Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Andreas demands justice for humanity
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #293809 |
Can confirm, though it only happens when the title is in the "yellow" range _and_ is pasted in. In other words, the outline should've become yellow, but goes red instead. (more) |
— | 26 days ago |
| Comment | Post #293782 |
I already upvoted your answer there. (more) |
— | 29 days ago |
| Edit | Post #293782 |
Post edited: Clarify, retag as bug, focus around the context of opening notification items in new tab. Resubmittance of an edit rejected for conflicting with the initial intent, after establishing that it was in line with the initial intent. |
— | 29 days ago |
| Comment | Post #293782 |
@#53401 Done. (And the minimum comment length limit gets in my way, hence this text in parentheses) (more) |
— | 29 days ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #293782 |
Suggested edit: Clarify, retag as bug, focus around the context of opening notification items in new tab. Resubmittance of an edit rejected for conflicting with the initial intent, after establishing that it was in line with the initial intent. (more) |
helpful | 29 days ago |
| Comment | Post #293782 |
@#53401
Are you willing to review a rejected edit of mine, and clarify if it aligns or not with the behaviour you've experienced, reported and requested a fix for?
Suggested edit: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/suggested-edit/1575 (more) |
— | 29 days ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #293782 |
Suggested edit: Clarify, include workaround, describe why it's more or less a bug report, and not a feature request. Retag as bug. (more) |
declined | 29 days ago |
| Comment | Post #293763 |
And that's still not an argument against the feature. It's an argument in favour of stronger curation and moderation. (more) |
— | 29 days ago |
| Comment | Post #293763 |
I like the feature request, so I upvoted it. It's a quality-of-life improvement that we should trust our contributors with to use wisely. It's useful, and it saves us time and mental gymnastics.
That said, your answer is definitely a worthwhile feedback to the feature request author (Frank). But i... (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
| Comment | Post #293704 |
@#53401 If you really believe generative AI can do that, I suggest you set up a script in your browser that applies generative AI to all missing alt text when you draft a post (Actually, don't do that; it would be a violation of Codidact's policy on AIGC). If not, I don't understand what AI has to do... (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
| Edit | Post #293692 | Initial revision | — | about 1 month ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should a question page have a line above the title? No, it's a waste of screen estate, and should therefore be removed. On another note, I would also caution against micromanaging minor design elements like these via Meta, because decisions made on Meta set a precedent, and in many ways tie the rope around future enhancements. The presence of this ... (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
| Edit | Post #293622 |
Post edited: Clarify, elaborate, add alt text |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #293622 |
Suggested edit: Clarify, elaborate, add alt text (more) |
helpful | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293597 |
If we're being futuristic and all, we might even get to include images in the dumps! :O (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290833 |
So there are outdated database entries. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290833 |
Time for a debugger and a breakpoint. Although this might be the ghosts of Codidact making a mess. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292229 |
Small look back at this, if opting for something very similar to my suggestions, I think it would be even clearer if instead of:
- _No synonyms:_ This tag has no synonyms
- _No children:_ Child tags: This tag has no children
- _Neither:_ This tag has no synonyms \ Child tags: This tag has no chi... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292634 |
Post edited: Generalized it for future applicability |
— | 4 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #292634 |
Suggested edit: Generalized it for future applicability (more) |
helpful | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293083 |
Thanks for undoing the refused status! I could've probably been more active here to help clear up the confusion earlier on. Sorry about that. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293083 |
> I understood the feature request to be for always adding it. If you meant we should have an option, I misunderstood.
Yeah, you misunderstood. The title of my feature request begins with "optional"; that's the key.
> Currently that option is to use the quoting syntax; are you asking for someth... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #293083 |
We’re technically misusing a feature. We aren’t quoting an image, or quoting anyone with it (unless it’s for instance a screenshot of text, in which case it should be copied as text into a blockquote instead).
Have the accessibility issues that may arise from this been considered?
Leaving the... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292214 |
It’s fully possible by simply applying a class to the `<img>` element. The class is styled in CSS. The rendering-side of the implementation is very easy. As for name, it could be called `image-frame`. The hard part is deciding how this is specified in the post body. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292856 |
You’ve had this discussion before:
- [Seeking feedback on experience with open source chat software](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/292005) (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292840 |
What is the goal here? What are you trying to achieve with this poll? (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292843 |
Doesn't this effectively mean that you're requesting "me" to be a stand-in value for every single parameter accepting a user ID, across the entire Codidact system? Well, at least for end-human-user-facing interfaces, or for every type of request that would reasonably be made for a logged in user (not... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292664 | Initial revision | — | 8 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Filters for a user's posts Because the Posts by user page is separate from the profile, there's currently no benefit for it to exist at the moment. Redirect to a search page prefilled with "user:xxx" instead. Had the full list been inline somewhere on the profile page, replacing it with the search page may be suboptimal ... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292656 |
I originally meant the list within the profile, as I didn't realize you were talking about the separate page. But with that brought up, I'm thinking it could perhaps just direct to the search page instead.
As long as it's a separate page, we don't get any of the benefits of still being on the prof... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292656 |
Originally downvoted this as well as began writing an answer stating I'd rather have the profile page clean without clutter, thinking that for any practical purpose where you'd want to filter a user's posts, you can use the search page. But then I thought, well... once I'm already on the user page, a... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292600 |
If we're trying to be beginner-friendly, we need a dropdown listing _only_ the community proposal tags, and then use that to create a filter for people. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292600 |
Right, the collapsed filter section which is very easy to miss. I never really figured out the filters on Codidact. I've been here for over a year, yet I still don't know how they work. I think that kinda speaks for itself. Filters as implemented on Codidact are more a complicated collections of butt... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292600 |
This would lead to way more categories than is manageable for users. It doesn't solve the problem of the user finding _where_ to post, as it'll be a confusing long list of categories. The solution is filtering. We need to shove a filtering selection into the the top of the Q/A category list. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292588 |
I specifically tried to _not_ make this a collection of _hard_ rules, like we're used to from SE. I find that having _hard_ rules and borders strips curators from making the right choices for the best of the knowledge repository, because there will always be edge cases. I do think that speaks in favo... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292588 |
I added a section expanding on when an existing answer in another community does not suffice to qualify the question as a cross-community duplicate. Does that cover your feedback? (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292588 |
Post edited: |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292588 |
Quite honestly, I didn't address that, because I think it's so obvious that those are not duplicates. But maybe I should add a section on how the same answer can have a different explanation based on which community it's part of. In that case, they would only be cross-community-duplicates if we had t... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292588 |
Post edited: |
— | 8 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292588 | Initial revision | — | 8 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What are duplicate questions? The most important aspect of a question, is always the answer. We may all have questions, but most questions here are not of the philosophical or rhetorical kind, hence without an answer, the question is not particularly useful. This is the practical answer to why we enforce duplicate closure on ... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292587 | Initial revision | — | 8 months ago |
| Question | — |
What are duplicate questions? What does Codidact consider a duplicate question? What practical consequences does that have? (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292455 |
Awesome, but none of that is an argument for the size limit. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292505 |
I don't see how a user can meaningfully have and use the curation ability without first acquiring the editing ability. I'd call it a configuration error if that is possible. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292505 |
Well, I guess if it's deleted between starting and submitting the edit. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292505 |
Under what circumstance would you even be able to suggest an edit on a deleted post? If you can view a deleted post, and is not the post author, you should have the editing ability, right? (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292502 |
Post edited: |
— | 8 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292502 | Initial revision | — | 8 months ago |
| Question | — |
500, internal server error, as I try to create a tag Unfortunately, the system won't let me create the tag I wish to make, over at Proposals. Codidact's soul must not be seeing the quality in this tag. Creating it did work when I navigated back to the page, and submitted again. At the same time, the synonyms and parent tag fields were not filled ou... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |