Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Trilarion‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #285576 @#8176 One difference to 10 years ago is that we know much better what high quality Q&A is and how to enforce it. Questions have to be clear, focused, objective, content has to be voted on and the really bad content has to be closed or deleted. I don't see that much risk of a repetition of the past. ...
(more)
about 15 hours ago
Comment Post #285576 @Lundin I see your concern about quality and it should definitely not be advertised as garbage dump, but I'm much less worried there. I like this idea and hope we can have the proposals community with the incubator category rather soon. I will worry about low quality of proposed questions there if th...
(more)
1 day ago
Comment Post #279384 @#8162 Thank you for the extensive update. It's good to see progress is made even during such stressful times. If you need more feedback on policies of the panels, you can always ask for it on meta. One last thing. Probably other people would be interested in reading this update too but it's quit...
(more)
3 days ago
Comment Post #285568 Now I thought about it and I think I'm a knowledge translator. I can help if they let me knowledge seekers to better seek and help knowledge providers to better provider by improving their respective contributions. Something like the lubricant in the knowledge distribution mechane. :)
(more)
3 days ago
Comment Post #285568 @#8056 In that case I'd say I'm more a knowledge seeker than a provider, but then all the knowledge I seek has already been provided somewhere in most cases. I would not need many more knowledge providers. What most knowledge seekers need is not a provider but more like a finder. The knowledge is out...
(more)
3 days ago
Comment Post #285571 ... and for each proposed target site there should be a meta question defining what is on topic and what is off topic and what is high quality and what is low quality. Not sure we could define that here and for all possible cases. (Just saw that Monica had the same idea in her answer.)
(more)
3 days ago
Comment Post #285568 @#36356 Thanks for the title. I like it. I thought of myself more along the lines of "expert amateur" or "amateur expert". It probably just means that these categories aren't totally binary.
(more)
4 days ago
Edit Post #285570 Initial revision 4 days ago
Answer A: Closing Articles
Closing of a question typically does not only prohibit the addition of further answers but also signals to the content creator and future visitors that something is seriously wrong with the content and needs to be improved (see also comments by Moshi and Olin). This signal is conveyed with a custom m...
(more)
4 days ago
Comment Post #285568 I have good enough search skills so that I can answer most of my question for myself, but I'm not as educated in a single subject that I can deliver high quality answers to difficult question except maybe in a small area that isn't covered on CD currently. Sure, I can edit and improve existing conten...
(more)
4 days ago
Edit Post #285568 Initial revision 4 days ago
Answer A: Incubator (takes all questions that aren't ontopic anywhere else) community
I fully agree that all other communities on CD should be focused in scope and concentrate on gathering a group of experts, but for me this one here should be the exception, because: - Serves as showcase for questions for other potential communities. And where else to showcase questions than in the...
(more)
4 days ago
Comment Post #285528 Thanks for the explanation. That is more or less what I thought it would be. If current science doesn't know yet, one can speculate but one cannot simply break fundamental physical/chemical laws in order to make things works. Instead one should hint at how things could work.
(more)
6 days ago
Edit Post #285535 Post edited:
6 days ago
Edit Post #285535 Post edited:
6 days ago
Edit Post #285535 Post edited:
6 days ago
Comment Post #285528 @#8046 Opening up new communities may not help much, but not opening up may also not help much either. The question is where more people can come from. As a compromise of opening up lots of new communities or opening up none, I came up with [let's open one](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/285535). An...
(more)
6 days ago
Edit Post #285535 Initial revision 6 days ago
Question Incubator (takes all questions that aren't ontopic anywhere else) community
This discussion where a user would like to ask a question and sees the availability of questions as main driver of new growth, made me thinking: could there be something to it? For quite some time now no new community has been created here and some existing ones struggle really heard. Therefore more ...
(more)
6 days ago
Edit Post #285529 Post edited:
7 days ago
Comment Post #285528 True, without more communities you may not be able to ask more questions, but then if there are not enough answerers, what good does it do to ask a question. You need everything, askers, answerers, good software, ... it's a miracle if one can pull that off. For example, I like your question here, ...
(more)
7 days ago
Edit Post #285529 Initial revision 7 days ago
Answer A: Does Codidact render MathJAX more slowly than StackExchange?
As Derek Elkins says, MathJax is rendered client-side both here and on StackExchanges. That means that Internet connection speed as well as server latency only influence how long it takes until the content is loaded and your browser starts rendering. The rendering time itself is only influence...
(more)
7 days ago
Edit Post #285528 Initial revision 7 days ago
Answer A: Is there a Codidact community fitting for this question (or one emerging)?
If I understand Scientific speculation correctly, it's for extrapolating current science for some possible future developments, but in this potential question you want to get a) evidence (difficult for scientific speculation) and b) want to learn something about the current time (not some possible fu...
(more)
7 days ago
Edit Post #275838 Post edited:
better title (was too generic)
8 days ago
Edit Post #276144 Post edited:
capitalization of title
8 days ago
Edit Post #279488 Post edited:
added qpixel tag
8 days ago
Comment Post #285501 Just to fully understand the answer, if I made a pull request about it on Github, this answer means it doesn't care either way, right? Importance isn't that important for me in this case, because the time needed to change that is also very small. There might be more important things but they also ...
(more)
9 days ago
Edit Post #285498 Post edited:
10 days ago
Edit Post #285498 Post edited:
10 days ago
Edit Post #285498 Initial revision 10 days ago
Question Should the active category name not be shown twice on the categories header?
One thing one realizes quickly when for example visiting meta.codidact.com is that it's a site about Q&A. The reason is that for example it is written twice: Screenshot of the current design showing the category name twice But is this duplication really necessary? What is the purpose of it? Usu...
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #279384 I was searching for public information about the Codidact Foundation (on codidact.org) and found only a link to this announcement. It says you are in the process to converting into a charitable organization and are working on bylaws but this post is more than a year old. I know that in the mean time ...
(more)
11 days ago
Comment Post #285473 Yes, this is a try to cleanup somehow. I personally would maybe keep a very, very small amount of imported content (voted up a lot or having additional answers), but remove all automatically created users.
(more)
11 days ago
Comment Post #285473 Currently the number of links to SE users is limited by hiding them behind one level of indirection, i.e. you link to the user profile and the user profile links to the SE account. One could keep it that way but still demote the users to something less userlike. Even a single page with a list and nam...
(more)
11 days ago
Edit Post #285473 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #285473 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #285473 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #285473 Initial revision 12 days ago
Question How many automatically created users that were never active are there still and what to do about them?
For some communities content from other places has been imported in the past and user profiles have been created, partly to allow users to quickly claim this identity if desired. However, these users differ from normal users in that they never were active. One could call them fake or dummy users. The...
(more)
12 days ago
Comment Post #285414 @#53922 I understand you now. That is a problem that can surely be solved one way or another, especially since nothing is really done yet and I'm basically waiting for Art to give feedback on another issue first. QPixel as a software itself can produce network profiles. There seem to be some special ...
(more)
13 days ago
Comment Post #285414 @#53922 "But do we want to have network-wide profile in each community?" That is a misunderstanding. That is not what is wanted here. There should be only one network-wide profile and it should be separate from/on top of all community profiles. QPixel should be able to do it (at least I hope so and I...
(more)
14 days ago
Comment Post #285414 @#53922 I thought that codidact as a whole is powered by a single QPixel instance and there is only a single database containing all the information currently. That's why making a network profile should be doable by adding some code to QPixel and then asking the Codidact admins to accept it and updat...
(more)
15 days ago
Comment Post #285293 @#55022 I don't know. Sometimes one just sees low quality content for 5 or 10 times in a row. That can happen. On the other side, upvoting every now and then would be an easy way around your limitations, but not much would be gained. What you probably want is some kind of anomaly detection, i.e. some...
(more)
15 days ago
Comment Post #285416 The dashboard might be a good landing page, although I don't understand why it exists for every sub-site (only the header changes between for example https://meta.codidact.com/dashboard and https://writing.codidact.com/dashboard). One could have a look at the differences of the dashboard and codidact...
(more)
17 days ago
Comment Post #285416 What you describe sounds to me like a customizable landing page. Basically codidact.com for logged in users. I fully agree with it (including the "there is too much space" and think this is a worthwhile project). The network profile should be reachable from there and should complement it. The customi...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #285414 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #285414 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #285414 Initial revision 17 days ago
Question What information should be displayed on a network profile?
I want to design a network profile (and then possibly implement it). There was already discussion about that in Community dropdown and profile information, Understanding how posts were possibly received by the community --- network wide and there is an issue with when single site accounts should be ...
(more)
17 days ago
Comment Post #285401 Yes, but search is already some kind of filtering operation, so extra filtering on search is more like just a refined search. On the other hand the standard questions list can also be seen as searching for *. As you say above, it's all just a query of some sort.
(more)
19 days ago
Edit Post #285401 Initial revision 20 days ago
Answer A: Proposal: filters for post lists
Filters also in search Filters and search are strongly related. As you say, the filter feature is something like a subset of search, only without the ability to input free text and possibly some other stuff. However, maybe search in return could profit from some of the UI elements for filters, mak...
(more)
20 days ago
Comment Post #277280 @#8058 Just checking, that migration of questions between communities isn't yet implemented?
(more)
26 days ago
Edit Post #285338 Initial revision 27 days ago
Answer A: Do SE users have the right to have their SE posts removed from Codidact? If so, how?
> My understanding is that the Creative Commons license gives Codidact the right to repost content from Stack Exchange as long as it credits the originals Yes, the Creative Commons licensed knowledge is free and can be displayed anywhere as long as you abide by the conditions of the license. Any o...
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #276830 Post edited:
better title
28 days ago
Edit Post #285335 Initial revision 28 days ago
Answer A: Is gaining rep based on SE content ok?
> Is it a problem if specific users harvest highly-voted questions on SE, then self answer, to farm a huge amount of rep? And if so, what can we do to prevent it? What you mean is that people basically could loosely copy content from elsewhere giving attribution if necessary. That new content w...
(more)
28 days ago
Comment Post #282240 The biggest concern is probably mixing games development with games usage. It looks like to different pairs of shoes at first glance. There is a difference between a game developer and a game player, although one could maybe start with two different categories "games", "development" and split later ...
(more)
28 days ago
Comment Post #282240 Recommendations are always a controversial topic. It could be that later-on a community decides to allow or disallow them. It's not like the scope is fixed forever. The problem with recommendations is that often they aren't very useful to others, incomplete or pure popularity contests. However with s...
(more)
28 days ago
Edit Post #285334 Initial revision 28 days ago
Answer A: Science-Fiction & Fantasy site
Following the proposal of manassehkatz one could make it about fiction: fiction.codidact.com "Questions and answers about the the plot/analysis/reception of works of fiction." or something like this. The creation of fiction should be off-topic because it's also ontopic on writing, I guess.
(more)
28 days ago
Comment Post #285293 @#36356 That's already quite a good definition. But of course it can also happen to while browsing through posts person A sees 10 posts of person B and votes on their quality. The difference is here only the looking at profiles step. What is maybe problematic about Codidact is that there is no vote l...
(more)
29 days ago
Edit Post #285297 Initial revision 30 days ago
Answer A: Unique favicons for each site
What about as a compromise using the book as favicon but colored in the color of the corresponding sub domain?
(more)
30 days ago
Comment Post #285293 I'm not sure that I understand what is meant here. Could maybe an example be given?
(more)
30 days ago
Comment Post #285264 @#53919 One open question is certainly the name of the merged site. Is it obvious how the merged site would be called? The second thing is the objection by r~~. He is only interested in Linux questions. Is there maybe a possibility to achieve that within a merged site? Or to what extent is it possibl...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285286 Ah, the message was basically missing context then. It should have told you in which field you were adding which link that was removed and it should have told you how to reply in a meaningful way. Not sure that replying to moderator notifications is a feature of the software yet.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285286 Has it happened before? Would hackers be likely to send such notifications? As a phishing attempt it looks rather disingenuous.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #277432 Post edited:
shortened text without losing content
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #282242 Post edited:
add to list
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #282242 From all the proposals that are currently not live, I could imagine this one has the highest chances to actually take off. Gaming is a hobby that many people share and I believe many active users from other CD sites would be able to contribute somehow. So maybe if in early 2022, we want to risk that,...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #282242 Suggested edit:
add to list
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Edit Post #277349 Post edited:
capitalization of title
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #278004 Post edited:
seems to have been fixed quite some time ago (also see comments)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #277103 Post edited:
The answer to the question was a bit hidden in the text. Emphasized it more.
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #75021 Post edited:
Emphasized the important part
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279678 Post edited:
Add clarification what post score > 0.5 means (it means more upvotes than downvotes).
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #276113 Post edited:
there is a link to the PP now in the footer, updated
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285264 @#53919 These numbers (1 against 3) on Linux Systems are really low. I hope the number of active Linux Systems users is a bit higher. Also there is no real proposal. Nobody knows how the merged site could look like. If somebody would make such a proposal it might be that the 1-2 users on Linux System...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #277110 Post edited:
added language in title, people may not remember what the core project was
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #276113 Suggested edit:
there is a link to the PP now in the footer, updated
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #275838 Suggested edit:
better title (was too generic)
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #75021 Suggested edit:
Emphasized the important part
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Comment Post #276569 See also [The Codidact Foundation: now with added bank accounts! ](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284688)
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #276738 Suggested edit:
capitalization of title
(more)
declined about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #276830 Suggested edit:
better title
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Comment Post #282538 I would have a couple of questions about architecture, but I'm not sure they are all art related.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #277103 Suggested edit:
The answer to the question was a bit hidden in the text. Emphasized it more.
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Comment Post #276754 The question is a bit why people want to follow some piece of content? To be notified of new answers maybe? I think something like bookmarking would be more interesting.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #277110 Suggested edit:
added language in title, people may not remember what the core project was
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Comment Post #277244 I like the idea a lot, especial with screens becoming wider and wider over the years, there is lots of unused space. It might be something dependent on the width of the available viewport(?).
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #277349 Suggested edit:
capitalization of title
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #277432 Suggested edit:
shortened text without losing content
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #276144 Suggested edit:
capitalization of title
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285264 Definitely. With "concerns in survey questions should be addressed" I also meant to include your things. This answer is more thought of as where we are in the process of a merge and how we should proceed when the current issues are resolved. There shouldn't be any voting now.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285264 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285264 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285264 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285264 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Is it possible to merge Power Users and Linux Systems? Would Codidact benefit from it?
The surveys Q&As have been live for a week and while the number of answers and votes is relatively low to say much with statistical certainty it seems as if Powerusers wouldn't have much of a problem with it but Linux System users might. Especially they might fear to lose a sense of community if merg...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285249 Why should Q&A + Meta = Comments?? Must be buggy.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285246 Post edited:
small changes in capitalization and formatting
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #285246 Suggested edit:
small changes in capitalization and formatting
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285236 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285236 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285236 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285236 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285236 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Should we remove closed questions from the question list?
No, we should not completely remove them from the question list, making them effectively private or moving them to a dedicated category. While the purpose of these actions seems to be to give these questions some respite as well as increase the quality of the question list at the same time, these...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285219 From a programming point of view one could call the toggle a filter and do probably a lot of good things with it, for example excluding closed questions, badly scoring questions or tags or questions with answers...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 @#8046 Okay, so until this feature here is implemented, if I encounter a question that may be not useful (and is closed and not a duplicate), should I (a) flag for moderator attention and request deletion or (b) do nothing because moderators would have deleted it already if they agree or (c) start di...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 @#8046 "We can have general rules for post deletion across the whole network without disrupting specific community rules." Maybe this was already discussed somewhere else or could be its own Q&A but I'm not sure I understand how the interplay of this Meta and the metas of all communities is supposed ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285189 I can also confirm that it works.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 @#8176 If you have 99 upvotes and one downvote, then the Wilson score is 101/104 which is almost 99/100. So yes, also with the Wilson score a downvote on lots of upvotes weighs approximately the same as any other vote. Only for small number of total votes (say less than 20 votes in total) the weight ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 Nice idea. But at least we should monitor the search hits / visits, which requires support for that by the software.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 I agree. I didn't mean it as a limiting step but rather as a gentle push to delete even more. There are questions that would fullfill your criteria (for example those linked in the question) that are still shown. Moderators can already remove (or hide) questions, I hope?
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 A more complex solution could be: monitor duplicates for a while and remove those that do not get enough search hits, for example keep only max 2 or 3 of the duplicates with the highest current rate of search hits. And additionally do not display score for duplicate, nor allow voting on duplicates. T...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 Maybe score < 0.3 would be similar (not exactly the same because Wilson score is not proportional to upvotes - downvotes.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 ...manual removal of the content that matches these criteria by moderators maybe?
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285202 Duplicates may have a negative score and no answer but may be kept as search magnets. Maybe add "duplicates are not automatically deleted currently".
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285197 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285197 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Question Regular deletion (roomba) of content unlikely to ever be useful
I noticed that questions exist on this network and are accessible that are unlikely to ever be very helpful, for example because they were marked as completely off-topic. Examples - Are international phone numbers available? in Power User - For cleaning food and objects, power scrubber vs. Elect...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285180 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: If a user is not able to directly edit the post, allow the edit to be suggested
This feature request was marked as declined, but in a comment, a preferred alternative was given, which was: > If you want to add mod-only (red) tags, better flag the post.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #278004 Suggested edit:
seems to have been fixed quite some time ago (also see comments)
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #278020 Suggested edit:
It's not broken anymorr, /questions doesn't exist anymore.
(more)
declined about 1 month ago
Comment Post #278171 Is the issue still happening? If not, maybe it was fixed in the mean time and stats-completed could be added.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279076 I can only say that the chosen layout here is unexpected. My approach to writing questions is a bit iterative, i.e. I keep coming back to title and body and iteratively improve them until I'm satisfied. I need a temporary title at the beginning because that is in my mind when clicking the Ask questio...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285146 Yes, I see. :) Very nice to be able to read about the history. One could convert the history here into a community wiki article post on Q&A that will be constantly added to. For a Wikipedia article it's a bit too detailed, relative to the importance of the subject, I guess. Wikipedia editors would pr...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279076 Title after body is also the one thing that irritated me most when starting here. One can get used to it, but most people probably expect title above body because that most closely resembles the final order. Often enough I first write a preliminary title, then the body and finally return to the title...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #278316 "I would prefer to post questions in Codidact than on Stack Exchange" Since you can do both (as stated by many answers here) why not doing Codidact first and Stack Exchange later and only if you are not satisfied with the answers here. That way you can support this platform with only losing a bit of ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #281235 Post edited:
added year to title (this game that is not happening might again not happening in other years) and a few improvments.
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285134 @#8046 Thanks for the suggestion. Will look at the GH issues.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285146 Wikipedia pages often have a history section. Inspired by this I searched for a publicly written history of Codidact (at least when it was founded). I found nothing on the codidact.org site. Maybe under "What is Codidact" there could be a more link with a history of Codidact?
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #279488 Suggested edit:
added qpixel tag
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279678 Just suggested an edit and saw that it slightly changes the meaning of the last paragraph. I would like to change the suggestion but cannot. Basically the idea was to write explicitly that score > 0.5 means more upvotes than downvotes and score 0.5 means equal number of upvotes and downvotes and so o...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #279678 Suggested edit:
Add clarification what post score > 0.5 means (it means more upvotes than downvotes).
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285134 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285126 @#53078 Kind of agree but I would do both. Showing only positive content to visitors is okay, after all they are likely more interested in reading something useful. However, if people register you want to show them all the content, so they will discover the negatively scoring content soon anyway. ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #280021 Somewhat related [multiple sign out buttons](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280247)
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285141 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Donation account cannot currently make live charges, transaction has not been processed
According to this comment there is an issue with invalid birth dates stored with the Stripe service that cannot be resolved easily. It's known and there is ongoing communication to try to fix that but currently donation through this channel is not possible. Sponsoring Codidact on Github might be a vi...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285134 [Wikipedia notability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability) is concerned with significance, external coverage and neutral view points. However QPixel could probably right away listed in some software lists on Wikipedia, I think.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285128 Okay, probably we should separate filters and sort orders, if only to be able to combine them independently. Maybe there is already a feature request about it somewhere and the programmers simply didn't come around to it yet... Will search for it.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285134 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285134 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285134 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: How to grow all of our communities?
Here maybe some things that others may have forgotten or may not have emphasized as such: Continue supporting the software development I'm really surprised how well developed and rich of features QPixel is, even more after hearing that it is an effort of only two main developers and a few other...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285128 Small nitpicking. I think the calculated score is always positive (between 0 and 1). You probably want to have a certain threshold there instead (let's say score > 0.4 for example). Positive might then not be the right word either, maybe more like "Useful", which would be the right word. Also it woul...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285122 @#8046 Or it could become even a full-flegded feature over time. Not only mergers but also splits are imaginable. It sounds not trivial though. What about user privileges, or links in the edit history or for search engines a rewrite of old URLs (people might have linked from outside to questions or a...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285122 How much content overlap is there? (Quite a lot, power user could actually have OS specific categories) Do the respective communities agree with that? (One would need to ask on their Metas) Does the software support that operation? (Merging of two sites, adding tags, selecting a new design set, how...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #280213 "Wouldn't it be helpful..." Not sure. What additional useful information would one gain? Does it matter through which means an edit was made? Sure, a pair revision would add some credibility, but in the end it's just an edit. Or is the idea to emphasize the role of the reviewers more?
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #281438 No problem. If I have time I can look at some of the proposal and search if they have been suggested otherwise and then create Q&A about them and link back to this Q&A. It doesn't really matter who is doing it and some of the proposals might be quite good.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #281235 Suggested edit:
added year to title (this game that is not happening might again not happening in other years) and a few improvments.
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Comment Post #281438 This question combines multiple feature requests in one. They should be split into separate feature request Q&A, so that they can be discussed on voted on independently.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #282004 Post edited:
slightly streamlined by removing not needed introductions
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #285103 @#8058 I see. Your comment would basically be an answer to this question that could be edited later when it's possible to donate again.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285103 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Question Donation account cannot currently make live charges, transaction has not been processed
Wanted to make a donation via the donate button but upon click on "Pay" an error message occured: "Your account cannot make live charges. If you are the site owner, please activate your account at https://dashboard.stripe.com/account/onboarding to remove this limitation. If you are a customer trying ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #284764 Post edited:
small typo
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #278749 Post edited:
the lines in the link to Github have changed and likely will change in the future, added a hint instead
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #282004 Suggested edit:
slightly streamlined by removing not needed introductions
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Edit Post #281894 Post edited:
slightly improved text
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #281894 Suggested edit:
slightly improved text
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Edit Post #281646 Post edited:
slightly improved language
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #282329 Post edited:
improved language a bit
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #281825 Post edited:
slightly improved language
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #281898 The history of license changes was basically that the license of new content changed with changes in the TOS (from 2.5 to 3 in 2010 I think, and from 3.0 to 4.0 in 2018, May). Independently of this, they announced license changes in 2019 and for a too large scope. That was received badly and also fac...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #281873 It's certainly useful, but then a declined flag isn't a big thing either and this feature would be hopefully needed in only a small number of cases. It can probably be low priority.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #281825 Suggested edit:
slightly improved language
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #281646 Suggested edit:
slightly improved language
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #278749 Suggested edit:
the lines in the link to Github have changed and likely will change in the future, added a hint instead
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Suggested Edit Post #282329 Suggested edit:
improved language a bit
(more)
helpful about 1 month ago
Comment Post #284509 I think it's good that you reported the problem (with Chrome or the code or both) because whoever it is to blame it either needs a fix, a workaround (could even be an additional hint) or a rejection. The important question is what we could do about it. Maybe the programmers have an idea there. I jus...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #283444 Agree with the social network features like like/dislike but what about agreement or importance? There is additional information that can be conveyed, like say a comment points out an important shortcoming of a post and if many people agree with the comment, basically signalling to others that this c...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #284458 It might make a difference in that readers might put more or less trust in a reaction if they know it's the same user or the other way around, a user might react more objectively if the reaction can be traced back. But I don't think this is likely to happen. I would assume that the post creator would...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #283580 FAQ within a Q&A system does not carry much meaning beyond (we expect many duplicates). Maybe choose a different name, something like "canonical" maybe, to indicate that this Q&A is very important and likely to represent consensus views that are likely to remain that way for a longer time.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #284331 @#36396 Providing additional service takes more time and there is usually no way around that. This post doesn't really say why and when alt texts would not be helpful. To me it looks like laziness at the costs of accessibility.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285074 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285074 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: How to deal with reactor if the reactor is no more or he thinks the post is still bad?
All the feedback that we give like votes, reactions or comments ages, i.e. its relevance/significance declines over time because circumstances change (what worked in the past might now not work anymore, content might have changed). This is a general problem with no trivial solution as far as I'm awar...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285073 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #285073 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Where should we discuss about unhelpful tags?
Tag usage and existence seems to be a meta issue, so discussing them on Meta seems like the natural place. If you can combine some of these discussions in a single question and find common patterns, that's good, but otherwise ask as many questions as needed. As a side note: after the issue has bee...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #284458 It's not only because it may bestow benefits, but also because one is not impartial with regard to self-created content. An independent "works for me" from a different person who does not have "any stakes in the content" is more reliable. That's why it's better not to be able to react to own content ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #284509 Should Chrome display that border but doesn't? If yes, it's a bug in Chrome, but still a problem for QPixel. In that case, maybe a different additional thing can be done for Chrome users. Chrome is widely used and probably should be supported, even with bugs in it.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #284843 The listed topics do not look very piquant to me. What would make them so in the context of this post?
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #284764 Replace T in the center with a space.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Suggested Edit Post #284764 Suggested edit:
small typo
(more)
helpful about 2 months ago
Comment Post #284846 "...growth for growth's sake isn't our main goal...." Sure, but growth in activity has a lot of advantages with many things scaling more favorably with a bigger community, For example getting good answers to questions more quickly or getting more interesting questions to answer. That's why I would sa...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #285046 "Redditors affray clicking links to Codidact, because they affray Codidact is malware or spyware." You basically say that the name "Codidact" is not known as a brand name and people are reluctant to try it out? Maybe it's also the name itself, that might come across as a bit suspicious?
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279832 @dmckee "The lines between experimental design and various engineering disciplines... are broad and blurry. Don't know how to address it here." It's mostly a matter of what the question is primarily, I'd say. You may be a physicist and working on a physical experiment but the actual problem you have ...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #276881 I like the topic, but I think it is a bit too narrow. Basically everything I can do on my own to get stuff done, like fixing everyday life problems, meditation techniques, ... maybe something like "life hacks, self improvements, crafts and arts". Would that work? Or maybe too large then.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #280084 There is quite a lot of overlap between [Medical science](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276933) and Biology, especially on the molecular scale. Maybe both could be merged or otherwise delineated?
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279809 Couldn't these three mentioned things here not be simply three different categories (these tabs) within a single site (proposal. money.codidact.com). After all they are all about money, or not? :)
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279299 I have also experience with Politics.SE and I have to say that voting there often gave the impression that people do rather vote according to their own political convictions and therefore judge not very objectively. I think that the only way for a smooth experience (especially with a low number of pa...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #280459 I just thought about applied statistics, machine learning and data science. But now I see that there are these category tabs. Will ask on Mathematics meta first and then come back.
(more)
about 2 months ago