Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for celtschk
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #281882 |
While you're working on the portal, you could make a simple “contact us” page that basically gives the email address for contact (with the usual spam-protection measures applied). (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281800 |
One thing other sites (including SE) do, and which I've heard is specifically because of SEO, is to put the text of the title in the URL even though the server ignores that part. For example, using that method, this question's URL might read `https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281799/questions-themselve... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281796 |
If this is implemented, it definitely should be an opt-in feature. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281781 |
While I do not miss reputation as such, I do miss being notified about up/downvotes on my posts. Reputation changes were a proxy to that. Indeed, on SE I liked the distinct rep points on votes of questions and answers (as long as those existed) exactly because it allowed be to immediately see whether... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281195 |
However the preview not matching the final post also seems to be a bug to me, regardless of what HTML is or isn't supported. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280917 |
More importantly, a question can have answers that don't solve it, or only partially solve it; as is, someone seeing that the question has an answer might consider it solved, and not take the time to read/answer it, although actually the question is still open. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280632 |
BTW, I consider the example linked to from your second point to be *less* readable than it would be with bold “Pro”/“Contra”. The colours don't draw my eyes to anywhere. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280632 |
Your first point isn't really solved by colours, as if they are allowed, the quoted text can also use them. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280405 |
A simple solution would be to put a close or collapse button on the text. If the categories page hadn't been removed, I'd say it's enough to list the descriptions there (as an aside, I actually miss a way to get a quick overview without clicking on all categories; if anything, I would have increased ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280409 |
To help finding it, there could be a link to it in the help. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280359 |
@OlinLathrop: Did you put quotes around the search term? If not, Google treats it more or less as independent words. Also Bing and Google use different algorithms, therefore Bing's order doesn't tell you anything on how the site's size affects Google results. Note that Google's PageRank algorithm (di... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280359 |
@OlinLathrop: There is no proof that deleting the 99% that was not touched on Codidact is not sufficient to reverse the effect. So what's wrong with first deleting the stuff that was not touched on codidact, to see if it has the desired effect? Also, do you have *any* indication of the claimed spill-... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276275 |
@PeterCooperJr.: IIUC the ending of APNG files is PNG, and the file formats are compatible (that is, a program supporting PNG but not APNG will see it as normal PNG image showing the first frame), so APNG should be automatically accepted if PNG is, unless special checks are done that filter them out.... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276272 |
Additional data point: Waterfox on Linux doesn't show TIFF, but all others. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280225 |
I don't think this site is technically a good fit for this, as there is no post type with threaded answers. Now in principle such post types could certainly be implemented, but that would be a *much* bigger task than just adding a new community. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279094 |
@MonicaCellio: It now works. Note that I'm not on Windows either, though (I'm mainly using Waterfox on Linux). @luap42: thank you. (Do multiple attributions in one comment work?) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280126 |
One possibility would be to have the option to upload linked images when submitting the post. Basically, the code would scan for any external image links, and if there are any. it would present a page asking you whether you want to upload those images (with an explicit warning that you must have the ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
I'd probably be a casual visitor/poster. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276824 |
@Canina: I think Unix/Linux-specific programming questions should be ontopic, even if they include languages like C++. OTOH, platform-independent questions (or questions specific to non-Unix platforms) should be offtopic, even if they are in Perl (bash, or generally Unix shells, are Unix specific alm... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278495 |
An alternative could be a toggle switch to change it on the fly. So e.g. when writing a question involving code, you can toggle to monospace while writing the code section, and to proportional while writing the text section. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277182 |
@J.E.B.: Do they have to be different sites, or could they simply be different categories of the same site? Note that Categories is a feature of Codidact that is not available on SE. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278340 |
I'm a physicist, and while for some reason I've not ended up contributing much on physics.SE, I might (or might not, experience will tell) contribute more on a new physics site. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #41993 |
Then site does not appear on the [Codidact.com main page](https://codidact.com/) nor at the site list at the bottom of the page. Is this intentional or an oversight? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →