Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Trilarionâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #285134 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285126 |
@#53078 Kind of agree but I would do both. Showing only positive content to visitors is okay, after all they are likely more interested in reading something useful.
However, if people register you want to show them all the content, so they will discover the negatively scoring content soon anyway. ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280021 |
Somewhat related [multiple sign out buttons](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280247) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285141 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Donation account cannot currently make live charges, transaction has not been processed According to this comment there is an issue with invalid birth dates stored with the Stripe service that cannot be resolved easily. It's known and there is ongoing communication to try to fix that but currently donation through this channel is not possible. Sponsoring Codidact on Github might be a vi... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285134 |
[Wikipedia notability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability) is concerned with significance, external coverage and neutral view points. However QPixel could probably right away listed in some software lists on Wikipedia, I think. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285128 |
Okay, probably we should separate filters and sort orders, if only to be able to combine them independently. Maybe there is already a feature request about it somewhere and the programmers simply didn't come around to it yet... Will search for it. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285134 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285134 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285134 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How to grow all of our communities? Here maybe some things that others may have forgotten or may not have emphasized as such: Continue supporting the software development I'm really surprised how well developed and rich of features QPixel is, even more after hearing that it is an effort of only two main developers and a few other... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285128 |
Small nitpicking. I think the calculated score is always positive (between 0 and 1). You probably want to have a certain threshold there instead (let's say score > 0.4 for example). Positive might then not be the right word either, maybe more like "Useful", which would be the right word. Also it woul... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285122 |
@#8046 Or it could become even a full-flegded feature over time. Not only mergers but also splits are imaginable. It sounds not trivial though. What about user privileges, or links in the edit history or for search engines a rewrite of old URLs (people might have linked from outside to questions or a... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285122 |
How much content overlap is there? (Quite a lot, power user could actually have OS specific categories)
Do the respective communities agree with that? (One would need to ask on their Metas)
Does the software support that operation? (Merging of two sites, adding tags, selecting a new design set, how... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280213 |
"Wouldn't it be helpful..." Not sure. What additional useful information would one gain? Does it matter through which means an edit was made? Sure, a pair revision would add some credibility, but in the end it's just an edit. Or is the idea to emphasize the role of the reviewers more? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281438 |
No problem. If I have time I can look at some of the proposal and search if they have been suggested otherwise and then create Q&A about them and link back to this Q&A. It doesn't really matter who is doing it and some of the proposals might be quite good. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #281235 |
Suggested edit: added year to title (this game that is not happening might again not happening in other years) and a few improvments. (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281438 |
This question combines multiple feature requests in one. They should be split into separate feature request Q&A, so that they can be discussed on voted on independently. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282004 |
Post edited: slightly streamlined by removing not needed introductions |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285103 |
@#8058 I see. Your comment would basically be an answer to this question that could be edited later when it's possible to donate again. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285103 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Donation account cannot currently make live charges, transaction has not been processed Wanted to make a donation via the donate button but upon click on "Pay" an error message occured: "Your account cannot make live charges. If you are the site owner, please activate your account at https://dashboard.stripe.com/account/onboarding to remove this limitation. If you are a customer trying ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284764 |
Post edited: small typo |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278749 |
Post edited: the lines in the link to Github have changed and likely will change in the future, added a hint instead |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #282004 |
Suggested edit: slightly streamlined by removing not needed introductions (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281894 |
Post edited: slightly improved text |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #281894 |
Suggested edit: slightly improved text (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281646 |
Post edited: slightly improved language |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282329 |
Post edited: improved language a bit |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281825 |
Post edited: slightly improved language |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281898 |
The history of license changes was basically that the license of new content changed with changes in the TOS (from 2.5 to 3 in 2010 I think, and from 3.0 to 4.0 in 2018, May). Independently of this, they announced license changes in 2019 and for a too large scope. That was received badly and also fac... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281873 |
It's certainly useful, but then a declined flag isn't a big thing either and this feature would be hopefully needed in only a small number of cases. It can probably be low priority. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #281825 |
Suggested edit: slightly improved language (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #281646 |
Suggested edit: slightly improved language (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #278749 |
Suggested edit: the lines in the link to Github have changed and likely will change in the future, added a hint instead (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #282329 |
Suggested edit: improved language a bit (more) |
helpful | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284509 |
I think it's good that you reported the problem (with Chrome or the code or both) because whoever it is to blame it either needs a fix, a workaround (could even be an additional hint) or a rejection. The important question is what we could do about it. Maybe the programmers have an idea there. I jus... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283444 |
Agree with the social network features like like/dislike but what about agreement or importance? There is additional information that can be conveyed, like say a comment points out an important shortcoming of a post and if many people agree with the comment, basically signalling to others that this c... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284458 |
It might make a difference in that readers might put more or less trust in a reaction if they know it's the same user or the other way around, a user might react more objectively if the reaction can be traced back. But I don't think this is likely to happen. I would assume that the post creator would... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283580 |
FAQ within a Q&A system does not carry much meaning beyond (we expect many duplicates). Maybe choose a different name, something like "canonical" maybe, to indicate that this Q&A is very important and likely to represent consensus views that are likely to remain that way for a longer time. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284331 |
@#36396 Providing additional service takes more time and there is usually no way around that. This post doesn't really say why and when alt texts would not be helpful. To me it looks like laziness at the costs of accessibility. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285074 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285074 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How to deal with reactor if the reactor is no more or he thinks the post is still bad? All the feedback that we give like votes, reactions or comments ages, i.e. its relevance/significance declines over time because circumstances change (what worked in the past might now not work anymore, content might have changed). This is a general problem with no trivial solution as far as I'm awar... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285073 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285073 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Where should we discuss about unhelpful tags? Tag usage and existence seems to be a meta issue, so discussing them on Meta seems like the natural place. If you can combine some of these discussions in a single question and find common patterns, that's good, but otherwise ask as many questions as needed. As a side note: after the issue has bee... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284458 |
It's not only because it may bestow benefits, but also because one is not impartial with regard to self-created content. An independent "works for me" from a different person who does not have "any stakes in the content" is more reliable. That's why it's better not to be able to react to own content ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284509 |
Should Chrome display that border but doesn't? If yes, it's a bug in Chrome, but still a problem for QPixel. In that case, maybe a different additional thing can be done for Chrome users. Chrome is widely used and probably should be supported, even with bugs in it. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284843 |
The listed topics do not look very piquant to me. What would make them so in the context of this post? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |