Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Trilarionâ€
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #285414 |
@#53922 I understand you now. That is a problem that can surely be solved one way or another, especially since nothing is really done yet and I'm basically waiting for Art to give feedback on another issue first. QPixel as a software itself can produce network profiles. There seem to be some special ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285414 |
@#53922 "But do we want to have network-wide profile in each community?" That is a misunderstanding. That is not what is wanted here. There should be only one network-wide profile and it should be separate from/on top of all community profiles. QPixel should be able to do it (at least I hope so and I... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285414 |
@#53922 I thought that codidact as a whole is powered by a single QPixel instance and there is only a single database containing all the information currently. That's why making a network profile should be doable by adding some code to QPixel and then asking the Codidact admins to accept it and updat... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285293 |
@#55022 I don't know. Sometimes one just sees low quality content for 5 or 10 times in a row. That can happen. On the other side, upvoting every now and then would be an easy way around your limitations, but not much would be gained. What you probably want is some kind of anomaly detection, i.e. some... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285416 |
The dashboard might be a good landing page, although I don't understand why it exists for every sub-site (only the header changes between for example https://meta.codidact.com/dashboard and https://writing.codidact.com/dashboard). One could have a look at the differences of the dashboard and codidact... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285416 |
What you describe sounds to me like a customizable landing page. Basically codidact.com for logged in users. I fully agree with it (including the "there is too much space" and think this is a worthwhile project). The network profile should be reachable from there and should complement it. The customi... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285414 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285414 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285414 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
Question | — |
What information should be displayed on a network profile? I want to design a network profile (and then possibly implement it). There was already discussion about that in Community dropdown and profile information, Understanding how posts were possibly received by the community --- network wide and there is an issue with when single site accounts should be ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285401 |
Yes, but search is already some kind of filtering operation, so extra filtering on search is more like just a refined search. On the other hand the standard questions list can also be seen as searching for *. As you say above, it's all just a query of some sort. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285401 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Proposal: filters for post lists Filters also in search Filters and search are strongly related. As you say, the filter feature is something like a subset of search, only without the ability to input free text and possibly some other stuff. However, maybe search in return could profit from some of the UI elements for filters, mak... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277280 |
@#8058 Just checking, that migration of questions between communities isn't yet implemented? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285338 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Do SE users have the right to have their SE posts removed from Codidact? If so, how? > My understanding is that the Creative Commons license gives Codidact the right to repost content from Stack Exchange as long as it credits the originals Yes, the Creative Commons licensed knowledge is free and can be displayed anywhere as long as you abide by the conditions of the license. Any o... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #276830 |
Post edited: better title |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285335 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Is gaining rep based on SE content ok? > Is it a problem if specific users harvest highly-voted questions on SE, then self answer, to farm a huge amount of rep? And if so, what can we do to prevent it? What you mean is that people basically could loosely copy content from elsewhere giving attribution if necessary. That new content w... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #282240 |
The biggest concern is probably mixing games development with games usage. It looks like to different pairs of shoes at first glance. There is a difference between a game developer and a game player, although one could maybe start with two different categories "games", "development" and split later ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #282240 |
Recommendations are always a controversial topic. It could be that later-on a community decides to allow or disallow them. It's not like the scope is fixed forever. The problem with recommendations is that often they aren't very useful to others, incomplete or pure popularity contests. However with s... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285334 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Science-Fiction & Fantasy site Following the proposal of manassehkatz one could make it about fiction: fiction.codidact.com "Questions and answers about the the plot/analysis/reception of works of fiction." or something like this. The creation of fiction should be off-topic because it's also ontopic on writing, I guess. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285293 |
@#36356 That's already quite a good definition. But of course it can also happen to while browsing through posts person A sees 10 posts of person B and votes on their quality. The difference is here only the looking at profiles step. What is maybe problematic about Codidact is that there is no vote l... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285297 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Unique favicons for each site What about as a compromise using the book as favicon but colored in the color of the corresponding sub domain? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285293 |
I'm not sure that I understand what is meant here. Could maybe an example be given? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285264 |
@#53919 One open question is certainly the name of the merged site. Is it obvious how the merged site would be called? The second thing is the objection by r~~. He is only interested in Linux questions. Is there maybe a possibility to achieve that within a merged site? Or to what extent is it possibl... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285286 |
Ah, the message was basically missing context then. It should have told you in which field you were adding which link that was removed and it should have told you how to reply in a meaningful way. Not sure that replying to moderator notifications is a feature of the software yet. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285286 |
Has it happened before? Would hackers be likely to send such notifications? As a phishing attempt it looks rather disingenuous. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277432 |
Post edited: shortened text without losing content |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #282242 |
Post edited: add to list |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #282242 |
From all the proposals that are currently not live, I could imagine this one has the highest chances to actually take off. Gaming is a hobby that many people share and I believe many active users from other CD sites would be able to contribute somehow. So maybe if in early 2022, we want to risk that,... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #282242 |
Suggested edit: add to list (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277349 |
Post edited: capitalization of title |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #278004 |
Post edited: seems to have been fixed quite some time ago (also see comments) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277103 |
Post edited: The answer to the question was a bit hidden in the text. Emphasized it more. |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #75021 |
Post edited: Emphasized the important part |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #279678 |
Post edited: Add clarification what post score > 0.5 means (it means more upvotes than downvotes). |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #276113 |
Post edited: there is a link to the PP now in the footer, updated |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285264 |
@#53919 These numbers (1 against 3) on Linux Systems are really low. I hope the number of active Linux Systems users is a bit higher. Also there is no real proposal. Nobody knows how the merged site could look like. If somebody would make such a proposal it might be that the 1-2 users on Linux System... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277110 |
Post edited: added language in title, people may not remember what the core project was |
— | over 3 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #276113 |
Suggested edit: there is a link to the PP now in the footer, updated (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #275838 |
Suggested edit: better title (was too generic) (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #75021 |
Suggested edit: Emphasized the important part (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #276569 |
See also [The Codidact Foundation: now with added bank accounts! ](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284688) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #276738 |
Suggested edit: capitalization of title (more) |
declined | over 3 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #276830 |
Suggested edit: better title (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #282538 |
I would have a couple of questions about architecture, but I'm not sure they are all art related. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #277103 |
Suggested edit: The answer to the question was a bit hidden in the text. Emphasized it more. (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |