Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #288229 |
Sounds good. I filed https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/1062 for further improvements. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #74825 |
Thanks for letting us know. We did a server migration a while back but we didn't expect any disruptions in old image links. I'm going to ask someone with the right back-end access to look into this. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288122 |
@#60928 yes, too big -- we have a fix for that pending. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288189 |
That's what I was thinking too. We want to make it clear there *is* a filter, and if we don't have a name, we can say that. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288189 |
If you're using a named filter, either one of the built-in ones or one you created and saved yourself, the name shows up there. So this is an issue specifically for ad-hoc filters. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288181 |
The filter is initially collapsed on the search page, like it is on the category page. It also now appears right above the posts, so the advanced guidance about what you can type into the search textbox is right next to that textbox and the filter widget is next to the posts (like on category lists)... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288181 |
[PR](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/1055). Doing the simple thing now. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288181 |
Oh wait; the filter state doesn't reflect the search; it's the same empty starting point as on the category list. I think expanding it here is unintentional. Search can do things that filters can't, so on reflection, a filter can't be guaranteed to wholly reflect a search query. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288181 |
Even on a desktop, it feels like there's a lot more stuff on the page before I get to the first search result. Expanding the filter shows how the search was built, which I assume is why it's open by default, but I've been wondering if it should start collapsed too. I hadn't realized it was also ope... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288156 |
I hadn't thought about the effects of votes, thanks. I think your conclusion is sound; the votes don't matter as much as the discussion around the proposal, and we can always use Meta to focus on specific cases ("what makes this question so great?").
(more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288162 |
I've updated the proposal to talk about filtering incubator Q&A, taking disagreements to meta (not edit wars), closing/archiving proposals that aren't working out, and curating the incubator. Thanks for your feedback! (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288160 |
I've updated the proposal to cover closing/archiving proposals that don't work out and curating the incubator. Thanks for your feedback! (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288162 |
Edit wars for the proposal are an important consideration. Thanks for bringing it up.
I'm imagining the description (wiki) post as the "current working draft", with discussions being resolved on meta using the same tag. The wiki post type also has comments for smaller points, so you don't have t... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288162 |
Yes, we've been thinking about the incubator idea for a while, and needed to have filters in place before we proposed it here. I'm expecting two (general, sometimes overlapping) types of participants: people browsing a broad range of content, and people focused on one or a small number of proposals.... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288160 |
It's a lot easier to use multiple accounts to support a proposal when "support" means "add your name to a list of interested people", and a lot harder when it means "help build a good body of Q&A to show that this community would work". That said, yes, we've had some problems in the past, and it's s... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288160 |
We could archive them in a category that's not publicly visible. I like having some way to clean up incubator questions that aren't going to help a proposal advance. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288150 |
Thanks for the report! I've reproduced the bug. You didn't do anything wrong; we apparently missed a test case. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287696 |
I don't know if anyone's started thinking about reputation on the network profile. First step was to figure out if it would help. So the possibilities are wide open right now. (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287719 |
Probably the easiest thing to do is to shorten the alt text. Instead of "user avatar", does "user pic" work? (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287696 |
Is your request specifically about the _dashboard_, or are you looking for an easy way to see reputation across all communities and the dashboard is a list of all communities? If we had the [network profile](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/284) and attached it there, would that work? (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287691 |
The search result in your screenshot is [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277995/278491#answer-278491). The body shown in the search result is the first part of that answer, not the question, and the votes and author are for the answer too. I just reproduced this by searching for "site ... (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288122 |
Oh, good point about "always show my questions" -- didn't think of that. Thanks! (Now that we have this I want to be able to set a filter for viewers who aren't logged in, yes. We don't have that piece yet.) (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287669 |
I agree that's confusing. I'd like some guidance from someone with actual visual-design clues and I don't want to lose track of this, so I filed a CoDesign issue to track it: https://github.com/codidact/co-design/issues/89 . (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287656 |
