Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Trilarion‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Edit Post #285335 Initial revision over 2 years ago
Answer A: Is gaining rep based on SE content ok?
> Is it a problem if specific users harvest highly-voted questions on SE, then self answer, to farm a huge amount of rep? And if so, what can we do to prevent it? What you mean is that people basically could loosely copy content from elsewhere giving attribution if necessary. That new content w...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #282240 The biggest concern is probably mixing games development with games usage. It looks like to different pairs of shoes at first glance. There is a difference between a game developer and a game player, although one could maybe start with two different categories "games", "development" and split later ...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #282240 Recommendations are always a controversial topic. It could be that later-on a community decides to allow or disallow them. It's not like the scope is fixed forever. The problem with recommendations is that often they aren't very useful to others, incomplete or pure popularity contests. However with s...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285334 Initial revision over 2 years ago
Answer A: Science-Fiction & Fantasy site
Following the proposal of manassehkatz one could make it about fiction: fiction.codidact.com "Questions and answers about the the plot/analysis/reception of works of fiction." or something like this. The creation of fiction should be off-topic because it's also ontopic on writing, I guess.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285293 @#36356 That's already quite a good definition. But of course it can also happen to while browsing through posts person A sees 10 posts of person B and votes on their quality. The difference is here only the looking at profiles step. What is maybe problematic about Codidact is that there is no vote l...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285297 Initial revision over 2 years ago
Answer A: Unique favicons for each site
What about as a compromise using the book as favicon but colored in the color of the corresponding sub domain?
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285293 I'm not sure that I understand what is meant here. Could maybe an example be given?
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285264 @#53919 One open question is certainly the name of the merged site. Is it obvious how the merged site would be called? The second thing is the objection by r~~. He is only interested in Linux questions. Is there maybe a possibility to achieve that within a merged site? Or to what extent is it possibl...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285286 Ah, the message was basically missing context then. It should have told you in which field you were adding which link that was removed and it should have told you how to reply in a meaningful way. Not sure that replying to moderator notifications is a feature of the software yet.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285286 Has it happened before? Would hackers be likely to send such notifications? As a phishing attempt it looks rather disingenuous.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #277432 Post edited:
shortened text without losing content
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #282242 Post edited:
add to list
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #282242 From all the proposals that are currently not live, I could imagine this one has the highest chances to actually take off. Gaming is a hobby that many people share and I believe many active users from other CD sites would be able to contribute somehow. So maybe if in early 2022, we want to risk that,...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #282242 Suggested edit:
add to list
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Edit Post #277349 Post edited:
capitalization of title
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #278004 Post edited:
seems to have been fixed quite some time ago (also see comments)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #277103 Post edited:
The answer to the question was a bit hidden in the text. Emphasized it more.
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #75021 Post edited:
Emphasized the important part
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #279678 Post edited:
Add clarification what post score > 0.5 means (it means more upvotes than downvotes).
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #276113 Post edited:
there is a link to the PP now in the footer, updated
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285264 @#53919 These numbers (1 against 3) on Linux Systems are really low. I hope the number of active Linux Systems users is a bit higher. Also there is no real proposal. Nobody knows how the merged site could look like. If somebody would make such a proposal it might be that the 1-2 users on Linux System...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #277110 Post edited:
added language in title, people may not remember what the core project was
over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #276113 Suggested edit:
there is a link to the PP now in the footer, updated
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #275838 Suggested edit:
better title (was too generic)
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #75021 Suggested edit:
Emphasized the important part
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Comment Post #276569 See also [The Codidact Foundation: now with added bank accounts! ](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284688)
(more)
over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #276738 Suggested edit:
capitalization of title
(more)
declined over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #276830 Suggested edit:
better title
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Comment Post #282538 I would have a couple of questions about architecture, but I'm not sure they are all art related.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #277103 Suggested edit:
The answer to the question was a bit hidden in the text. Emphasized it more.
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Comment Post #276754 The question is a bit why people want to follow some piece of content? To be notified of new answers maybe? I think something like bookmarking would be more interesting.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #277110 Suggested edit:
added language in title, people may not remember what the core project was
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Comment Post #277244 I like the idea a lot, especial with screens becoming wider and wider over the years, there is lots of unused space. It might be something dependent on the width of the available viewport(?).
(more)
over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #277349 Suggested edit:
capitalization of title
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #277432 Suggested edit:
shortened text without losing content
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #276144 Suggested edit:
capitalization of title
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285264 Definitely. With "concerns in survey questions should be addressed" I also meant to include your things. This answer is more thought of as where we are in the process of a merge and how we should proceed when the current issues are resolved. There shouldn't be any voting now.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285264 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285264 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285264 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285264 Initial revision over 2 years ago
Answer A: Is it possible to merge Power Users and Linux Systems? Would Codidact benefit from it?
The surveys Q&As have been live for a week and while the number of answers and votes is relatively low to say much with statistical certainty it seems as if Powerusers wouldn't have much of a problem with it but Linux System users might. Especially they might fear to lose a sense of community if merg...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285249 Why should Q&A + Meta = Comments?? Must be buggy.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285246 Post edited:
small changes in capitalization and formatting
over 2 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #285246 Suggested edit:
small changes in capitalization and formatting
(more)
helpful over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285236 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #285236 Post edited:
over 2 years ago