool for manually finding the colour value of whichever pixel your mouse is pointing at, but I don't know of an automated way to get all of the computed values at once. Some of the tools for compiling to CSS, such as SASS and SCSS, allow seeing the CSS output which might...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289202 Initial revision over 1 year ago
Answer A: How to send message to mod other than by flag?
Awkward workaround is acceptable until this feature is implemented You are correct, there is not yet a better way to contact a moderator than the awkward workaround you mentioned (flagging an unrelated post). To be clear: 1. A better method to get a moderator's attention should exist, so this w...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289173 Post edited:
Mention unticking the CSS on the body to take light mode screenshots
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289173 Post edited:
Mention signed in only version
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289173 CSS filters are powerful (they can do far more than these simple adjustments) but I would want to think carefully before making them built in. As a user script, browser compatibility is no problem because people it doesn't work for can simply not use it. If we made it built in we might break the s...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289173 When you say "finer-grained adjustment of the contrast" do you mean being able to set different contrast levels in different regions of the page?
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289173 Initial revision over 1 year ago
Answer A: UX changes: dark theme, distinct borders and shortcuts
Horrible hacky dark mode Until there's a real dark mode, here are some quick CSS hacks that you can try out in the developer window of your browser, and add to a userscript or user stylesheet if you like the results. The site as it currently looks With no CSS changes, here's the starting poi...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289166 Initial revision over 1 year ago
Question Code block copy button in more places, such as help documents
I find the copy button on code blocks in posts very useful. Could this also be added to code blocks in other places such as help documents? For example, the Template for Proposal Posts would be much easier to copy if there were a copy button.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #288657 I was very tired when I posted that comment and completely overlooked that you might mean a suggested edit. Reading it now, being more awake, it's perfectly clear that "applied" means "approved" rather than "submitted for approval". Thanks for being understanding.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289143 Post edited:
Make link human readable
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289141 Initial revision over 1 year ago
Question Native sorting button blocks other sorting orders
The sorting buttons at the top of a category's post list include "Activity", "Age", and "Score", which are all orders into which to sort the posts. However, for sites with imported content they also include "Native". This is not a sort order, but a filter, showing only posts that were not imported. T...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289139 Initial revision over 1 year ago
Question Hover text on sorting buttons not available on mobile
The sorting buttons at the top of a category's post list have title text which appears on hovering with a mouse, but this is not available on mobile devices. The sorting buttons above the filters section "Activity", "Age", and "Score" are reasonably intuitive names, so a mobile user could still...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #289018 Post edited:
Remove redundant markdown added by a bug during the previous edit
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289058 I have no preference, just wanted to raise the question so both can be made how you want them at the same time (you plural, the mods)
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289058 Would you want the same behaviour for links that have a start date in the future? Do they currently stay in the "inactive" tab until the start date is reached?
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #288657 I'm very confused by this question. I was sure I had kept my time travel a secret. Could you rephrase to help my parsing?
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289018 Thanks for the perspective. I appreciate that votes are difficult to interpret, particularly when the question seems to be also leaning towards an answer. I suppose a large number of downvotes will probably also achieve the same as a large number of upvotes - more people will be likely to be curio...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #289018 I can't speak for the downvoters. I don't know whether the objections are to the question or to the way it is phrased. Personally I see this as an important question. Codidact exists to provide freedom from the conflicts of interest associated with profit driven organisations. Users publicly raisi...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #288976 I'll make sure I focus more on the title and introduction from now on.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #288974 The comment was all that was needed - it made sense and did help. I wouldn't have known about mobile without your comment.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #288974 Thanks for highlighting this. I've established that the problem only occurs in windows of width 780 pixels or more, and edited the post to make this clear. I've also added a screenshot so this post can make sense to mobile viewers.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #288976 For future readers, note that this answer is to the initial bug report where I did not understand that the problem only occurs for some viewers, and I phrased the bug report in a way which made it sound like I was complaining about scroll bars. Although I have now edited away the context, this ans...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #288976 I absolutely agree that horizontal scroll bars are the solution. Thanks for highlighting that the title and opening paragraph suggested the opposite. I have now edited to make the title mention the right hand panel, to mention in the first paragraph that scroll bars are a good thing, and added a s...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #288974 Post edited:
Add screenshot so mobile users can see the problem
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #288974 Post edited:
Make title clearer and add section on mobile view
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #288976 If skimming through the post didn't look immediately awful, I'm wondering if you are viewing on mobile, where I've just been informed the problem does not exist. On desktop the expandable details section has a summary which is a code block stretching out and partly obscuring the right hand side panel...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #288974 Post edited:
Highlight which rendered results are broken in the editor preview
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #288974 Post edited:
Typo
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #288974 Post edited:
Mention this may not be noticed until next time
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #288974 Initial revision over 1 year ago
Question Some code blocks extend into the right hand panel on desktop
If a code block contains a line too long to fit in the available horizontal space, the excess to the right is hidden, with a scroll bar to allow seeing the rest (this is a good thing): Raw text: ````text ```text This is an exceptionally long line for the purpose of demonstrating what happens wh...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #288715 Post edited:
Link to related post
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #287892 Post edited:
Link to related post
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287245 I should have reread my 9 month old post before responding to your comment. I've now spotted my earlier misunderstanding and edited to reflect your comment. I raised the GitHub issue earlier today, with my current understanding, and forgot that my understanding 9 months ago when I wrote this post ...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #287245 Post edited:
Explain that the number is useful
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287245 Thanks for the explanation. I appreciate the difference. The bug is not that there is title text, but that the title text is applied to the container instead of the element. It just needs to be made more specific. Hovering over "1.1k" and seeing "1063" makes perfect sense. Hovering near the sor...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #287837 Post edited:
Add note that duplicate flags now require details
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #287837 For me, a duplicate flag with empty Details section is submitted successfully (and shows up to a moderator) in my local development environment, but is rejected with a red message "Details are required for this flag type - please enter at least 15 characters" on the dev server. Both are using the lat...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #287245 Post edited:
Link to GitHub issue
over 1 year ago
Edit Post #288931 Initial revision over 1 year ago