The regex governing this is `const altRegex = /!\[(?:Image_alt_text)?\](?:\(.+(?!\\\))\)|\[.+(?!\\\])\])/gi;` (in `app/assets/javascripts/markdown.js`, but if I try to touch a regex I might cause the world to end or something. Happy to get a PR from someone with more clues than I have! (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287466 |
The tools problem with comment threads still exists after the bugfix; that turned out to be something different, not yet identified. (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288047 |
Oh, it was content not IP! Thanks for letting me know. (I haven't seen the Discord discussion yet.) (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288047 |
We do want to get this fixed, though. If it's coming from Cloudflare it could be IP-based. Don't reveal anything secret, but is there anything different about how you're accessing the site compared to in the past? (It's odd that you can reach here, though I _think_ I remember a Collab-specific Clo... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288047 |
I attempted to reproduce the problem but [was able to post](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/288049) (I'll delete that later when this is resolved). I was expecting a general Cloudflare problem. I'll make sure our sysadmin team knows about this. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288025 |
Thanks for raising it again. This is something we want to do better with. I'm not sure we have anybody already on the team who knows enough about the current norms/tools to make recommendations. Would you be interested in getting involved? (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287549 |
Not just meta; I just saw the problem on Cooking too. I'll assume it's a general problem with logo sizing. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #277365 |
I realized I've closed an older question as a duplicate of a newer one. I did it because there are more details in the newer one and neither has answers; hope no one minds. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287892 |
Or maybe "progress toward this ability" should be made visible somehow on the page about that ability, the one that currently tells you you don't have it. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287468 |
I don't know what the best way to handle this is and I don't have a lot of personal experience with reading code on my phone, but I also don't want to lose track of this issue so I filed https://github.com/codidact/co-design/issues/81 (note: Co-Design, not QPixel). (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #283323 |
Oh! I think I know why I thought it was fixed. I went to a _question_ URL where I had a notification about an answer, and clicking that notification dismissed the notification pane. Are you saying that the bug only occurs where there is an exact match of URL -- comment thread URL, question URL whe... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287866 |
Ah! I must have done something wrong before; I'm now seeing the behavior you're reporting.
(more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287866 |
Hi. I want to test [this bug](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/683#issuecomment-1429057310) without bothering anybody else. Could you reply to this comment? Thanks. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287768 |
I just visited your profile on desktop in Chrome and I'm seeing the full image. Can you say more about your environment? (I tried changing the size of my browser window, but that didn't affect this.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287763 |
I didn't realize it wasn't shown there. Thanks for pointing it out. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287246 |
Fixed, pending deploy. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287740 |
Reproduced: Chrome, Android, Meta and Judaism (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287740 |
You can cause a notification by marking a read notification as unread. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287303 |
I *should*, but apparently there's a bug at the moment. Working on it... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287303 |
Oops, thanks for catching that! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287303 |
[GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/co-design/issues/79) - co-design, so then would need to be propagated to qpixel. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287725 |
A way to do this might be to add a link to the pending edit suggestion (so you can see the diff), and if it's your edit the "approve" and "reject" buttons are replaced with "cancel". (I don't know if best practice is to also have an "ok" or "done" button so you can go back to where you were without ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287704 |
Hmm, something seems to be wrong -- removed the link while we investigate. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287458 |
More examples in this duplicate question: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/287670 (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287671 |
I meant a dot next to "edit", yes. I believe the code that's under review now adds it for the local category. We know there's more to do. I'd like to see the dot appear if *any* category has pending edits, and for the page that the "edit" button takes you to tell you about all categories. (Whethe... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287671 |
These are good suggestions, thanks. There's a pull request under review for the dot, which is the minimum we need (do *something* to let people know, in other words). Being able to subscribe is an interesting idea. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #287650 |
Huh -- I never noticed that @#53890! Or if I did, it was a long time ago and I then forgot about it. Thanks for pointing it out. Since the page already *exists*, I think we should find ways to make it more prominent. Making it another section on the profile, for yourself only (like preferences, e... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |