Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for ArtOfCode
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #74831 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74893 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74861 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74847 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74862 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74823 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74960 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Bug reports: meta.codidact.com or codidact.org? I'm assuming you mean forum.codidact.org, rather than just codidact.org? The former is a discussion forum; the latter is just a static site with nowhere that you could report anything. If that's the case, bug reports come here, not to the forum. The forum is there for discussions about feature des... (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74914 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74951 |
That should be easy enough. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74951 |
And, while I'm here, what do you mean by an "associated notice"? I'd need to re-read the specs, but I'm pretty sure the Atom spec doesn't provide for that sort of thing, unless you're thinking of just prepending it to the post body/summary. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74951 |
What do you mean by "feature"? Simply bring that post back to the top? That's easy enough. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74947 |
I might be interested in participating in a cooking site... not sure whether we have _enough_ interest overall without getting an existing community interested, though. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74934 |
@MaskedMan The basic idea is that Q&A is the core concept; it works really well for a lot of things, which is why you see it mentioned in a number of places - it's "Q&A-based" software. That doesn't mean we stop there, though - we have other types of post planned. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74934 |
Codidact hasn't chosen to take the same path, @MaskedMan - we recognised the downsides of that approach too. We just haven't got to that point of development yet; other features have been more important. It hasn't been forgotten. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #41993 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74916 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Requests to improve the contests These are all things that would be great to do, and they're all planned in some form, down the line. It won't be immediate; there's a bunch of other more critical features that need to be done first before we can look at a specific Contest post type that does this sort of thing. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74915 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74909 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74912 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: I shouldn't be able to vote on deleted posts. Missed that rule when I was working out what could/couldn't be voted on five years ago, and apparently nobody's noticed it yet... Fixed now - thanks! (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74883 |
@JamesJenkins The link you're using there is to an HTML page, not to an image. _Usually_ links that end in .jpg, .png etc are images, but Wikimedia hijacks them and serves HTML; you want <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Pavement_ants_battling_on_sidewalk.jpg/1280px-Pavement_... (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74890 |
@mattdm Sure, we can set up a redirect, that's easy enough. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74896 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74899 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Unusual button layout on mobile browser Yes, [status-bydesign]. I didn't see any other way to make them all fit while keeping them reasonably large tap targets. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74894 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Software Engineering && Mathematics && Computer Science Let me refer you to an answer I wrote a few days ago. One person can't start a community - it simply doesn't work. To get a successful site moving, there needs to be a group of people willing to put in the time and effort to seed and curate high-quality content and to get the word out about the co... (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74883 |
@JamesJenkins As long as it's a direct link to an image, adding a ! should embed the image in the post - that should work anywhere Markdown is supported. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74884 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: New Answer does not get license. Fixed. Thanks for the report! (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74883 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74883 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74883 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Import image from web link? It already exists in simple Markdown: image alt text (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74864 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: I suggest a "MediaWiki Answers" sort of site Here's the thing. This Site Suggestions category is here for, per its description, folks who have some sort of core group of users interested in building a site. The idea for a site is one thing, but it's not enough to get a good, active site going - a site needs a community, and one person does not ... (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74834 |
Post edited: |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74832 |
I'm thinking of something like this: <https://meta.codidact.com/rails/active_storage/blobs/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBidz09IiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJibG9iX2lkIn19--b8a402898b15a6ea725fc7f3993c7256ef39d4aa/Screenshot%20from%202020-05-04%2019-59-09.png> (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74834 |
Heh. I just ran into this entirely independently too, so this is definitely an issue. I'll see what I can do about that. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74832 |
No reason why they couldn't, @mattdm - I'd just have them list across the top of a category page. Let me mock something up. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74832 |
There's also an argument to be made that it might be worth starting with fewer categories as I suggested here, and then if you _do_ end up with a wall of one type, that's a good argument that it should have its own category. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74832 |
@mattdm I see what you're getting at, but I'm not convinced categories are the right solution either. We'll also have support for a custom top-of-sidebar slot soon - in theory for "professional services" disclaimers such as Law and Mi Yodeya have, but it could also be abused for something saying "X, ... (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74833 |
Licensing will be available by launch in any case - the PR adding the feature in is in final review and will be merged and deployed shortly, after which we can add whatever license you think is right. (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74832 | Initial revision | — | about 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Photo-Video Codidact Site Bear in mind how categories work: Image alt text That works great for a few categories, but not so great when you've got lots. That's by-design: categories are intended to be very broad groups of questions, as Monica's already said in a comment. Think of how distinct Q&A and Meta are from one a... (more) |
— | about 5 years ago |