Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for FoggyFinder
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #284490 |
@#53503 Nope. Unlike reactions you can't see who are voted for your posts. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284460 |
@#8046 Thank you. I've updated my answer accordingly (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283807 |
> I am not marking it as bug cause, it's status-bydesign.
I'd remove this sentence since status "by-design" means it won't be changed. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283235 |
@#53922i These changes were merged but aren't deployed yet. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283614 |
Using only `shift` on thread creation is enough to replicate the bug. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283610 |
Nice! What about votes that you gave? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283364 |
Same here. It happens so rarely so I didn't bother to create Q by myself. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283070 |
I agree with a comment above. This Q doesn't not fit SD community at all (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282962 |
_If that is happening, then I agree that is a bug and the question should be changed to say that. ... What the question states is that new content (i.e. a comment) is associated with the account._
100%, but I'd personally expect that one can't create a new content iff the account is removed. All b... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282962 |
_I didn't quote anything, I paraphrased._
Yes, you're right. I didn't know that the word "paraphrase" exists in English so forgive me that my comment is strictly speaking isn't totally correct. But I hope it is still clear what I meant. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282962 |
This is simply wrong. If you quote something give it with a full context.
> At present, this will mean that any content associated with your account on that site will be unlinked from your account and attributed to System, which will not be reversible later.
Contents are still belong to Istiak... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282953 |
May I ask what are the reasons behind your request to remove the account from these communities? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282921 |
@#53922 That's not what I wrote. Moreover I didn't mention meta at all. The very first sentence in the my comment above "cause you're joining automatically when you're following a link". By "a link" I meant a reference to some other community. Like, for example, in this Q [Please, don't kill Olin Elt... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282921 |
@#8082 cause you're joining automatically when you're following a link. I'd never join EE as well as some other codidact communities. I see no reason to have an account in a community iff I'm not going to participate there in any form so I'd prefer to remove my account from there. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282884 |
Agree, but I'd not consider this as a bug though. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282689 |
@#53922 it's useful when you get to a page from a reference from external source i.e chat etc (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282165 |
@#8046 I thought the fix is already in. Current version is poining to the [9fdbbe185c40c61eb6175111423e75348e67f45e](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/commit/9fdbbe185c40c61eb6175111423e75348e67f45e) commit while fix is in [56a080f6a2a5ee599de493ce300cf5afa35d781b](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282382 |
What if there are a lot of comments? I.e. preview doesn't show all of them? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282410 |
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276896 (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282366 |
__Well, i guess my Q can then be closed as a duplicate of the second question/answer hkotsubo mentioned in their comment.__
I disagree. I count that this Q is a totally valid one and isn't a duplicate. I think it would be better to await confirmation from mods that `z` currently is equal to the de... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282366 |
I agree that's exactly what @#53078 is described. Take a look at the score formula:
with `z = 2`: z ^ 2 = 4, (z ^ 2) / 2 = 2
we get
`(upVotes + 2) / (allVotes + 4)`
We can easily calculate scores of each answer:
4|0 = 0.75 = (4 + 2)/(4 + 4) = 6 / 8 = 3 / 4
7|1 = 0.75 = (7 + 2)/(8... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282349 |
Which one seems unobvious? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282342 |
Wonderful, though it's a bit odd to see author of a comment before text. It's may confuse users. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282026 |
@Olin Lathrop I think the Q "why?" was a rhetorical one (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281827 |
@elgonzo oh, I didn't think it might be confusing. Answer is edited. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281781 |
awesome, thank you (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281781 |
Downvote. I understand the reasons behind it and somewhere even agree. But to me such a big change should be discussed with community first. It doesn't look good to me. Especially because it was removed silently despite the fact that there was a clear statement: "the rep in the header is back, until ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281469 |
There is no community for such Qs yet. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281410 |
See https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/249 (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281410 |
I think it calculates amount for all categories instead of just current category. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281235 |
I would prefer to not have such uh "fun". This day is annoying enough elsewhere. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281189 |
I don't think the Q is good in current form. Maybe you could clarify it at least in a bit? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280657 |
@Monica Cellio perfect, thank you (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
I'd be a casual user (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280018 |
Duplicate of https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279989 ? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279764 |
@Monica Cellio order is incorrect for As in a Q, not Qs on a main page (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279761 |
Yeah, that's annoying. You know someone mention you but you have no idea what was there. What worst: person who mentioned you also doesn't know whether you had read their post or not (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279677 |
I had the same error yesterday but after a while it started to work. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279504 |
The main meta page still redirects me to an `abilities-downtime` page. That's definitely related to browser cache but is there is anything that you can do from your side? If I didn't visit some Q on a meta accidentally I would think Codidact is still down. And I think I'm not the only one who experie... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278757 |
nice, thank you (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278722 |
I think the Q is not a "bug" but "feature-request" (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278665 |
@Rounin arguable. For example, I've found badges annoying. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278665 |
Why badges are necessary? For now I see no arguments in your Q. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278353 |
@ShowMeBillyJo We're talking here about corner, specific cases that related to moderator/staff members who can't be unbiased when critics are directed towards them. It's not a proposal to allow/ignore insulting, bullying and anything like that. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278353 |
@ShowMeBilly Nope, here is a direct quote *Letting a trolling post get downvoted to oblivion is way better than any mod action of removing or otherwise censoring it.* (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
`If I posted such an answer, I would be suspended for at least one year.` Bet? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278353 |
@ShowMeBillyJo `My comment has nothing to do with any theoretical answerers or upvoters.` Yep, cause you just took away the context. Though I see nothing wrong with this sentence by itself. Seems like a reasonable advice. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278353 |
@ShowMeBillyJo Here's situation: You were insulted. This answer received 20 downvotes and 1 upvote. Why opinion of one unknown is so important? Why would you bother? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278353 |
`This is the language of bullies and abusers. This is blaming and shaming the victim, and it's not ok` @ShowMeBillyJo How? Why opinion of a single abstract abuser is more valuable than opinion of ten others who support you? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278364 |
You know, this Q is also `classic internet trolling: not interested in contributing constructively but posting for the sole reason to cause conflict and drama`. I would suggest you removing this Q at all. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |