Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for FoggyFinder‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Edit Post #281643 Initial revision almost 3 years ago
Answer A: What does flag represent in profile's statistics?
The number `4` on your picture is a link to the `Flag History` page. You could click on it and see details for those flag that were raised by you. A flag has three states: `helpful`, `declined`, `pending`. It also contains short statistics (summary): ``` N flags K helpful, M declined, P pe...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Edit Post #281576 Initial revision about 3 years ago
Answer A: Giving question feedback in private - a moderating system to reduce conflicts
I strongly against of the idea of a private feedback for the reasons that were already named in other answers. No point to repeat them one more time. But I find an idea of the `Sandbox`, `Workshop`, whatever we call it amazing. Moreover in a different community I had proposed something similiar ...
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281469 There is no community for such Qs yet.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Edit Post #281446 Post edited:
add tag
about 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #281446 Suggested edit:
add tag
(more)
helpful about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281410 See https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/249
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281410 I think it calculates amount for all categories instead of just current category.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Edit Post #281275 Initial revision about 3 years ago
Question What will happen to comments when account is removed?
Today there was a request to remove user's account. This user has some Qs which were transported(converted) to System user. But comments are disappeared. Though there is a possibility that user removed all they comments manually before requesting deletion I don't think this is the case. Anyway...
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281235 I would prefer to not have such uh "fun". This day is annoying enough elsewhere.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281189 I don't think the Q is good in current form. Maybe you could clarify it at least in a bit?
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #280657 @Monica Cellio perfect, thank you
(more)
over 3 years ago
Edit Post #280657 Initial revision over 3 years ago
Question Search via clicking by a tag displays incorrect category of an item
If one searches / filters result by a tag (by clicking on one of them) the all items in a list have a badge that indicates current category instead of correct one. For example, when I click on `mvvm` tag in Software Development community with `Code Reviews` as a selected category I receive that: ...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Edit Post #280108 Post edited:
I see no reason to add new tag related to ux. Replaced to an existing one.
over 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #280108 Suggested edit:
I see no reason to add new tag related to ux. Replaced to an existing one.
(more)
helpful over 3 years ago
Edit Post #280095 Post edited:
add tags
over 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #280095 Suggested edit:
add tags
(more)
helpful over 3 years ago
Comment Post #276995 I'd be a casual user
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280018 Duplicate of https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279989 ?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Edit Post #280003 Initial revision over 3 years ago
Question Add vertical scrollbar to the community dropdown
It seems like community dropdown has no restriction on a height (or it is too big) so it doesn't look fine on displays with small sizes: dropdown It would be great if this list couldn't occupy more than some specific height with an additional scrollbar if needed. I know I can use general scr...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279764 @Monica Cellio‭ order is incorrect for As in a Q, not Qs on a main page
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279761 Yeah, that's annoying. You know someone mention you but you have no idea what was there. What worst: person who mentioned you also doesn't know whether you had read their post or not
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279677 I had the same error yesterday but after a while it started to work.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Edit Post #279653 Initial revision over 3 years ago
Answer A: Should users without the ability to review suggested edits see the 'suggested edit pending...' text if they cannot see the diff?
I think this is "by-design" and the behaviour is good as is. Currently user can see that there is a pending edit to a post so they cannot suggest another option. And, actually, it is good: Some other QA communities allow multiply edits, so history of a Q contains lots of similar changes from ...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279504 The main meta page still redirects me to an `abilities-downtime` page. That's definitely related to browser cache but is there is anything that you can do from your side? If I didn't visit some Q on a meta accidentally I would think Codidact is still down. And I think I'm not the only one who experie...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Edit Post #278995 Post edited over 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #278995 Suggested edit:

(more)
helpful over 3 years ago
Edit Post #278901 Post edited over 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #278901 Suggested edit:

(more)
helpful over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278757 nice, thank you
(more)
over 3 years ago
Edit Post #278743 Post edited over 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #278743 Suggested edit:
fix typo
(more)
helpful over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278722 I think the Q is not a "bug" but "feature-request"
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278665 @Rounin arguable. For example, I've found badges annoying.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278665 Why badges are necessary? For now I see no arguments in your Q.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278353 @ShowMeBillyJo We're talking here about corner, specific cases that related to moderator/staff members who can't be unbiased when critics are directed towards them. It's not a proposal to allow/ignore insulting, bullying and anything like that.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278353 @ShowMeBilly Nope, here is a direct quote *Letting a trolling post get downvoted to oblivion is way better than any mod action of removing or otherwise censoring it.*
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278364 `If I posted such an answer, I would be suspended for at least one year.` Bet?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278353 @ShowMeBillyJo `My comment has nothing to do with any theoretical answerers or upvoters.` Yep, cause you just took away the context. Though I see nothing wrong with this sentence by itself. Seems like a reasonable advice.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278353 @‭ShowMeBillyJo‭ Here's situation: You were insulted. This answer received 20 downvotes and 1 upvote. Why opinion of one unknown is so important? Why would you bother?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278353 `This is the language of bullies and abusers. This is blaming and shaming the victim, and it's not ok` @‭ShowMeBillyJo‭ How? Why opinion of a single abstract abuser is more valuable than opinion of ten others who support you?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278364 You know, this Q is also `classic internet trolling: not interested in contributing constructively but posting for the sole reason to cause conflict and drama`. I would suggest you removing this Q at all.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278313 @MathPhysics `Let us allow the author of the post clarify what they meant` Yep. I see no issues with clarification. But you haven't done that. You didn't change the text after you read comments on the answer. You didn't change the text after first removal. It was obvious that people is confused by th...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278313 The second ("too busy") implies that one doesn't have time at all and/or they even doesn't bother about project's future. "most (all) community staff <...> are too busy" - looks like ungrounded statement. This project exists cause staff spend hours and hours of unpaid time to create something that...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278313 @MathPhysics `I reread it many times, and I cannot find any disrespect in it. ` I'll try to explain. It's disrespectful cause there is no proof to your words. There is a big difference between **"busy"** (expected) and **"too busy"**. While you're busy you can still spend some time to improve the ...
(more)
over 3 years ago