Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for trichoplax
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edit | Post #289143 |
Post edited: Make link human readable |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289141 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Native sorting button blocks other sorting orders The sorting buttons at the top of a category's post list include "Activity", "Age", and "Score", which are all orders into which to sort the posts. However, for sites with imported content they also include "Native". This is not a sort order, but a filter, showing only posts that were not imported. T... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289139 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Hover text on sorting buttons not available on mobile The sorting buttons at the top of a category's post list have title text which appears on hovering with a mouse, but this is not available on mobile devices. The sorting buttons above the filters section "Activity", "Age", and "Score" are reasonably intuitive names, so a mobile user could still... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #289018 |
Post edited: Remove redundant markdown added by a bug during the previous edit |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289058 |
I have no preference, just wanted to raise the question so both can be made how you want them at the same time (you plural, the mods) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289058 |
Would you want the same behaviour for links that have a start date in the future? Do they currently stay in the "inactive" tab until the start date is reached? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #288657 |
I'm very confused by this question. I was sure I had kept my time travel a secret. Could you rephrase to help my parsing? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289018 |
Thanks for the perspective. I appreciate that votes are difficult to interpret, particularly when the question seems to be also leaning towards an answer.
I suppose a large number of downvotes will probably also achieve the same as a large number of upvotes - more people will be likely to be curio... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #289018 |
I can't speak for the downvoters. I don't know whether the objections are to the question or to the way it is phrased.
Personally I see this as an important question. Codidact exists to provide freedom from the conflicts of interest associated with profit driven organisations. Users publicly raisi... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288976 |
I'll make sure I focus more on the title and introduction from now on. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288974 |
The comment was all that was needed - it made sense and did help.
I wouldn't have known about mobile without your comment. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288974 |
Thanks for highlighting this. I've established that the problem only occurs in windows of width 780 pixels or more, and edited the post to make this clear. I've also added a screenshot so this post can make sense to mobile viewers. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288976 |
For future readers, note that this answer is to the initial bug report where I did not understand that the problem only occurs for some viewers, and I phrased the bug report in a way which made it sound like I was complaining about scroll bars.
Although I have now edited away the context, this ans... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288976 |
I absolutely agree that horizontal scroll bars are the solution. Thanks for highlighting that the title and opening paragraph suggested the opposite.
I have now edited to make the title mention the right hand panel, to mention in the first paragraph that scroll bars are a good thing, and added a s... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288974 |
Post edited: Add screenshot so mobile users can see the problem |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288974 |
Post edited: Make title clearer and add section on mobile view |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288976 |
If skimming through the post didn't look immediately awful, I'm wondering if you are viewing on mobile, where I've just been informed the problem does not exist. On desktop the expandable details section has a summary which is a code block stretching out and partly obscuring the right hand side panel... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288974 |
Post edited: Highlight which rendered results are broken in the editor preview |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288974 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288974 |
Post edited: Mention this may not be noticed until next time |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288974 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Some code blocks extend into the right hand panel on desktop If a code block contains a line too long to fit in the available horizontal space, the excess to the right is hidden, with a scroll bar to allow seeing the rest (this is a good thing): Raw text: ````text ```text This is an exceptionally long line for the purpose of demonstrating what happens wh... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288715 |
Post edited: Link to related post |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287892 |
Post edited: Link to related post |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287245 |
I should have reread my 9 month old post before responding to your comment. I've now spotted my earlier misunderstanding and edited to reflect your comment.
I raised the GitHub issue earlier today, with my current understanding, and forgot that my understanding 9 months ago when I wrote this post ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287245 |
Post edited: Explain that the number is useful |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287245 |
Thanks for the explanation. I appreciate the difference. The bug is not that there is title text, but that the title text is applied to the container instead of the element. It just needs to be made more specific.
Hovering over "1.1k" and seeing "1063" makes perfect sense.
Hovering near the sor... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287837 |
Post edited: Add note that duplicate flags now require details |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287837 |
For me, a duplicate flag with empty Details section is submitted successfully (and shows up to a moderator) in my local development environment, but is rejected with a red message "Details are required for this flag type - please enter at least 15 characters" on the dev server. Both are using the lat... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287245 |
Post edited: Link to GitHub issue |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288931 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Get rid of minimum character requirements Prevent zero only - I'm comfortable with preventing users from posting zero character comments and posts. - I agree there are times when insisting on 15 characters is unhelpful. - For comments, I see no reason to make the minimum higher than 1. - For posts, I'd expect them to be longer but 15 is ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288896 |
Thanks for explaining. With priviliges and abilities being two separate things, it might be worth making the separation more definite. The screenshot in this answer exclusively uses "privileges" in the Roles section, and "abilities" in the Recalc Abilities section, but the screenshots in the question... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288886 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Cannot view with no filter when a category has a default filter This is the filter section above a post list: Filter section showing the default filter for the category In a category where I have set a default filter, I can temporarily view the post list using a different filter by selecting it from the "Predefined Filters" drop down box, and then clicking ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287765 |
At some point I got a persistent zero (persisting until I manually refreshed the page) but haven't seen it since (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287765 |
Somewhere in trying to work out the steps to reproduce this I also ended up with a blue notification circle with a zero in it, but I haven't been able to make that happen again. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287765 |
I am. Steps to reproduce:
1. Open this page in 2 tabs.
2. Mark your top notification as unread.
3. Close the notification panel and see the blue notification circle.
3. Switch to the other tab and click on the unread notification.
4. Switch back to the first tab and see the blue notification cir... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288858 |
I like this approach. I also enjoy overthinking, so I'm not best placed to judge whether it's more than we need, so I'm interested to see what others think.
Since we already have at least 1 other instance, and possibly more we don't know about, committing to not breaking existing behaviour without... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288828 |
The [answer explaining why we shouldn't do this](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288828/288834#answer-288834) has plenty of upvotes (including mine) so I'm pretty sure we're safe from this happening. I have been thoroughly convinced that my suggestion is a bad idea... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288834 |
The post you link to discusses questions, rather than answers, which makes me realize what I was overlooking:
An answerer will generally put `--` inside a code block or inline code, so it won't get converted, but someone asking a question is less likely to know to do this, so we can't rely on it.
... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288826 |
That's one difference with Codidact - there is no voting on comments. There is only voting on posts (questions/answers/articles). The [reputation per vote is adjustable though](https://software.codidact.com/posts/288728). (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288828 |
Post edited: Clarification |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288828 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Should we render double hyphen as an em dash? Some places render "--" (double hyphen) as "—" (em dash). Currently Codidact does not -- so these are left as double hyphens in both the edit preview and a rendered post (like that). Would it be useful for Codidact to automatically render double hyphen as an em dash? Are there settings in... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288825 |
Post edited: Replace "--" with "—" as the markdown renderer doesn't do this for us |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #288825 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288826 |
We have a [community called Collab for people working on the software behind Codidact](https://collab.codidact.org/categories/56). It's not the test community you're asking about, but it can help with setting up a local development instance of the software which would allow you to try out whatever yo... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |