Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Monica Cellio‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #293214 Should we strip `user:me` and show those results after (an edited version of) this message? You'd still get something, and maybe that was enough or maybe you need to log in now and try again.
(more)
about 20 hours ago
Edit Post #293219 Initial revision about 20 hours ago
Answer A: 500 error page for user:me when not signed in
In addition to whatever we do about the error, should we add a button/link/whatever for "share these results" on the results page? That way, if you meant to share your posts (specifically) with somebody else, you'd be able to do that without editing in your own user number. Sharing the URL re-evalu...
(more)
about 20 hours ago
Comment Post #293215 Same -- it occasionally happens to me and I've been unable to characterize it. Maybe some weird race condition?
(more)
about 20 hours ago
Comment Post #293208 This is a question of what the policy is or should be, but this reads like advice for people using links in posts.
(more)
2 days ago
Edit Post #293146 Initial revision 8 days ago
Answer A: Deleted post hidden from everyone in the question list
Moderators can see a list of all deleted posts (most recent first). This is one of the links in the "Moderator Tools" section that mods (and admins) see in the sidebar: screenshot showing where the link is (There is a second link, "Admin Tools", in this list for those with admin access.) Cu...
(more)
8 days ago
Comment Post #293083 All good. None of this is urgent, and now we understand each other.
(more)
20 days ago
Edit Post #292208 Post edited:
see https://meta.codidact.com/comments/thread/10422
20 days ago
Edit Post #293083 Post edited:
20 days ago
Comment Post #293083 I understood the feature request to be for always adding it. If you meant we should have an *option*, I misunderstood. Currently that option is to use the quoting syntax; are you asking for something more first-tier, like a button in the editor or something like that? We've tried to avoid forking ...
(more)
21 days ago
Edit Post #293084 Initial revision 24 days ago
Answer A: Can we streamline the process for closed bad questions?
Some mitigation: Sometime in the last several months (sorry I missed updating here at the time), we added a flag type that is visible to people with the Curate ability: new flag: change post status > Change post status > This post should be reopened/closed, locked/unlocked, or deleted/und...
(more)
24 days ago
Edit Post #292208 Post edited:
explanation: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/292208/293083#answer-293083
24 days ago
Edit Post #293083 Initial revision 24 days ago
Answer A: Optional frames, borders or shadow around images
We've updated the help here on Meta -- where most cases of potential confusion will arise -- to include the tip about using blockquotes. As noted in other answers, trying to add borders or shadows could introduce problems in some cases, so we're going to leave that in users' hands. As with other f...
(more)
24 days ago
Edit Post #276628 Post edited:
added image-in-blockquote tip
24 days ago
Edit Post #293078 Initial revision 25 days ago
Answer A: How to deal with links to commerce?
Personal opinion, not speaking for the team: I don't think we need a blanket ban on links, but we should make sure such links are actually necessary when used. Sometimes a link to a product listing (whether the original manufacturer or a third-party vendor) is useful; often it is not. It sounds ...
(more)
25 days ago
Comment Post #291593 Thanks! I see now.
(more)
25 days ago
Edit Post #292574 Post edited:
27 days ago
Edit Post #291242 Post edited:
27 days ago
Edit Post #293075 Initial revision 27 days ago
Answer A: Searching tags with a string with more than two characters results in a 500
This one has been a thorn in our sides for a while, but I think we've finally fixed 500s from tag search for all of the cases that were breaking. It turns out that our pagination code did not like empty result sets, oops.
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #291715 Post edited:
27 days ago
Edit Post #293037 Post edited:
27 days ago
Edit Post #293021 Post edited:
deployed now
27 days ago
Edit Post #292845 Post edited:
27 days ago
Comment Post #291593 I'm having trouble reproducing this. Are you still seeing it?
(more)
28 days ago
Comment Post #293021 I agree with asking policy questions on Meta where they are more visible and discoverable! I've tried to find needles in the Discord haystack, and it's very hit-or-miss at least for me. And nobody's going to casually notice it after it scrolls out of view there.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #293021 I agree that's parasitic behavior and we should make a clear statement about it. Thanks for linking to that staff answer -- good to have on record. And please do ping us or escalate flags if these accounts are frustrating you! We appreciate our volunteer moderators and never want this to be a chor...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #293021 Oh, that sounds like a real nuisance! I just took a look at recent flags and it looks like those accounts have been nuked (thanks). I'll see if someone with DB access can spot any common factors (like IP). Next time you get one, feel free to escalate the flag -- admins have a "stronger" nuke optio...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #293021 Thanks for these examples! Spam account A is the easiest of this lot: if it's only a spammer (no valid posts) you can delete that sucker, or if you think it's redeemable or it has valid posts too, you can suspend. Spam account B sounds like at least a suspension (and editing or deleting the low-qua...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #293021 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Where do the ToS draw the line regarding what a spam account is?
This is a partial response, not a complete answer, but I want to provide an update. You're right that the various policy-related links are not as prominent as they should be. Changing the TOS, even just for something like this, will require notifying everyone, so before we make this change we wan...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #292992 This question made me realize that the category description was a little unclear, so I've clarified that "about the software" is *using* here and *setting up or extending* on Collab (with link).
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #292992 Question closed about 1 month ago
Comment Post #292992 Hello. I see you've asked this question on [Collab](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/292977), which is the best place for questions like this. (I'm sorry for the delay in getting you an answer.) I'm going to close this question here; can't mark it as a duplicate across communities, hence leaving ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #292843 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #287030 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #289241 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #289242 We opted for consistency with the category page, where the count ("3 answers" etc) reflects only the undeleted ones. In other words, for both category pages and the presence of the TOC, everyone sees the same thing -- but if you can see deleted posts, you'll see more if you follow those links.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #291584 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #292884 Question closed 2 months ago
Comment Post #292884 Welcome! I see you've asked on Collab (and gotten an answer there), so I'll close this here and direct folks to https://collab.codidact.org/posts/292887 .
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #279907 Post edited:
fixed variable that crept in
2 months ago
Edit Post #281113 Post edited:
fixed variable that crept in
2 months ago
Comment Post #292855 Whoops, thanks. Fixed now. The history is that originally that text was baked into the repo, which wasn't good for other users of the platform, so we switched to the variable, but since we hadn't planned for that kind of structure, we accidentally deployed that on our own network.
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #292855 Post edited:
fixed accidental injection of variable from previous deploy
2 months ago
Edit Post #279920 Post edited:
fixed variable that crept in
2 months ago