Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edit | Post #288181 |
Post edited: |
— | 1 day ago |
Comment | Post #288229 |
Sounds good. I filed https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/1062 for further improvements. (more) |
— | 1 day ago |
Edit | Post #288229 | Initial revision | — | 2 days ago |
Answer | — |
A: No visible response when searching on mobile The filters widget is now collapsed on the search-results page, like it is for categories. This restores the status quo for small viewports, but I've just noticed while verifying this fix that the "advanced search" block still takes a lot of room on my phone. Should we do anything about that? (more) |
— | 2 days ago |
Edit | Post #287547 |
Post edited: |
— | 2 days ago |
Edit | Post #287458 |
Post edited: |
— | 2 days ago |
Edit | Post #288228 | Initial revision | — | 2 days ago |
Answer | — |
A: Some symbols are displayed as HTML encoding in question description This is fixed now. Here's a current screenshot of the same example: (more) |
— | 2 days ago |
Edit | Post #287061 |
Post edited: |
— | 2 days ago |
Edit | Post #288227 | Initial revision | — | 2 days ago |
Answer | — |
A: Quick copy button for code blocks This is now fixed. A "copy" button appears in the top right corner of a code block on hover (desktop) or on tap (mobile). (more) |
— | 2 days ago |
Edit | Post #287576 |
Post edited: |
— | 2 days ago |
Comment | Post #74825 |
Thanks for letting us know. We did a server migration a while back but we didn't expect any disruptions in old image links. I'm going to ask someone with the right back-end access to look into this. (more) |
— | 3 days ago |
Comment | Post #288122 |
@#60928 yes, too big -- we have a fix for that pending. (more) |
— | 3 days ago |
Edit | Post #288204 | Initial revision | — | 5 days ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should we have a network-wide policy against AI-generated answers? We have posted our default policy for generative-AI content. It's more of a clarification than an actual change; as pointed out in another answer, representing Chat-GPT or any other content that you did not create as yours is plagiarism and was already disallowed. When you use another's material you... (more) |
— | 5 days ago |
Comment | Post #288189 |
That's what I was thinking too. We want to make it clear there *is* a filter, and if we don't have a name, we can say that. (more) |
— | 7 days ago |
Comment | Post #288189 |
If you're using a named filter, either one of the built-in ones or one you created and saved yourself, the name shows up there. So this is an issue specifically for ad-hoc filters. (more) |
— | 7 days ago |
Comment | Post #288181 |
The filter is initially collapsed on the search page, like it is on the category page. It also now appears right above the posts, so the advanced guidance about what you can type into the search textbox is right next to that textbox and the filter widget is next to the posts (like on category lists)... (more) |
— | 8 days ago |
Comment | Post #288181 |
[PR](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/1055). Doing the simple thing now. (more) |
— | 8 days ago |
Edit | Post #288187 |
Post edited: |
— | 8 days ago |
Edit | Post #288175 |
Post edited: |
— | 8 days ago |
Edit | Post #288179 |
Post edited: |
— | 8 days ago |
Edit | Post #288181 |
Post edited: |
— | 8 days ago |
Comment | Post #288181 |
Oh wait; the filter state doesn't reflect the search; it's the same empty starting point as on the category list. I think expanding it here is unintentional. Search can do things that filters can't, so on reflection, a filter can't be guaranteed to wholly reflect a search query. (more) |
— | 8 days ago |
Edit | Post #288187 | Initial revision | — | 8 days ago |
Answer | — |
A: Mismatch between search guidance, search help page, and search behaviour for votes and score Thanks for this report. The behavior is powerful; we should update the documentation, not limit search. I've updated the search topic in the help center to describe how the operators actually work and pushed that change to the network. I can do that much without changing code. :-) I've also sub... (more) |
— | 8 days ago |
Comment | Post #288181 |
Even on a desktop, it feels like there's a lot more stuff on the page before I get to the first search result. Expanding the filter shows how the search was built, which I assume is why it's open by default, but I've been wondering if it should start collapsed too. I hadn't realized it was also ope... (more) |
— | 9 days ago |
Comment | Post #288156 |
I hadn't thought about the effects of votes, thanks. I think your conclusion is sound; the votes don't matter as much as the discussion around the proposal, and we can always use Meta to focus on specific cases ("what makes this question so great?").
(more) |
— | 9 days ago |
Comment | Post #288162 |
I've updated the proposal to talk about filtering incubator Q&A, taking disagreements to meta (not edit wars), closing/archiving proposals that aren't working out, and curating the incubator. Thanks for your feedback! (more) |
— | 9 days ago |
Comment | Post #288160 |
I've updated the proposal to cover closing/archiving proposals that don't work out and curating the incubator. Thanks for your feedback! (more) |
— | 9 days ago |
Edit | Post #288156 |
Post edited: Addressed feedback received so far. |
— | 9 days ago |
Comment | Post #288162 |
Edit wars for the proposal are an important consideration. Thanks for bringing it up.
I'm imagining the description (wiki) post as the "current working draft", with discussions being resolved on meta using the same tag. The wiki post type also has comments for smaller points, so you don't have t... (more) |
— | 12 days ago |
Comment | Post #288162 |
Yes, we've been thinking about the incubator idea for a while, and needed to have filters in place before we proposed it here. I'm expecting two (general, sometimes overlapping) types of participants: people browsing a broad range of content, and people focused on one or a small number of proposals.... (more) |
— | 12 days ago |
Comment | Post #288160 |
It's a lot easier to use multiple accounts to support a proposal when "support" means "add your name to a list of interested people", and a lot harder when it means "help build a good body of Q&A to show that this community would work". That said, yes, we've had some problems in the past, and it's s... (more) |
— | 12 days ago |
Comment | Post #288160 |
We could archive them in a category that's not publicly visible. I like having some way to clean up incubator questions that aren't going to help a proposal advance. (more) |
— | 12 days ago |
Edit | Post #288156 | Initial revision | — | 13 days ago |
Question | — |
Let's improve how we manage proposals for new communities We currently use posts in the Site Proposals category to organize proposals for new communities on our network. Sometimes a community has come together quickly and this has worked really well, but most of the time it feels like we are not serving our potential new communities well. We've known fo... (more) |
— | 13 days ago |
Comment | Post #288150 |
Thanks for the report! I've reproduced the bug. You didn't do anything wrong; we apparently missed a test case. (more) |
— | 14 days ago |
Edit | Post #288143 | Initial revision | — | 16 days ago |
Answer | — |
A: Redundant "Posts" heading on every community in the dashboard There are some additional sections visible only to admins and/or global moderators, which is why the heading exists at all. But you're right: for the vast majority of people, that's the only visible section, so the heading looks odd. I think the solution would be either to only show that heading ... (more) |
— | 16 days ago |
Comment | Post #287696 |
I don't know if anyone's started thinking about reputation on the network profile. First step was to figure out if it would help. So the possibilities are wide open right now. (more) |
— | 21 days ago |
Edit | Post #287691 |
Post edited: confirmed in comments |
— | 22 days ago |
Comment | Post #287719 |
Probably the easiest thing to do is to shorten the alt text. Instead of "user avatar", does "user pic" work? (more) |
— | 22 days ago |
Comment | Post #287696 |
Is your request specifically about the _dashboard_, or are you looking for an easy way to see reputation across all communities and the dashboard is a list of all communities? If we had the [network profile](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/284) and attached it there, would that work? (more) |
— | 22 days ago |
Comment | Post #287691 |
The search result in your screenshot is [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277995/278491#answer-278491). The body shown in the search result is the first part of that answer, not the question, and the votes and author are for the answer too. I just reproduced this by searching for "site ... (more) |
— | 22 days ago |
Comment | Post #288122 |
Oh, good point about "always show my questions" -- didn't think of that. Thanks! (Now that we have this I want to be able to set a filter for viewers who aren't logged in, yes. We don't have that piece yet.) (more) |
— | 25 days ago |
Edit | Post #288122 | Initial revision | — | 25 days ago |
Article | — |
Announcing filters We've seen many requests over time for some way to customize what you see on the list of questions in a category – finding unanswered questions, hiding closed or low-scoring questions, or building more personalized views. You can use search for one-off queries, but until now you couldn't set a sticky... (more) |
— | 25 days ago |
Comment | Post #287669 |
I agree that's confusing. I'd like some guidance from someone with actual visual-design clues and I don't want to lose track of this, so I filed a CoDesign issue to track it: https://github.com/codidact/co-design/issues/89 . (more) |
— | 26 days ago |
Comment | Post #287656 |
The regex governing this is `const altRegex = /!\[(?:Image_alt_text)?\](?:\(.+(?!\\\))\)|\[.+(?!\\\])\])/gi;` (in `app/assets/javascripts/markdown.js`, but if I try to touch a regex I might cause the world to end or something. Happy to get a PR from someone with more clues than I have! (more) |
— | 26 days ago |
Edit | Post #288102 |
Post edited: I see it on article-only categories now, so either I looked right past it or we quietly fixed it. |
— | 29 days ago |
Edit | Post #39539 |
Post edited: |
— | 30 days ago |
Edit | Post #288105 | Initial revision | — | 30 days ago |
Answer | — |
A: Recent feature changes to the Codidact software May 2023 - Filters for the category list - fixed that bug in the inbox and community list; I am so sorry it took us this long to get a change from our design framework to the qpixel code to production, and we have taken steps to make this easier in the future - the "edits waiting" silver dot now... (more) |
— | 30 days ago |
Edit | Post #288102 |
Post edited: added GitHub issue link for future work |
— | 30 days ago |
Edit | Post #287466 |
Post edited: |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #287466 |
The tools problem with comment threads still exists after the bugfix; that turned out to be something different, not yet identified. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Edit | Post #288102 | Initial revision | — | about 1 month ago |
Answer | — |
A: Proposal: filters for post lists There'll be more of an announcement coming, but here are some quick notes in the meantime. The top of each category now has a new widget: filters widget (circled) If you expand it you'll see some filtering options: form showing all the things you can set There are some predefined filte... (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Edit | Post #287650 |
Post edited: bug fix is now live, plus there's the profile addition |
— | about 1 month ago |
Edit | Post #283323 |
Post edited: |
— | about 1 month ago |
Edit | Post #285370 |
Post edited: announcement and documentation to come |
— | about 1 month ago |
Edit | Post #287830 |
Post edited: |
— | about 1 month ago |
Edit | Post #288052 | Initial revision | — | about 2 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Blocked from posting to Collab by script tag inside code block Summarizing some discussion in Discord (Communities server, network-town-hall): the problem wasn't trichoplax or an IP issue but, rather, a code block that contains a `script` tag. Cloudflare is detecting that as an attempt to inject Javascript, apparently — it doesn't detect the difference be... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #288047 |
Oh, it was content not IP! Thanks for letting me know. (I haven't seen the Discord discussion yet.) (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #288047 |
We do want to get this fixed, though. If it's coming from Cloudflare it could be IP-based. Don't reveal anything secret, but is there anything different about how you're accessing the site compared to in the past? (It's odd that you can reach here, though I _think_ I remember a Collab-specific Clo... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #288047 |
I attempted to reproduce the problem but [was able to post](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/288049) (I'll delete that later when this is resolved). I was expecting a general Cloudflare problem. I'll make sure our sysadmin team knows about this. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #288025 |
Thanks for raising it again. This is something we want to do better with. I'm not sure we have anybody already on the team who knows enough about the current norms/tools to make recommendations. Would you be interested in getting involved? (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #287549 |
Not just meta; I just saw the problem on Cooking too. I'll assume it's a general problem with logo sizing. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Edit | Post #287933 | Initial revision | — | 3 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: No response when clicking on the title of a thread on a recently deleted post I think we should match "interaction type". The person clicking on a thread title expects an in-page expansion, not a new page, so I think an in-page notification about the deletion is better than moving to a separate 404 page. When the front-end code finds out about the deletion (by trying to ex... (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #277365 |
I realized I've closed an older question as a duplicate of a newer one. I did it because there are more details in the newer one and neither has answers; hope no one minds. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #277365 | Question closed | — | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #287892 |
Or maybe "progress toward this ability" should be made visible somehow on the page about that ability, the one that currently tells you you don't have it. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #287468 |
I don't know what the best way to handle this is and I don't have a lot of personal experience with reading code on my phone, but I also don't want to lose track of this issue so I filed https://github.com/codidact/co-design/issues/81 (note: Co-Design, not QPixel). (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #283323 |
Oh! I think I know why I thought it was fixed. I went to a _question_ URL where I had a notification about an answer, and clicking that notification dismissed the notification pane. Are you saying that the bug only occurs where there is an exact match of URL -- comment thread URL, question URL whe... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #283323 |
Post edited: Sorry, I was wrong -- not fixed yet. |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #287866 |
Ah! I must have done something wrong before; I'm now seeing the behavior you're reporting.
(more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #287866 |
Hi. I want to test [this bug](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/683#issuecomment-1429057310) without bothering anybody else. Could you reply to this comment? Thanks. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #283323 |
Post edited: I tested this again and it's working now, though I'm not certain what change also fixed this. |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #287020 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #287836 | Initial revision | — | 4 months ago |
Question | — |
UI question: how should the "post" button behave in restricted categories? Most of the time, any logged-in user can post a new top-level post (question, article, maybe other types). Categories can restrict this posting access, however. For example, on the Meta blog, only moderators and administrators can post. Everybody sees a "create post" button. If you aren't allow... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #287657 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #287649 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #278198 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #287424 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #278943 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #287825 | Initial revision | — | 4 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Extra brackets for footnotes (but this time in post) This should be fixed now, but it's complicated and I'm just going to quote a bit from the pull request: > Note: This will result in footnotes that currently only have one pair of brackets having none. Unfortunately, this is an inconsistency in the HTML itself which cannot be corrected except by ed... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #287824 | Initial revision | — | 4 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Double brackets in footnotes This should be fixed now, but it's complicated and I'm just going to quote a bit from the pull request: > Note: This will result in footnotes that currently only have one pair of brackets having none. Unfortunately, this is an inconsistency in the HTML itself which cannot be corrected except by ed... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #287246 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #280872 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
Edit | Post #276628 |
Post edited: added HTML details/summary, with thanks to https://meta.codidact.com/posts/287279 |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #287768 |
I just visited your profile on desktop in Chrome and I'm seeing the full image. Can you say more about your environment? (I tried changing the size of my browser window, but that didn't affect this.) (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #287763 |
I didn't realize it wasn't shown there. Thanks for pointing it out. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #287246 |
Fixed, pending deploy. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287246 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287744 | Question closed | — | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287740 |
Reproduced: Chrome, Android, Meta and Judaism (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287740 |
You can cause a notification by marking a read notification as unread. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287303 |
I *should*, but apparently there's a bug at the moment. Working on it... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287303 |
Oops, thanks for catching that! (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287303 |
[GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/co-design/issues/79) - co-design, so then would need to be propagated to qpixel. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #278424 |
Post edited: This got fixed at some point but I'm not sure when. It was getting truncated on '<'. |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #278171 |
Post edited: This appears to have been fixed at some point; see discussion in https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/162, and let us know if it recurs please. Thanks. |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #278275 |
Post edited: This appears to have been fixed at some point; see discussion in https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/162, and let us know if it recurs please. Thanks. |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #279654 |
Post edited: This appears to have been fixed at some point; see discussion in https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/162, and let us know if it recurs please. Thanks. |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287725 |
A way to do this might be to add a link to the pending edit suggestion (so you can see the diff), and if it's your edit the "approve" and "reject" buttons are replaced with "cancel". (I don't know if best practice is to also have an "ok" or "done" button so you can go back to where you were without ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #280723 |
Post edited: added some things that don't require admin access |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287713 |
Post edited: also address new answers |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287713 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can "last activity" provide more context on what it was that happened? We've made some progress since this question was posted, but there is still work to do (especially in the case of deleted answers). Edits to questions and closures are more specific (I assume reopens are but can't find an example to confirm). New answers, edits to answers, and answer deletions stil... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287704 |
Hmm, something seems to be wrong -- removed the link while we investigate. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287695 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should we have organization accounts? An alternative approach would be to have the concept of organizations but not separate accounts. A user who is a member of one or more organizations could have a way, when posting, to say "on behalf of this org", and it would show up something like your "for the dev team" example. Advantages: - ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287670 | Question closed | — | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287458 |
More examples in this duplicate question: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/287670 (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #276589 |
Post edited: seems to have been fixed somewhere along the line |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287671 |
I meant a dot next to "edit", yes. I believe the code that's under review now adds it for the local category. We know there's more to do. I'd like to see the dot appear if *any* category has pending edits, and for the page that the "edit" button takes you to tell you about all categories. (Whethe... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287671 |
These are good suggestions, thanks. There's a pull request under review for the dot, which is the minimum we need (do *something* to let people know, in other words). Being able to subscribe is an interesting idea. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287662 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
Article | — |
January 2023 Newsletter Happy new year from the Codidact team! We have a bunch of updates to share about the server migration, platform changes, and new contributors – and we'll check in on the roadmap we laid out to see how we're doing. Server upgrade We have migrated and slightly re-architected our servers. Our ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287619 |
Post edited: PR under review |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287657 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can't click notification icon The notifications bug is known and we're working on a fix. (It has to be made in one repo, propagated to another via `npm`, and then of course deployed. I think we're waiting for the `npm` step at the moment.) The bug happens if you click directly on the number or text, but if you click in the whi... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287650 |
Huh -- I never noticed that @#53890! Or if I did, it was a long time ago and I then forgot about it. Thanks for pointing it out. Since the page already *exists*, I think we should find ways to make it more prominent. Making it another section on the profile, for yourself only (like preferences, e... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287650 |
This is a [known bug](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/287466) with a workaround: click in the white area below the number/text instead of directly on the icons. It's aggravating and we have a fix in process.
I didn't close this as a duplicate because of the part at the end. We don't have another ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287649 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287649 |
That's a good point. I've submitted a [PR](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/929) to change this. For the last label, I went with "confirm new password" to lead with the imperative verb; I'm told this is a little easier for people to understand if English isn't their first language and might ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287424 |
@#53890 I think you're on to something. The [database schema](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/blob/develop/db/schema.rb#L408) says that the posts table has columns for both "body" and "body_markdown". I'm guessing that we save the HTML to speed up rendering, but I'm not sure. If so, it would ma... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #286336 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287641 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Comment flagging is hidden from inexperienced users We definitely want this to be possible from the in-page view, without clicking through to the thread. This issue is even on the roadmap we laid out at the beginning of the year -- it's important. I thought this would be easy but it turns out there are some complications in the code. I was just ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287624 |
Post edited: revised part about Discord threads based on info in a comment |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287624 |
@#53196 thanks for letting me know. I remember threads just plain disappearing when the feature first showed up, but maybe I just didn't know where to look for them. I've avoided threads since then because of that. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287624 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Creating new Discord channels We can't grant the ability broadly without also granting destructive abilities, as another answer says. If any community wants more channels under its section, admins can create them -- just let us know. I haven't used Discord threads much, but when they first showed up, threads would be auto-del... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #285825 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
Edit | Post #287623 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Comments count includes deleted comments, which it shouldn't We fixed the inconsistency a different way. Instead of computing the numbers for all threads at page-load time, we still report the full number of comments, but when you expand the comment thread you see that there are deleted ones, like this: "skipping 3 deleted comments" before the one visible ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287466 |
Ah, in-page panel versus link -- thanks! I've tried to capture all this in a bug report here: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/923. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287619 |
Thanks for the report. We did have this issue before and it was [fixed](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/192), but it looks like something has broken it again. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287466 |
The dashboard and mobile sign-on widgets also have icons but do not have the bug. Are those icons actually characters in some font and not images? (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287466 |
Thanks for all the debugging help, @#53890! (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #287573 |
@#53890 if Art's changed fixed this, please let us know (a flag is good) and we'll mark it status-completed. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287583 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Where do meta questions about the Codidact Collab site belong? Oh sorry; I'll fix that description. By "help using the sites" I think we meant issues specific to this network. You can go ahead and ask Collab meta questions on Collab; it's a small community and I don't want to make people go to a different category for what's likely to be a very small number of... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287466 |
@#53890 we deploy from `develop`, but after a change gets made in co-design it then needs to propagate to qpixel and then be deployed, and I'm not sure where that stands.
@ArtOfCode tonight I noticed that this bug *doesn't* occur with the mod menu; I clicked on the word "mod" rather than under it ... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #283932 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287549 |
Sounds unrelated, then -- thanks for checking! (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287549 |
Wow, that's weird. Thanks for the report.
I don't know if this is related, but I've sometimes noticed, only on Meta, that (on desktop at ~1200px) the logo gets very large and flushing my browser cache fixes it. I've never noticed this on any other community. So first thing for us to check is wh... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #286582 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #286582 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287545 |
I thought we had a "why Codidact when SO exists?" question; maybe we do and I'm failing to find it. Meanwhile, here are some related non-duplicates: [The Codidact Vision](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276296) (jump down to "Codidact is not an SE clone"), [How does Codidact avoid repeating Stack Ex... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287529 |
Can you edit to add more information about the types of questions that might fit here? Science, regulatory, economic, others? Thanks. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287489 |
Post edited: added GitHub link |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287461 |
Sorry about the ambiguity; I've edited. We had a design idea for a much more dynamic and interactive preview; we haven't done that yet, but figured we could at least add the static post previews. They're configurable; if a community wants them to be shorter (or gone), we can do that. Best place fo... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287461 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287479 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Category new activity indicators reset after release I believe this was a glitch related to this particular upgrade, and not upgrades in general. Or, at least, we haven't seen this in the past. We're not sure what caused it yet and will continue to investigate. I'm sorry for the disruption (I was surprised by all the silver dots too). (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287466 |
I agree that's a problem (and from another comment thread, it looks like a dev knows how to fix it). The problem happens if you click on the icon, but if you click in the whitespace below it, the control works (shows you the inbox, communities, etc). I think from your post that you've already figur... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287463 |
Thanks for the suggestion! Edited. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287463 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287475 |
I like the unified look, and I agree the icons make it easier to spot at a glance. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287469 |
Sorry for the too-terse changelog entry! (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287464 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Typo in error - Tags can't have more than 5 tags This has been changed to: Post can't have more than 5 tags (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287036 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #286235 |
Post edited: missed one |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #286235 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287198 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287145 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #286303 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287463 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Make navigation bar optionally fixed at the top The user profile now has a network preference to make the top (navigation) bar sticky. The default is the current behavior (not sticky). (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #277057 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #285013 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #283807 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #278607 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #277518 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287461 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #284888 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #284083 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #286454 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287461 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Questions previews were introduced: Can the layout be improved? Question previews were added after some user requests; we'd been planning to eventually do a fancier "expand in place" design where you could use a control to see the beginning of the question and a summary of answers and then collapse it again, but that will take more time and in the meantime we cou... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287460 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Questions previews were introduced: Can the layout be improved? I'd like to see the "score bar" vertically align with the title, instead of being vertically centered in the whole "slot" for the post. (I didn't notice this with shorter titles in testing -- should have tried some longer ones!) (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #276941 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #286192 |
Post edited: sorry for the long delay! |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287101 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #287129 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
Edit | Post #286235 |
Post edited: placeholder |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #287424 |
I think it's a safe bet that if it affects any post it affects all of them; this is rendering code, nothing community-specific about it. I just don't remember them looking like this in the past, and now I can't remember when (or if) that was the case. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287424 |
That looks like a regression. I'm _pretty_ sure that footnotes used to display properly in single brackets in posts. The editor preview is sometimes different (something about the client-side markdown library versus the final rendering, I think). Does anybody else remember footnotes having single ... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Edit | Post #287406 | Initial revision | — | 7 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: How do I suggest edits to the tag wiki? It's been a while since you asked this and, sadly, we still haven't implemented suggested edits for tag pages so there would be a way to gain approved suggested edits. I agree it's frustrating. Moderators are able to grant specific abilities to specific users, so it is possible for a community to... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287021 |
I realize that this is a bug report and the other question is a support request, but the result of the support request was acknowledging the bug, so I went ahead and marked it as a dupe so that when it gets fixed there'll be one place to update, not two. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Edit | Post #287021 | Question closed | — | 7 months ago |
Edit | Post #287390 | Initial revision | — | 7 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Codidact Collab - should it be listed? That's a good question. We kept it separate because we didn't want to distract people from their primary focus, which we assumed would be on the communities here rather than the underpinnings. Collab is linked from the GitHub repository and we expected that to be the primary path in. I don't hav... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287346 |
On the help, I meant that we could add the HTML workaround, since Markdown doesn't support it natively, if that would be helpful. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287346 |
We're using CommonMark and whatever it supports, but this might be a good thing to add to the [formatting help](https://meta.codidact.com/help/formatting). (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287322 |
Comments don't have to be long in character count in order to be long in "height" on the screen -- depends on what's in there. A few lines of code (which happens on Software Dev, Power Users, or Code Golf) can make a comment that exceeds the editor viewport. Consider mentioning that use case in the... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287316 |
I assume the folks on Code Golf would have better ideas about what to call the two close reasons. Each community can edit close reasons to suit its needs; we just need to make it possible. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287316 |
@#53890 I was imagining that Code Golf would define something like "completed" (requires link) and "done"; I'll edit the comment to make that clearer. The first one would use the duplicate _mechanism_, but it doesn't have to be called "duplicate".
The code already supports cross-category duplicat... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287316 |
Here's the [GitHub change request for per-post-type close reasons](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/911), with some proposed UI. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Edit | Post #287316 | Initial revision | — | 7 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Closing Articles Articles can be made closable in configuration (does not require a code change), but it's a global, network-wide change, so we'd need to make sure that doesn't have negative consequences for any of our communities. The down-side is that currently there is one set of close reasons per community (no... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287315 |
Thanks for this investigation. That sounds plausible, and I agree it's confusing. I've filed https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/909. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287304 |
Maybe consider using 2 and 3, skipping 1 entirely? If the usual semantics are that a page had one h1 (which is the title of the question), then using 2 and 3 in the body of a post doesn't seem wrong to me. A little odd to start with `##`, but what the reader (or screen-reader) will see should still... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #287304 |
I was writing an answer based on the original question and this answer while you were editing. @#8045, please see the suggestions in my answer. I, too, could *barely* tell there was a difference, and only because the word "heading" is in all of them. The difference between 2 and 3 is huge, though,... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Edit | Post #287305 | Initial revision | — | 7 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Main and subheadings are almost the same size, but not in the edit preview I think the problem is in the relative sizes. Here's what I see -- and the first two looked the same to me too until I took a really close look: screen shot from post The first one is large, the second one is slightly smaller, barely, and then there's a huge size difference between the second ... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #283928 |
With filters (currently under development), there's another use case: filtering out posts that have been "resolved". For the Code Golf sandbox that's duplicates pointing to the actual challenges or withdrawn challenges. For other uses of articles it could mean things that have been superseded, are ... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Edit | Post #287145 |
Post edited: fix merged but not yet deployed |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #287145 |
Thanks for the report. This will be fixed in the next update. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Edit | Post #287129 |
Post edited: Fixed but not yet deployed. |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #287129 |
Someone looked into fixing this and discovered it's already fixed in a version that hasn't been deployed here yet. Marking status-planned to reflect that. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #287130 |
My guess (haven't checked with someone who can confirm yet) is that profile descriptions are posts and posts have the restriction. For a question, answer, article, or other post type, a minimum length makes sense. I'm guessing that profiles inherited that -- an effect of design and not a specific d... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #287129 |
How bizarre. I can't imagine that's intentional. Thanks for letting us know. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #287128 |
Not intentional; I think it's just not a case anyone thought about. The _editor_ imposes a minimum length; the default profile text has never been edited, so it doesn't trigger that. We should fix this -- while a post in a community shouldn't be able to be empty, your profile is yours to use -- nor... (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Edit | Post #287101 |
Post edited: |
— | 8 months ago |
Edit | Post #287116 | Initial revision | — | 8 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Vote summary refers to "you" even for another's profile You're right; that's awkward if you're looking at someone else's profile. I have submitted a pull request to change this wording to: > A daily summary of votes received for posts. The user name is already shown in the line just above this one, so I don't think we need to repeat it. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
Comment | Post #287058 |
Pretty sure it's the latter. We added code blocks to support Software Dev, and maybe blockquotes were part of that. I don't recall lists coming up, so I think it's "never really thought about it", not deliberate. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Edit | Post #287036 |
Post edited: Fix should be in the next deployment: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/895 |
— | 9 months ago |
Edit | Post #74961 |
Post edited: We're not using Trello any more, and I think the forum reference has aged out at this point. |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #287046 |
The current behavior is confusing, yes. If the viewer can see deleted posts I think we should link to the deleted answer (which has a notice that it's deleted). If the viewer *can't* see deleted posts (the usual case), we should show something like "the linked post has been deleted so we're showing... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #287036 |
That should say "Posts", yes. I thought this would be a trivial string edit that I could go ahead and fix. Found the line of code, and... it's being constructed in a way that I don't quite understand yet because I am a Ruby newbie, so I need to learn a little more first (or someone else will fix it... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #287031 |
Someone is working on changes that we believe will fix this too. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #287032 |
There are a couple of in-progress efforts to improve search, [newer](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/834) and [older](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/428). I have hopes that one of these will succeed, hence tagging status-planned. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Edit | Post #287032 |
Post edited: |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #287011 |
You know, I had somehow missed that "activity" wasn't there. Oops. I've filed https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/894; I can't tell if it's an easy client-side change or a harder backend change, but with luck someone else can answer that. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Edit | Post #278225 |
Post edited: |
— | 9 months ago |
Edit | Post #286995 | Initial revision | — | 9 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: How to make an edit that only changes the tag list by adding a tag that does not exist? While reviewing older bugs we discovered that this problem no longer exists. I'm sorry we didn't catch this at the time; I don't know if someone fixed it but we failed to update here, or if it was fixed as a side-effect of some other change, but I just tested this out in this suggested edit and it s... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Comment | Post #286978 |
We have a general *mechanism* for internationalization, but building out non-English versions hasn't gotten much attention so far. Contributions are welcome. The general idea is identifiers in the code instead of hard-wired strings, and then per-language YAML files that map those IDs to text. I'm ... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
Edit | Post #286830 |
Post edited: develop not master (just remembered that tripped me up) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #286830 |
Thanks @#56850, and please do let us know how we can help. If you add SSO, I'll bet there are folks on the Codidact team who'd be interested in taking a look at what you've done. :-)
(more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Edit | Post #286830 | Initial revision | — | 10 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Using QPixel in education We've heard about a few people who were considering setting up their own instances, but I don't know whether any of them have done it yet. I hope people do; we didn't set out to just set up our own network of communities, but also to provide the means for others to do so. The qpixel repository on... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Edit | Post #286816 | Question closed | — | 10 months ago |
Edit | Post #286757 | Initial revision | — | 11 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Filter to show only positive posts Ultimately I'd like this to be one of the predefined filters when we implement this feature, which is on the roadmap but will take a while. On the other hand, it seems like we have a more pressing need. One approach, which was the starting point for the question you linked to, is to filter the vi... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
Comment | Post #286545 |
The icon that shows up in the usercard is a configuration option and can be changed. I suspect the one that goes with the "moderator" label in the abilities section of the profile is baked in. I agree that having two different icons is confusing. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
Edit | Post #286683 | Initial revision | — | 11 months ago |
Answer | — |
A: Archive to mark as "resolved", without locking the comment? I think what you might be looking for is "resolved" -- you want to indicate that a thread has been handled, but you want to leave the door open for feedback. I would expect a hypothetical "resolve" option to do the following: - Hide the thread by default, as with archived threads. - Show "resolv... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
Edit | Post #276935 |
Post edited: |
— | 11 months ago |
Comment | Post #276935 |
I'm marking this as status-deferred because it's something that would be nice to have but won't be soon. Workarounds (not complete solutions) are the dashboard (tells you *that* something is new, but not what) and the RSS feeds. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
Edit | Post #286616 | Initial revision | — | 12 months ago |
Article | — |
June 2022 Newsletter This newsletter was sent to our email subscribers and is being reposted here. Hello from the Codidact team! It's been a while since we sent out a newsletter (sorry!). We want to share some updates, including news about the long-awaited server upgrade made possible by very generous donors. ... (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
Comment | Post #286460 |
It's a balance. When there are lots of comments, we've seen that some people won't keep scrolling to get to the actual answers. (We saw that on SE, and it's clear from the amount of repetition on some other platforms that it's happening elsewhere too.) Maybe we need to add an "expand all" control ... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #39469 |
Welcome @#8169! I'm glad you found it. Someday we will have email notifications for pings (after a delay to avoid being noisy), but we don't have that yet. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286486 |
That's the idea -- expand a thread in-page including the reply box and the other controls (edit, delete, etc). But make it two-step, so you don't automatically see everything in that 79-comment argument -- see the first 5 and that there are 74 more, and then if you want it, expand and it's all yours... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286486 |
Somebody started working on inlining all comments but it seems to have stalled and I need to find out why. The idea is that we'll still show just the first five by default, so you don't have to expand a huge thread just to see what it's about, but then there'd be a "show rest" control. The thread p... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286479 |
One reason we added threaded comments is that, regardless of intent or active moderation, we know from other sites that comments *will* sometimes be used for discussions. Sometimes those discussions are worth keeping (as background for an edit, for instance, or to alert people who would otherwise st... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286460 |
What do you mean by them being hidden? Do you mean that only the thread titles are visible by default? Until there are more than 5 comments, you can see everything in-page, without navigating away. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286469 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Remove "Post" terminology from sites other than META There are other types of posts (and other types of top-level posts). In a comment you mentioned the category bar that contains "posts", "tags", and "edits". This has to work on all categories on all communities. While every community has categories where all top-level posts are questions, some h... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286456 |
That's a good suggestion. I've created https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/797 to track it. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286452 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: How can I curb my search to the Main site, not Meta? From the help: > filtering by category > > To filter by category, you will need to know the unique numeric id for that category. This can be found by looking at the url shown when you click to view all posts in a particular category. Use the formatting `category:xxxx` to apply this filter. T... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286425 |
@#56529 if the last line, which mentions the other user, were removed, would that satisfy you? We do need a screenshot to demonstrate the problem; I looked through my own recent pings but I don't have an example of this issue. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286376 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Deficiencies in the Terms of Service This is already being discussed in a comment thread, but I'm bumping it up to an answer for visibility and so it can be voted on. > "We may update our terms from time to time without further notice to you, unless notice is required by law. Your use of the Service after the Terms are updated const... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284460 |
@#8103 yeah, all our modals are like that, and it's confused me too. (Somewhere here I have a question about how to dismiss search.) The 'x' suggestion has come up; I don't know what blocks that (some design principle I'm not aware of, some Ruby thing, something about how our code is structured, so... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286268 |
Hi again, @#53878. Small change of plans; I have the list now and can pass it on. Could you give me an email address (or Twitter ID or Discord ID) so I can send you the list? You can contact me on Twitter or Discord or email monica at codidact dot org. Thanks for the help! ( @#8103 I'll send to ... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286336 |
Adding a "Delete" button that soft-deletes the user immediately (in the UI) and queues the actual deletion (in the DB) for later seems like a good solution to me. I agree we should have it; my answer was to explain why "delete for real right now" isn't implemented yet. We do want to make this more ... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286336 |
If we did "on hold" then we could do it immediately (as visible on-site). That's a good point.
I'm not sure what you mean about IP/cookies/content interest and DOM nodes. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286336 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Please allow a user to permanently delete their account The current email path (and asking you to prove you control the account, because email can be spoofed) is a stopgap. We do want to allow you to delete an account more directly. If you could make the request from the site, for instance, then the fact that you're signed in would already demonstrate c... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286268 |
@#53878 we can contact you via the email address you used for this account. (Where "we" means a developer with DB access -- getting those error logs also requires DB access, so this isn't any extra load for anybody.) Thanks @#8103 for helping too! (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286268 |
Yes, it's still a concern. Thanks for offering to help! I've asked a developer with access to the info to get in touch with you (so the two of you can decide together what works best for sharing info and coordinating). (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285470 |
@#53492 it looks like that lets us auto-link from GH to Meta (etc). We're already doing that (though with actual links, not auto-links), but what we're missing is going the other direction. If I link to a meta post from a GitHub issue, it'd be great if something could be added to the meta post (com... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286243 |
Yeah, when I suggested archiving as an option, the primary use case I had in mind was "support edit history". I need to think more about the primary question here, which is why I haven't responded to that yet. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286223 |
Post edited: title and question asked opposite yes/no questions, so clarifying |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286236 |
Post edited: |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286236 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Allow using <kbd> in the website (Unsuccessful test. Oh well; I thought it was fixed but not yet I guess.) -- This is regular text. This is kbd text. This is regular text with a kbd element within. > This is a quote with kbd text. These all work in the preview now; let's see what happens when I submit. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286223 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Is the Codidact community the same as Stack Overflow? Welcome! We certainly aim to be better. From the platform side, serving the community (not stockholders) is one of our primary goals, really our reason to exist. We expect everybody to be civil and of course don't tolerate things like personal attacks and harassment. Each community is a little ... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286192 |
I didn't know we limited width (and can't find where we do but I am not fluent in CSS). I thought it was just that we wouldn't overflow the space allocated to the post, which is proportional I thought. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286192 |
Perfect is the enemy of good. I don't know how to make it wider, but I submitted a PR to make the section taller. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285741 |
Thanks for checking. I've filed this to track it: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/787. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285741 |
I tested this on Android with Chrome 99.0 on your linked example and also [this post](https://christianity.codidact.com/posts/286016) and I see the footnote number. Are they still missing for you? Wondering if this is an OS difference or something else. Thanks. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286109 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: How can I see a list of all my deleted questions? You can see your own deleted questions if you have the URLs, but we haven't yet implemented a way for you to see those links in the UI (like with a "deleted" tab or filter on your profile). I've emailed you a list of the URLs of your deleted questions for the community you asked about. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286086 |
Testing: are you able to see https://powerusers.codidact.com/posts/285487? (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286071 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Help wanted: investigating server errors We've had several bug reports here on Meta about server 500 errors, and we know that these can deter participation. That's bad at any time but especially when we are trying to grow. We want to do better. So far, our developers with database access have been looking these up when there's a bug re... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #286060 |
Post edited: Fix pending but not deployed yet. |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286060 |
Somebody with database access can check that error code, yes. Thanks for the report.
Your reputation is correct; it shows as 11 (currently) on your profile. Here on Meta, reputation doesn't show in the "usercard"; those stats are number of top-level posts, number of answers, net votes, and edits.... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286052 |
I think guest posting would have to be accompanied by some sort of pre-publication community review, else it would be too easy to flood the site with spam or trolling. That doesn't mean "no"; it means it's something we have to figure out how to implement. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285470 |
@#53280 sorry for any confusion I've caused. We welcome bug reports and feature requests on Meta (especially ones that benefit from community discussion). Some people directly report bugs on Github and that's fine too. We create Github issues for bugs reported on Meta (including per-community meta... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286026 |
I meant ranking answers under the question, yes. Right now there are three actions somebody can take to affect that: vote up, vote down, don't vote. People who can't downvote just won't vote, which means you can't sort the merely-ok answers above the actively-wrong ones.
Tying votes to a comment r... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #286026 |
Without downvotes, how would you sort answers? In particular, how would you support the "meh" and wrong answers, all of which would have zero upvotes but with variable quality? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #74823 |
Post edited: fixed broken link (I thought we had set up URL redirection, oops) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285961 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: What are the bus factors of Codidact? > Software: QPixel is publicly available so that sounds good but for the Codidact flavor of QPixel additional parts must be assembled to create the software this network runs on. How many persons know how to do that? Is it written down anywhere? We have an operations manual of sorts in a private w... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285954 |
This is an important question, thanks. Rather than a bunch of fragmentary answers, I'm working with the people who know various parts of this so we can post one answer that covers all the areas you ask about. A delay means we're organizing this across timezones, not that we're ignoring you. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285845 |
The root cause of the various mismatches between the preview and the final rendered text is the different libraries used on the frontend and backend. I don't know enough to be able to say how hard it is to fix that, but I'm guessing there's something that makes it hard since this keeps coming up and... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285845 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285842 |
@#36363 I've approved a suggested edit that focuses the question on the points you brought up. I'm leaving this comment here so you'll know how that edit got approved, in case you object (but I hope you won't, as I think it will lead to a more productive discussion of the issue you've raised). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285776 |
@#54706, @#8176 - we're working on the acute problem while knowing we also have a longer-term gap. The team and mods are discussing. (I thought I left a comment here but it must have been somewhere else.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285783 |
@#36396 you should have access now (and a ping from me). Sorry for the extra system; we don't have private group messaging built into our software yet. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285783 |
FYI, we're discussing the short-term problem in the moderators' channel. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284515 |
Post edited: Just discovered or remembered that this limit can be changed, which seems like an important part of the discussion. |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285776 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285776 |
This looks like a duplicate of https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284472. Could you post your proposed solution here as an answer there? Thanks. (There's another answer with a time-based+score-based system you might be interested in, too.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #276996 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285710 |
@#54706 one could imagine a later version where an "add this to my list" control is available on your posts when browsing, which would make it easier to manage. People can create this in the "about" space now -- it supports all the same Markdown that posts do -- but you have to build it yourself. B... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285710 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Request for a Member Story feature which helps to highlight a Codidact member's topic expertise The "about" section of your profile, as noted in another answer, provides a place to put whatever content you like, including a proto-CV if you choose. But I think there's a more general idea here that I'd like to explore: a way to highlight particular posts, regardless of their scores or the commun... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285694 |
I think you mean something more curated than automated, right? Could you say something more about what this might look like on Codidact? For example, are you thinking of a CV like on SO, or something more like "posts I made that I want to highlight"? Per-community, or network-wide? (We're plannin... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285658 |
Spaces in tags would likely lead to confusion in the editor -- when you type a space and there's no match, is that the end of a proposed new tag or a space in the middle of an existing or new tag? I think our intent was to not allow them and this is a bug. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #278775 |
Related, newer proposal: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/285535. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285576 |
@#8176 an important (IMO) difference is that "Not Programming Related" was treated as a site unto itself, while the incubator would be more of a holding pen and sandbox. I'm imagining a clear explanation at the top (plus a notice like what you see on Meta when not logged in), and maybe excluding it ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285576 |
@#8176 I was thinking of using the incubator to support proposals. (Area 51 has many problems; can we do better?) The incubator will need to be more proactive in closing stuff that couldn't work anywhere, and about deleting closed questions that don't get fixed. Part of my idea with "no rep" was t... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285576 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Incubator (takes all questions that aren't ontopic anywhere else) community I'm speaking only for myself (not the team) and with insufficient caffeine. I might refine this idea later. :-) We know we need to improve our community-proposal process, particularly in the area of scope and sample questions. Sometimes the only way to show a topic or type of question is to actu... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #276505 |
Post edited: This was fixed sometime since this question was asked but I don't know when. Just tested with a new user. |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #276505 |
This was fixed somewhere along the way; I just tested with a new user and can't see the close and delete links. (You can see them on your *own* posts, but that's because you can do those things there.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285470 |
Post edited: added project link |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285528 |
Communities need people who are interested in answering those questions *and are able to do so*, though, @#36363. Having a place to ask questions that won't get decent answers, or maybe any answers at all, doesn't help, I'd like to see more, and more-active, communities here too -- for which we nee... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285473 |
The attribution requirements include linking to the SE user, so if we deleted the stub account we would need to add that link to all the affected posts. I'd rather have fewer of those outbound links to SE than more. But I agree that they shouldn't clutter up the users list and ones with no remainin... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285470 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Article | — |
Codidact Technical Roadmap Something we've been lacking on the Codidact project thus far is a clear development roadmap. Various people have goals in our heads, and some of our GitHub issues have priorities set, but that's not as helpful as it could be. Developers new to the platform don't know where to jump in, and unless y... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285414 |
If codidact.com/users/##### can't serve a database-driven page (I was assuming it could), then we can create users.codidact.com and do it there. Or something similar. I don't think *where to host it* is going to be a big factor here. codidact.com doesn't have a back end *now*, but that doesn't mea... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285415 |
Using separate accounts requires more work, but on the flip side, protecting "hidden" accounts so they really can't be connected by observers is also complicated. SE has had problems with that for years, because "hidden" wasn't really but by having something called "hide", they gave people the impre... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284930 |
Post edited: Can't reproduce now, but it was doing that at one point so I guess something we did since then fixed it? |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285441 |
Post edited: based on a comment discussion |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285249 |
I checked a few other communities and the numbers are out of sync there too. I can't explain it with different post types (like articles) or deleted posts. Filed https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/754. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285097 |
Post edited: Fixed, pending deployment. |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284930 |
I currently [see the quote symbol in the diff](https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/fSYmdMfjfRYpL411gokjNYy6), not the HTML encoding. Do you too? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285441 |
Thanks for the feedback @#36396. Everything you've listed -- pings, comments in threads you're following, comments on your own posts -- would also show up in inbox notifications, but of course the inbox is everything combined. (At least you can mark individual items as read or unread, but if you're... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285449 |
Or maybe add "all communities" (the dashboard link) at the *top* of the communities list, and maybe also move "sign out" somewhere else. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285414 |
@#53922 on SE, every site is separate and there's network-level integration. I don't know if they actually have separate databases or are doing multi-tenancy inside one DB, but each site is kept separate. That's why on SE you have different profile IDs and can have different profile contents (name,... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285414 |
@#54706 is correct. The network of communities at codidact.com is powered by a single instance of qpixel backed by a single database, and so a network profile is possible, just as network-wide user preferences are possible.
Other networks using the qpixel software would have their own qpixel inst... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285441 |
Sorry, the boxes are where logos would go (or key elements from logos, I guess). My idea was that you could click and drag the logo or name to re-order items, while just plain clicking would take you to your profile on that community. If a drag interface is too hard, we could use the "move up/move ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285416 |
@#36396 I sketched out an idea that I think addresses most of your points in [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/285414/285441#answer-285441). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285441 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: What information should be displayed on a network profile? I thought the best way to respond to this answer would be with a sketch. The answer raises a few key points: - Show me my communities (not all of them), in an order I choose. - Show me where there's new stuff I should know about. - Compactly. For the "list of communities" part of the netwo... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285416 |
You hinted at one difference: codidact.com is a static page, which doesn't changed if you're logged in. It includes the community descriptions; it's more for browsing for interesting places to go. The dashboard, on the other hand, shows the more details (for logged-in users): all the categories, wh... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285416 |
I, too, use the dashboard as my entry point, so I can see where there's new activity. (Ok, I also keep tabs open to a couple communities, including Meta, 'cause I'm here a lot.) If you could control the order of communities in the network profile, and if the profile showed an indicator for any new ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285417 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: What information should be displayed on a network profile? > Do Activity and Vote Summary need to be separate tabs? One could call it History instead and then have filters and sorting on it or expand the number of tabs into a larger list (questions, answers, ...). I think of Activity and Vote Summary as being pretty different. Activity is "stuff I did"; ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285415 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: What information should be displayed on a network profile? > Is there one account (email/password) for the whole network or one account for each site? There is one account for the whole network. Profiles on individual communities are auto-created when you visit a community for the first time while logged in. It would take some work to create separate ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285401 |
Search is, in a sense, one-shot filters. The distinction I'm making in my head is between one-off queries and ongoing filtering. Both are search under the hood, logically speaking. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285402 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285402 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285402 |
Oh, directly going to the "success" link doesn't work for me either (404). I assume that's because I didn't come from the donation workflow. (We should make that more resilient, I agree.) What I meant was that when I went through the donation workflow and got to this step, I got a correctly-render... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285374 |
@#8049 another answer suggests being able to choose, when creating/editing a filter, whether it's local or global. This seems a good approach to me, especially if we couple it with some sort of preconditions so a question-based filter won't be selectable on the blog, for example. We'll need to work... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285402 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: 404 Not found after donation success I went through the donation workflow, starting on Software, and `donate/success` is working for me now. I don't know if you hit something transient or if there's some other difference between us. (I'll ask someone with access to the server logs to take a look.) I wouldn't expect directly visitin... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285401 |
Now that you mention it, search results are another kind of post list, so it seems like we ought to be able to apply filters there too. And if we don't get it "for free", we should take the extra steps to add it there.
(more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285370 |
Interesting idea, thanks! Possibly a first step is to give people a way to make a filter public combined with a way for others to use someone's public filter, so I can choose "trichoplax's unanswered" filter or some such. I don't know if we want to add all public filters into a global dropdown lis... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285374 |
That's a good point. Not all filters would work in all contexts, so I guess that list you can choose from needs to gray out the ones with conditions that don't apply (for example, anything involving questions/answers on the Meta blog or Code Golf sandbox). For the case of the same tag on different ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285370 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Proposal: filters for post lists Several discussions have touched on the idea of being able to filter the contents of the post list. Whether your goal is to find unanswered questions, hide closed questions, hide ignored tags, or build a more complex filter, this is something we've wanted to be able to support for a while. A design... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285338 |
We needed a way to link the posts together so that people could claim the account in the future. The easiest path to that seemed to be to create a stub user account, make it clear it's a stub and not a real person yet, and give the real person a way to say "that's me" and take over ownership.
I d... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285337 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285337 |
@#53391 oh, good point. Yeah, that wouldn't be very helpful, and I think the other answers already cover that. I think it's probably still useful to have something here for the special case of your own work (it's come up before), so I'll make an edit to cast this more as a sub-answer. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285337 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Is gaining rep based on SE content ok? I realize the question is more about harvesting and reposting others' work here, but there's a special case of reposting I'd like to address. (For the general question, see the other answers.) Sometimes it happens that you've written an answer you're proud of somewhere else, whether SO or Quora o... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285288 |
As much as possible, we want formal interactions to happen on-site (even if they also send email). Warnings are logged with the profile and moderators have access to them, which is helpful when deciding how to respond to a new problem. (Have we warned or suspended before for this?) Similarly (from... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #277432 |
Does your browser show the name on mouse-over? That's how I navigate among tabs with the same favicon, whether different communities here, different pages from the same site/community that would have the same favicon anyway (questions, dashboard, etc here), and tabs where the favicon is unclear or mi... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #277432 |
A favicon is the little image that appears in the browser tab. I added a link to the question. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #277432 |
Post edited: added link for clarity (question in comment) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #277941 |
Post edited: this link was pointed out on a question marked as a dupe of this one, so adding it here |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285279 |
Thanks for the feedback. I apologize for misunderstanding your question. If you prefer, I can reopen it and you can add the help link as an answer. Or feel free to edit that link into the answer on the other question. The important thing is to connect people with the info they seek; I'm not fussy... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #277349 |
Post edited: done a while ago; missed the tag then |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #276359 |
Post edited: fixed a while ago, never tagged |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #39454 |
Post edited: done a while ago; missed the tag then |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #276808 |
Post edited: done a while ago; missed the tag then |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #277121 |
Post edited: done a while ago; missed the tag then |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285279 |
The question I just marked this as a duplicate of covers the same territory, so even if it's not exactly your question, I think it's a match. If you disagree, please let us know. Bottom line: *your* work is always fair game, but you might need to recast a question in your own words to bring in an a... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285279 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285246 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285246 |
No worries -- duplicates aren't a badge of shame or anything, just consolidation. I'll go ahead and mark it, so we'll know it doesn't need a new GitHub issue to track it. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285247 |
I'm actually getting ready to take a stab at a spec for a real filtering mechanism, so the tabs would be *sorts* (like age and score) while the filters would be *filters*. Instead of trying to jam more buttons in there when we know we're going to want more filters than just this, let's build filters... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285246 |
This question is broader but includes a request for a network profile: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279409. On the other hand, that one having two status tags (because it asked for two things, one of which is implemented) could be confusing. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285247 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Filtering questions with "no answer" and/or "no accepted answer" ? You can search by answer count by adding `posttype:1 answers:n` to your search. To find unanswered questions, search for `posttype:1 answers:0`. When you type `posttype:` in the search form, you'll see a pop-up that lists the available post types. You don't have to memorize the numbers. We do... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285227 |
Clarified in an edit. I just meant that we don't need to have the auditing block author edits when no one else is involved, if that would make this easier to do. If it's easy to add the auto-comment, then we don't need to worry about staging it like this. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285227 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285227 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Editing Thread Titles Based on feedback to this answer and other conversations, I propose the following: 0. Allow anybody with the Curate ability to edit the title at any time (this is true today). 1. Allow the creator of the thread to edit the title at any time until there is a comment from somebody else. 2. Add... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285221 |
What do you think about the suggestion in [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/285216/285219#answer-285219) of having a toggle? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285216 |
Thanks for the reminder; I had forgotten about that post. I think as a practical matter we should think in terms of a filter rather than a category; in addition to the category code not currently being designed for more fluid movement like this, a community can have more than one Q&A category and ha... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285216 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Should we remove closed questions from the question list? Should we exclude closed questions from the question list? Closed questions (and their answers) would still be linked on the owners' profiles, would be included in search results, and would produce the usual notifications from activity on them. This change would only be to get them out of the mai... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285202 |
@#54706 if the community already has a meta consensus about that type of question, please flag to ask a moderator to delete it. (If there's any context the mod might need to make that connection, best to mention it. Like, if a science community had a rule against certain types of sources, mentionin... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285202 |
@#54706 I meant that any community can decide, via discussion on its meta, that such-and-such types of posts (whatever applies there) should be deleted, and they could implement that independently of anything else we do. I.e. they don't _need_ an automated system, though automation would make it eas... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285103 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285189 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285199 |
Moderators can suspend or revoke individual abilities for any user. This level of granularity in suspensions is probably new to most people, so perhaps we need to make it more widely known? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285202 |
Regardless of any general mechanism or rules, each community is free to decide on its own what content should be deleted. When there's a community consensus, people could flag for mods to delete until there's something better. Anybody can _flag_, so we don't have to place the whole curation burden ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285189 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Donation account cannot currently make live charges, transaction has not been processed Update: Stripe has now unblocked us and I just successfully made a donation (from a different community where I didn't turn the button off last night). I'll restore the button here on Meta. Again, I apologize to everybody who was trying to support us and hit this roadblock. The issue was that ou... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285149 |
Oh yes, I remember that -- from the very early days, before we decided to improve QPixel (the Ruby code) instead of starting over. Somebody on the team came across that and shared it; as far as I know, none of us were involved (or know those folks). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285149 |
Post edited: added some links |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285149 |
I had Ars Technica in mind when I wrote that (and *almost* named them). I don't have any contacts there; I hope someone else knows a way in. And I agree that we need to make things more appealing for visitors who come in response to such an article. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285149 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Proposal for Wikipedia article I would love for Codidact to have an entry on Wikipedia and, particularly, for it to be linked in this list of Q&A platforms. Wikipedia has notability requirements that must be met before they'll host a page. Basically, we need media or other prominent discussions of Codidact that didn't come fro... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285134 |
Thanks for this thoughtful analysis! I agree with a lot of what you say here. You mentioned that the qpixel code makes you want to learn Ruby; just as an FYI, a couple of our contributors did not know Ruby when they started. If you're interested in getting involved with platform development, our l... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285134 |
If anybody can help us get the media references that would help satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements, that would be great! I would particularly like to see us on [this list](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Q%26A_sites) (with linked page). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285128 |
Filters as a separate thing are part of that feature request I want to write but haven't yet. (The main part is "user-defined", but that pretty much forces separate placement.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285128 |
Oh, good idea -- use the controls we have already, and change the default. (We're going to hit a point soon when we have too many buttons there, but by then maybe we'll have built a filtering UI and won't need as many horizontal buttons.)
I agree we don't want to call it "hot". Besides what you ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285127 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should we modify the default (front) page for anonymous visitors? As a starting point for discussion, I suggest that the logged-out view not show any posts that are closed or have a score worse than that of +0/-1. We're not trying to pretend that downvotes never happen, just mitigate their aggregate effect. I'm proposing this for the default view only. Someon... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285126 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Should we modify the default (front) page for anonymous visitors? A complaint we've heard a lot is that when a community's front page has many questions that are not well-received, it deters visitors. (It also deters some people who are already here, I know.) This is not a good look: post list: 0/0, 0/-2, 2/-5, 0/-2, 0/-3, 0/-6, 1/-1, 0/-3 I'm trying not to... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285122 |
@#54706 agreed -- not trivial, but when we set up Software Dev we did so anticipating that sub-communities might eventually split off, so nothing *prevents* it AFAIK other than deciding about things like the points you raised. Merger is probably the easier case: nobody's going to lose abilities, and... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285122 |
Re "does the software support it?": I think we can assume that if this is what both communities want, we can find a way to do it. (Probably through direct database manipulation by one of the devs with access.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284764 |
Definitely an oversight. [GitHub issue tracking this](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/694). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285098 |
I noticed this a while back and filed [an issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/679) on GitHub, but it looks like no one's gotten to it yet. I agree the current situation is confusing. We didn't think to poke at "all reactions disabled" in testing, oops. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #285085 |
I'm not seeing the tag on the post or in the editor. Are you still? If so, do you also see it in a different browser or incognito window? (I'm wondering if something is being too-heavily cached.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284458 |
Reactions are signed, not anonymous (unlike votes). Does that make a difference? (I'm not arguing either way, just probing.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284468 |
About upper case: we didn't think to disallow it, and then somebody used it for a proper name. I think there was some discussion somewhere after that, but inconclusive. We should probably discuss making tags case-preserving but case-insensitive, to prevent "Tag" and "tag" coexisting in the same tag... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #285055 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Response to Monica Cellio's cross posts — "How can we grow this community"? I'm sorry if I didn't make the purpose of these posts clear enough. We are asking each individual community to talk about those communities. We're not looking for general suggestions like "use Reddit"; that's not actionable. But if, say, there's a particular subreddit that is well-aligned with one... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #281910 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284973 |
Just to answer a question in this post: no, admins don't have an interface for that either. If a deleted post is getting in the way (perhaps because it's long), the best thing to do would be to edit it. The original is still available in the history should anybody need to review it, but the deleted... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284972 |
The question title asks how to promote on Reddit, so I was expecting a question about best practices, avoiding unwanted promotions, etc. The question body instead asks about specific communities on Reddit that might overlap with ours. Which do you mean to ask? (I think the question in the title is... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284937 |
Yikes. Thanks for the report! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284750 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284905 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Ability to hide / ignore tags Proposal: - If a question has at least one tag that you've marked as a favorite, it's highlighted (as now). - If a question has at least one tag that you've marked as ignore, it's de-emphasized somehow (grayed out or similar). - If both conditions apply, the question gets no special styling (th... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284531 |
Testing - sorry for the extra ping @#8176. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284083 |
Post edited: Possible fix coming. |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284888 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284888 |
Someone suggested a solution and I believe will submit a PR, so we should be able to fix this. (I don't understand the issue deeply; I'm the messenger, not the programmer. :-) ) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #280350 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #280350 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284083 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284888 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Stop inserting space after question titles This is one of those annoying things that sounds like it should be easy to fix, but isn't. There's more explanation in the GitHub issue, but the view is picking up the whitespace in the source code that is required to keep that code legible. It's an annoyance, but we think living with it is better ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #283823 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284887 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Renaming a tag rewrites history I brought this one up internally and we all agree that yes, it's confusing. Unfortunately, it's also a complicated change; we don't track tag history now, and adding that would make the code complex in several places, so we're not going to try to do that now. I apologize for the confusion that tag ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284886 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
A few small changes, mostly about moderation and curation The latest update includes a few small changes of possible general interest: - Moderators can now escalate flags to the admin team. If you have a flag that requires our attention, or if you want to recuse yourself and you don't have a fellow moderator to ask for help from, or if you need some hel... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284480 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284750 |
Admins can now delete tags. Mods can escalate a request to admins. (Removing a tag involves touching a bunch of places in the database, because it's "as if it never existed", so admin-only for now at least.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #280176 |
The last part is done now; if you hover over a tag that doesn't have a short description, you see "no description yet". (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #280176 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #280176 |
This was done a while ago but I missed this update. If there is a short description, it shows on hover. What is missing, and I hope to improve, is that if there *isn't* a short description, there's no hover text at all. I think it would be better to show something like "no description yet" so it do... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284750 |
Github issues: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/719, https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/720. I haven't proposed auto-clean first; I think first we need to enable deleting and then have a way to be alerted that there are unused tags (and which they are), so communities can clean them ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284750 |
I'd like both -- some sort of auto-cleaning, and also better tools for mods to manage this. We haven't gotten to it yet, but I'll make sure we have issues tracking these (might exist already; will check and create if not). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284751 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284751 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Notification dropdown doesn't consistently change items from "unread" to "read" This is (newly) happening for me today, using Firefox 93.0 on Windows 10. I haven't been using Codidact a lot on this machine lately, but I have used it in recent weeks without seeing this problem. A few days ago I updated Firefox to try to reproduce a different bug. I do not know if these facts a... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284750 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: How can tags be deleted? This is a gap we need to address, yes. There's another way to get rid of them that's a little hacky: you can merge the bad tag into another one. If there's an obvious target (like there were two tags for the same thing but one was misspelled) I would merge into the correct one. If there's no obvio... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284733 |
Just saw your update. Weird! I had to use my work computer to try this on Windows and I don't control the DNS there, so I can't exactly replicate your situation, sorry. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284733 |
I just tried, also using Firefox 93.0 on Windows (Win 10, if it matters), and it worked for me. Is it still failing for you? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284720 |
Oh, I like that -- highlight the tag, not the whole post section. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284720 |
That's one possibility. If it also has a favorite tag, though, the person might want to see it. So it seems like we need to choose one of:
1. Favorite overrides ignored (you see it as a favorite)
2. Ignored overrides favorite (you don't see it or it's grayed out)
3. Neither applies and you see ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284720 |
I don't think there's a specific reason we didn't, other than that no one was asking about it at the time. What should happen if a question has both a tag you list as a favorite and one you ignore? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284629 |
We definitely want to have some indication of tag-based domain knowledge, whether that's badges or something else. (One idea would be that, on answers to questions, the usercard could indicate this state for applicable tags on that question -- e.g. this is a C++ question, so right there under the an... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284688 |
Yeah, somebody's already working on adding a donation button or link to the .org page, I'm pretty sure. (Separate repo, because the foundation is not the network though there's a ton of overlap.) (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284688 |
That's a good thought. Now that we've got something in place at all, we can look into adding recurring donations. I hadn't thought of that. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284688 |
@#8045 I think the first comment was about .com, not .org (.com = list of communities). Or `donate.codidact.com` sounds like a good approach too. Or if all of this is too much hassle, we can presumably massage the wording on the page to be clear that you're supporting the whole project and not just... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284688 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284680 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Reacting without signing in error The "react" control is now not shown if a user is not logged in. Vote buttons still are; they provide context for the score and, further, voting buttons are widespread on the Internet and people are used to them not working if not signed in, so this should not be surprising here. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284506 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284474 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284494 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284476 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284476 |
This is a line with a `<br>`. <br>
This is another line. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #282492 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #283614 |
Ah, thanks. Yes, that I can reproduce. So when you tab out of the textbox the button lights up; looks like we need to do whatever check we're doing when you click out for tab too. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284629 |
Yes! I'm really proud of everybody involved -- our community members and leaders (without whom we would be in trouble), the team building the platform, all the people who help us make it better by testing, poking at things, and asking "why?" and other questions. We've been able to do some significa... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284629 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Happy Birthday, Codidact! It feels like we celebrated Codidact’s first birthday only yesterday and that Codidact was founded just a few days ago, but here we are. Codidact is now officially two years old! [^1] Two years ago luap42 set up the Discord server that led to all the discussions that led to this network and the code... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #283614 |
I can't reproduce now, using Chrome. Can you? Specifically, I started a 14-character comment and then tried the following tests:
(1) shift: button not enabled;
(2) shift-enter: button enabled, which is correct because that's the 15th character.
I then removed a character (so down to 13) and... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284618 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Get a [faq] tag, mods! There doesn't seem to be consensus for all communities, but any community that wants new moderator-only tags, FAQ or otherwise, can have them -- just let us know (on your community's meta). The category definition includes a place to add such tags. (On our earliest communities, before we had some o... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284476 |
A comment thread was archived because it looked like the changes discussed in it were made. I might have misunderstood. You can still see it; you have to click on "show more" under the other threads. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284476 |
Sounds good, thanks. I archived it because I wasn't sure if it provided context for edits, should anybody be looking at the post history later. Probably could have deleted, but I took the less-destructive option, which still gets the thread out of the way. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284476 |
Oh, I'm sorry -- I mistook the "I have edited to explain" to refer to a *post* edit, so I (and a flagger) thought the whole thing was obsolete. Does this thread cover it, or should I un-archive the other one? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284515 |
I'd say a combination. Moderators can suspend the ability right now if they want to; maybe we didn't do a good-enough job of communicating that with them. But some sort of automated traffic control also sounds like a good idea. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284526 |
Maybe I'm in a minority, but I'd rather have the tags in the title. When I go to a question page I read from the top down, but the tags are at the bottom. (I once proposed moving tags to right after the title, but it didn't go over well.) I don't know why SO has that policy or whether it's been di... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284515 |
That's an interesting idea -- a sort of "share the space" measure, as opposed to an absolute threshold. A busy community can more easily absorb a few bad questions. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284257 |
I posted an [updated proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284169/284517#answer-284517) based on your and Fie's feedback. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284228 |
I took your proposal and these comments and Lundin's answer and posted an [updated proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284169/284517#answer-284517). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284517 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Let's improve how we handle duplicates Update based on feedback I really like the ideas proposed in this answer, which at the time of this posting has the same vote count as this question (+6, -0). The proposal in that answer creates what I think is a better experience for the asker and the community, and is less complicated from a be... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284515 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Hobbling of users who consistently post low-quality content It sounds like we want to temporarily revoke a person's ability to make lots of posts when recent quality is an issue. The Participate Everywhere ability allows one to post without limit. Nominally, the requirement to earn it is: > To earn this ability, you need to have roughly 75% of your pos... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284509 |
I see the [red border](https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/UWLZpbTUJx4umuWiThSpmz9D) when a title is too short, in Chrome 94.0.4606.71 on MacOS. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #283812 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #283334 |
Post edited: oops, that bug that was blocking me was fixed ages ago but I lost track of this - fixed now |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #275927 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284494 |
I mocked up an [example for site proposals](https://a.dev.codidact.org/posts/313) on the test server -- take a look. Note that reactions are per post type, *not* per post type per category; I created a "proposal" type that's like questions, so it could have its own reactions. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284490 |
*Who* voted isn't public, but the fact that you *got* votes is public.
Reactions are signed, so there's no expectation of privacy there. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284494 |
According to the [announcement](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284455), that's possible now. I'm not sure, but it might need an admin assist to turn on reactions for other post types. Let us know what you'd like for your communities and we'll try to help. Or for here on Meta, I guess make a meta ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284485 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Allow a user to edit a threaded comment's title after the threaded comment has been created I think it's reasonable for the person who created the thread to be able to edit the title so long as the only comments are from that user. As soon as there's a comment from someone else, though, there's the chance that changing the thread title can affect context for those comments (or even can be ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284478 |
Could you edit to clarify what you're asking? In particular, which of the titles in this screenshot do you mean? https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/VqnmvAMtb88xpVxziMgwnZzE (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284478 |
Oh wait, you mean the *thread* title, not the *post* title that shows on thread pages. Sorry, misunderstood. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284469 |
This question came up in the earlier design discussions, but it looks like we never resolved it. We want to give some indication that reactions might be obsolete, but we don't want a trivial edit to cause this effect (fixing a typo doesn't make the answer not outdated, usually).
I like the idea o... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284478 |
I assume you mean on the thread pages, right? And you're not proposing to change how inline comment threads are shown? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284470 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284460 |
You can dismiss it by clicking on the "react" link under the voting buttons again. This is like flags, close, the inbox, etc -- not super-obvious, but yes you can get rid of it again. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284458 |
True, you can edit and at least say there's a problem even if you don't yet know what the fix is. And if a self-answer works, somebody else might add that reaction. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284458 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should it be possible to "react" to one's own posts? Good question. A reaction doesn't bestow benefits (reputation, progress toward abilities, or preferential placement on the page), so in one sense reacting to your own post is harmless. On the other hand, it does add an attention-grabbing marker, and it might make sense to restrict that. I've bee... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284455 |
@#53503 oh right, sorry -- you need to opt in to that. See the "so you're a moderator now" topic in the help on the community where you're a moderator. Sounds like we need to be more proactive in pointing new mods to that, sorry. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284455 |
We've sent mail to moderators letting them know that (a) this is live and (b) how to configure it on their communities. I, too, had Languages & Linguistics in mind, and I don't know if "works for me" makes sense on Code Golf. We chose a starting set that we think makes sense and adds value on *most... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284368 |
I downloaded your PNG and was able to upload it in an answer on that post. You linked to a comment thread; were you trying to embed the image in the comment? How were you doing that (since we don't provide the uploader widget on comments)? Please add more information about what you did. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284437 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Answer | — |
A: Split any question post with two or more questions into several posts (per the number of questions) and attribute it to the asker Sometimes several questions are closely related and are best handled as a group, as this answer says. Sometimes the asker (who is, pretty much by definition, less expert than the people who will answer the question) can't tell whether questions are closely related and should be handled together. ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #282550 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284332 |
What I meant is: should the whole page, including answers, be blocked because you blocked the asker? Even if there's an outstanding answer that someone linked to that you want to read? You wouldn't want to have to unblock Troll666 just to read an answer from AwesomeExpert, right? Sure, without rea... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284332 |
If you're blocking someone who asked a question, what should happen if you navigate to the page via an answer link or comment thread? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #283884 |
Thanks @#53526! I, too, find it exciting to be able to build -- and adjust -- what our communities need, with a lot more flexibility than is available in some platforms/projects/sites. I love that we aren't stuck with limitations baked into the code base a decade ago! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284228 |
"Similar" (nice suggestion) and "exact duplicate" seem like useful terms. "Similar" questions would remain answerable; exact duplicates wouldn't. We probably want them to share some workflow; I expect a lot of nominations to start as one and end up as the other. So maybe we present a list of quest... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284228 |
Your comments make me think of "related questions" or, if that sounds too broad, "question clusters". If people interested in question A probably also want to see question B, we should have some way (that's less ad-hoc than reading comment threads) to create those connections.
I'm not thinking of... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284228 |
Thank you for this thoughtful feedback. I like the ideas you're suggesting here. One of the reasons I wanted to separate duplicate evaluation from other closure (and not even call dupes "closed") is the negative feelings that closure can carry. We certainly don't want askers to feel bullied as som... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284169 |
A "disagree" vote would start a new round of voting, and if the net score reaches the threshold it's un-duped. I see I described the notice but didn't include the voting buttons there, oops. (If someone disagrees, there's a notice about "might have been incorrectly marked...", which should get "it'... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284169 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284169 |
@#53196 re first comment: yes, people can agree or disagree while the suggestion is pending:
> Everybody else who has Participate Generally sees two buttons next to each suggested duplicate: "agree" and "disagree". Choosing either prompts for a comment to add to the thread (like the initial sugge... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284169 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
Edit | Post #284169 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Let's improve how we handle duplicates Currently, marking a question as a duplicate is part of question closure. Duplicates are a little different from other close reasons, though -- often the question itself is clear, complete, and otherwise solid, but it happens to have been asked before. Question closure can leave people feeling j... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #284072 |
I don't think this is correct. As another answer says, the user-authentication system isn't tied to the Codidact network; you can set up your own, just as the users on our test server are separate from this network. While the Codidact team can't commit to debugging every problem that comes up, we a... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #283998 |
That's a good point about positioning, @#8056. Maybe that expander (or those expanders, in the case of an answer, coming soon) should be below the title. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #283998 |
@#8056 your last request is already there. The post is behind an expander so people looking for comments jump to comments, but you can expand to see the post. Coming soon: if the post is an answer, you'll also be able to see the question from the thread page. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283928 |
Code Golf might have a use case for this, though it would require cross-category duplicates too: they want to be able to mark sandbox posts, which are articles, as "finalized", meaning the challenge was posted. If you come across such a sandbox post, it'd sure be handy to be able to go straight to t... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283998 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Show more threaded comments after clicking the title of a threaded discussion I agree that someone who asks for the comments should see the comments, especially with the "collapse" control. Very occasionally here (so far; this happened often on some sites Someplace Else), there will be a very long comment thread, by which I mean 20+. Over there we sometimes saw 100+ commen... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283884 |
Thanks Mark! I'm looking forward to more growth too. We're a lot smaller than Some Other places, but I hope we distinguish ourselves in how we treat people and work together. It's going to take time to spread the word, but everybody who helps others have good experiences here helps us grow. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283884 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Article | — |
Newsletter #8 (August 2021) Hello from the Codidact team! We're here with another update from our corner of the Internet. Platform ## We've made a lot of improvements large and small since our last newsletter. First, we finished threaded comments, and they are already helping people to organize conversations without bei... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #75053 |
This proposal has been merged into the linked one. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283745 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283668 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283668 |
Confirming a fix: @#53196 I just typed "@mosh", selected the popup, and got the correct behavior. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283348 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283348 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283235 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283623 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283611 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283692 |
Ironic example. :-) (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283692 | Question closed | — | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283318 |
Sorry, I was slow to create the usual answer to collect interest, but now that we have threaded comments, I think this is better -- anybody can add a comment and you don't need to wait for someone with privileges to edit the post.
I am interested in this community and think it's an interesting exp... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283235 |
I had incorrectly marked this as status-complete, having misunderstood the timeline. Sorry about that! (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283235 |
This just happened to me on Power Users, posting on https://powerusers.codidact.com/comments/thread/4171 with this error code: 48bd593f-6bcf-402b-87e6-ce624c068a02. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283235 |
Post edited: just happened to me, so either not fixed or recurred |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283632 |
Also, when composing a post, the button is initially disabled, and when you type enough text in the body it's enabled -- even before you fill in a title. Once you start to type the title it's disabled again until it's long enough. We should check *all* requirements, not just the active field, befor... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283235 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283235 |
Has this happened again since you posted this report? (We've fixed some other things in the vicinity.) (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282410 |
Post edited: You have to start typing before it shows up, but it's there now. |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283604 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Has anyone seen my unicorn? Alas, our unicorn herders have gone missing, and we don't know when they'll return. For now, we've just pushed a change to generate boring avatars for people who were using unicorns. We still hope to get our wandering unicorns back, either from the original server or by running our own, but in the ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283536 |
Welcome to Codidact! As you've seen, we have proposals for individual communities for economics, finance, and accounting, and this proposal for a combined community covering all three. We're not the experts; y'all are. Doe a combined community make sense? Are the people who are interested in one ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283537 |
Welcome to Codidact! As you've seen, we have proposals for individual communities for economics, finance, and accounting, and this proposal for a combined community covering all three. We're not the experts; y'all are. Doe a combined community make sense? Are the people who are interested in one ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: added from new answer |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 |
Post edited: added from new answer |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283531 |
That's the backend; does the client restrict it at all? (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276994 |
This community has just launched: https://rpg.codidact.com/posts/283503. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #74852 |
This community has been launched! Thanks for all the work to get to this point. Go forth and build. :-) https://rpg.codidact.com/posts/283503 (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74852 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #74852 |
Status-pending: we plan to launch this community. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74852 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280723 |
Post edited: clarification - the rep values are changes for the author of the post, not for the voter |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283406 |
Sorry for the ambiguity. What's configurable is the rep change for the *recipient* of the vote. The voter's reputation doesn't change and we don't have a way to configure that. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280723 |
@#53078 we don't currently have rep changes for *casting* votes, so that's not configurable right now. There's an interesting discussion to be had there, I think: is rep loss the best way to keep downvoting in check, or is it just what we're used to from Somewhere Else? Should voting be limited in s... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278059 |
Post edited: not sure what status tag to use -- instead of fixing this we replaced the comment system :-) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283233 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283228 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283234 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280723 |
Post edited: noticed some duplication |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282086 |
Post edited: Wiki is now behind an expander |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282480 |
Post edited: We now don't let you enter a too-short comment (button is disabled). All bets are off if you find a way to bypass the client check; I don't know what the server will return if you send something too short. |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282531 |
New threads are inline now. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283364 |
Thanks @#54232; I'll ask devs to take a look. (I don't have the right access to investigate.) (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283364 |
Are you visiting the links in the same tab, or are you launching other tabs? The notification doesn't "notice" that you've visited it if you open the link in another tab. (I'm not sure why. I don't think it's intentional so much as "how that code works".) If a notification is hanging around way p... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283358 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283360 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Delete the [<i>test</i>] tag. Done. I also found and nuked [my-test], [status-this-is-a-test], and [somebody-test] (eliding the identity of "somebody"). We, uh, need a way to make newly-created tags more visible for community review. Our longer-term plans include restricting who can create tags, but for new or young communit... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283349 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Answers order is changed when we access a specific answer by its direct link I'm not sure how intentional it is, but it's a known change to fix a related bug. Until recently, if you followed a direct link to an answer that wasn't on the first page of the post, that action failed and you got redirected to the question instead. I'm not sure of all the details, but apparently ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283336 |
It's a different place in the code but the same problem, so we should look to see what we did to fix the paste problem for posts (recent change) and apply the same pattern for comments and any other textboxes we can think of where it might be relevant. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283334 |
Oops. Thanks. I have an edit pending, but we need to fix a small bug before I can post it, so as soon as we do that we'll get this fixed. On *meta* there's no need to point to the global FAQ and ToS at *all*; Meta is already, well, meta, not a primary subject-matter community. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283318 |
Codidact does not make any claims of ownership; authors own their content. We require that it be *licensed* to us so that we can actually have that content on our public communities. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283318 |
If there is another license that makes sense to add for this community, we can do that. But any license must grant *us* the ability to publish and edit the content (part of normal operations), so it can't be "no rights". (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283318 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283250 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283250 |
This is fixed now, but it sounds like there might be some additional things to wrap up, so I'm not applying the status tag yet. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283250 |
Something is wrong, yes. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283229 |
How would knowing specific votes help moderators? Knowing if there is a *pattern* of voting between two users can help in some cases, but for that you don't need to know the specific votes. For now, detecting voting abuse falls to the people with database access (mods should ask for help if they su... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280350 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283225 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should we show length of character for each "things"? You will now see a length indicator for post titles, post bodies, and thread titles when you're approaching the limit. (I'm not real sure from reading the code, but I think it shows up when you get to 75% of the limit.) We chose this approach, as opposed to showing and updating the count with every... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282984 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283224 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Allow comment thread owner to delete comment threads when only comments from the comment thread owner remain undeleted This is fixed using the approach Mithical suggested in a comment: when the last comment in a thread is deleted, the thread is now automatically deleted. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283054 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279764 |
Post edited: activity button now sorts by activity using the "activity" parameter, and "age" parameter is gone |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283075 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283079 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283167 |
I wonder if we should support multiple duplicate targets? Somewhere Else we sometimes saw discussions like "this is closed as a dupe of X but should be a dupe of Y instead". Should we have a way to *add* a dupe suggestion to a dupe? If so, what should that look like? (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283119 |
This is how CommonMark does it, yes. You'll see the same behavior on GitHub. Coming from SE I had to get used to it too, but it's just a difference in markdown implementations. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283054 |
https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/592 (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283095 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Is there any disadvantages of getting Quora-like community which might affect Codidact Quora seems to be more of a social platform than a knowledge-sharing one. You have to dig through a lot of stuff you don't care about to find the information you're looking for. We don't want to do that. Another answer talked about some of the ways we are not a clone of SE. In addition to those... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283079 |
@#53922 let's be consistent. Using two different names for the same action is confusing. "Link" (or "permalink") is just a link; you can visit or copy it. "Copy link" is an action, setting the value on the clipboard. Those are two different things. The name and the behavior should match, and in ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283018 | Question closed | — | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276994 |
Welcome @#54211! Do feel free to put a direct link to your games in your profile (I'm assuming itch.io has such a page per creator?). (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277872 |
Post edited: formatting is less disruptive with threaded comments so we can allow more |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278722 |
Post edited: formatting is less disruptive with threaded comments so we can allow more |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277995 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279299 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #275968 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276933 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #74946 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280103 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282538 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282240 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #74852 |
Please "follow" this thread to be notified of status changes for this proposal. Please don't comment in this thread otherwise; we want to keep it focused so followers don't get extraneous notifications. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #283018 |
Can we identify some areas that would be off-topic on Power Users but on-topic here? (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282960 |
I meant configurable through the admin tools ("site settings"). We can modify the code to make limits configurable for a community the same way a bunch of other things are configurable, but right now it's baked into the code. The GH issue proposes changing that. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #283010 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Add an icon for verification (for mods) The icon appears in the "user card": screenshot It doesn't appear in the post lists (question list, search results, etc), but it doesn't seem like mod/admin status is important to call out there, where you aren't yet seeing what the person actually said beyond a title. The latest changes Som... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282984 |
I wonder about the performance impact of checking as you type -- it's one thing to update for a comment that caps out at 500 characters, but a 30,000-character post would be different. At the very least, though, if you *hit* the limit and a submission is rejected because of it, we should report the ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282960 |
I don't think it's configurable today, but I entered a [GitHub request](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/582) to see if it can be made so. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282871 |
Thanks for confirming! (I got as far as confirming that we didn't grab the shift version, but didn't go on to actually insert a Unicode character.) (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282968 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How can we improve community proposals? Indicating interest and following proposals Now that we have threaded comments, and the ability to follow threads (meaning you get inbox notifications of new comments), maybe we can use that to simplify some things. Two suggestions: - For each proposal, create a thread on the post named someth... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280302 |
I think we can use comment threads (and the ability to follow them) to do this now. We can add a "follow this proposal" thread that people can follow, and when a proposal changes state we can comment in the thread and followers will be notified. It's still a manual process but at least it'll ping p... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282436 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282950 |
Probably not a configuration setting, or at least I haven't come across it. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282939 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282940 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
User profile now has a Discord link We currently use Discord for community chat. Not everybody uses Discord and that's fine; nobody is required to be in chat. Someday we would like to remove our dependence on a third-party service, but that will not be soon. If community members (or moderators) want to use chat to talk with somebo... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280046 |
Post edited: according to https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/commit/93a923e8e26df977ea906c275eb903ebe4711818 |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282939 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
New search options The team has made some improvements to search, including the following new options (taken from the search help): filtering by user If you want to search for posts written by a particular user you will need to know their unique user number for the community. This can be found by looking at th... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282872 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282910 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: changes to reputation I see a lot of frustration in your post. I'm sorry you're having a rough time on Codidact. I'm particularly sympathetic to the language barrier; languages are hard to gain fluency in (at least as adults) and English is especially challenging because of its "eclectic" history. I was once yelled at ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282026 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282872 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: No filter for unanswered questions Instead of adding another button, we've made search more robust. Better documentation will be coming, but you can now search for `answers:#`. `answers:0` finds unanswered questions. Actually, it finds unanswered top-level posts, so it's currently returning articles too (oops), but you can also add... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282871 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Keyboard shortcut for image upload prevents me from entering Unicode characters by number The keyboard shortcut for uploading an image is now explicitly control-u, excluding control-shift-u. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282159 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280584 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280930 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282808 |
One site mechanic that should help us that we decided from there very beginning that answer "acceptance" is broken on SE. We sort by score, no pinning, and when we finish the feature, anybody will be able to say "worked for me" not just the person who asked the question. (I'm on mobile right now so d... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282808 |
I had that experience on SE too at times; if my well-researched answer was later than others, it might not get any attention while the ones at the top kept getting votes because they were at the top. I think the slower pace here helps with that too; nobody can read everything on some of SE's larger s... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282808 |
Thank you for sharing this perspective. I'm concerned about the FGITW/HNQ effect too, where a popular but wrong answer pushes others out of view. In case you haven't noticed this yet, we use a different ordering algorithm for answers here at Codidact to mitigate that. We use a scoring system that t... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282810 |
Chat is good for some things and some people, but we never intended to suggest that people must use it, especially when it's a third-party system. We shouldn't require that you trust, or want to have an account on, or want the hassle of Discord in order to get stuff done on Codidact. It's there for... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279384 |
That's a good idea @#52991, thanks! (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281378 |
TopAnswers has a similar approach. They have stars (only up, not down), and the number you can cast on a post is an exponential function of your received stars. A thing I like about this is that it's an *option*; as an expert in a topic I'd like to not have the full weight of that expertise affect ev... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282810 |
We have a Discord chat as an informal thing, but it's not directly tied to accounts here and not everyone uses it, and that's fine. Everyone should feel welcome to use meta (or flags if you think something shouldn't be public) to bring attention to issues. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280723 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280350 |
Post edited: we weren't good about updating this, sorry! |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282397 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282653 |
I hope you didn't read my response as criticizing the question -- not the intent at all! It's important for both the target community and the larger Codidact community to be able to discuss questions of community scope/boundaries/separation/integration. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282653 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Ideas on the separation of Game Development from Videogames CD I'm not a videogamer, so I'll admit up front that I'm generalizing from related areas: as a boardgamer or RPG player, would I want to share space with people creating games, game systems, modules, and player aids? My personal reaction is: yes, very much so! First off, when creators participate in... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282165 |
Sorry @#53207 - I thought we were still waiting for deploy, but that's because I apparently shouldn't try to read commit logs before caffeine. :-) Moshi says it's fixed, so I've updated the tag. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282165 |
Post edited: apparently I can't read commit history before caffeine and this really was already in |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282347 |
I agree we should show that there were deleted comments; even if you can't see what was there, you can at least tell that some context is missing and maybe that's why that later comment seems off. But it would be nice to not *count* the deleted comments in the preview; saying you're seeing 5 of 10, ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282591 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Comment Changes Should people be able to edit comments if there are more comments in the thread than are shown in the in-page preview? It seems like that runs the risk of unknowingly changing context out from under later comments that you haven't looked at. We should (all) think more about comment edits. Somepl... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282578 |
I didn't mean to suggest increasing the limit. If you type 500 characters as text, it's a certain size that people have grown used to. With code blocks, a comment could plausibly be 2-3 times as tall. is that a problem or is that ok? The typical case of a few lines of code seems reasonable to me,... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282578 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Comments don't like multi-line code :/ When comments were all shown directly under the post with no way to collapse them, it made sense to restrict formatting that could make them take up a lot more vertical space. But (a) we do allow Mathjax (on communities that use it) and (b) comments are now threaded, so I think it makes sense to rel... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282577 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Editing Thread Titles I started to write up a platform issue for this, but realized I have questions we need community feedback on first: 1. Who should be able to edit the title, beyond those with the Curate ability who already can? Only the creator, or any participant in the thread? (We do not have a "suggest edit" ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282570 |
That's true for "homework problem sets", but sometimes homework is in the form of questions to be answered with words. For example, "when should you use an interface versus class inheritance?" is one I've seen. Granted the homework form might also contain instructions ("be sure to address..."). Bu... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282563 |
@#8176 in case this helps: the guidance at the top of the "ask question" page is customizable per community. If Software Dev wants to add something (such as policy links), we can do that. Ideally, work out a draft on SD meta and ping a team member when it's ready. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282570 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: The homework dumps are coming - how about a network-wide policy? Speaking personally, not for the team: I don't think we should impose a network-wide policy, but I do think we should work out a policy draft that communities can adopt or adapt. We don't know what kinds of communities we'll ultimately attract here. Some might be more interested in mentoring, coa... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282542 |
Post edited: fixed merge conflict |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282542 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282542 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Art Codidact Site Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282538 |
The off-topic list doesn't say, but I assume that "technique" questions (how do I achieve this effect) would be not only welcome but probably pretty common?
Are there any arts that are excluded? Are woodworking, blacksmithing, weaving, sculpting, enameling all in scope? What about digital arts --... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282495 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Threaded comments are here! Feature request: timestamps. Ok, I admit I can be a little obsessive. Plus, if I'm a moderator, I should try to stay on top of things that are happening on my community. This includes new comments. Would it be possible for the thread entry under a post to show not only the number of comments ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282346 |
For comments on the page, to "contain" long threads I'd keep the current approach of showing the first five comments only (not all of them), but if you click the link at the bottom it would load the rest. I think this strikes a good balance between comment accessibility and comments being out of the... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282346 |
After using it for a while in real contexts (not just on a test server), and given all the feedback, the solution I'd like to see is: you can see all comments from the post page, you can reply from there, and we also keep the link to the separate page because there are cases where that's easier to ma... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282480 |
Oh, thanks for the additional info! My test message wasn't short enough. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282480 |
That's weird. I just logged in with a generic account (no special privileges) and posted a thread here: https://a.dev.codidact.org/comments/thread/66. Did you log out and back in again like it says in the message, and if so did that make a difference? (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282479 |
It's also worth noting that the dev server might be running experimental code or might be down at times.
Also, when you sign up on the dev server and get the confirmation email, you have to edit the URL from meta.codidact.com to the dev server. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282240 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282342 |
Good point, thanks -- I'll try to elaborate on that in a place more visible than this comment. We didn't want the UI complexity of deep nesting and branching, and we do have plans for reply chains so you can reply to specific comments and see that in the rendering. Haven't gotten there yet. You ca... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282459 |
I think if we log the history somewhere, maybe in mod tools or even for now just in the DB, that'll be sufficient. The threat model would be hostile edits: a comment thread turns into a heated argument and somebody changes the title to "so-and-so is an idiot" or something -- we want to know who did ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282435 |
@#54114 people participate here from all over the world and, even among native English speakers, there are variations -- there's no one "proper" English. Please do help everyone to improve posts by asking questions if they're unclear. Let's keep in mind that everyone's coming from a different backg... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282425 |
Should we move this to the Q&A category, since it's more discussion about one or more proposals than a solid proposal of its own? We had a Q&A discussion about Software Dev before we launched that, so there's precedent. (At the time we had more than one code-related proposal, so this was a "what sh... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282420 |
Thanks Mark. It truly is a group effort. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282420 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Article | — |
Working together: community customizations Code Golf is not a typical Q&A community. Code golf is a form of competitive programming -- somebody poses a coding challenge, and people try to solve the problem using as few bytes of code as possible. In other words, like in the physical game, golfing is about completing the challenge with the few... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282353 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282376 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282342 |
Post edited: preference, comment flags, and a little more signal that we're listening and continuing to improve this |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277863 |
Post edited: fixed with threaded comments |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282242 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282362 | Question closed | — | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282346 |
Going to a new page does remove ready access to context (like if you need to consult the post the thread is attached to). It's a link away, but I think that's one issue behind the requests for inlining the thread. Maybe the answer is inlining or maybe the answer is some other change to the thread p... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282353 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Threaded comments are here! status-completed Regression: comments with mathjax aren't properly rendering in the in-page preview (see General Comments here), but they do render properly on the full thread page (example). Related bug report. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277098 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281617 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280484 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282342 |
Thanks - this is good feedback! (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282342 |
I renamed the thread for you, and thanks for catching that. I didn't think to test who can edit thread titles. On the one hand, if you can edit a comment then you should be able to edit the title (at least if you created it). On the other hand, the title is more of a "shared resource" and we don't... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282342 |
Thanks @#53305; that's good feedback. If the thread (where you can add a comment) showed up in-page so you could see everything else easily, would you want to expand to support the whole thread (no matter how many comments), so you could see everything right there, or would you want a scrollbar on t... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282342 |
I found it odd initially too, @#53207, but it grew on me after I used it for a while. See what you think after a few days. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282342 |
Thanks! The "massive wall of comments" problem is very real in some places, so we really wanted to make that better. I think the in-page preview plus separate pages for the whole thread will be a good balance. I'm looking forward to seeing what happens in practice; if we need to adjust things we w... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282342 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Threaded comments are here! From our earliest discussions of what the Codidact platform would be, we've known that we had to tackle comments. Comments are very important for giving feedback and asking for clarifications. Some other platforms try to keep comments focused and prune the discussions that naturally happen too, but... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282336 |
Welcome to Codidact! This is a question for Hindus to answer -- what's true for one religious community isn't necessarily true for others. I hope some Hindus and other prospective participants will respond to your question. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282308 |
Related: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278946 (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281439 | Question closed | — | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282308 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282146 |
@ManishS we have MathJax (including in titles) for communities that want it (such as https://math.codidact.com). I don't know if we have "pure" LaTeX absent MathJax. We don't turn on MathJax everywhere because it introduces some noticeable lag in rendering, but we're happy to turn it on for any co... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: Saw this comment on the question so adding here. |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282242 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282292 |
Yes, answer tags don't make sense for all communities, and also not for all answers even in communities that use them. Answers should use tags when they need to distinguish a specific case from a general case (e.g. this answer to a python question is for python 2 but not python 3). (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282291 |
A "latest version" policy when answering makes sense at the time. Now fast-forward a few years when C++17 isn't the latest version any more, or imagine that the community existed back when C++11 was current. Now you have a bunch of answers and only dates can guide you. Would it help to be able to ... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282281 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Should we be able to tag answers? On some of our communities, it would be helpful to be able to label answers systematically: - On Code Golf, by language. - On Software Development, Power Users, or Linux Systems, by specific version/platform/library -- for example, if the answer to a C++ question is different for C++11 than C++... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282242 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282240 |
Post edited: Proposal includes a scope, so if there's consensus that part's good. A short summary seems easy based on that. The big thing we need is people. |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282242 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282243 |
Meta is just the example; this would be used on all the communities (with each community being able to customize that orange banner area along with its logo). (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282242 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Getting a gaming community of Codidact Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282165 |
Thanks for checking. The other possibility was that *we* were caching it, though I'd expect us to refresh that at the same time we check/update abilities. So looks like a bug. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282165 |
Is this still happening? (Trying to rule out caching.) Also, congratulations! (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282163 |
That was a widely-reported bug; I don't see the harm in making the resolution a little more clear to people who are looking at some of those reports. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282159 |
I wonder if the image-upload shortcut could be (or was meant to be) Ctrl-U, as opposed to Ctrl-shift-U, and if we could be stricter about that. Or maybe image upload could get a different shortcut. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282101 |
@Istiak it's the same link as in the post: https://mattjbrent.github.io/# . (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282146 |
@celtschk thanks for pointing that out. I wonder if there's a library or something that already implements this entity-to-rendering (or entity-to-Unicode) translation. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282138 |
I like where your proposal is going. Personally, I'd drop rep and put the hamburger menu back -- people using phones expect a hamburger menu and know what it means. By dropping the rep out we can make room and still even show some banner. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282149 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Taking our design to the next level: feedback wanted More phone feedback -- smaller layout issues. For a screenshot see this answer ('cause wow is that huge and I don't want to do that on a second answer). - I'm glad to see that the "filter results" button is visible and not just lost to "that column goes to the bottom in a responsive design". (No... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282148 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Taking our design to the next level: feedback wanted I looked at the mockup on my phone. At default zoom this is what I see (in Chrome, in case it matters): Screenshot screenshot Focusing on the question list (for this answer): - With the amount of stuff at the top and the size of the titles, I see only one question. That seems unfort... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282146 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should HTML entities be supported in titles? We reviewed this and have decided to leave titles as text-only, but we have a workaround that we hope isn't too difficult. To support HTML entities we'd have to run titles through HTML rendering, which adds an opening for security risks. Sure, we have those with the body already, but this would b... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282138 |
One of the goals is a design that works on all platforms. On my phone, the layout in this answer is too wide to be legible -- if the design fits the text is too small, and if I zoom to get readable text things don't fit. I'm not seeing what you're seeing when I visit Reddit, so I can't test what th... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282101 |
@Istiak it's a responsive design. I tried it on my Android phone and while there are some things I'd change (will write an answer later), it worked for me. If you're seeing a problem on mobile please let us know; one of the goals here is to have a design that works everywhere, without customized v... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281617 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276994 |
Thanks @corporat - that's what I assumed from context, but hadn't heard the specific term VTT before so just checking. :-) (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282110 |
I don't think the footer omission is an intended change; it's just that this mockup only uses the first handful of questions to demonstrate the changes and then stops. The footer isn't going away. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282106 |
Some people use the same avatar everywhere -- Google, Twitter, Facebook, here, etc -- and we shouldn't impede that. It's already annoying that some sites use circles and some squares, making it harder to make something that works everywhere. Telling people "oh, you need to resize (etc) your image f... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282101 |
@Moshi this is great feedback; could I persuade you to write some answers? People might want to discuss and vote on what you say about tag styling, tag filters, and post score, for example. Oh, and I totally missed the round avatar -- no idea if that's an intentional change, but worth asking about!... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282101 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Taking our design to the next level: feedback wanted Our team has been exploring some ideas to improve Codidact's design. We've wanted to improve the visual design for a while, and we also have a lot of other usability changes we'd like to make. We want visual design and function to complement each other, creating a more intuitive and pleasant experi... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276994 |
Oh wait. The top-voted answer here already proposes "human-mediated", which is the point I was meandering around. In other words, yes I think RPGs that happen to be played online, with a human GM and human players, are solidly in scope already. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276994 |
Welcome @corporat ! I'm happy to see the recent interest in this proposal. By VTT do you mean virtual RPGs or virtual games more broadly (like board games)? Personally, I think so much of RPGs is about the *play* (roleplaying, rules, story development, etc) that the exact venue is kind of secondar... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280299 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281577 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281080 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281881 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #282093 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Deleting a question that has answers that were deleted by System, transfers the answer deletion to the question deleter This is fixed going forward, but existing deletion records haven't been updated. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281907 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282086 |
I'd be inclined to put the wiki behind a "more" link that does an in-page load, so you can see the full wiki and the questions together but don't have to. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282026 |
We want to add better filtering, including a way to define and save your own filters. We aren't there yet, but I wonder if we could at least make search support `answers:#`, so you could search for unanswered or just one answer or whatever you like. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #282005 |
We have plans to allow refining the search on a particular community to either just this category or all categories. It seems reasonable to also allow going in the other direction (all communities, not just this one). All of this still needs some UX design, but let's consider it when we do the othe... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281137 |
@Moshi sorry about the non-ping (didn't know that). Here's the [GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/326). (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281993 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Battery Science & Engineering Speaking for myself, not for the team. This sounds like a very specialized topic. If there's a strong community around that specialized interest, that can work fine -- several sites on SE are also pretty specialized. (I mean c'mon, 20 blockchain sites instead of one?) While existing communities... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281137 |
Thanks for the info @Moshi; I've reopened the issue. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281983 |
I don't know what's most common; people use Twitter and mailing lists and Facebook and wherever else to attract people who aren't already here, too. Improving how *Codidact* treats *Codidact links* is a good idea; if the renderer automatically generated the Markdown you're looking for that would add... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281983 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Improving the "copy link" button "Copy Link" is on top-level posts for consistency with answers. On an answer the URL takes you straight to that answer, which isn't what would be in your URL bar. (I think the work on the threaded-comments branch will add comment links, too -- same idea.) Your proposal works smoothly if where yo... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281976 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Article | — |
Newsletter #7 (May 2021) Hello again from the Codidact team! We're here with another progress report. Communities Our communities continue to grow, some more slowly and some more quickly. On many of them we're seeing questions at a variety of expertise levels, which is great! If you can't answer that complex special... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281910 |
@Istiak I think it's a case we just didn't consider. When logged out we could still show the description (what it is, what you need to do to earn it), without the user-specific progress. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281910 |
Hmm, yeah, that's not the behavior I expected either. I guess it's because of the "so-and-so has/you have earned this ability" bit, but I hope we can just skip that if there's no specific user being queried or logged in. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281911 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Why do we have the "Participate Everywhere" ability when we haven't yet done anything? Bootstrapping. Our communities are still small, so after we rolled out the abilities system we decided to put all our communities in "new community" mode, which lets everyone start with Participate Everywhere. Moderators can suspend a specific ability for a user if it's being misused, either for a ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281907 |
That's a bug, yes. Answer state should derive from the state of the question (not true now, known issue), but in any case the attribution of the deletion shouldn't change. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281882 |
@JohnDoea that's a good idea, thanks! (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281902 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How are the different site header colors picked? Can the community request a color change? There's a list of about a dozen colors that are available. The choices are largely arbitrary. We want the logo and color to not clash (those can be determined in either order), and since we don't yet have banner art to distinguish communities from each other visually, just logos, we want some varie... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281898 |
Why do you need it on Physics? Do you want to *create* content with CC 3.0 there? If so, please make a request on Physics meta and we can add it there. I'm still not sure why you want it, but you can explain it there. We don't need 3.0 here to support using 3.0 content from elsewhere; we just nee... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281898 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: CC BY-SA 3.0 license doesn't show The imported post is CC BY-SA 3.0 because that's how the source (Stack Exchange) licensed it. That notice reports a license. The list of licenses you can choose when posting here is unrelated. That list is configurable (per-community), so if people want 3.0 to be an option we can add it. So far... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281893 |
And if there's a larger issue about a particular question, one that requires more discussion, raising a question on the community's meta is a good next step. (That will also be more visible.) Usually if a closure is controversial it's because something about the community's scope or policies isn't ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281882 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Why isn't there a "contact us" button in the footer of this website? You're right, and that's been on our to-do list for a while, sorry. You can send email to support@codidact.com. We have a support portal under development; email actually flows into that now and the back end works, but I think you need to create an account on that platform and we'd rather wire that... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281825 |
A PR to improve this text has been merged; it'll be in the next deployment. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281803 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: send mail for new community Apart from the email question, which as Art said can be controversial, we want to have a better way to notify people who expressed interest when a new community launches. We'd need to write a whole new "proposals" framework to do that right, which is a lot of work and we have higher-priority tasks r... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281311 |
@Istiak I didn't apply the tag because of the multiple issues. The main issue, about duplicate votes, is still a concern. The author has updated the post to reflect that the bug is fixed. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278840 |
Update: we've launched Power Users. Scope is still a little fuzzy, but can be refined on meta there with the foundation from this proposal. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276995 |
@paulocoghi launched - hope you can help out! (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276995 |
@Ullallulloo launched. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276995 |
@dessert launched - hope you can help out! (We have one question now, but I trust there will be more soon.) (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276995 |
@ploni launched. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276995 |
@jrh launched now. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276995 |
@ShowMeBillyJo launched. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276995 |
@mbomb007 launched. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276995 |
@. . launched. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281781 |
@celtschk agreed; that's important feedback that is currently missing. We plan to add information about voting activity (time-based) to the user profile, filling the same niche as SE's reputation tab, because it's important to know which posts are getting attention. Once we have that we can figure... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281761 |
This is an interesting idea; a creative community could build a different *kind* of Q&A community, with other types of content being first-class elements alongside it. When you have a chance, could you maybe add a few sample questions that you envision this community hosting? Subjective isn't autom... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281717 |
I guess that list is fed by the same JSON that feeds the list on codidact.com, which we haven't updated yet. They're in the site switcher and the dashboard, so I guess those get their info directly from the database. Thanks for letting me know. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281717 |
Post edited: there was a bug, now fixed, that caused this not to show up when I posted it, so this trivial edit is to bump it |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281732 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Could "last activity" link to where it happened (e.g. specific answer)? Please ignore this answer (if you see it). We need to test a specific scenario involving, ironic, "last activity". (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281731 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: I can't post a comment to an answer ; jquery errors appear in (Chrome) browser console We believe this has been fixed by some other changes made since you reported this. I marked it status-completed based on that, not because I can point to a code change. If you see this again, please let us know. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280155 |
Hi @elemtilas - good to see you here. Scientific Speculation (which is narrower than Worldbuilding) launched after this proposal was made (I think), but yes, there's WB scope that wouldn't fit there. Anybody is welcome to help build out the scope for a community proposal or an existing community. ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281717 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How should we approach our (non-developer) software community proposals? We have just launched Linux Systems and Power Users. Both communities have some outstanding scope issues from their proposals, but that's fine: there's enough of a baseline to get started, and the communities can continue to work out details on their community metas. Welcome aboard everyone. We'... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278833 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276824 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281208 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281311 |
The issue with the flag errors is now fixed and deployed. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281409 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281651 |
@Istiak on that question, somebody posted and then deleted an answer, and that's the activity that showed as a modification on the question list. We need to distinguish among modifications; if we said "edited" or "answered" or "closed" or "answer deleted" then you'd know what the change was even if... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281651 |
@Lundin thanks for the information, and for pointing out that this case couldn't possibly have been a tag edit. We've had (and fixed) other history bugs, so while I don't know why this one doesn't show, I think we'll still need to wait to see if it happens again. Debugging single occurrences, espec... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281651 |
Post edited: this wasn't a tag edit (or a question edit even) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281577 |
Related: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/485 (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281410 |
Related? https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/268 (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281610 |
Asking *reviewers* to decide if it's a minor edit is a nice approach. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278833 |
Post edited: trivial edit to try to unstick a zombie tag |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281446 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281233 |
@Istiak you can always bring your own answers here; you wrote them, after all. For other people's answers, you would have to follow the attribution requirements in the license used by SE. It's usually better to write your own answer; you can cite the other and quote parts of it, like you would fro... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278833 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281650 |
Thanks for the detective work. I thought from this that the problem is that *added* tags don't get counted, but if so, then [status-planned on Site Proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/categories/10/tags/997) should return 0, because no proposal starts with that. Instead it correctly shows the one ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281651 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Post edited by a user but no changes visible We have had some bugs in edit history. Fixes for these bugs apply to future edits, but we don't have a good way to update events that predated the bug fixes. That edit was six months ago and I know we've fixed history bugs since then. If you see a new edit that doesn't show history correctly ple... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281641 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Could we have a way to edit without bumping posts? Speaking for myself and not the team (I haven't discussed this with anyone else), here are some things I'd like to consider: - We shouldn't try to programmatically determine what a "minor" edit is; in the right context, one character is a major edit. Designation as minor needs to be human-powered... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281623 |
Yeah, known problem that we really need to fix. Sorry for the inconvenience. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281617 |
Oh wait, I see what's going on -- if you *close* as a duplicate you have to supply a link, but if you *flag* you don't. That's an oversight. I don't know what it'll take to fix this. At the very least, we could add some text asking people to supply the link in the textbox. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281617 |
This is a bug. The duplicate close reason is supposed to require a link. I just checked the configuration here on meta and it's set to yes (required), but I was able to flag this as a dupe without supplying one. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281615 |
I would want major edits to still bump, because if somebody did a major overhaul of a (previously) poor post I probably want to change my vote, which means knowing about the change. But I don't want to be directly notified of every change (i.e. following posts doesn't solve this for me), because tha... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281611 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Understanding how posts were possibly received by the community --- network wide I think what you're asking for is (1) better information about votes you're receiving, so you know which posts are being up- or down-voted, and (2) for that information to be available in one place. For the first, we do want to provide this information on the user profile page. You should be able... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281577 |
I've sometimes seen the empty circle (like you reported here) and sometimes seen "0" as the notification count. Haven't worked out the characterization yet. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281576 |
Thinking out loud: could be another button at the top of the question list instead of a new category. Consider that more than one category could have this need, so we wouldn't want to spawn an extra category per, but we might be able to separate them another way. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276994 |
Second what Peter said. Some communities come together quickly, some slowly. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281554 |
@ r~~ links to related information, starting points for investigation (not an answer but maybe building blocks for an answer), comments/questions that are more tangential but still might be of interest (e.g. did you know there's a new version of that library that solves this problem?). These are th... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281554 |
@hkotsubo better contextual guidance is one of our goals, yes. We're not there yet, but it's a design goal. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281554 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Giving question feedback in private - a moderating system to reduce conflicts I'd like to propose a different way of thinking about the problem (and I agree there are problems here). Some premises: - New users don't know how things work, so we need to keep it simple. - Many non-veteran users are deterred by bad "people" experiences -- if your question is off-topic the... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39446 |
Post edited: this question is so old it didn't have a required tag :-) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281533 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Bootstrapping: who can speak for a community? It's been a while since I asked this question. In the meantime we've launched several communities that weren't transplants from SE, so most of our communities didn't start with "imported moderators". Here's what we're doing for all communities now: When a community is new, the moderation load is... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281527 |
I forgot about this question; thanks for reminding me. We should post an update. Since I asked this, we've started asking communities to nominate people -- when a community first starts the load is low enough that staff can handle any issues that come up, and then the community can choose its initial... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281521 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: A "Super user" like community to include Q&As about software applications usage There's been a lot of discussion here and on other proposals and questions about this idea. We want to launch a general "software users" community where questions about applications, OS settings, cloud-based tools, etc will all be in scope -- the broad approach we also took with Software Development... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276824 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276824 |
We'll draw a summary from the top-voted scope answer, something like "community for users of Linux and Unix-like operating systems". That can be tweaked farther, but no point in blocking a popular proposal on a minor thing. Similarly, we can start with the scope that's been discussed here and refin... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281507 |
Post edited: Oops, I meant to cast that as more of a question. Thanks Moshi. |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281507 |
@Moshi fair point, and maybe the meta context is enough. I'm asking, not asserting. :-) As for discussion etc, while those are a different aspect than things like "comments" or "editing", they're still the "original context" of the question rather than a disposition from the staff, so that feels di... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281507 |
@Moshi I worry that it becomes more of a "for those who know" thing at that point. If you know there are status tags, you'll probably figure out what "planned" means. On the other hand, if you're on a databases community where questions could be about query plans, maybe less clear. Or "declined" on a... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281507 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Let's revamp our status tags I agree that distinguishing these kinds of responses from other moderator-only tags would be helpful, and that we don't need to keep doing what we started doing early on when we needed something. The "status-" is part of the name to avoid having only one type of "encoding"; somebody who can't se... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281466 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Disallowing quoting question parts in answers, rather, in comments only Quoting is sometimes necessary for context. Sometimes an answer needs to focus on one part of the question -- one claim, one line of code, etc. Not being able to quote would impede clarity. This doesn't mean we don't want askers to improve their questions. If somebody asks for clarification, yo... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281458 |
@Istiakshovon sorry for the confusion. I wasn't suggesting that you change anything, just taking your suggestion and talking about how we might address it along with a related problem. Feature requests can attract that kind of response sometimes as people think through how the feature might work. ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281438 |
Your English is fine, don't worry! If something's unclear, people can ask about it. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281458 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Separate question and answer in profile Yeah, we definitely want to improve that aspect of the profile page. We want to allow you to break posts out by type and also by category -- you shouldn't have to dig through all your Q&A posts to find that one article you posted in the "resources" category. Because we can now add new post types,... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281378 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280056 |
@Istiakshovon new users who haven't earned other abilities yet are limited to a few posts a day. The "Participate Everywhere" ability lifts those restrictions and is earned by having enough well-received posts. In principle, if you had that ability and then had a run of poor posts, you could lose it... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281449 |
BTW, the privilege thresholds can be changed for individual communities. We probably should have rolled out lower levels to start with rather than the "mature, active site" levels that we designed for. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281446 |
I find those "in"s suspicious -- "in 10 hours", vs. "4 hours ago" etc (what I see for my read notifications). Hmm... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281443 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: information of codidact Welcome to Codidact. I'm glad you found your way here. In case you haven't seen it yet, The Codidact Vision lays out, at a high level, what we aspire to build. We put community first, and feedback from the community is very important in shaping what we build. We're a very small team currently... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281411 |
The team creates GitHub issues for things raised on Meta (main or per-site). FRs are good to bring up on Meta so the community can discuss them first. Whether you call it a bug or an FR, improving this tooltip doesn't seem controversial, so consider this to be on our radar now. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281407 |
Hasn't been ruled out, for sure. We want an API; we just haven't gotten there. Which means yes, there's opportunity to be involved. I'll defer further elaboration to the devs (I can't say anything about timing). (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281383 |
I have a bunch of rep on Writing from technical-writing questions. People shouldn't assume I have special standing if I answer a question about poetry. In fact, if I thought people would judge all my answers based on my rep, that might push me to *not answer* other questions (that I can also answer... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281378 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Why is there a rep system in Codidact? We didn't set out to have a reputation stat, but because we started by adapting code that had it, we started out that way. When we brought up removing it, a few people objected strongly. (See, for example, this discussion.) We've "nerfed" reputation; unlike on SO, reputation doesn't affect your ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281312 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What to do about sock puppets in Site Proposals? There is some amount of subjectivity in evaluating proposals, which is not ideal. It's important for us (all, together) to figure out how we can improve our process. Ultimately we probably need to make some software changes to better support proposals, but right now we have those "indicate your int... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280166 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281270 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Add more context in the community ads It looks like this has changed; I just saw this: "Check out this article" I'm inferring that the ad is now sensitive to the type of post being linked; I'd like to confirm that with the developers before marking this status-completed, since I've only got the one data point so far. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281238 |
This is not the place to discuss the Judaism community. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281248 |
@ShashankVM the word "kosher" just means "fit". I've heard many Jews use it in non-religious contexts and do so myself. As for votes, people downvoted because they disagreed with you, which can happen regardless of the topic. There were downvotes on Meta before this announcement and there will be ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281248 |
The "easter eggs" I've seen (I think my first was some hidden content on a DVD, not even software) have been extras that you have to seek out and that don't affect anything else. The DVD one led to some deleted scenes, I think, but didn't affect my normal viewing of the movie. Similarly, the hidden g... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281248 |
@ShashankVM was the only use of "easter egg" in an answer to one of these questions? I admit I hadn't given the term, which I've heard for years, any deeper thought. Now that you've brought up the religious angle I'll try to be more careful about it. I don't play video games and can't comment on the... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281235 |
Nobody on the Codidact team wants to have fun at others' expense. If there are aspects of the game, or its presence for people who haven't chosen to activate it, that cause problems for those with disabilities or anyone else, we want to know so we can address it. As someone with a disability myself,... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281248 |
@ShashankVM re "getting the Q&A back on track", you probably didn't see it if you're not active on the Judaism community, but the "fun" questions were segregated (different category) and only live for a limited period of time. The category description also made it very clear what was going on. Pur... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281248 |
Post edited: response to comments |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281248 |
@ShashankVM I'm having trouble understanding how my invitation for people to help with development if they want to led you to think I'm expressing a requirement. That's not my intention at all, and I'd happily rephrase if it's unclear but I'm a little confused about how to do so. Nobody is required... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281248 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What are the pros and cons of gamifying Codidact.org? I want to supplement Mithical's answer, with which I agree. Broadly speaking, Codidact has three major pieces, all essential: - its communities, without which none of the rest of this would matter - the platform itself (the code that runs our communities) - the development team, the people who ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281239 |
The opt-in nature is an important aspect. One year SE restyled all their sites to look like those awful Myspace sites from the 90s. (Maybe not SO because they care about that one; don't remember.) It rendered SE completely unusable for people with certain visual disabilities and very annoying for man... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281227 |
@OlinLathrop the tradeoff is between the people doing curation here (who can turn it on) versus those coming from outside who don't know enough to curate yet and are just going to be confused by the SE icons all over the place. I encourage people who are active on the affected communities to turn it... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281233 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How to ensure that duplicating a post from another website won't cause content duplication that would hurt Codidact's SEO? There are two aspects to copies, license/attribution and duplication. The CC-BY-SA license doesn't require you to include attribution links for your own work. This is why, on communities with imported content, we remove those attribution links when people claim their imported posts -- we no longe... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281228 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can comment input fields be vertically scalable? The comment box is now resizable; drag the control in the lower right corner down to make the area bigger. Because comments can include newlines, wide Unicode characters, and probably other unpredictable things, choosing a size to fit 500 ASCII characters in a paragraph wouldn't be a complete solu... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277177 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281194 |
Post edited: [dir] attribute is now supported as per luap42's answer |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281227 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Question | — |
New preference: show the icon for SE imports (off by default) Three of Codidact's early communities did large-scale imports of content from Stack Exchange, and at the request of some community members, we added an icon to those questions on question lists. Over time, some have felt that the utility of that marker has dropped off; after many months, both import... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281208 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281208 |
Ok, it's the angle brackets in the `script` tag in your comment; when I removed those, the comment posted. I'm not sure if we accept HTML in comments or if we should be escaping all angle brackets, or something else I haven't thought of. (If we accept any HTML, I imagine the escaping approach would... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281208 |
Test: Thanks; must I use the `const url = "http://example.com";
fetch(url` code? I already use the code in the same webpage I send data from (i.e. the code comes between a `script` tag in the very same webpage that the data is sent from). In other words, I should paste the **XHR/Fetch** code in the ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281208 |
Can you add the comment to your post? It sounds like there's something special about *that* comment, since comments in general work, so we'll need to see what you're trying to post in order to be able to debug it. Thanks. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281204 |
It still happens in Safari 12.1.1. Whether that's a browser we support, I don't know -- just commenting to indicate that you're not seeing it working because we fixed a bug. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281167 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: A "Super user" like community to include Q&As about software applications usage Summary: I'm breaking this out from this answer so it can be voted on separately. It sounds like we have consensus, but it's a little hard to tell. > Power User Codidact is a community where computer enthusiasts (power users) ask and answer questions about software and hardware usage. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278888 |
PC hardware and close affiliates like routers, but I agree that consumer electronics are too far afield even if your TV now has a computer inside it. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281137 |
ArtOfCode gets the credit for fixing it; I'm just the messenger. :-) (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280973 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281138 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Ad templates don't work with Articles The bug with ads for individual articles is fixed. The ad templates for random posts (at all, or from a specific category) apply some selection criteria, so we don't accidentally promote poorly-received posts, closed questions, etc. I'm not sure what those criteria are, but according to a comment... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279624 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281137 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: The history diff does not highlight tags being added This is now fixed for new tag-only edits (example), but we don't have a way to go back and fix older history entries. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277447 |
Post edited: We had fixed this locally (by editing the close reasons here) a while back, but it's now fixed in the code. |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280861 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281103 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Cancelation prompt is unintuitive The behavior of the dialogue has now been fixed -- clicking "ok" abandons your changes and returns you to the page you were on, and clicking "cancel" puts you back in the editor (with your changes still there). We're relying on the browser to present the confirmation and the interfaces there don't s... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281072 |
And it's not specific to those users/images. In your screenshot mine is one of the larger ones; here on Meta it's one of the smaller. Weird! Thanks for pointing it out. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281037 |
Could you share the code you're trying to post via some other means (like in a gist or something) so we can use it to test? Thanks! (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281030 | Question closed | — | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281026 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can a moderator promote Codidact for free on Reddit? We don't seem to have active Redditors (people with the track record that would prevent being labeled as spammers), but I'm all for responsible promotion! Do we have within our community an established Reddit user with a good track record who'd be willing to work with us on this? (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281023 |
A community *about* law would be fine, just like one about medicine would be fine, but we can't take on the, err, legal liabilities of giving professional advice in either area. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #281013 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #281012 |
Can you describe what the community would cover here? People shouldn't have to try to reverse-engineer it from Reddit links; please tell us what you want to build. Thanks. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280963 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Why not broaden Electrical Engineering to Engineering? The scope of the Electrical Engineering community is up to them. If you want to propose changes, you should ask on their meta. We don't impose scope on communities; we allow communities to define their own boundaries. The EE community was specifically proposed as EE and not general. The proposa... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280955 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280955 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Advertise on Stack Exchange? SE sites (that aren't in beta) have "community ads", which are ads submitted by users on that site for things they think will be of interest to other users on that site. Some use them to promote SE-specific things like sandboxes or weekly chats. Some use them to promote external resources of variou... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280939 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Article | — |
Newsletter #6 (February 2021) Hello from Codidact! We're here with another batch of recent news. Platform Since our last newsletter, the team has been focusing on bugs and smaller features, including: - Search is now inline; you can click the box and start typing instead of having to go to another page. You can also se... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277362 |
See https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280930#answer-280930. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277362 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280931 |
Thanks -- did not know about that! We want to do *responsible* promotion, and this looks like a useful place to post. I see in their rules: "Users who create an account just to post their buisness/project will be banned. You must have an active account to post." I don't quality but will see if som... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280930 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How can I filter out tags in my search? Tag search is now completed. The help isn't updated yet, but: to use a tag in a search, use the syntax `tag:tagname`. You can use the `-` operator with it, same as for other search terms. Searching for two tags is an AND. I tried your search and it returns both questions and answers. It looks ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280798 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280220 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280779 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278770 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280165 |
@seth.wagenman I would expect that most questions on a biology community wouldn't involve sexual issues at all. For those that do, I would expect participants to take the same dispassionate, clinical, science-based approach that professionals in the field do. Not being a professional in the field I d... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277966 |
@10Rep this is why I want a small, well-defined set. And Lundin's suggestion to tie to to an ability is sound. We don't want to emulate Discord here. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280159 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 |
Post edited: per request in comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 |
Post edited: per request in comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: per request in comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 |
Post edited: per request in comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 |
Post edited: per request in comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280165 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280461 |
Post edited: per request in comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280911 |
On the other hand, we had hoped that Cooking, already a broader interest, would flourish in the pandemic. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280872 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
How should we make pending edit suggestions more visible? Each category header includes an "Edits" link, which is a link to a list of pending suggested edits in the current category. But nothing alerts people with the ability to approve those edits that something is waiting, other than that the author of the post gets a notification. This means that somet... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280871 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should there be a community here for Linux users? Linux, Unix, both? Other answers here talk about Linux, Unix, and Unix-like systems. Neither of the scope posts has a lot of votes yet (and we can see that WSL is controversial). Is this a Linux-only community or broader? What's the one-line summary we could present to people who casually come ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280846 |
Thanks for that additional information. Do you remember one and if so could you link to it? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280846 |
DIdn't work for me either. I wonder if we missed something in the work to generalize posts and the nomination code is looking for a *question* specifically. (That's an article.) Granted, if you do nominate an article it's still going to say "can you answer this question?", which isn't ideal (and the... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280689 |
Could you add a screenshot of what you're seeing, since Moshi couldn't reproduce? Thanks. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280825 |
I've never been sure, when editing, whether to delete them for tidiness or preserve them for community verification that I'm not putting words in people's mouths or something. I'm happy to go either way if there's a consensus. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280827 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Do we need the drop down menu at the upper right corner to link to all other communities? We added that drop-down menu in response to requests from community members. Yes there's a link in the footer (and that has been brought up before), but many feel that we need something a little more prominent. A widget in the header also helps with discovery; people who visit a Codidact community ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280797 |
Would questions of the form "what have been the consequences of legislation X in jurisdictions that have enacted it" be in scope? (Obviously with qualifications to keep it from being too broad.) That is, we don't want opinion-based questions about whether a policy or law is good, but are questions ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280788 |
We have another (not-very-developed) proposal for a Biology community, so marking this one as a duplicate. Folks who are interested in this topic, please help develop a scope and build up a group of people to start it. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280788 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280788 | Question reopened | — | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280723 |
@Moshi I don't see a way to do it through the admin UI. (Moderators can change *close* reasons, which covers most of what's needed for questions, but I don't see a way to change *flag* reasons, which could apply to other post types.) That seems worth a feature request for the future (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280723 |
@Moshi that's not one of the configuration options right now, but I can ask the devs how wired-in that is. (I don't know how easy or hard it is to expose it.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279798 |
Thanks for the update. There is a deleted answer there, so this bug still exists. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280723 |
@Mithical good point, thanks. Edited. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280723 |
Post edited: suggested in a comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280723 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280723 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What customizations are available on Codidact? Site-level settings These settings apply across all parts of a community. Unless the category-level settings say otherwise, they can't be overridden for individual categories. General: - Name - Color scheme (there's a menu; we can't change to arbitrary color values) - Default category (usua... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280722 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
What customizations are available on Codidact? On Codidact, lots of things can be customized for individual communities. Generally these changes need to be made by admins, but we'll make them on request. But what are all these things? What can communities customize? (Eventually this will be a help topic, but while things are under active de... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280711 |
@10Rep yes, if you have content on SE that fits a community here (like Photography), please feel free to bring it over. If you can make it better (update for anything else you've learned since then, etc), that's even better. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280711 |
@paulocoghi thank you and welcome to Codidact! I am very happy that we have people who want to come here and work together to build excellent communities. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280711 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Transferring my questions and answers from StackOverflow and other SE sites As this answer says, yes, absolutely -- it's your work and you're free to post it here. While you're doing so, please see if you can improve it too. Instead of just copying stuff, let's make it better on Codidact. And if you want to import answers, the best approach is to re-ask the question in ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280680 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280689 |
Oh, I didn't realize non-moderators saw those. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280680 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280680 |
Known bug; at one point in chat somebody reported getting it down to -10 or something. Since the impact is low, we haven't prioritized it. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280157 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276996 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276997 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280657 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280657 |
The intent is (a) -- show everything, but with the category being *correct*. A search option to restrict by category (show me *only* this category vs search all categories) is on the to-do list. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280610 |
I wonder if DIY consumer electronics fits into a broader category (DIY? something else?) and whether that would be viable as a community. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280634 |
The comment is from a moderator on Software Dev, so I'd go with that. You can raise questions about scope on Software Dev's meta category. When I wrote my answer here I wasn't thinking about *business* questions, as the proposal seemed to be about technical aspects. Sorry about that; I've clarifie... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280153 |
Post edited: clarified per comment from Software Dev mod |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280159 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280159 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276997 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276996 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280157 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280461 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280159 |
@DNB the first is a one-liner (no description at all) and the second is significantly downvoted, so I didn't bother, but it doesn't have to be me. If you want to help build up those proposals, feel free to create these answers. If you can help by adding some description/scope where needed, that'd b... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280159 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280157 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276996 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276997 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280461 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280461 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280162 |
@Wikis sometimes proposals move slowly. What this says to me is that there isn't high interest among the "native" population here, and we'll need to promote the proposal in other places where SF folks hang out. If you're involved in such communities and can do it without violating the norms of thos... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280577 |
Thanks for nailing down what I had in my head but couldn't quite formulate: "how interesting are the questions from one area for a person mainly interested in another area?". That's the difference between a community with some commonalities and disjoint groups sharing a space. (Also, to be clear, I... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276824 |
Related question: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280574 (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277548 |
Related question: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280574 (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278833 |
Related question: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280574 (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280574 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
How should we approach our (non-developer) software community proposals? We have some software (but not software-development) proposals: - "Superuser-like" community for software applications - office suites - Linux Are these three separate, distinct communities, or should any of them be combined? Office suites strike me as a subset of the kinds of software a... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: update for existing participant, per new comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: update for existing participant, per new comment |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280157 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280531 |
And in particular, see the [welcome post](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/280447) there. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280517 |
@1muffon1 I didn't realize that a tag-only edit *didn't* generate a notification. Sorry! Yes, we found and fixed this bug recently. (That's the exclusive "we"; *I* didn't do anything except convey the news. The actual credit goes to others.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279798 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280349 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280405 |
We've made the text of the category description smaller for now, while we explore what it would take to make it collapsible. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280504 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280504 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: It is possible to close a question as duplicate to itself. This is fixed now. We know that the error message isn't very informative; we'll try to address that later. But you now get one of those pink pop-up error messages if you try to link a post to itself when closing. We are not yet detecting duplication loops; this is a narrower fix. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278655 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280503 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Move posted dated box to white space to the left of poster information? We have moved the post date/time and license info to the left side, along with the edit info. This separates the metadata about the post from the information about the user who posted it. We have no plans to change the size of the reputation number. By the way, the stats that are shown in that b... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280482 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278500 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280489 |
We should probably show it next to the editor if there is enough space ("enough" to be determined). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277868 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280484 |
We're doing this as part of a larger reworking of comments, currently in progress. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280464 |
The design considerations are different, as Art said. Still, we are open to discussing specific aspects. Some of our design principles are different and that affects layout; categories, for example, are fundamental, and SE doesn't do that at all. Some things can be adjusted; I've thought about moving... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280406 |
The Codidact team can't take on the task of finding people to support every community that someone would like to see here. We need supporters of community proposals to do that legwork. By the way, I don't have any status on Reddit either. If there are people there who would potentially come here, ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280459 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280461 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Site for Where is This? Identifying Places in pictures? Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280405 |
@PeterTaylor moving the text into the category header (something I briefly thought about too) would not work well on small viewports, like phones. I've just filed a GitHub issue to make it collapsible instead. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280419 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74852 |
Post edited: Addressed in an answer. |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280413 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: closure-as-duplicate post notice is inaccurate We have an issue open to fix this in the code, but I recently realized that moderators can also fix it locally: the close reasons are editable. I've edited it here on Meta to say "This question has been addressed elsewhere". Moderators, please consider backward compatibility when editing close re... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280409 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What about having a category in Meta for documentation about the platform? This is an interesting idea. We have help, but only moderators can edit it. We want documentation about the platform (as opposed to how our network or particular communities operate) to end up in the help that is part of the platform repository and seeded to all new communities -- but not everythin... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280406 |
What we need is for some folks here -- needn't and probably shouldn't be Codidact admins, but rather people who would participate on these communities -- to do some of this outreach. If there's a group of people who want to support a community here, we want to set it up. But we're a small team and ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280405 |
Thanks for the feedback. We should consider making some of those sections collapsible. The reason users aren't with tags and posts is that tags and posts are at the category level, while users are global for a community. If you click on "tags" in the meta category, for example, you'll only see the... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280358 |
Are you testing in an incognito browser? I just searched Google in such for "problem collaborative work different voices"; the first hit was a scraper, the second SE, and the third Codidact. (Interestingly, the scraper scraped the question but not the answers, so it's actually *less* useful than th... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280382 |
Right, if you want to tell people about your blog or Twitter account or whatever else, *but* you don't want it to be publicly linked, then you could put it in the not-completely-public block. You'd just have to do it manually -- type "Twitter: " or whatever, instead of filling in a form. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280391 |
We want to be able to support internationalization. Right now our effort there is "don't do things that will impede internationalization"; we don't have enough people to be able to do better now and still get everything else done that we've identified as priorities, but this is on our roadmap. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280388 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How can we make Codidact more friendly for askers? A lot of Codidact's distinctives, as Manasseh notes in comments on another answer, are about how the Codidact team and the community interact -- that communities here have much more control, that the team is accountable to the communities not to shareholders, much better responsiveness to requests an... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280382 |
Would being able to limit the profile description to people who are signed in, versus anybody, meet your need? This would give you a place to put whatever you want that you don't want in Google results etc, while not making the user interface complex. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280379 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: We should delete all old imported content. Writing already has consensus to delete unclaimed, untouched, imported posts. We should see how that changes things, and then the other two communities with large-scale imports can decide how they want to proceed. Writing, at least, is unlikely to be interested in throwing out work that people he... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280375 |
@OlinLathrop what did you do for EE, which was also founded by experts who (I think) were more prepared to answer than ask? What can we learn from EE? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280342 |
@ArtOfCode make the Tools control a toggle instead of just promoting? And raise a mod flag if a post gets promoted again after having been unpromoted? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280375 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
New communities: Music, Physics We have launched two new communities, Music and Physics. As new communities with no data imports, they are blank or nearly-blank canvases now. We'd like to have some content before we advertise them off-network (in the communities list), but y'all won't necessarily notice them if we don't announce ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280369 |
I think 10 Rep meant without console shenanigans, @fedorqui. :-) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280368 |
@ploni it involved opening links in new tabs and marking some things unread and back to read. I'm not sure of the exact sequence I followed, but it took a few tries to stumble on the -1. :-) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280368 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: When clicking "mark read" it shows a 0 when it should actually dissapear. With a bit of effort, you can even do this: -1 I think the code that shows the notification count draws the notification "container" (the blue circle) once, and then just updates the number from some data value. Only when you close and reopen the notifications, or refresh, or move to another... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280356 |
Fixed now. Sorry for the disruption. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280084 |
@fedorqui while a suggested edit is pending you can't edit. Can you see the edit link now? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280084 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280356 |
How strange! What happens if you go to the [edit URL](https://outdoors.codidact.com/posts/279707/edit) directly? (Trying to figure out if you can edit but there's a UI weirdness or if you can't edit at all.) Does it happen on any other posts or just that one? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280162 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280349 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280355 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can we have customised text in the "Posting Tips" banner for each post type? I think this is a bug. There is default guidance for answers that is different from that for questions, and a category can override either or both. This category does not override the answer guidance, so it should be getting the default. Instead, it's getting the question guidance. To answer yo... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280346 |
Voting feedback is important, independent of rep. If something I posted is getting downvotes but not comments, I want to know to take another look. If a quick-and-dirty answer I posted a while back is suddenly getting a new flurry of upvotes, I want to know so I can consider improving it. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277185 |
@10Rep -- good news; the community has now launched. Please bring your questions about orchestral tracks to music.codidact.com. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280319 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280342 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can we get an option to remove a post from the nominated posts list? Moderators can now see a list of promoted posts and can remove a question from the list there. I acknowledge the imbalance: anyone with the Curate ability can nominate, but only moderators can remove. I hope we will be able to improve this tooling in the future, but now at least moderators can re... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280318 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280341 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can we get a list of questions on a site currently nominated for the Community Promotions? There is now a new section in the moderator tools for promoted posts. It looks like this: screenshot Moderators can cancel a promotion from this page. It would be better if the list of promoted posts were visible to all community members, not just moderators -- this would help communities c... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279693 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280326 |
Interesting. At first I wondered if we had some sort of "you can't review your own suggestions so we won't show them" logic, but I can't see it in the list either. Investigating. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278340 |
@NaveenMishra the Physics community has launched. (See the link at the top of the proposal.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278340 |
@Knight the Physics community has launched. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278340 |
@dmckee the Physics community has launched. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278340 |
@DonielF the Physics community has launched. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278340 |
@HDE226868 the Physics community has launched. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #75000 |
Hi. Sorry for the off-topic ping but I didn't have another way to reach you. Just wanted to let you know that communities for Music and Physics have both just launched. You expressed interest in Music and your profile suggests you might be interested in Physics, and I didn't have a good way to let... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277182 |
@J.E.B.ofPonderworthy just in case you didn't see, the community has been launched. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280318 |
If it's mod-specific, it could be added to the page for managing featured posts. (I mean a separate section on that page, not mingling.) If it's generally available, and it seems reasonable for people to be able to see it, then I'm not sure where to put it. But I agree it'd be good to have. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279458 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280322 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Seeing deleted posts This was a bug. Deleted posts aren't supposed to be shown on profiles to people who can't also see the posts. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280243 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280300 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280298 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280321 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Search box instead of link We had a lot of discussion about how to approach this, keeping responsive design in mind, and decided to add the search icon but not move the search bar into the header. I admit that you don't know on hover, when it lights up, whether clicking it will navigate away or give you a pop-out; we have som... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280302 |
Agreed. I'd like to have a way for people to register interest and then a way to notify them all in a batch. Pinging people one at a time in comments doesn't scale. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278458 |
It's not per-category yet, but you can now set it per-community. (The delta between my two comments is not an accurate predictor of the time to per-category settings. :-) ) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276650 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280273 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can auto-saving be individually disabled? You can now set a preference to disable autosaving. See the "preferences" tab on your profile. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278506 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278494 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278492 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280259 |
Post edited: updated code means updated answer :-) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280225 |
@celtschk we're actually working on threaded *comments* now (no ETA, but in progress). How that would play into a proposal like this, I don't know, but it seems relevant. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279094 |
Post edited: based on comments |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279094 |
Re multiple pings in a comment, don't know. I got pinged; we'll have to wait to see if luap42 did too. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280259 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279094 |
Could you check if this is still happening for you? Those shortcuts work for me in Chrome now, but I don't know what you were using and I haven't gotten to a Windows machine yet to test in Edge. Also, we've made the setting global and moved it into a new "preferences" section on the profile page. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279094 |
Post edited: oops, tagged based on the "by the way" part, but that was secondary |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278458 |
It's not per-community yet, but you can now set a global preference for default license. We'll continue to work on preferences. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279094 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280259 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Shortcuts for individual categories don't seem to work We've added a "preferences" tab to the user profile. There are global (network-wide) and per-community preferences. We've made keyboard shortcuts a global preference. We don't yet have "global, but with local overrides"; a preference is either global or has to be set on each individual community... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279614 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280248 |
Yes, I agree. This is on our radar: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/370. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280248 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280229 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280228 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280228 |
Does the "edit" link not work on the other post? If so, please let us know how it failed. Meanwhile, could you add some text *here* about what this community would cover? It doesn't have to be long, but trying to figure out what any given subreddit is about is kind of tedious, and anyway "do what ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280225 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280017 |
This *should* be fixed now. Values are still cached, so there are some people who'll still show 0s incorrectly, *but* when there's an event that would change any of the values that cache gets flushed. So the next time someone whose card is showing 0s posts, for example, it should get fixed. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278039 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280232 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Answer edited, shows as activity on the front page, but not on the answer The cause of this bug has been found and fixed, going forward. Correcting the existing cases of this incorrect reporting wasn't practical, but it shouldn't happen again. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280174 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277368 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280143 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280143 |
Test comment (sorry for the ping). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279595 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280115 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280231 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Add a link to the dashboard somewhere There is now a link to the dashboard at the bottom of the site switcher. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279862 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Test comment number something-more-than-6. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279571 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280230 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Strikethrough markdown not working For anybody puzzled by the question, the strikethrough that shows there didn't work at the time of posting but does now, because the bug is fixed. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277950 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280220 |
No you shouldn't have deleted it, so no worries there. We have a design for duplicates where, in fact, you would be able to directly mark it as such; we just haven't gotten there yet. In the meantime, flagging is the best way to handle it, which you discovered, so thanks. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280086 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280212 |
I think we always want edits to bump posts; otherwise a "minor" designation could be abused, unless we also add in other logic to determine that it's not really minor, which gets complicated. I think what the question is suggesting and this answer is supporting is a way to treat them differently in ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280210 |
If we did the binary (favorites) approach, what order would you want the favorites to appear in? (I'm wondering if we're going to need fuller ordering anyway and the easier binary option won't end up helping.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280174 |
I wonder if it would be better at the top, flush right, next to the "notifications" header. This placement would also make it available on a phone, and (on desktop) solve a rendering glitch I've seen occasionally where "mark all as read" appears before the notifications, at the top, and then gets pu... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280177 |
Thanks! This is the sort of thing I was looking for. It looks solid to me; let's see how the community feels about it. (In particular, I hope the people who expressed interest will vote or provide feedback.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280170 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How can we improve community proposals? We've implemented one part of this (that seems to have consensus and no objections): the tags. I've updated the proposal guidelines, created the three "needs" tags, and retagged many proposals. (Sorry about the churn on the proposals list.) If we find in the course of using them that we need to tw... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280167 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should there be a community here for Linux users? There's a lot of interest in this proposal. That's great! There are also questions about scope. We'd like to help this community succeed, and to do that we need everyone (or at least most folks) to agree on what it is you're building. Could somebody add a draft scope (doesn't need to be long bu... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74861 |
Post edited: Thai is on-topic on Languages & Linguistics; please bring these questions there. |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #74861 |
There is now a community for languages in general, where questions about Thai are welcome, so I'm declining this one. Please participate there; we'd love to have you! (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277345 |
Post edited: We have a community for Mathematics and one for Physics is forming, so also having a Math+Physics community would be very confusing. |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #275914 |
Post edited: use Software Development where this is on-topic, and if that doesn't work out for some reason we can revisit |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279180 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #275968 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74991 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74852 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277182 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280103 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280103 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280166 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Chemistry Proposal Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280165 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Biology proposal Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280084 |
There is a bug blocking the approval of the suggested edit here. Just letting you know we're working on it, not ignoring the suggestion. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278339 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276824 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276824 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278339 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279809 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Finance (Not Economics) Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #275968 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279180 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280163 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Defining and Defeating Tyranny Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279372 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280162 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Science-Fiction & Fantasy site Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277182 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279299 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280161 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: A site for politics Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279062 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Accounting community Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276933 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276933 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278946 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278946 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278833 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280159 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: A "Super user" like community to include Q&As about software applications usage Note: Please see also How should we approach our (non-developer) software community proposals?. We are trying to work out how this proposal interacts with others. Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280158 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Site for office suites Note: Please see also How should we approach our (non-developer) software community proposals?. We are trying to work out how this proposal interacts with others. Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277548 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74852 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277995 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280157 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Travel Codidact Site Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74946 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276881 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74991 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74999 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280156 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: General Engineering Codidact Website Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74999 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280155 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How's the interest for a Worldbuilding site? Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipa... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279001 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #75053 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903 |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277950 |
Post edited: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903, |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280153 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: A newbie friendly and non-judgmental site focusing on Q&A related to Cloud technologies Questions about cloud technologies are on-topic on Software Development, as long as they are about the technical aspects. Software Development didn't exist when this suggestion was posted. I encourage you to ask cloud questions there. If later there is consensus that cloud technologies should have... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278544 |
Post edited: t-shirts too :-) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280147 |
I would say that history doesn't lie, but luap42 might have access to the database and thus be able to cover tracks. :-) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280150 |
SEO is a good point. Thanks for the tip. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280151 |
Thanks for the report -- will investigate. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280150 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can the title of the question be a "clean" link to the question itself? Does the "copy link" link below the question meet your needs? screenshot Those of us who came from Somewhere Else are used to the title being a link, but we thought an explicit link would be more discoverable. This doesn't mean we couldn't also make the title a link; we just haven't yet. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280148 |
Individual communities might have had discussions in SE chat before or while creating communities here, but I'm not aware of any significant discussion of the platform itself over there before we set up that Discord chat and Discourse forum that were our first steps before we had a meta. Discussions... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280143 |
Test comment to see if I can reproduce. (Answer: yes.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279670 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279669 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279522 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280111 |
This isn't just about duplicates. It looks like URLs in flag text are never links; the flag text is just text. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280116 |
Was it a suggested edit? That's a [known bug](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280086). I just tried notifications of various sorts in my inbox and I couldn't trigger it with anything else. If it wasn't an edit, could you say what it was so we can investigate? Thanks. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280107 |
Yes, we need to add a "suggest edit" link there. Sorry for the delay. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280095 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280095 |
Hiding, alas. Known issue; thanks for the nudge. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279612 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280086 |
Reproduced. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279905 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279986 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279985 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #275927 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280058 |
"Follow" has been on the wishlist for a while, and I like the idea of the option (on by default) when editing. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280058 |
@OlinLathrop that's a good idea. We'd then want people to be able to opt out, so fixing a typo doesn't sign you up for notifications for years to come. We'll need to do some work on notifications and preferences before we can do that, or add "follow". Meanwhile, one person gets notified, which is ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278388 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280058 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
New post type: wiki We've had some discussions here on Meta about shared resource pages -- wiki-style articles that anybody could edit, canonical posts, and so on. My original idea for this was that individual posts could be marked as "freely editable", and this could be used with any of our existing post types (questi... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279989 |
@ArtOfCode are you saying that it'll work right going forward, but the existing data errors will remain? If you check the links you'll see that those posts aren't being reported correctly; does that mean that edits that predate the fix will remain broken (but it won't happen again), or that there's ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280018 |
The bug has been fixed and new answers show up as new activity and bump posts again. Posts that got new answers during the bug's lifetime (a couple days I think) haven't been updated/bumped. In other words, it shouldn't happen again but there are residual mismatches. For example, the Code Golf Cha... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280018 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280018 | Question reopened | — | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280018 |
Not the same. The root cause of that one appears to be a problem with how suggested edits are reported (or not, as it turns out, confusing the tracking). The present bug, which has now been fixed, was about new answers, specifically. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279989 |
I found the [unreported edit](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/213131/history) on Scientific Speculation. This seems to be the bug with suggested edits not being reported on the post. A *different* bug was marked as a dupe of this one; that other one was fixed but this wasn't. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279989 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280056 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What will become of reputation? (Personal opinion, not official anything.) I'm one of the people who, from the beginning, wanted to change how we handle reputation, because while Someplace Else got some things right with it, their setup also produced some degenerate results that I don't want to replicate. The biggest problem,... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279903 |
@Zerotime the answers from Mithical and James Jenkins on the [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276933), and especially the voting on them, make me think there are unresolved issues. But it's also been a while now, so maybe voters have changed their positions (but not updated votes) or aren'... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280021 |
It's now back in the hamburger menu (if the viewport is too small to display it in the header). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280045 |
Ditto. I wonder if this has to do with the bug that luap42 characterized somewhere else as category view permissions being too aggressive. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280044 |
I agree that putting the rep number back in the header until we have those other feedback mechanisms would be a good idea. That number changing is currently the only indicator people have that people are voting on their posts. And particularly if there are downvotes, you want to know so you can try... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280038 |
I saw the problem before and can confirm it's working now. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39445 |
Post edited: this didn't age all that well... |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280021 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279989 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280017 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280020 |
Yikes. Reproduced on Meta. Did not reproduce on Judaism or Writing. Hmm. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280018 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
New answers are not being reported as new activity or bumping posts It appears that new answers are no longer being reported as new activity on the question list and bumping questions. Here's an annotated screenshot: question list highlighting two wrong "last activity" dates https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280005 shows the last activity as by luap42, but Mithi... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280017 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Heads up: small design changes, a better user card and some long-expected features For some but not all users, the post counts are showing as 0 when that's clearly wrong. For example: screenshot That's from elsewhere on this page. The numbers also show as 0 for me in the user list (and I'm about to find out if they do here too). Update three hours later: Mithical's a... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #280011 |
@luap42 maybe put *both* the timestamp and the license over on the left, so the usercard area is *just* stuff about the user and the other area is *just* stuff about the post. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #280016 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Community ad has the wrong logo Logo is now right: screenshot That screenshot is from Meta (I included part of the "hot" list as evidence). Unfortunately, the URL that's being generated is still wrong, so clicking will probably produce a 404. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279986 |
@ArtOfCode it's clickable now, but it's the wrong URL. I just clicked, on Meta, on an L&L ad, and it took me to that post ID on Meta, which doesn't exist and thus gave a 404. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279903 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
How can we improve community proposals? Now that we've seen several community proposals, some of which succeeded and some of which have run into hurdles, I want to look at how we're managing and tracking proposals. While there will always be an element of human judgement, I feel like we don't have a good handle on how to decide when to ad... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279887 |
@DonielF we're actually working on a community-editable post type right now, now that it's easier. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279897 |
Oh, you did say that and I missed it. Thanks. So when suggested edits get approved the message is getting dropped, it looks like. Drat. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279897 |
That's odd. I just made [this edit](https://languages.codidact.com/posts/279224/history) and the reason appears there. I wonder what the difference is. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279896 |
Confirmed. Investigating. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279753 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Hey, at least we gave you "mark all as read"! (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Yup, reproduced. When do you think collapsed comments should be auto-expanded: when you click "add a comment", or when you submit yours? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
I see five comments and am adding another one (#7). Let's see what happens. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Test comment number 6. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Test comment number 5. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Test comment number 4. (Yeah, you did kind of volunteer for these pings. :-) ) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Test comment number 3. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Test comment number 2. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279862 |
Test comment number 1. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279861 |
Hmm. You should not see the Tools menu if you don't have any of the relevant abilities (i.e. if you can't do anything on that menu). I saw a change go in in this part of the code today (not live yet), so possibly this has already been noticed and fixed -- will check. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279157 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276824 |
Could somebody add a draft scope (doesn't need to be long but should indicate what's in/out broadly) as an answer, so people can comment, vote, and refine? Please address *Linux* vs *Unix* (is it both? just the former?). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #39451 |
@Jordan I'll give this more thought to flesh it out more, but I think the problem with SE's profit model is that it led them to pursue business that *bypasses* the communities -- they make money by selling private Teams/Enterprise instances or through their jobs business. Aside from SO, which they ne... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279809 |
Thank you! That helps. If I understand correctly: economics is more theory/academic and "systems", finance is business-level theory & practice, and accounting is the particular tools & methods used to implement the former. Is that about right? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278230 |
Post edited: fixed by abilities feature |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279807 |
Thanks for the report. We're looking into it. We've seen cases of the attribution notices not going away before but never figured out if there were a more widespread problem. Apparently there is, so we'll need to look at what's going on in the database. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279809 |
Could you say more about the distinction between finance and economics, for those of us who are not experts in these fields? How does [accounting](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279062) factor in? Thanks. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279798 |
You're right; there are two deleted answers. This is a bug. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279806 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Rollback Feature for Questions and Answers I agree; "roll back to this version" has been useful on other platforms and I'd like us to have it. I think the interface should allow for a rollback reason, like the edit reason, so the explanation can be attached directly to the edit and not lost in comments that the reader has to match up time-wi... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279801 |
Good point @Canina. I'll amend the suggestion on GH. As for articles, good question -- while the "no more answers" aspect of closing doesn't apply, can there be duplicate articles and should they be linked together through the system if so? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279801 |
In [this GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/193) I proposed "This question has been addressed at (link)". I think that covers all the cases -- answered before, asked before without answers, superseded (dupe of a newer question, where "before" is wrong). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279764 |
Oh, sorting *answers*. Thanks; the question said that clearly and I missed it. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279764 |
I'm not seeing this. When I click on the "activity" button the URL is https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3?sort=activity. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279758 |
@Olin after my direct edit, the notice was updated correctly. (Should've logged that, sorry.) Then when I approved the suggested edit, it disappeared. It looks like it only manifests with suggested edits. I hope that, now that we know where to look, this won't be hard to fix. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279765 |
@msh210 this is why I did it openly, so all would know what I was doing and why. (Was going to put a smiley here to acknowledge your "kidding", but while I know we're just kidding around, the sentiment is real -- if I do something that would be an issue if done under other circumstances, I want to b... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279765 |
@Moshi confirmed -- answers too. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279765 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Change not listed in question Tentative characterization of the bug: this happens when a user who does not have the Edit ability makes a suggested edit and that suggestion is approved. Look at the edit history on this question. After Olin's edit the "last edited" indicator was correct. After I edited it was updated correctly (... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279758 |
Ok, it's not just third-party edits; mine showed up fine. New hypothesis: *suggested* edits produce this behavior. We need an edit suggestion from someone who can't edit directly. I have a sock; hang on. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279758 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279758 |
I saw another example on Judaism, and then checked [this recent edit of mine](https://meta.codidact.com/a/276824/276995) where it shows up. Two differences: the missing ones are on questions, and the missing ones (so far) are third-party edits (not by the authors). Can we find cases to isolate thos... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279758 |
Here's another (recent) example of this happening: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279760. Question list shows an edit by Moshi, question doesn't, but the history does. It also shows that the OP edited once, and that edit doesn't show either (though I don't know if it did before Moshi's edit). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279761 |
Yes, the post was deleted and yes, it would be good if notifications could be withdrawn in such cases but that doesn't work yet. The comment, from the OP a few minutes before deleting, was: "@Lundin Testing would seem (to me) often difficult without data, and I suspect that is often imported." This... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279758 |
Same here (Chrome, MacOS). I don't think this one is browser-dependent. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277007 |
@nalply glad to hear it! The community exists now, so no more need to register interest here -- you can head over to [Mathematics](https://math.codidact.com/) and ask and answer questions. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279753 |
Hmm, doesn't seem to be global now; did somebody else edit it? Do you see it in the list in the mod tools now? (You should not have been able to make it global, so if you did, that's a bug...) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279613 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279751 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Most reputations dropped by 1 (maybe the "starter" 1 rep disappeared for people who had more) A rep recalculation restored the 1 point to everybody. Whether accounts should start at 1 or 0 is a separate question, but they're now consistent again. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279750 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Article | — |
Newsletter #5 (December 2020) Hello from Codidact! We have lots of news about our organization, our communities, software updates, and some award nominations. Organization We are delighted to announce that The Codidact Foundation is now a recognized non-profit organization! We've incorporated in the UK as a Community Inter... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279717 |
@Canina Art gets the kudos; the rest of us asked questions and found cases that helped him figure it out. He's planning to write a blog post about lessons learned from this upgrade, including this problem. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279719 |
Here's another pair with weird behavior: https://judaism.codidact.com/categories/43/tags/3061 (from Divrei Torah, includes a mislabeled one from Challenges but nothing from Q&A), and the same tag in Q&A with only Q&A hits: https://judaism.codidact.com/categories/32/tags/3061 (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279677 |
Post edited: "No repro" in the sense that it works now, even though I saw it at the time too (just for this user). |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279718 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Mismatch between number of answers listed and actual number All cases of this mismatch on the network should now be fixed. Thanks for the reports. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279708 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279670 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279711 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279717 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Vote counts broken by the update? Found the problem! There'll be a post from ArtOfCode later with more information, but we believe we've now corrected the problem with some votes (cast during the upgrade window) not having been properly recorded everywhere. (They were, err, partially recorded, which made this hard to debug.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279669 |
The edit history on this post is strange. I see two edits from the same person within a minute or so. I reviewed and approved one of them (a tag-only edit). I'm puzzled by the other one. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279624 |
Another case here: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279669/history. I approved that edit, which added a tag. The diff does not show the tag addition anywhere. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279711 |
I have seen this too on another post -- blue highlighting indicating a vote (which I did cast), and reported votes of +0/-0 so clearly my vote isn't accounted for. Investigating. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279663 |
GH issue for the votes-received part: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/133 (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279677 |
That's weird. It's you, not everyone. Hmm... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279670 |
Should be tag*s*, not tag*d*: https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/edit_tags. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279613 |
Starting at 0 is fine with me. But in that case new accounts should, too, and it appears that accounts with no posts have 1 rep. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: reapplied vanishing edit |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279180 |
Post edited: trying to force this edit through (don't know why it didn't take) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279654 |
What browser are you using? I'm trying to reproduce, and I've struck out on Chrome, Firefox, and Safari (on MacOS). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279638 |
Maybe a checkmark in parens to indicate that it's qualified? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279560 |
That's very bizarre @user8078. Since Judaism should *never* have redirected to Meta, I'm stumped. (It wasn't the meta category on Judaism, was it?) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279637 |
Oh, *sorting*! Yeah, that's a good point; we should think about how to sort the list. SE calls their review things queues, but I don't think they're actually ordered, which yes is confusing. They present you things to review one at a time, and you have to do something with the one you've got befor... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279637 |
@Moshi I mean we shouldn't make queues just because Someplace Else does them. Maybe we want something like that, that people step through one post at a time, or maybe we want something different, but as a first step we can meet the (I agree glaring) need by having a page of links. People can scan t... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279637 |
@luap42 yes, let's just do a list of posts with pending edits; from there people can click through to go to the posts themselves. No fancy queue stuff, extra buttons, etc, just an index. If we want to get fancy, two tabs -- one for posts and one for tags. We can add it to the widget currently call... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279560 |
@user8078 no repro for me. Is it still happening to you? Can you provide more details? Judaism -> Meta seems an odd redirect to me. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279623 |
I suspect it has to do with *when* it was asked, i.e. during the database upgrade. I've asked our DB person to check whether the sync for new changes missed this. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279622 |
Thanks. Looks like the source image is .PNG while all the others are .png, and I think case has caused problems with images before. (So we want to fix that *too*, but in the meantime, the fix here seems obvious.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279615 |
I was thinking of just linking the word "abilities" in that heading. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279615 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Add a more obvious link to the Abilities page Making the "Earned Abilities" heading on the profile page link to the full list (/abilities) seems like a good way to solve this. It avoids adding one more tab on the profile (which is already constrained on small viewports like phones) while putting the link on the relevant part of the page. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279613 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Most reputations dropped by 1 (maybe the "starter" 1 rep disappeared for people who had more) The recent database update included a reputation recalculation. Reputation doesn't mean as much as it used to (it doesn't govern abilities any more), but it's still present and visible. In the recalc, almost everybody's reputation dropped by 1. I think what probably happened is that the "starter... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279612 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
A new answer produces two notifications Since the abilities update, I'm getting double notifications for new answers to my questions. For example, both of the following notifications have the same URL, https://cooking.codidact.com/questions/279584: (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279560 |
Answer(s) missing here: https://software.codidact.com/questions/279593 (reported [here](https://software.codidact.com/questions/279609), and I remember seeing one or two answers there too). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279564 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279607 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Can we have a button to insert a table in posts? There is now a new button, which inserts the following markdown for you to populate and expand: | Title1 | Title2 | |- | - | | row11 | row12 | (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279268 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279606 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: 403 error when voting to close The "Close" link is no longer shown to people who don't have the ability to use it. If you can't vote to close and you think action is needed, you can flag instead. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279605 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Replenish votes statistic with "Other" block to make it complete The redesigned profile that came with the abilities branch now also shows a proper breakdown. Example: votes by direction and post type (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277197 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279560 |
My user history shows edits that are now missing (example: on [this post](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279180)), so user histories might provide another way to find things, maybe? Unfortunately the user history doesn't show the edit diff, so I can't just reapply it -- we'll need to get that a... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279560 |
I posted a comment on https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279595 last night that is missing. (It was about trying to reproduce the problem, so would be good to get back.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279560 |
@Canina thanks. Yes, I remember editing both of those. There might have also been some more interested users on Physics? Can't remember if any are missing now (their comments would be too). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279560 |
I made updates to a few site proposals in the last week. I don't remember which ones, but newest activity is currently showing as 9 days ago and that's definitely wrong. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279504 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279504 |
@FoggyFinder I asked, and apparently the request isn't even reaching our servers; the caching is happening locally, so there's nothing we can do to force expiration on our end. :-( (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #275968 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279180 |
Post edited: additions from comments |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279180 |
@seth.wagenman proposals sometimes go for a while before solidifying; it's fine to leave this here. I didn't see your comments until now; sorry for the delay. I'm going to edit your examples into the post where they'll be more visible. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279504 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279504 |
@Zerotime Cooking is working for me. If it's not for you, try flushing browser cache, in case it cached the redirect to our "down" page? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279504 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279504 |
Discord and Twitter, @luap42... they'll be able to reach us. So we'd best get this right. :-) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279504 |
Post edited: suggested edits from Mith :-) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279504 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279504 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Abilities update is here! U P D A T E: It looks like some changes have gone missing after the rollout; we're working on adding them back right now. See this answer for more information. We have deployed the new abilities system! Please let us know if you find any problems - while we've tested the system as much as we ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279411 |
@mbomb007 the list on codidact.com is maintained in files checked in to git; the dashboard reads out of the database. The community descriptions shown on codidact.com aren't in the database. I don't know if there's a technical reason for codidact.com to not depend on the DB. (Descriptions could b... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39540 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278967 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276227 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279470 |
@fedorqui there might actually be some low-level conditions; not sure. The tooltip reports the same number for all buttons, though, so maybe not. I would have to ask the developer or try to find it in the code. Maybe in the future we could improve it, yes. We're also working on a design for *use... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279468 |
@OlinLathrop I'm puzzled too. Have you tried in incognito mode (assuming Edge has something like that)? On other browsers, I understand, incognito mode disables all extensions, so if there's some extension interfering that you wouldn't have thought would be related, that would be a way to catch it.... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279470 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What is the 'lottery' button for? "Lottery" is a random set of 50 questions. It's a way to be reminded of older posts that have dropped off the front page. I agree with the suggestion that "Random" would be a better label; we didn't think of it at the time for some reason. I also agree that the tooltips could be more informative... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279411 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Community dropdown and profile information Thanks for bringing this up. I agree; we need to add the concept of a network profile and have a GitHub issue for it. But we haven't gotten to it yet. (Our devs think this is a good first issue for anybody looking to join the team, in case anybody reading this is.) Another way to get to the com... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279384 |
@Alexei we're working on getting a bank account set up so we can accept donations, thanks. (Needed a corporate identification number first in order to be able to open an account. And now, we have learned, everything is slower because of Covid. But as soon as we're set up we'll let folks know. :-) ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278340 |
Thank you Knight and @NaveenMishra for giving this proposal a boost, and welcome to Codidact! While we're waiting for a physics community I hope you'll take a look at our [other communities](https://codidact.com/) which you might also be interested in. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279390 |
When I hear literature I think of written material specifically (books etc), while I think the proposal here means to include movies, TV, etc. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279372 |
@Lundin would you be able to flesh that out into a scope proposal in an answer, so people can vote, comment (more easily), and edit? Thanks. (I wasn't active over there so I don't know what those pitfalls were.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279371 |
This is one of the things we intended auto-save to mitigate, so if that's not working we'll want to look into that. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279372 |
I feel like there could be a useful partnership with [Scientific Speculation](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/), too -- this community for what exists, that one for what *could* exist (with a science ground). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278339 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279292 |
That's strange; I've definitely seen tag-only edits. Can you link to the post you tried to edit so we can figure out what might be special about that case? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279279 |
We show the "close" link to people who can't use it? Oops. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277185 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278908 |
Would questions about configuring email, domains, and the like be on-topic? Just tonight I had an [issue with email forwarding and Gmail rejections](https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/2089825.html), which I posted about on my blog for lack of a better place to ask. Would this sort of thing be included? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278688 |
Definitely agree on the name -- let's banish "hot". (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279180 |
Could you add a few examples of questions (titles I mean) that you see people asking on this community? I think it'd help people not deeply involved in this area get a better understanding of the topic. Codidact is oriented more around *knowledge* (Q&A, blogs, resource collections, etc) than around... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278476 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279039 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279118 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: "last activity" on the post history of questions is misleading. The last activity shown there was for the whole page, same as what you see in the question list. That's confusing in the history case, as you point out. We talked about updating it to show the correct information, but since the entire history is already shown, you can easily see what the last activ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277489 |
Post edited: no popup, but renamed it to "copy link" to make its behavior more clear |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279069 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278949 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279062 |
@1muflon1 thanks for explaining! It does sound like the two should not mingle, then. The idea is for each community to build *a* community, not multiple co-located ones that don't interact. :-) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279095 |
@KalleMP I don't see a comment from you (even deleted). Is it possible you clicked the "discard" button instead of the "post" button? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279095 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Implement duplicate up-down vote buttons For the buttons, I propose something bolder: don't duplicate them, move them. The logical time to make a voting decision is when you've read a post, so I agree they belong at the bottom. But why have them at the top? Currently we bundle the reporting of existing votes and the voting buttons toge... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279064 |
I've closed this here, as it is a community-specific matter that is more properly discussed on Languages & Linguistics Meta. You are welcome to bring it up there, taking into account the feedback you got here. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279064 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279091 |
Do you mean on the question list? That does work here on the individual question, but it looks like it doesn't work there and I agree it ought to. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279069 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Have permalink button show a popup instead of redirecting The Permalink control now allows you to copy a working URL for the post through the usual browser affordance (right-click + "copy URL" on desktop browsers, long-press on touch interfaces). Oddly, it's not the same URL you get if you actually click the control, but at least you can get a working link... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278949 |
Fixed, pending deploy. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279067 |
Also, one of the communities here that initially imported (almost) everything from Somewhere Else is now discussing deleting those imports, because they did not serve us well. *Selective* importing is valuable, but bulk importing turned out not to be. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279063 |
Welcome to Codidact. This suggestion would work better as a possible refinement of [this one](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279001). As for tags, we use "idea" when the proposal is more early-stage and "proposal" when it's farther along. I admit that's kind of fuzzy. The other purpose of the... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279062 |
See also: [proposal for economics](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277995). Yes I know that accounting and economics are not the same thing, but some who are interested in accounting might also be interested in economics. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #279061 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Site for Where is This? Identifying Places in pictures? "Where is this?" sounds like an interesting part of a community, but I'm having trouble imagining a community forming around just that. More specifically, I could see this being part of a general puzzles community, or as part of a travel community, or -- with restricted scope -- part of Outdoors. ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #41993 |
Post edited: name will be Code Golf and a PR for the answer TOC (leaderboard) is under review |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279039 |
Oh, I see -- the history bit is pulling last activity for the *page*, the same value that's shown in the question list, instead of for the post. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #41993 |
@Lundin status-pending means we're planning to launch it. We think the CG proposal has enough interested, enthusiastic users to launch. status-needs-people means we don't think there are enough people yet to support a proposed site; it's a call to action to say you're interested (if you are) and sh... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #41993 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #279009 |
Bingo. I just reproduced this (using Chrome). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278968 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278500 |
Thanks @1muflon1! I'll ask the dev team to look at it. Since I (accidentally) neglected this for a few weeks and we've deployed other changes, I just wanted to check back first before doing that. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276997 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278968 |
Argh. Why does it happen to laserkittens and not to me? (Also why should the renderer care *how* the markdown got generated, but that's a different question.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278968 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278500 |
Did one of your edits fix this, or did some other change fix the bug? The linked post looks like it has the correct numbering now, but I can't tell if that's because you found a workaround or because it's working now. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278969 |
Wow, this is getting weirder. I copied the source of your answer into mine, and it works -- exact same Markdown! Could you try copying my first one into yours? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278968 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278969 |
Any idea what the difference is between your reproducer and my non-reproducer? (I used the same link target as in the answer that's linked from the question, the one that displayed the error until I edited). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278968 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278967 |
And, as shown in my test-case answer, that didn't happen here in this category. Stranger and stranger! (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278968 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Possible Markdown rendering issue Test cases (all look fine in the preview): Link text edited to include period. Link text contains no punctuation. Other punctuation too? What about comma, or exclamation point! -- Copying text from the other answer to see if who posts it makes a difference (I sure hope not): Th... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278967 |
Weird! Sorry to mess up your test case with an experiment, but I edited the post to move the period out of the link (the original text had "in this proposal." as the link text) and that fixed it. I don't know *why* that should matter. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278966 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278957 |
Sounds like a question about the math for crypto would be on-topic either on this community or on Math, and the asker would choose based on focus or personal preference. That's fine; scopes overlap sometimes. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278961 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278961 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How does voting on site proposals work? I don't understand those voting patterns either. Because people vote for all sorts of reasons, ranging from "I enthusiastically support this" to "that sounds reasonable to me (but I wouldn't participate" to "I think there are serious flaws" to "I am opposed to any site about X regardless of the meri... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278948 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278948 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278948 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: A Site for Privacy and Data Protection Enthusiasts Record your interest here If you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, something else?), or edit the post directly. I'll edit comments into the post later. ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #41993 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278764 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278765 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278945 |
Ah, as opposed to "save changes" for posts. I see why the text for comment edits could be confusing, yes. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278935 |
In an ideal world we'd make the URL about the tag set and not the category. It's not intuitively obvious that two different URLs (for example, Languages Q&A and Languages Resources) point to the same tag set. Tags started out as just tags, and then tag sets came along, and then categories came alon... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278904 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278915 |
I wrote some stuff in a [GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/251) to track this. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278915 |
@luap42 thanks, yeah. I guess most of the examples I remember seeing were live on a dev server that's not still there. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278915 |
Ooh, luap42 prototyped this; I'm not sure where it stands but will try to find out. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278905 |
Post edited: didn't realize markdown tables worked now |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278406 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278905 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278905 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Tables in posts You can now use tables in HTML or Markdown. See an example with Markdown: ```` | Latin | English | Spanish | Catalan | |-------- |--------- |--------- |--------- | | filum | thread | hilo | fil | | filius | son | hijo | fill | | furnus | oven ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278644 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278300 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278300 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278900 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: HTML tables are misdisplayed Testing: Downvotes Minimum upvotes to stay above 40% 1 1 2 1 3 2 4 3 5 3 6 4 7 5 (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278330 |
Post edited: was a data error |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278840 |
Following the model we've discussed for Software Dev, gaming questions could start as part of an "applications" community, perhaps in their own category from the beginning, and spin off when volume of both content and users with diverging interests dictates. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276997 |
@Zerotime you've indicated you're enthusiastic. As noted in the discussions here, this community will require more careful moderation than some. If this community were to launch, would you be interested in being a moderator? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276997 |
@JamesJenkins you've indicated you're enthusiastic. As noted in the discussions here, this community will require more careful moderation than some. If this community were to launch, would you be interested in being a moderator? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278853 |
Post edited: meant to include EE as another quick-start positive example |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278853 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What criteria are used to determine to launch a new community? I'm speaking only for myself here. Unfortunately, we're still kind of winging this, and learning as we go. We now realize we launched some early communities without enough active, engaged members, but we don't know where that sweet spot is yet. We don't want to hinder communities, and we also do... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277408 |
Post edited: please add more details if this is still an issue, thanks |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278840 |
7 is there to see if we're paying attention, right? :-) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #41993 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278833 |
Office suites seems too narrow, though. I assume the community proposed here would also accept questions about Zoom and OpenVPN and Pidgin and Cygwin and so on? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278833 |
I like Power User too. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278833 |
Software Applications? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278608 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277098 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277098 |
The comment reworking (for threaded comments) will affect this too, so deferring until after that (even though I too find the current behavior annoying). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278330 |
And still happening, so it wasn't a fluke. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277321 |
Did this happen? I see the "planned" tag but it's been there a while. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278487 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278166 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74893 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #74893 |
We now have Software Development and Mathematics, so I'm closing this. (Discussing multiple proposals together was tricky anyway.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278806 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Medical science site This proposal seems to have a good baseline for moving forward. There are answers about definition, sometimes controversial, but it looks like there's a good foundation to work with -- y'all will have to work out some of the scope boundaries on your meta, but you've got a starting point. You've got... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278805 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278805 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Tag contents don't reflect merge after 24 hours We haven't identified the cause of this bug yet. It's not caching. The posts are correctly tagged, but they aren't showing up in the tag search. One is deleted so wouldn't anyway (but I guess the count included the deleted post?). One is an article, but other articles show up in tag searches so i... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278714 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277566 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277504 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278770 |
Sorry, I was mistaken -- you can now discard a *new* comment, but that doesn't seem to have made it to the edit code yet. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277948 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278713 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278801 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278803 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: A clickable X that doesn't work We just deployed a fix for this (noticed as part of investigating another bug). Please try again. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278764 |
Post edited: scope looks solid enough to proceed; can we get some more active participants? |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #275968 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276933 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278339 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277182 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276824 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74852 |
Post edited: The definition is well-developed in answers here; what's needed is people who'll be active in the new community. |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277566 |
This should be fixed in the next deployed version. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277948 |
This should be fixed in the next deployed version. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278770 |
This should be fixed in the next deployed version. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278096 |
@msh210 is this still happening? (There have been a couple updates since you reported it, so I want to check back before doing more.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278730 |
Post edited: CIC first, then CIO (fixed typo) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39451 |
Post edited: updated code of conduct link |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #39450 |
@PeterMortensen good idea, thanks -- done. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39450 |
Post edited: expanded abbreviation for clarity |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #39450 |
Post edited: expanded abbreviation for clarity |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278715 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278715 |
Thanks @user53196. We send the email versions of these from a generic account, but they're infrequent enough that I don't think we need a generic account here. (Plus, we want to make sure someone gets pinged.) I do agree that writing about myself indirectly like that is kind of strange, but at lea... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278715 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278713 |
Reproduced. Also, and I don't know if this is related, the dismissible notice...isn't. I tap the "x" and nothing happens. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278715 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Article | — |
Newsletter #4 (October 2020) Hello from Codidact! This past Friday was Codidact's first birthday! We're counting that from the day that luap42 set up a Discord server to discuss building a new Q&A platform. One thing led to another, and a few weeks later there was a GitHub repository, a Discourse forum for discussion, a wik... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277995 |
We have a proposed scope with some support (it can always be discussed and refined). What this proposal really needs now is more people who'll help build the community. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #41993 |
Post edited: with all the discussion I think this is well into "proposal" territory, not just an idea |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278665 |
We haven't designed a badge system yet -- doesn't mean we can't, but we haven't prioritized it. We're happy to hear proposals for what a badge system might reward. (We'll also need to consider the effects of badge-hunting -- do any badges motivate undesirable behaviors?) We don't want to just copy... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278608 |
Post edited: addressed comments |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278656 |
I was just discussing the sandbox case with someone. We talked about ask-refine-move, but moving the post would bring all its comments too, which would have to be deleted (but still get in the way for people who can see deleted comments), and there was a feeling that sometimes having the conversation... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #74822 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277185 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278609 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278609 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278609 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278608 |
@Moshi from the discussion in 19th Byte it sounded like the community could have questions *about* golfing and related topics that aren't themselves challenges. They can tell us what they need; I'm in no position to judge. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278609 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278608 |
@Moshi it could be renamed. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278609 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278608 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278608 |
@Moshi or maybe it's all challenges and I misunderstood? The idea was one category for challenges, which have different rules from Q&A *about* golfing etc, and which are the only ones that use a leaderboard. Edited to just say "challenges". (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278609 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278608 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278608 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278609 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Site suggestion - Code Golf Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278608 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Site suggestion - Code Golf Based on new comments here, I had a conversation with some folks in the Nineteenth Byte on Discord to ask them about their interests and needs. I pointed out the TopAnswers site, which some of them were not aware of, and pointed them to this proposal. There seems to be interest in having a communit... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #41993 |
Post edited: see discussion in comments on my answer |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #74822 |
Thanks for bringing that up, @Razetime. I'm going to remove the status-declined tag, but we'll need to flesh out this proposal, gather a community, and *talk with the TopAnswers* folks. If TA is a good solution for golfing but folks just don't know about it, that's one class of problem. If there's so... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278542 |
Post edited: "no repro" isn't quite right, but I didn't want to create "status-no-longer-an-issue" so I'm using that |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278544 |
@10Rep check out our [list of communities](https://codidact.com/) and see if any of them fit your interests -- you should be able to get to 10 rep (and more) soon if so. :-) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278544 |
Welcome aboard @Circuitfantasist! We're glad to have you and everyone else who's checking us out. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278505 |
Composition style: Markdown or HTML (which allows room to add some third thing that becomes popular later that we haven't thought about now). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278504 |
The vote-time override has to be there too, but in some earlier discussion some brought up the hassle of having to click it every time, so there was a request for a default. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278493 |
I'm not convinced it's a good idea to advertise when somebody last visited the site. It feels kind of stalkerish. You can't tell when somebody else last looked at Twitter or Reddit or (AFAIK) Facebook, for instance. When somebody last *took an action* is public information, but just browsing feels... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278492 |
@Lundin we probably need some tag-referencing syntax that includes the set name. Gotta think about this. Aside from meta being its own thing we don't expect a lot of diverse tag sets, but we'll have to see what communities want to build. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278501 |
This is an interesting idea to talk about, but is a little beyond what preferences are needed. We've talked informally about customized views, filters, etc and I want to come back to that later. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278498 |
We can also change the default for the category on Outdoors (for new posts) if the Outdoors community requests it. Probably nobody thought about it. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278496 |
@1muflon1 we're going to be revising reputation, actually -- see [coming soon: abilities and changes to reputation](https://meta.codidact.com/articles/278234). We do have data import (so people can bring in Q&A from SE) but it's a little fragile and we want to make changes before doing more of that... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278496 |
@1muflon1 glad to have you! I suspected from your scope answer that you had some decent background in the field. :-) We do not see Codidact and SE as a zero-sum game; the platforms and the communities emphasize different things, and it's quite fine to participate on both. Our Judaism community ge... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Site for Economics Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278491 |
Thanks for these additions -- very helpful! This looks like a good starting point for other economics experts to weigh in on. (Oh, that reminds me -- "survey of interest" post coming right up.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278492 |
@Moshi a community can have multiple tag sets. A category within a community must use exactly one tag set. Tag sets contain only tags; they cannot contain other tag sets. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278490 |
No worries @Moshi; having one place to collect it is handy, and if something *has* been brought up elsewhere (or it's big enough to call for a separate discussion), it can just be linked. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278492 |
Tag sets are per-community, yes. Every community has two tag sets to start, called Main and Meta. Most of our communities that have other categories are using Main on them. Meta doesn't have meta but both Blog and Site Proposals have their own tag sets. Note that tag names are unique within tag s... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278492 |
Interesting edge case -- *technically* tags *aren't* per-category but, rather, tags are part of a tag set and each category uses a tag set, *which can be shared*. So, for example, if Software Dev had a Code Review category and it used the same tag set as Q&A, then we'd probably highlight that JavaSc... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278444 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278491 |
Thank you; this is helpful input. Would you perhaps be able to propose a high-level scope description -- what topics *should* be on-topic, as opposed to what shouldn't be? How do expert economists (of which set I am not a member) frame things? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278490 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Future planning: what user preferences would be useful? I am starting to think about user preferences. This won't happen for a while, but I'd like to gather input so we can start thinking about a functional design. Currently a user has a single account across our network. When you edit your description or your display name or your blog link, those ch... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278488 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Allow licence change when there's only one contributor I agree that authors should be able to make an immediate edit to change the license -- you post, only then notice the default license, and can't fix it. That's frustrating. The workaround of deleting and reposting is extra hassle -- and, for answers and for people who can see deleted posts, adds cl... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278487 |
@OlinLathrop actually no; if you started to edit a post, then your choices are your edit state or nothing, but "go back to the way it was before I touched it" isn't an option unless you copy it out of the post history. (Or open it in an incognito window, or probably other things we shouldn't make pe... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278476 |
@Dani I don't actually know what it's called, no. I just picked some words that seemed descriptive. :-) I've created a GitHub issue for this problem and somebody has already volunteered to work on it. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278487 |
I would think that "cancel" should mean "throw away my draft". But I see it doesn't currently; it just cancels the *session* while preserving the state. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278476 |
Thanks for the edit! I see it now. Just missing the header block with the title/link and score there, it looks like. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278444 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should we have a community for Reviewing Code? Should it be a separate community, or should Software Development also support code reviews (as a separate category)? It feels like there are natural affinities there, including linking to existing content and asking followup questions, but I didn't participate in CR over there so I don't know how r... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #276854 |
Sorry for the delayed status tag. This got fixed some time in the past (not sure when) but we failed to update here. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276854 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278077 |
Well, it hasn't been *answered* before; it's an outstanding bug. But there's another bug report for this so I'm linking them together. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278077 | Question closed | — | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278004 |
We made some RTL-related fixes and I'm not seeing this any more, but I don't know if we (think we) fixed this. Are you still seeing it? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277475 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278406 |
Yeah, if it's not visible from the start, we can't expect people to know about it. I see now -- this specific example is just short enough that the horizontal scroll is evident for me. But on https://software.codidact.com/questions/277881 the code block is longer and the scroll doesn't appear from ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278413 |
Post edited: respond to comments |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278413 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What languages have syntax highlighting support? Codidact uses highlight.js for syntax highlighting. We support whatever languages are enabled by default in that package; we haven't restricted them. As I write this, they list 189 languages with examples on their website as well as on a table on their GitHub. Syntax highlighting is enabled for ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278412 |
@Moshi syntax highlighting is only enabled for communities where we expect code, because (like Mathjax) it adds some rendering time to every post and we don't want to slow down sites that wouldn't benefit. Sorry about your edge case; it's certainly reasonable to ask on Meta about the syntax highligh... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278406 |
Thanks for the screenshot. I'm not seeing it in Firefox 79.0 (or Chrome 84.0) but don't have ESR handy. There should definitely be a horizontal scrollbar there. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278404 |
This would be controlled per-community, yes. A community that doesn't want imports wouldn't have to allow them, but some communities *do* want imports and this would let them have them. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278394 |
@Lundin not as part of the import process, no. But once the post is here, people can edit to merge answers, preserving attribution. This would be a good use case for the "community wiki" proposal, too, as it's truly a combined effort that no one person gets "credit" for. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278394 |
Post edited: responding to an answer about edit history |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278396 |
Oh, good point. I said that because the license doesn't require importing the entire edit history. And maybe we don't want to recreate the full edit history here, but for imported posts we could include the original edit history as a link in the post history. That way the information is available ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278394 |
@Lundin agreed; people need to be judicious in using the tool. Sometimes some of the answers are good (or good starting points for edits) and others should be deleted, which the community could do here but can't do there. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278394 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Proposal: tool for user-requested import of a single question and its answers from SE We have a tool for doing bulk imports of questions (and answers) from SE. It has several limitations: - Running it requires direct DB access. - The resulting data is sometimes wrong in various ways -- duplicates, answers not getting wired up to the right questions, something that blocks voting som... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278391 |
Another use case: [resources on Languages & Linguistics](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/40). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278387 |
Our planned workflow for duplicates is: anyone can propose a duplicate; if the author agrees it's marked (done); otherwise the author is invited to edit or can dispute the duplicate suggestion (this has nothing to do with that). So yes, an author who finds or agrees with a dupe target can just go ah... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278388 |
@manassehkatz I considered adding that (specifically if there've been no edits). I don't know how much that complicates the implementation (don't count this post for abilities, no do again / move it over to System, no move it back). Maybe only change ownership once there *is* an edit and the rest is... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278388 |
@Lundin on your last point, that's what I had in mind with setting the System user as the owner (in my "to be determined" paragraph). I don't know if there are better ways, but that's *a* way. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278388 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278388 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Do we have/should we have community wikis? Update: We didn't do what I proposed here, but we instead created a wiki post type. See there for details. I wrote a GH ticket based on this suggestion, with the following expansion: We should avoid the term "community wiki", which was sometimes confusing on Some Other platform too. If we ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278386 |
We don't have it yet. An "anyone can edit" option for the author is something I'd like to see us do. ("Anyone" to be further clarified; probably means anyone who's gained the Participate Generally ability?) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278340 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Why not have a physics community for physics enthusiasts? Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278304 |
We don't yet have the ability to lock posts, so if you edit that back in again we will have to delete the post again. Please find more appropriate ways to express yourself, and please stop pretending to be someone other than the author of the question. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278304 |
Post edited: Restoring the edit that allowed this post to not be deleted. See staff answers at https://meta.codidact.com/questions/278310. |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278330 |
Huh, weird -- but not here on Meta. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278319 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Post on Stack Exchange and Codidact You own your posts and are free to do with them as you choose, including posting them in more than one place -- here, Stack Exchange, Quora, Reddit, etc. By posting on Codidact you grant us a license to use your posts, but it's not an exclusive license. Thank you for supporting Codidact! If you ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278313 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Why was this answer to the volunteer-discussion removed? That answer (and this meta question) prompted a lot of discussion. This discussion is a good outcome. We are by the community, for the community, which means if the community questions what we're doing, we need to discuss that. We don't need to keep engaging if someone is clearly out to be disrupt... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278290 |
Not only *can* that mechanism be used for gathering feedback, but it *has* been -- at least the review panel, I know. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278283 |
There have been a few cases of employees with no other activity on a site (i.e. they can only downvote because of their status) downvoting community ads, but I'm not aware of them outright deleting any yet. I haven't been tracking edits to posts like the ones you're talking about, but if those posts... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278282 |
@Mithical plus all the *other* challenges that come with paying people, conflicts of interest, resulting strife... Someday the Codidact project might have both the need and the means to hire people for certain roles (I'm guessing a role that keeps the servers running and happy would top the list), th... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277092 |
Oh wow. That missing sidebar is where the core of the tour -- that is, the explanations and instructions -- goes. A tour without that would be pretty cryptic. Is that still happening? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278236 |
Saving the post as a draft in case the tour-taker wrote a real question is a good idea. Thanks for the suggestion. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278225 |
@ArtOfCode I ran into this on some community metas recently when adding the missing basic tags (like support). I couldn't characterize it at the time, so while I might have mentioned it in chat I didn't do anything more -- figured maybe it was a fluke. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278205 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Orientation / Welcoming Committee Welcome to Codidact! Codidact is very much a work in progress, and input is welcome. This network-wide Meta is the best place to find existing feature requests. Some also come in as GitHub issues (in the codidact/qpixel repository -- that's the main code repo). It's best to look around and get ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277157 |
Reproduced the reappearance of this bug today. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278183 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: To be constructive, or not to be constructive, that is the question. No system of rules can run only on statutory rules. There is always case law, because no set of laws/rules that people can actually manage will ever include everything. We are trying to write a clear, succinct "statute" about what we expect on our network. We know that some things will require h... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278162 |
Comments are getting reworked (design work is happening now) and will be threaded. With the ability to separate threads (after people learn to reply instead of just adding to the end), comments will be more organized. With threading, I don't know if comments "rising to the top" still makes sense. I'd... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278132 |
Are you having problems with all uploads or just this one (or is this the only one you've tried so far)? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277007 |
@DerekElkins [launched](https://math.codidact.com/questions/278124) (in case you didn't see). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277007 |
@8063 [launched](https://math.codidact.com/questions/278124) (in case you didn't see). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277007 |
@JoshuaTS [launched](https://math.codidact.com/questions/278124) (in case you didn't see). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277007 |
@PeterTaylor [launched](https://math.codidact.com/questions/278124) (in case you didn't see). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278110 |
I agree with both of you: communities should be able to set the norms that work for them, *and* these norms need to be communicated clearly so people don't stumble over the differences. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277002 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278097 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Community Rules I agree; we need to help communities communicate clearly about their norms, particularly to newcomers. Each community has a "FAQ" or "introduction" topic in the help that moderators can edit, and moderators can create other help topics. Electrical Engineering has built out a body of site-specific h... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278086 |
@aCVn categories could change that, yes. But, fundamentally, the groups have enough important differences that I suspect they shouldn't share common infrastructure like reputation/abilities and a single meta. Federated communities like with my vague SoftwareDev subcommunities might work better. But... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278086 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How granular should network communities be? A community with common interests is a part of it too. At Some Other place somebody wanted to combine all the Abrahamic religion sites into one, arguing that they share a lot of biblical books and tags could differentiate religious context. I argued against this because the three communities view t... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276995 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278074 |
I understand (some stuff about) web client code in the abstract. I think there's room to learn something from that question even if I'm not a C++ programmer. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278073 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278073 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Should we show tags before the body, to provide context for reading the question? Today I saw the following question on Software Dev (this is the beginning): title and first paragraph could apply to several languages (rest of post...) The title, "connect with SLOT/SIGNAL:QPushButton clicked signal not received by main window" sounds like it could be about one of several... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278050 |
Yeah, I'm not trying to play a *reductio ad absurdum* card; I'm just trying to tease out whether it's a small number of arbitrary links (and roughly how many), or whether it's "support more specific sites beyond Twitter and one free link". (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #278050 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Allow users to link more than one website in their profile. Let's talk about design. Clearly we wouldn't want to allow any number of links, because having a thousand links would break the layout in some way. Unless we put it behind a "show more" control of some sort when we reach the "too many to lay out reasonably" point, wherever that is (and it's proba... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278036 |
@luap42 category, not site -- a place right here on Meta for people to congregate. But, needs assessment first. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278036 |
@luap42 or it could be a "fun" category off of Meta, or a place in Discord with different conventions, or a different Discourse forum to avoid conflating chit-chat with older planning, or something else... I'd like to better understand the need before we dive into setting something up. I think there'... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278036 |
The forum Moshi refers to was more focused than what this question describes, though. Zerotime, can you say more about what you imagine this looking like? For example, you mentioned new threads being bumped as a negative, I think, but the forums I've used have done that too. What would be the importa... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278030 |
We should do something non-destructive if the tag has a description, for those cases where someone did things in the wrong order with a tag re-org or the like. (SE did this badly; mods got a list of "orphan tag wikis" with no indication of where they'd come from.) (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278004 |
Also reproduced (Chrome, Mac) with no special language settings. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278006 |
Just last night I talked with somebody who found us but doesn't use SE, and I've seen some others. As we increase activity and visibility I would expect to see more of that. We don't have the Google rank and resulting visibility that they have, so we need to find other ways to (responsibly) get the... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #278010 |
Yes. **Communities first** is a key difference, and many other things follow from that. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277998 |
We should create a help topic for this, since many of our users will be coming from (or familiar with) SE. We can use answers here as input for that. For some high-level Codidact philosophy (not nuts and bolts of how things work), see [The Codidact Vision](https://meta.codidact.com/articles/276296)... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277993 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should we use the Article type for bug reports? I've sometimes seen bug reports be answered with workaround while awaiting a fix. I think I've seen that here on Codidact (though I haven't gone looking for examples). I know I saw it sometimes on Some Other site. I don't know how important it is, but it's something we would lose if we made this c... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277990 |
Good point. There are probably FAQs that medical professionals would prefer to link to rather than answering *again*, too. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277985 |
@Zerotime [done](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276933#answer-277990) (incorporated into a broader suggestion). (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277990 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Medical science site Resources This community should consider compiling and jointly curating a "resources" category (or something similar that serves the same purpose). This could include lists of good (= reliable, credible) references, perhaps broken up by medical sub-field. It could also include a list or lists o... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277985 |
My upvote is for the "good references"/"bad references" suggestion (however worded). I'd suggest that the community curate lists of known-credible and known-problematic references and that these reactions could be links to those lists. I'm concerned that one reaction per reference, or using answers... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277966 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Suggestion for allowing to mark answers as "accepted", "outdated" or "dangerous" How should we handle possibly-outdated reactions? No, not by reactions to reactions. An edit to a post made after reactions were added could change the applicability of those reactions. Somebody might have edited to address a danger or update an out-of-date recommendation. Conversely, somebody ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277958 |
@OlinLathrop I think signed votes could be displayed in a similar way, but I've been thinking of *casting* them as part of the *voting* process rather than a separate reaction. I'm imagining that a user can, as part of voting, say "make this public", UX to be determined. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277958 |
@Mithrandir24601 exactly. Reactions should *augment* votes, not *divert* or *duplicate* them. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277958 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277958 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Suggestion for allowing to mark answers as "accepted", "outdated" or "dangerous" I was part of that conversation, so my input is mostly reflected in this proposal already. I want to add one thing, about community customization, which gets into philosophy. I don't want us to end up with gazillions of emoji decorating posts. That way lies madness and Discord. A reaction shoul... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277950 | Post edited | — | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277007 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277943 |
If we do this, I would suggest status-pending (for consistency with site proposals), and that it means the work is done or nearly done with very high probability of being done soon enough for the next deploy. It should mean "coming soon" rather than "somebody started a branch for that". (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277945 |
The Trello board contains everything that's been reported/requested that's neither done nor declined. Not everything there has been triaged, and prioritization is loose. After triage, bugs and FRs go to GitHub. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277941 |
If you see a question somewhere else -- Quora, SE, a coworker, whatever -- and you bring it here so you can answer, that's fine. (Of course the question might get other answers too, as is proper.) It's a kindness to share a link with the asker, sure, especially if you already have an active account t... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #277941 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What is the policy on importing questions by simply quoting the question over here? I haven't consulted with the rest of the team yet, so treat this as my personal opinion and not Codidact policy, please. Under the terms of the Creative Commons license used at SE (and here), quoting content from there is fine so long as you provide attribution and link. These questions do that (... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #277924 |
I see the other post has now been updated with status-planned. I think that's a good approach. We can move it to status-completed after deploy. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277002 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277487 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277549 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277841 |
@manassehkatz that JSON file is what we use to publish our community list beyond the sites -- the list on codidact.com, and if you look at TopAnswers you'll see that they include our list of communities just as we include theirs. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277863 |
Is *that* why some of my notifications don't seem to work right? Thanks for figuring this out. I consider this a bug. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277859 |
Yes we'll definitely enable Mathjax on this site. I can't imagine it working without that. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277007 |
@DonielF probably about a week out due to logistics stuff (not about this proposal but about dependencies and scarce resources). (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277854 |
Sometimes the answer to overlap can be different framing, e.g. taking the physics part of the math & physics proposal and forming a natural sciences proposal. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277854 |
@MathPhysics I don't want to speak in absolutes. We'll want to *discuss* it and make sure the overlap can be addressed. There can be more than one community for a topic; people just have to be able to tell where to go for what. For example, we wouldn't block a general engineering site because EE e... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277549 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277549 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277854 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Launching a new community with enough contributors even though disagreements exist One of the things we look for in a new site is enough interested participants to make it viable. We now ask people to make their interest known, because votes don't necessarily correlate with intended participation. Sometimes an upvote means "I want this" and sometimes it means "yeah, that sounds l... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277848 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Add the ability to customize suspended user profile blurb We don't have a custom reason yet, but there is now a third option: no public reason. This means you don't have to give a wrong reason, even if you can't customize a right reason. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277578 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: I cannot understand the meaning of some downvotes In an ideal world, bug reports and support requests would be a separate stream from discussions and feature requests. We work with the tools we have, while also working to improve them. (A few people have reported software bugs on GitHub, which is fine too but not something we'd want to require.) ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277549 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277569 |
To explain how it got there in this case: someone provided a link to an image in a comment, I wanted to incorporate the image into the answer, and I didn't want to save it just to upload it so I instead used the URL directly. When our image-upload process can accept a URL and not just a file, this p... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #275968 |
I think to move forward, this proposal needs a more fleshed-out scope proposal. Please review the comments and answers here and edit as you think appropriate. Thanks. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #276933 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #276997 |
@Zerotime completely my fault; this has grown beyond an idea at this point, has people interested in building it, and needs to flesh out scope some including doing something about the issues raised here. (Scope can be worked out more on a live site, but getting a basic shape of it here is good.) I'... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277565 |
@FoggyFinder yes it's supposed to be +5 for questions, +10 for answers or articles, -2 for downvotes. I think there might be a bug; checking with folks. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277549 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277565 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277565 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277565 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Was score system changed? Various things, not all of them understood, affect the accuracy of the reported reputation number. For example, sometimes a post is deleted or undeleted but the reputation adjustments don't get made. A system-wide reputation recalculation updates rep numbers by recomputing all of them. An admin ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277549 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277549 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277549 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Need a mathematics Q&A site Needed: a logo. Thanks to everyone who's responded to the other answer about prospective participants. We plan to move forward with this community. Right now the person who's been designing our logos is very busy with other things, so to try to remove barriers, I'm here to ask for your help. ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277502 |
Questions deleted by users can be deleted in error, so while it's *usually* spam or trolling, there could also be a misunderstanding, language barrier, overzealous deleter, or whatever. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277503 |
Post edited: updating to address edits to the question |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277544 |
Our use cases/wireframes call for a pop-up that invites you to sign in; I guess we haven't gotten there yet with the code. (This should apply to any control that's visible but requires that you be signed in.) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277538 |
Meta actually does have a Meta, because it's baked into the site-setup code, and it took a few days for us to get rid of it. While it was there it confused people, but I admit we never created Meta Meta Meta where people could ask questions about Meta Meta. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277518 |
Reproduced (Chrome, Mac). (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277503 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Block adding answers and editing of question/answers of deleted questions. I strongly agree that being able to add a new answer after a question has been deleted doesn't make sense, and that most people also shouldn't be able to add comments. (Moderators should be able to, and see the comments for another suggestion.) I think the author should be able to edit a deleted ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277497 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Question | — |
"recent deletions" moderator tool produces error The "recent deletions" link under mod tools is consistently returning a 500 server error for me. One reference: `2ba998b1-84b1-4675-aeb8-bebcf3465b5f` I've tried this on two sites. It's been a few days since I last accessed this tool anywhere, so I can't pin down when this behavior might have st... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277185 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #276998 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277454 |
@Olin I don't see how that's different from misapplied tags now. People sometimes use the wrong tag because they assumed from the name it was one thing when it's actually meant to be something else. I'm saying we shouldn't allow both "apple" and "Apple" to be tags on the same site; that'll just add... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277459 |
Interesting idea. We could extend the [use case for suggesting a duplicate](https://github.com/codidact/feature-development/blob/master/scoped/flag/duplicate.md) to add a checkbox for the supersede case; I don't know if there are better ways. Right *now* duplicate is part of the close flow like on ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277454 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should we allow capitalized tags? I think tags should be case-preserving and also case-independent. By this I mean: I do not want us to have two tags that differ only in capitalization, because I think that will lead to errors and confusion. (If you need tags for "apple" the fruit and "Apple" the company on the same site, find some... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277007 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277383 |
@aCVn yeah, automated someday, but I think we're gambling that the load won't be so high as to preclude manual handling in the window between now and when we can implement that. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277379 |
No repro in Safari on a Mac (desktop). I don't have an iPad or iPhone to test with. (I think we've seen other iOS-only issues.) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277356 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Community Wiki Posts I think you're asking about what SE calls community wiki, as opposed to the community user. On SE, the Community user owns things that are otherwise ownerless, like posts from deleted users. Community wiki, on the other hand, is a status that an individual post has, meaning "make it easy for people... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277348 |
@Mithical that'd be a problem with the *user account*, though; it's not that we'd be saying "you can be here but can't be a mod" but, rather, we'd be saying "GDPR says you can't be here, sorry!". @ArtOfCode TOS violations would be problems; I wasn't thinking of that as a legal issue, but maybe I'm t... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277349 |
I remember writing something about this but need to track down where. We do want people to be able to search either globally (on a site) or just within a category. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277348 |
I want the community to be protected from rogue team members too. What's an example of a legal issue forcing the team's hand? I have guesses but don't know enough about law (especially on an international site) to know if they're reasonable. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277208 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #277314 |
I don't know what that symbol is supposed to be. It looks like a bell to me. I often have trouble with emoji and uncommon Unicode symbols, though. Maybe Art can enlighten us. :-) (more) |
— | almost 3 y |