Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Monica Cellio‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #280489 We should probably show it next to the editor if there is enough space ("enough" to be determined).
(more)
about 21 hours ago
Edit Post #277868 Post edited:
1 day ago
Comment Post #280484 We're doing this as part of a larger reworking of comments, currently in progress.
(more)
1 day ago
Edit Post #280164 Post edited:
1 day ago
Edit Post #280160 Post edited:
1 day ago
Edit Post #278496 Post edited:
1 day ago
Comment Post #280464 The design considerations are different, as Art said. Still, we are open to discussing specific aspects. Some of our design principles are different and that affects layout; categories, for example, are fundamental, and SE doesn't do that at all. Some things can be adjusted; I've thought about moving...
(more)
2 days ago
Comment Post #280406 The Codidact team can't take on the task of finding people to support every community that someone would like to see here. We need supporters of community proposals to do that legwork. By the way, I don't have any status on Reddit either. If there are people there who would potentially come here, ...
(more)
3 days ago
Edit Post #280459 Post edited:
3 days ago
Edit Post #280160 Post edited:
3 days ago
Edit Post #280164 Post edited:
3 days ago
Edit Post #278496 Post edited:
3 days ago
Edit Post #280461 Initial revision 3 days ago
Answer A: Site for Where is This? Identifying Places in pictures?
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
3 days ago
Comment Post #280405 @PeterTaylor moving the text into the category header (something I briefly thought about too) would not work well on small viewports, like phones. I've just filed a GitHub issue to make it collapsible instead.
(more)
3 days ago
Edit Post #280419 Question closed 4 days ago
Edit Post #74852 Post edited:
Addressed in an answer.
4 days ago
Edit Post #280413 Initial revision 4 days ago
Answer A: closure-as-duplicate post notice is inaccurate
We have an issue open to fix this in the code, but I recently realized that moderators can also fix it locally: the close reasons are editable. I've edited it here on Meta to say "This question has been addressed elsewhere". Moderators, please consider backward compatibility when editing close re...
(more)
4 days ago
Edit Post #280409 Initial revision 4 days ago
Answer A: What about having a category in Meta for documentation about the platform?
This is an interesting idea. We have help, but only moderators can edit it. We want documentation about the platform (as opposed to how our network or particular communities operate) to end up in the help that is part of the platform repository and seeded to all new communities -- but not everythin...
(more)
4 days ago
Comment Post #280406 What we need is for some folks here -- needn't and probably shouldn't be Codidact admins, but rather people who would participate on these communities -- to do some of this outreach. If there's a group of people who want to support a community here, we want to set it up. But we're a small team and ...
(more)
4 days ago
Comment Post #280405 Thanks for the feedback. We should consider making some of those sections collapsible. The reason users aren't with tags and posts is that tags and posts are at the category level, while users are global for a community. If you click on "tags" in the meta category, for example, you'll only see the...
(more)
4 days ago
Comment Post #280358 Are you testing in an incognito browser? I just searched Google in such for "problem collaborative work different voices"; the first hit was a scraper, the second SE, and the third Codidact. (Interestingly, the scraper scraped the question but not the answers, so it's actually *less* useful than th...
(more)
5 days ago
Comment Post #280382 Right, if you want to tell people about your blog or Twitter account or whatever else, *but* you don't want it to be publicly linked, then you could put it in the not-completely-public block. You'd just have to do it manually -- type "Twitter: " or whatever, instead of filling in a form.
(more)
5 days ago
Comment Post #280391 We want to be able to support internationalization. Right now our effort there is "don't do things that will impede internationalization"; we don't have enough people to be able to do better now and still get everything else done that we've identified as priorities, but this is on our roadmap.
(more)
5 days ago
Edit Post #280388 Initial revision 5 days ago
Answer A: How can we make Codidact more friendly for askers?
A lot of Codidact's distinctives, as Manasseh notes in comments on another answer, are about how the Codidact team and the community interact -- that communities here have much more control, that the team is accountable to the communities not to shareholders, much better responsiveness to requests an...
(more)
5 days ago
Comment Post #280382 Would being able to limit the profile description to people who are signed in, versus anybody, meet your need? This would give you a place to put whatever you want that you don't want in Google results etc, while not making the user interface complex.
(more)
6 days ago
Edit Post #280379 Initial revision 6 days ago
Answer A: We should delete all old imported content.
Writing already has consensus to delete unclaimed, untouched, imported posts. We should see how that changes things, and then the other two communities with large-scale imports can decide how they want to proceed. Writing, at least, is unlikely to be interested in throwing out work that people he...
(more)
6 days ago
Comment Post #280375 @OlinLathrop what did you do for EE, which was also founded by experts who (I think) were more prepared to answer than ask? What can we learn from EE?
(more)
6 days ago
Comment Post #280342 @ArtOfCode make the Tools control a toggle instead of just promoting? And raise a mod flag if a post gets promoted again after having been unpromoted?
(more)
6 days ago
Edit Post #280375 Initial revision 8 days ago
Question New communities: Music, Physics
We have launched two new communities, Music and Physics. As new communities with no data imports, they are blank or nearly-blank canvases now. We'd like to have some content before we advertise them off-network (in the communities list), but y'all won't necessarily notice them if we don't announce ...
(more)
8 days ago
Comment Post #280369 I think 10 Rep meant without console shenanigans, @fedorqui. :-)
(more)
8 days ago
Comment Post #280368 @ploni it involved opening links in new tabs and marking some things unread and back to read. I'm not sure of the exact sequence I followed, but it took a few tries to stumble on the -1. :-)
(more)
8 days ago
Edit Post #280368 Initial revision 8 days ago
Answer A: When clicking "mark read" it shows a 0 when it should actually dissapear.
With a bit of effort, you can even do this: -1 I think the code that shows the notification count draws the notification "container" (the blue circle) once, and then just updates the number from some data value. Only when you close and reopen the notifications, or refresh, or move to another...
(more)
8 days ago
Comment Post #280356 Fixed now. Sorry for the disruption.
(more)
8 days ago
Comment Post #280084 @fedorqui while a suggested edit is pending you can't edit. Can you see the edit link now?
(more)
9 days ago
Edit Post #280084 Post edited:
9 days ago
Comment Post #280356 How strange! What happens if you go to the [edit URL](https://outdoors.codidact.com/posts/279707/edit) directly? (Trying to figure out if you can edit but there's a UI weirdness or if you can't edit at all.) Does it happen on any other posts or just that one?
(more)
9 days ago
Edit Post #280162 Post edited:
9 days ago
Edit Post #280349 Post edited:
9 days ago
Edit Post #280355 Initial revision 9 days ago
Answer A: Can we have customised text in the "Posting Tips" banner for each post type?
I think this is a bug. There is default guidance for answers that is different from that for questions, and a category can override either or both. This category does not override the answer guidance, so it should be getting the default. Instead, it's getting the question guidance. To answer yo...
(more)
9 days ago
Comment Post #280346 Voting feedback is important, independent of rep. If something I posted is getting downvotes but not comments, I want to know to take another look. If a quick-and-dirty answer I posted a while back is suddenly getting a new flurry of upvotes, I want to know so I can consider improving it.
(more)
9 days ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
9 days ago
Comment Post #277185 @10Rep -- good news; the community has now launched. Please bring your questions about orchestral tracks to music.codidact.com.
(more)
9 days ago
Edit Post #280319 Post edited:
9 days ago
Edit Post #280342 Initial revision 9 days ago
Answer A: Can we get an option to remove a post from the nominated posts list?
Moderators can now see a list of promoted posts and can remove a question from the list there. I acknowledge the imbalance: anyone with the Curate ability can nominate, but only moderators can remove. I hope we will be able to improve this tooling in the future, but now at least moderators can re...
(more)
9 days ago
Edit Post #280318 Post edited:
9 days ago
Edit Post #280341 Initial revision 9 days ago
Answer A: Can we get a list of questions on a site currently nominated for the Community Promotions?
There is now a new section in the moderator tools for promoted posts. It looks like this: screenshot Moderators can cancel a promotion from this page. It would be better if the list of promoted posts were visible to all community members, not just moderators -- this would help communities c...
(more)
9 days ago
Edit Post #279693 Post edited:
9 days ago
Comment Post #280326 Interesting. At first I wondered if we had some sort of "you can't review your own suggestions so we won't show them" logic, but I can't see it in the list either. Investigating.
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #278340 @NaveenMishra‭ the Physics community has launched. (See the link at the top of the proposal.)
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #278340 @Knight the Physics community has launched.
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #278340 @dmckee‭ the Physics community has launched.
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #278340 @DonielF‭ the Physics community has launched.
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #278340 @HDE226868‭ the Physics community has launched.
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #75000 Hi. Sorry for the off-topic ping but I didn't have another way to reach you. Just wanted to let you know that communities for Music and Physics have both just launched. You expressed interest in Music and your profile suggests you might be interested in Physics, and I didn't have a good way to let...
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #277182 @J.E.B.ofPonderworthy‭ just in case you didn't see, the community has been launched.
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #280318 If it's mod-specific, it could be added to the page for managing featured posts. (I mean a separate section on that page, not mingling.) If it's generally available, and it seems reasonable for people to be able to see it, then I'm not sure where to put it. But I agree it'd be good to have.
(more)
10 days ago
Edit Post #279458 Post edited:
10 days ago
Edit Post #280322 Initial revision 10 days ago
Answer A: Seeing deleted posts
This was a bug. Deleted posts aren't supposed to be shown on profiles to people who can't also see the posts.
(more)
10 days ago
Edit Post #280243 Post edited:
10 days ago
Edit Post #280300 Post edited:
10 days ago
Edit Post #280298 Post edited:
10 days ago
Edit Post #280321 Initial revision 10 days ago
Answer A: Search box instead of link
We had a lot of discussion about how to approach this, keeping responsive design in mind, and decided to add the search icon but not move the search bar into the header. I admit that you don't know on hover, when it lights up, whether clicking it will navigate away or give you a pop-out; we have som...
(more)
10 days ago
Comment Post #280302 Agreed. I'd like to have a way for people to register interest and then a way to notify them all in a batch. Pinging people one at a time in comments doesn't scale.
(more)
11 days ago
Edit Post #280161 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #280158 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #280161 Post edited:
12 days ago
Comment Post #278458 It's not per-category yet, but you can now set it per-community. (The delta between my two comments is not an accurate predictor of the time to per-category settings. :-) )
(more)
12 days ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #276650 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #280273 Initial revision 12 days ago
Answer A: Can auto-saving be individually disabled?
You can now set a preference to disable autosaving. See the "preferences" tab on your profile.
(more)
12 days ago
Edit Post #278506 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #278494 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #278492 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #280259 Post edited:
updated code means updated answer :-)
12 days ago
Comment Post #280225 @celtschk‭ we're actually working on threaded *comments* now (no ETA, but in progress). How that would play into a proposal like this, I don't know, but it seems relevant.
(more)
12 days ago
Edit Post #278340 Post edited:
12 days ago
Edit Post #279094 Post edited:
based on comments
12 days ago
Comment Post #279094 Re multiple pings in a comment, don't know. I got pinged; we'll have to wait to see if luap42 did too.
(more)
12 days ago
Edit Post #280259 Post edited:
13 days ago
Comment Post #279094 Could you check if this is still happening for you? Those shortcuts work for me in Chrome now, but I don't know what you were using and I haven't gotten to a Windows machine yet to test in Edge. Also, we've made the setting global and moved it into a new "preferences" section on the profile page.
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #279094 Post edited:
oops, tagged based on the "by the way" part, but that was secondary
13 days ago
Comment Post #278458 It's not per-community yet, but you can now set a global preference for default license. We'll continue to work on preferences.
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #279094 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #280259 Initial revision 13 days ago
Answer A: Shortcuts for individual categories don't seem to work
We've added a "preferences" tab to the user profile. There are global (network-wide) and per-community preferences. We've made keyboard shortcuts a global preference. We don't yet have "global, but with local overrides"; a preference is either global or has to be set on each individual community...
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #279614 Post edited:
13 days ago
Comment Post #280248 Yes, I agree. This is on our radar: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/370.
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #280248 Question closed 13 days ago
Edit Post #280229 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #280228 Post edited:
13 days ago
Comment Post #280228 Does the "edit" link not work on the other post? If so, please let us know how it failed. Meanwhile, could you add some text *here* about what this community would cover? It doesn't have to be long, but trying to figure out what any given subreddit is about is kind of tedious, and anyway "do what ...
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #280225 Post edited:
13 days ago
Comment Post #280017 This *should* be fixed now. Values are still cached, so there are some people who'll still show 0s incorrectly, *but* when there's an event that would change any of the values that cache gets flushed. So the next time someone whose card is showing 0s posts, for example, it should get fixed.
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #278039 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #280232 Initial revision 13 days ago
Answer A: Answer edited, shows as activity on the front page, but not on the answer
The cause of this bug has been found and fixed, going forward. Correcting the existing cases of this incorrect reporting wasn't practical, but it shouldn't happen again.
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #280174 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #277368 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #280143 Post edited:
13 days ago
Comment Post #280143 Test comment (sorry for the ping).
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #279595 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #280115 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #280231 Initial revision 13 days ago
Answer A: Add a link to the dashboard somewhere
There is now a link to the dashboard at the bottom of the site switcher.
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #279862 Post edited:
13 days ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number something-more-than-6.
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #279571 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #280230 Initial revision 13 days ago
Answer A: Strikethrough markdown not working
For anybody puzzled by the question, the strikethrough that shows there didn't work at the time of posting but does now, because the bug is fixed.
(more)
13 days ago
Edit Post #277950 Post edited:
13 days ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
13 days ago
Comment Post #280220 No you shouldn't have deleted it, so no worries there. We have a design for duplicates where, in fact, you would be able to directly mark it as such; we just haven't gotten there yet. In the meantime, flagging is the best way to handle it, which you discovered, so thanks.
(more)
15 days ago
Edit Post #280086 Post edited:
15 days ago
Comment Post #280212 I think we always want edits to bump posts; otherwise a "minor" designation could be abused, unless we also add in other logic to determine that it's not really minor, which gets complicated. I think what the question is suggesting and this answer is supporting is a way to treat them differently in ...
(more)
16 days ago
Comment Post #280210 If we did the binary (favorites) approach, what order would you want the favorites to appear in? (I'm wondering if we're going to need fuller ordering anyway and the easier binary option won't end up helping.)
(more)
16 days ago
Comment Post #280174 I wonder if it would be better at the top, flush right, next to the "notifications" header. This placement would also make it available on a phone, and (on desktop) solve a rendering glitch I've seen occasionally where "mark all as read" appears before the notifications, at the top, and then gets pu...
(more)
17 days ago
Comment Post #280177 Thanks! This is the sort of thing I was looking for. It looks solid to me; let's see how the community feels about it. (In particular, I hope the people who expressed interest will vote or provide feedback.)
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #280170 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: How can we improve community proposals?
We've implemented one part of this (that seems to have consensus and no objections): the tags. I've updated the proposal guidelines, created the three "needs" tags, and retagged many proposals. (Sorry about the churn on the proposals list.) If we find in the course of using them that we need to tw...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #280167 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Should there be a community here for Linux users?
There's a lot of interest in this proposal. That's great! There are also questions about scope. We'd like to help this community succeed, and to do that we need everyone (or at least most folks) to agree on what it is you're building. Could somebody add a draft scope (doesn't need to be long bu...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #74861 Post edited:
Thai is on-topic on Languages & Linguistics; please bring these questions there.
17 days ago
Comment Post #74861 There is now a community for languages in general, where questions about Thai are welcome, so I'm declining this one. Please participate there; we'd love to have you!
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #277345 Post edited:
We have a community for Mathematics and one for Physics is forming, so also having a Math+Physics community would be very confusing.
17 days ago
Edit Post #275914 Post edited:
use Software Development where this is on-topic, and if that doesn't work out for some reason we can revisit
17 days ago
Edit Post #277995 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #279180 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #275968 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #74991 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #74852 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #277182 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #280103 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280103 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #280166 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Chemistry Proposal
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #280165 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Biology proposal
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Comment Post #280084 There is a bug blocking the approval of the suggested edit here. Just letting you know we're working on it, not ignoring the suggestion.
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #278339 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #276824 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #276824 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #278339 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #279809 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280164 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Finance (Not Economics)
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #275968 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #279180 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280163 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Defining and Defeating Tyranny
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #279372 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280162 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Science-Fiction & Fantasy site
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #277182 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #279299 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280161 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: A site for politics
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #279062 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280160 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Accounting community
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #276933 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #276933 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #278946 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #278946 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #278833 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280159 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: A "Super user" like community to include Q&As about software applications usage
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #280158 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Site for office suites
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #277548 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #74852 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #277995 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280157 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: Travel Codidact Site
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #74946 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #276881 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #74991 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #74999 Post edited:
17 days ago
Edit Post #280156 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: General Engineering Codidact Website
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipate...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #74999 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #280155 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: How's the interest for a Worldbuilding site?
Please use this post to indicate your interest in helping to build this community. You can either edit this post (if you have the edit ability on Meta) or comment and someone else will edit it into the post. Please indicate if you expect to be a casual or more active participant. If you anticipa...
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #279001 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #75053 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903
17 days ago
Edit Post #277950 Post edited:
https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903,
17 days ago
Edit Post #280153 Initial revision 17 days ago
Answer A: A newbie friendly and non-judgmental site focusing on Q&A related to Cloud technologies
Questions about cloud technologies are on-topic on Software Development, which didn't exist when this suggestion was posted. I encourage you to ask cloud questions there. If later there is consensus that cloud technologies should have their own community, we can spin it off then.
(more)
17 days ago
Edit Post #278544 Post edited:
t-shirts too :-)
18 days ago
Comment Post #280147 I would say that history doesn't lie, but luap42 might have access to the database and thus be able to cover tracks. :-)
(more)
18 days ago
Comment Post #280150 SEO is a good point. Thanks for the tip.
(more)
18 days ago
Comment Post #280151 Thanks for the report -- will investigate.
(more)
18 days ago
Edit Post #280150 Initial revision 18 days ago
Answer A: Can the title of the question be a "clean" link to the question itself?
Does the "copy link" link below the question meet your needs? screenshot Those of us who came from Somewhere Else are used to the title being a link, but we thought an explicit link would be more discoverable. This doesn't mean we couldn't also make the title a link; we just haven't yet.
(more)
18 days ago
Comment Post #280148 Individual communities might have had discussions in SE chat before or while creating communities here, but I'm not aware of any significant discussion of the platform itself over there before we set up that Discord chat and Discourse forum that were our first steps before we had a meta. Discussions...
(more)
18 days ago
Comment Post #280143 Test comment to see if I can reproduce. (Answer: yes.)
(more)
18 days ago
Edit Post #279670 Post edited:
18 days ago
Edit Post #279669 Post edited:
18 days ago
Edit Post #279522 Post edited:
18 days ago
Comment Post #280111 This isn't just about duplicates. It looks like URLs in flag text are never links; the flag text is just text.
(more)
19 days ago
Comment Post #280116 Was it a suggested edit? That's a [known bug](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280086). I just tried notifications of various sorts in my inbox and I couldn't trigger it with anything else. If it wasn't an edit, could you say what it was so we can investigate? Thanks.
(more)
22 days ago
Comment Post #280107 Yes, we need to add a "suggest edit" link there. Sorry for the delay.
(more)
23 days ago
Edit Post #280095 Post edited:
24 days ago
Comment Post #280095 Hiding, alas. Known issue; thanks for the nudge.
(more)
24 days ago
Edit Post #279612 Post edited:
24 days ago
Comment Post #280086 Reproduced. Thanks for the report.
(more)
25 days ago
Edit Post #279905 Post edited:
25 days ago
Edit Post #279986 Post edited:
25 days ago
Edit Post #279985 Post edited:
25 days ago
Edit Post #275927 Post edited:
25 days ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
26 days ago
Comment Post #280058 "Follow" has been on the wishlist for a while, and I like the idea of the option (on by default) when editing.
(more)
26 days ago
Comment Post #280058 @OlinLathrop that's a good idea. We'd then want people to be able to opt out, so fixing a typo doesn't sign you up for notifications for years to come. We'll need to do some work on notifications and preferences before we can do that, or add "follow". Meanwhile, one person gets notified, which is ...
(more)
26 days ago
Edit Post #278388 Post edited:
26 days ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
26 days ago
Edit Post #280058 Initial revision 26 days ago
Question New post type: wiki
We've had some discussions here on Meta about shared resource pages -- wiki-style articles that anybody could edit, canonical posts, and so on. My original idea for this was that individual posts could be marked as "freely editable", and this could be used with any of our existing post types (questi...
(more)
26 days ago
Comment Post #279989 @ArtOfCode are you saying that it'll work right going forward, but the existing data errors will remain? If you check the links you'll see that those posts aren't being reported correctly; does that mean that edits that predate the fix will remain broken (but it won't happen again), or that there's ...
(more)
26 days ago
Comment Post #280018 The bug has been fixed and new answers show up as new activity and bump posts again. Posts that got new answers during the bug's lifetime (a couple days I think) haven't been updated/bumped. In other words, it shouldn't happen again but there are residual mismatches. For example, the Code Golf Cha...
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #280018 Post edited:
27 days ago
Edit Post #280018 Question reopened 27 days ago
Comment Post #280018 Not the same. The root cause of that one appears to be a problem with how suggested edits are reported (or not, as it turns out, confusing the tracking). The present bug, which has now been fixed, was about new answers, specifically.
(more)
27 days ago
Comment Post #279989 I found the [unreported edit](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/213131/history) on Scientific Speculation. This seems to be the bug with suggested edits not being reported on the post. A *different* bug was marked as a dupe of this one; that other one was fixed but this wasn't.
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #279989 Post edited:
27 days ago
Edit Post #280056 Initial revision 27 days ago
Answer A: What will become of reputation?
(Personal opinion, not official anything.) I'm one of the people who, from the beginning, wanted to change how we handle reputation, because while Someplace Else got some things right with it, their setup also produced some degenerate results that I don't want to replicate. The biggest problem,...
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
27 days ago
Comment Post #279903 @Zerotime the answers from Mithical and James Jenkins on the [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276933), and especially the voting on them, make me think there are unresolved issues. But it's also been a while now, so maybe voters have changed their positions (but not updated votes) or aren'...
(more)
27 days ago
Comment Post #280021 It's now back in the hamburger menu (if the viewport is too small to display it in the header).
(more)
27 days ago
Comment Post #280045 Ditto. I wonder if this has to do with the bug that luap42 characterized somewhere else as category view permissions being too aggressive.
(more)
27 days ago
Comment Post #280044 I agree that putting the rep number back in the header until we have those other feedback mechanisms would be a good idea. That number changing is currently the only indicator people have that people are voting on their posts. And particularly if there are downvotes, you want to know so you can try...
(more)
27 days ago
Comment Post #280038 I saw the problem before and can confirm it's working now.
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #39445 Post edited:
this didn't age all that well...
27 days ago
Edit Post #280021 Post edited:
27 days ago
Edit Post #279989 Post edited:
27 days ago
Edit Post #280017 Post edited:
27 days ago
Comment Post #280020 Yikes. Reproduced on Meta. Did not reproduce on Judaism or Writing. Hmm.
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #280018 Initial revision 27 days ago
Question New answers are not being reported as new activity or bumping posts
It appears that new answers are no longer being reported as new activity on the question list and bumping questions. Here's an annotated screenshot: question list highlighting two wrong "last activity" dates https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280005 shows the last activity as by luap42, but Mithi...
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #280017 Initial revision 27 days ago
Answer A: Heads up: small design changes, a better user card and some long-expected features
For some but not all users, the post counts are showing as 0 when that's clearly wrong. For example: screenshot That's from elsewhere on this page. The numbers also show as 0 for me in the user list (and I'm about to find out if they do here too). Update three hours later: Mithical's a...
(more)
27 days ago
Comment Post #280011 @luap42 maybe put *both* the timestamp and the license over on the left, so the usercard area is *just* stuff about the user and the other area is *just* stuff about the post.
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #280016 Initial revision 27 days ago
Answer A: Community ad has the wrong logo
Logo is now right: screenshot That screenshot is from Meta (I included part of the "hot" list as evidence). Unfortunately, the URL that's being generated is still wrong, so clicking will probably produce a 404.
(more)
27 days ago
Comment Post #279986 @ArtOfCode it's clickable now, but it's the wrong URL. I just clicked, on Meta, on an L&L ad, and it took me to that post ID on Meta, which doesn't exist and thus gave a 404.
(more)
27 days ago
Edit Post #279903 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Question How can we improve community proposals?
Now that we've seen several community proposals, some of which succeeded and some of which have run into hurdles, I want to look at how we're managing and tracking proposals. While there will always be an element of human judgement, I feel like we don't have a good handle on how to decide when to ad...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279887 @DonielF we're actually working on a community-editable post type right now, now that it's easier.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279897 Oh, you did say that and I missed it. Thanks. So when suggested edits get approved the message is getting dropped, it looks like. Drat.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279897 That's odd. I just made [this edit](https://languages.codidact.com/posts/279224/history) and the reason appears there. I wonder what the difference is.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279896 Confirmed. Investigating.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279753 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 Hey, at least we gave you "mark all as read"!
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 Yup, reproduced. When do you think collapsed comments should be auto-expanded: when you click "add a comment", or when you submit yours?
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 I see five comments and am adding another one (#7). Let's see what happens.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 6.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 5.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 4. (Yeah, you did kind of volunteer for these pings. :-) )
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 3.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 2.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 1.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279861 Hmm. You should not see the Tools menu if you don't have any of the relevant abilities (i.e. if you can't do anything on that menu). I saw a change go in in this part of the code today (not live yet), so possibly this has already been noticed and fixed -- will check.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279157 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #276824 Could somebody add a draft scope (doesn't need to be long but should indicate what's in/out broadly) as an answer, so people can comment, vote, and refine? Please address *Linux* vs *Unix* (is it both? just the former?).
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #39451 @Jordan I'll give this more thought to flesh it out more, but I think the problem with SE's profit model is that it led them to pursue business that *bypasses* the communities -- they make money by selling private Teams/Enterprise instances or through their jobs business. Aside from SO, which they ne...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279809 Thank you! That helps. If I understand correctly: economics is more theory/academic and "systems", finance is business-level theory & practice, and accounting is the particular tools & methods used to implement the former. Is that about right?
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #278230 Post edited:
fixed by abilities feature
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279807 Thanks for the report. We're looking into it. We've seen cases of the attribution notices not going away before but never figured out if there were a more widespread problem. Apparently there is, so we'll need to look at what's going on in the database.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279809 Could you say more about the distinction between finance and economics, for those of us who are not experts in these fields? How does [accounting](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279062) factor in? Thanks.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279798 You're right; there are two deleted answers. This is a bug.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279806 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Rollback Feature for Questions and Answers
I agree; "roll back to this version" has been useful on other platforms and I'd like us to have it. I think the interface should allow for a rollback reason, like the edit reason, so the explanation can be attached directly to the edit and not lost in comments that the reader has to match up time-wi...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279801 Good point @Canina. I'll amend the suggestion on GH. As for articles, good question -- while the "no more answers" aspect of closing doesn't apply, can there be duplicate articles and should they be linked together through the system if so?
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279801 In [this GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/193) I proposed "This question has been addressed at (link)". I think that covers all the cases -- answered before, asked before without answers, superseded (dupe of a newer question, where "before" is wrong).
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279764 Oh, sorting *answers*. Thanks; the question said that clearly and I missed it.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279764 I'm not seeing this. When I click on the "activity" button the URL is https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3?sort=activity.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279758 @Olin after my direct edit, the notice was updated correctly. (Should've logged that, sorry.) Then when I approved the suggested edit, it disappeared. It looks like it only manifests with suggested edits. I hope that, now that we know where to look, this won't be hard to fix.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279765 @msh210 this is why I did it openly, so all would know what I was doing and why. (Was going to put a smiley here to acknowledge your "kidding", but while I know we're just kidding around, the sentiment is real -- if I do something that would be an issue if done under other circumstances, I want to b...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279765 @Moshi confirmed -- answers too.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279765 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Change not listed in question
Tentative characterization of the bug: this happens when a user who does not have the Edit ability makes a suggested edit and that suggestion is approved. Look at the edit history on this question. After Olin's edit the "last edited" indicator was correct. After I edited it was updated correctly (...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279758 Ok, it's not just third-party edits; mine showed up fine. New hypothesis: *suggested* edits produce this behavior. We need an edit suggestion from someone who can't edit directly. I have a sock; hang on.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279758 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279758 I saw another example on Judaism, and then checked [this recent edit of mine](https://meta.codidact.com/a/276824/276995) where it shows up. Two differences: the missing ones are on questions, and the missing ones (so far) are third-party edits (not by the authors). Can we find cases to isolate thos...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279758 Here's another (recent) example of this happening: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279760. Question list shows an edit by Moshi, question doesn't, but the history does. It also shows that the OP edited once, and that edit doesn't show either (though I don't know if it did before Moshi's edit).
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279761 Yes, the post was deleted and yes, it would be good if notifications could be withdrawn in such cases but that doesn't work yet. The comment, from the OP a few minutes before deleting, was: "@Lundin Testing would seem (to me) often difficult without data, and I suspect that is often imported." This...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279758 Same here (Chrome, MacOS). I don't think this one is browser-dependent.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #277007 @nalply glad to hear it! The community exists now, so no more need to register interest here -- you can head over to [Mathematics](https://math.codidact.com/) and ask and answer questions.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279753 Hmm, doesn't seem to be global now; did somebody else edit it? Do you see it in the list in the mod tools now? (You should not have been able to make it global, so if you did, that's a bug...)
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279613 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279751 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Most reputations dropped by 1 (maybe the "starter" 1 rep disappeared for people who had more)
A rep recalculation restored the 1 point to everybody. Whether accounts should start at 1 or 0 is a separate question, but they're now consistent again.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279750 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Article Newsletter #5 (December 2020)
Hello from Codidact! We have lots of news about our organization, our communities, software updates, and some award nominations. Organization We are delighted to announce that The Codidact Foundation is now a recognized non-profit organization! We've incorporated in the UK as a Community Inter...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279717 @Canina Art gets the kudos; the rest of us asked questions and found cases that helped him figure it out. He's planning to write a blog post about lessons learned from this upgrade, including this problem.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279719 Here's another pair with weird behavior: https://judaism.codidact.com/categories/43/tags/3061 (from Divrei Torah, includes a mislabeled one from Challenges but nothing from Q&A), and the same tag in Q&A with only Q&A hits: https://judaism.codidact.com/categories/32/tags/3061
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279677 Post edited:
"No repro" in the sense that it works now, even though I saw it at the time too (just for this user).
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279718 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Mismatch between number of answers listed and actual number
All cases of this mismatch on the network should now be fixed. Thanks for the reports.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279708 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279670 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279711 Post edited:
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #279717 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Vote counts broken by the update?
Found the problem! There'll be a post from ArtOfCode later with more information, but we believe we've now corrected the problem with some votes (cast during the upgrade window) not having been properly recorded everywhere. (They were, err, partially recorded, which made this hard to debug.)
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279669 The edit history on this post is strange. I see two edits from the same person within a minute or so. I reviewed and approved one of them (a tag-only edit). I'm puzzled by the other one.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279624 Another case here: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279669/history. I approved that edit, which added a tag. The diff does not show the tag addition anywhere.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279711 I have seen this too on another post -- blue highlighting indicating a vote (which I did cast), and reported votes of +0/-0 so clearly my vote isn't accounted for. Investigating.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #279663 GH issue for the votes-received part: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/133
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279677 That's weird. It's you, not everyone. Hmm...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279670 Should be tag*s*, not tag*d*: https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/edit_tags. Thanks for the report.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279613 Starting at 0 is fine with me. But in that case new accounts should, too, and it appears that accounts with no posts have 1 rep.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #276998 Post edited:
reapplied vanishing edit
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279180 Post edited:
trying to force this edit through (don't know why it didn't take)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279654 What browser are you using? I'm trying to reproduce, and I've struck out on Chrome, Firefox, and Safari (on MacOS).
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279638 Maybe a checkmark in parens to indicate that it's qualified?
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279560 That's very bizarre @user8078. Since Judaism should *never* have redirected to Meta, I'm stumped. (It wasn't the meta category on Judaism, was it?)
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279637 Oh, *sorting*! Yeah, that's a good point; we should think about how to sort the list. SE calls their review things queues, but I don't think they're actually ordered, which yes is confusing. They present you things to review one at a time, and you have to do something with the one you've got befor...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279637 @Moshi I mean we shouldn't make queues just because Someplace Else does them. Maybe we want something like that, that people step through one post at a time, or maybe we want something different, but as a first step we can meet the (I agree glaring) need by having a page of links. People can scan t...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279637 @luap42 yes, let's just do a list of posts with pending edits; from there people can click through to go to the posts themselves. No fancy queue stuff, extra buttons, etc, just an index. If we want to get fancy, two tabs -- one for posts and one for tags. We can add it to the widget currently call...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279560 @user8078 no repro for me. Is it still happening to you? Can you provide more details? Judaism -> Meta seems an odd redirect to me.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279623 I suspect it has to do with *when* it was asked, i.e. during the database upgrade. I've asked our DB person to check whether the sync for new changes missed this.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279622 Thanks. Looks like the source image is .PNG while all the others are .png, and I think case has caused problems with images before. (So we want to fix that *too*, but in the meantime, the fix here seems obvious.)
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279615 I was thinking of just linking the word "abilities" in that heading.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279615 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Answer A: Add a more obvious link to the Abilities page
Making the "Earned Abilities" heading on the profile page link to the full list (/abilities) seems like a good way to solve this. It avoids adding one more tab on the profile (which is already constrained on small viewports like phones) while putting the link on the relevant part of the page.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279613 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Question Most reputations dropped by 1 (maybe the "starter" 1 rep disappeared for people who had more)
The recent database update included a reputation recalculation. Reputation doesn't mean as much as it used to (it doesn't govern abilities any more), but it's still present and visible. In the recalc, almost everybody's reputation dropped by 1. I think what probably happened is that the "starter...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279612 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Question A new answer produces two notifications
Since the abilities update, I'm getting double notifications for new answers to my questions. For example, both of the following notifications have the same URL, https://cooking.codidact.com/questions/279584:
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279560 Answer(s) missing here: https://software.codidact.com/questions/279593 (reported [here](https://software.codidact.com/questions/279609), and I remember seeing one or two answers there too).
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279564 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279607 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Answer A: Can we have a button to insert a table in posts?
There is now a new button, which inserts the following markdown for you to populate and expand: | Title1 | Title2 | |- | - | | row11 | row12 |
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279268 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279606 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Answer A: 403 error when voting to close
The "Close" link is no longer shown to people who don't have the ability to use it. If you can't vote to close and you think action is needed, you can flag instead.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279605 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Answer A: Replenish votes statistic with "Other" block to make it complete
The redesigned profile that came with the abilities branch now also shows a proper breakdown. Example: votes by direction and post type
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #277197 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279560 My user history shows edits that are now missing (example: on [this post](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279180)), so user histories might provide another way to find things, maybe? Unfortunately the user history doesn't show the edit diff, so I can't just reapply it -- we'll need to get that a...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279560 I posted a comment on https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279595 last night that is missing. (It was about trying to reproduce the problem, so would be good to get back.)
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279560 @Canina thanks. Yes, I remember editing both of those. There might have also been some more interested users on Physics? Can't remember if any are missing now (their comments would be too).
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279560 I made updates to a few site proposals in the last week. I don't remember which ones, but newest activity is currently showing as 9 days ago and that's definitely wrong.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279504 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279504 @FoggyFinder I asked, and apparently the request isn't even reaching our servers; the caching is happening locally, so there's nothing we can do to force expiration on our end. :-(
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #275968 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279180 Post edited:
additions from comments
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279180 @seth.wagenman‭ proposals sometimes go for a while before solidifying; it's fine to leave this here. I didn't see your comments until now; sorry for the delay. I'm going to edit your examples into the post where they'll be more visible.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #276998 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279504 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279504 @Zerotime Cooking is working for me. If it's not for you, try flushing browser cache, in case it cached the redirect to our "down" page?
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279504 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279504 Discord and Twitter, @luap42... they'll be able to reach us. So we'd best get this right. :-)
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279504 Post edited:
suggested edits from Mith :-)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279504 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279504 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Question Abilities update is here!
U P D A T E: It looks like some changes have gone missing after the rollout; we're working on adding them back right now. See this answer for more information. We have deployed the new abilities system! Please let us know if you find any problems - while we've tested the system as much as we ...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279411 @mbomb007‭ the list on codidact.com is maintained in files checked in to git; the dashboard reads out of the database. The community descriptions shown on codidact.com aren't in the database. I don't know if there's a technical reason for codidact.com to not depend on the DB. (Descriptions could b...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #278967 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #276227 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279470 @fedorqui‭ there might actually be some low-level conditions; not sure. The tooltip reports the same number for all buttons, though, so maybe not. I would have to ask the developer or try to find it in the code. Maybe in the future we could improve it, yes. We're also working on a design for *use...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279468 @OlinLathrop I'm puzzled too. Have you tried in incognito mode (assuming Edge has something like that)? On other browsers, I understand, incognito mode disables all extensions, so if there's some extension interfering that you wouldn't have thought would be related, that would be a way to catch it....
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279470 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Answer A: What is the 'lottery' button for?
"Lottery" is a random set of 50 questions. It's a way to be reminded of older posts that have dropped off the front page. I agree with the suggestion that "Random" would be a better label; we didn't think of it at the time for some reason. I also agree that the tooltips could be more informative...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #279411 Initial revision about 2 months ago
Answer A: Community dropdown and profile information
Thanks for bringing this up. I agree; we need to add the concept of a network profile and have a GitHub issue for it. But we haven't gotten to it yet. (Our devs think this is a good first issue for anybody looking to join the team, in case anybody reading this is.) Another way to get to the com...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279384 @Alexei we're working on getting a bank account set up so we can accept donations, thanks. (Needed a corporate identification number first in order to be able to open an account. And now, we have learned, everything is slower because of Covid. But as soon as we're set up we'll let folks know. :-) ...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #278340 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #278340 Thank you Knight and @NaveenMishra for giving this proposal a boost, and welcome to Codidact! While we're waiting for a physics community I hope you'll take a look at our [other communities](https://codidact.com/) which you might also be interested in.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279390 When I hear literature I think of written material specifically (books etc), while I think the proposal here means to include movies, TV, etc.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279372 @Lundin would you be able to flesh that out into a scope proposal in an answer, so people can vote, comment (more easily), and edit? Thanks. (I wasn't active over there so I don't know what those pitfalls were.)
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279371 This is one of the things we intended auto-save to mitigate, so if that's not working we'll want to look into that.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279372 I feel like there could be a useful partnership with [Scientific Speculation](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/), too -- this community for what exists, that one for what *could* exist (with a science ground).
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #278340 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #278339 Post edited:
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279292 That's strange; I've definitely seen tag-only edits. Can you link to the post you tried to edit so we can figure out what might be special about that case?
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #279279 We show the "close" link to people who can't use it? Oops.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Edit Post #277185 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #278908 Would questions about configuring email, domains, and the like be on-topic? Just tonight I had an [issue with email forwarding and Gmail rejections](https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/2089825.html), which I posted about on my blog for lack of a better place to ask. Would this sort of thing be included?
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #278688 Definitely agree on the name -- let's banish "hot".
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #279180 Could you add a few examples of questions (titles I mean) that you see people asking on this community? I think it'd help people not deeply involved in this area get a better understanding of the topic. Codidact is oriented more around *knowledge* (Q&A, blogs, resource collections, etc) than around...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278476 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #279039 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #279118 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: "last activity" on the post history of questions is misleading.
The last activity shown there was for the whole page, same as what you see in the question list. That's confusing in the history case, as you point out. We talked about updating it to show the correct information, but since the entire history is already shown, you can easily see what the last activ...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #277489 Post edited:
no popup, but renamed it to "copy link" to make its behavior more clear
2 months ago
Edit Post #279069 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #278949 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #279062 @1muflon1‭ thanks for explaining! It does sound like the two should not mingle, then. The idea is for each community to build *a* community, not multiple co-located ones that don't interact. :-)
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #279095 @KalleMP‭ I don't see a comment from you (even deleted). Is it possible you clicked the "discard" button instead of the "post" button?
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #279095 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: Implement duplicate up-down vote buttons
For the buttons, I propose something bolder: don't duplicate them, move them. The logical time to make a voting decision is when you've read a post, so I agree they belong at the bottom. But why have them at the top? Currently we bundle the reporting of existing votes and the voting buttons toge...
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #279064 I've closed this here, as it is a community-specific matter that is more properly discussed on Languages & Linguistics Meta. You are welcome to bring it up there, taking into account the feedback you got here.
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #279064 Question closed 2 months ago
Comment Post #279091 Do you mean on the question list? That does work here on the individual question, but it looks like it doesn't work there and I agree it ought to.
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #279069 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: Have permalink button show a popup instead of redirecting
The Permalink control now allows you to copy a working URL for the post through the usual browser affordance (right-click + "copy URL" on desktop browsers, long-press on touch interfaces). Oddly, it's not the same URL you get if you actually click the control, but at least you can get a working link...
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #278949 Fixed, pending deploy.
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #279067 Also, one of the communities here that initially imported (almost) everything from Somewhere Else is now discussing deleting those imports, because they did not serve us well. *Selective* importing is valuable, but bulk importing turned out not to be.
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #279063 Welcome to Codidact. This suggestion would work better as a possible refinement of [this one](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279001). As for tags, we use "idea" when the proposal is more early-stage and "proposal" when it's farther along. I admit that's kind of fuzzy. The other purpose of the...
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #279062 See also: [proposal for economics](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277995). Yes I know that accounting and economics are not the same thing, but some who are interested in accounting might also be interested in economics.
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #279061 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: Site for Where is This? Identifying Places in pictures?
"Where is this?" sounds like an interesting part of a community, but I'm having trouble imagining a community forming around just that. More specifically, I could see this being part of a general puzzles community, or as part of a travel community, or -- with restricted scope -- part of Outdoors. ...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #41993 Post edited:
name will be Code Golf and a PR for the answer TOC (leaderboard) is under review
2 months ago
Comment Post #279039 Oh, I see -- the history bit is pulling last activity for the *page*, the same value that's shown in the question list, instead of for the post.
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #41993 @Lundin status-pending means we're planning to launch it. We think the CG proposal has enough interested, enthusiastic users to launch. status-needs-people means we don't think there are enough people yet to support a proposed site; it's a call to action to say you're interested (if you are) and sh...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #41993 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #279009 Bingo. I just reproduced this (using Chrome).
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278968 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #278500 Thanks @1muflon1‭! I'll ask the dev team to look at it. Since I (accidentally) neglected this for a few weeks and we've deployed other changes, I just wanted to check back first before doing that.
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #276997 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #278340 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #278968 Argh. Why does it happen to laserkittens and not to me? (Also why should the renderer care *how* the markdown got generated, but that's a different question.)
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278968 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #278500 Did one of your edits fix this, or did some other change fix the bug? The linked post looks like it has the correct numbering now, but I can't tell if that's because you found a workaround or because it's working now.
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #278969 Wow, this is getting weirder. I copied the source of your answer into mine, and it works -- exact same Markdown! Could you try copying my first one into yours?
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278968 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #278969 Any idea what the difference is between your reproducer and my non-reproducer? (I used the same link target as in the answer that's linked from the question, the one that displayed the error until I edited).
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278968 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #278967 And, as shown in my test-case answer, that didn't happen here in this category. Stranger and stranger!
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278968 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: Possible Markdown rendering issue
Test cases (all look fine in the preview): Link text edited to include period. Link text contains no punctuation. Other punctuation too? What about comma, or exclamation point! -- Copying text from the other answer to see if who posts it makes a difference (I sure hope not): Th...
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #278967 Weird! Sorry to mess up your test case with an experiment, but I edited the post to move the period out of the link (the original text had "in this proposal." as the link text) and that fixed it. I don't know *why* that should matter.
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278966 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #278957 Sounds like a question about the math for crypto would be on-topic either on this community or on Math, and the asker would choose based on focus or personal preference. That's fine; scopes overlap sometimes.
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278961 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #278961 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: How does voting on site proposals work?
I don't understand those voting patterns either. Because people vote for all sorts of reasons, ranging from "I enthusiastically support this" to "that sounds reasonable to me (but I wouldn't participate" to "I think there are serious flaws" to "I am opposed to any site about X regardless of the meri...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278948 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #278948 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #278948 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: A Site for Privacy and Data Protection Enthusiasts
Record your interest here If you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, something else?), or edit the post directly. I'll edit comments into the post later. ...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #41993 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #278765 Post edited:
2 months ago
Comment Post #278945 Ah, as opposed to "save changes" for posts. I see why the text for comment edits could be confusing, yes.
(more)
2 months ago
Comment Post #278935 In an ideal world we'd make the URL about the tag set and not the category. It's not intuitively obvious that two different URLs (for example, Languages Q&A and Languages Resources) point to the same tag set. Tags started out as just tags, and then tag sets came along, and then categories came alon...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #278904 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278915 I wrote some stuff in a [GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/251) to track this.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278915 @luap42 thanks, yeah. I guess most of the examples I remember seeing were live on a dev server that's not still there.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278915 Ooh, luap42 prototyped this; I'm not sure where it stands but will try to find out.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278905 Post edited:
didn't realize markdown tables worked now
3 months ago
Edit Post #278406 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278905 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278905 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Tables in posts
You can now use tables in HTML or Markdown. See an example with Markdown: ```` | Latin | English | Spanish | Catalan | |-------- |--------- |--------- |--------- | | filum | thread | hilo | fil | | filius | son | hijo | fill | | furnus | oven ...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278644 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278300 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278300 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278900 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: HTML tables are misdisplayed
Testing: Downvotes Minimum upvotes to stay above 40% 1 1 2 1 3 2 4 3 5 3 6 4 7 5
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278330 Post edited:
was a data error
3 months ago
Comment Post #278840 Following the model we've discussed for Software Dev, gaming questions could start as part of an "applications" community, perhaps in their own category from the beginning, and spin off when volume of both content and users with diverging interests dictates.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #276997 @Zerotime you've indicated you're enthusiastic. As noted in the discussions here, this community will require more careful moderation than some. If this community were to launch, would you be interested in being a moderator?
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #276997 @JamesJenkins you've indicated you're enthusiastic. As noted in the discussions here, this community will require more careful moderation than some. If this community were to launch, would you be interested in being a moderator?
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278853 Post edited:
meant to include EE as another quick-start positive example
3 months ago
Edit Post #278853 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: What criteria are used to determine to launch a new community?
I'm speaking only for myself here. Unfortunately, we're still kind of winging this, and learning as we go. We now realize we launched some early communities without enough active, engaged members, but we don't know where that sweet spot is yet. We don't want to hinder communities, and we also do...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #277408 Post edited:
please add more details if this is still an issue, thanks
3 months ago
Comment Post #278840 7 is there to see if we're paying attention, right? :-)
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #41993 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278833 Office suites seems too narrow, though. I assume the community proposed here would also accept questions about Zoom and OpenVPN and Pidgin and Cygwin and so on?
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278833 I like Power User too.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278833 Software Applications?
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278608 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #277098 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #277098 The comment reworking (for threaded comments) will affect this too, so deferring until after that (even though I too find the current behavior annoying).
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278330 And still happening, so it wasn't a fluke.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #277321 Did this happen? I see the "planned" tag but it's been there a while.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278487 Question closed 3 months ago
Edit Post #278166 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #74893 Question closed 3 months ago
Comment Post #74893 We now have Software Development and Mathematics, so I'm closing this. (Discussing multiple proposals together was tricky anyway.)
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278806 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Medical science site
This proposal seems to have a good baseline for moving forward. There are answers about definition, sometimes controversial, but it looks like there's a good foundation to work with -- y'all will have to work out some of the scope boundaries on your meta, but you've got a starting point. You've got...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278805 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278805 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Tag contents don't reflect merge after 24 hours
We haven't identified the cause of this bug yet. It's not caching. The posts are correctly tagged, but they aren't showing up in the tag search. One is deleted so wouldn't anyway (but I guess the count included the deleted post?). One is an article, but other articles show up in tag searches so i...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278714 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #277566 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #277504 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278770 Sorry, I was mistaken -- you can now discard a *new* comment, but that doesn't seem to have made it to the edit code yet.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #277948 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278713 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278801 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278803 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: A clickable X that doesn't work
We just deployed a fix for this (noticed as part of investigating another bug). Please try again.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278764 Post edited:
scope looks solid enough to proceed; can we get some more active participants?
3 months ago
Edit Post #275968 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #276933 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278339 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #277182 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #277995 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #276824 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #74852 Post edited:
The definition is well-developed in answers here; what's needed is people who'll be active in the new community.
3 months ago
Comment Post #277566 This should be fixed in the next deployed version.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #277948 This should be fixed in the next deployed version.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278770 This should be fixed in the next deployed version.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278096 @msh210 is this still happening? (There have been a couple updates since you reported it, so I want to check back before doing more.)
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #276994 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278730 Post edited:
CIC first, then CIO (fixed typo)
3 months ago
Edit Post #39451 Post edited:
updated code of conduct link
3 months ago
Comment Post #39450 @‭PeterMortensen‭ good idea, thanks -- done.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #39450 Post edited:
expanded abbreviation for clarity
3 months ago
Edit Post #39450 Post edited:
expanded abbreviation for clarity
3 months ago
Edit Post #278715 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278715 Thanks @user53196. We send the email versions of these from a generic account, but they're infrequent enough that I don't think we need a generic account here. (Plus, we want to make sure someone gets pinged.) I do agree that writing about myself indirectly like that is kind of strange, but at lea...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278715 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278713 Reproduced. Also, and I don't know if this is related, the dismissible notice...isn't. I tap the "x" and nothing happens.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278715 Initial revision 3 months ago
Article Newsletter #4 (October 2020)
Hello from Codidact! This past Friday was Codidact's first birthday! We're counting that from the day that luap42 set up a Discord server to discuss building a new Q&A platform. One thing led to another, and a few weeks later there was a GitHub repository, a Discourse forum for discussion, a wik...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #277995 We have a proposed scope with some support (it can always be discussed and refined). What this proposal really needs now is more people who'll help build the community.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #277995 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #41993 Post edited:
with all the discussion I think this is well into "proposal" territory, not just an idea
3 months ago
Comment Post #278665 We haven't designed a badge system yet -- doesn't mean we can't, but we haven't prioritized it. We're happy to hear proposals for what a badge system might reward. (We'll also need to consider the effects of badge-hunting -- do any badges motivate undesirable behaviors?) We don't want to just copy...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278608 Post edited:
addressed comments
3 months ago
Comment Post #278656 I was just discussing the sandbox case with someone. We talked about ask-refine-move, but moving the post would bring all its comments too, which would have to be deleted (but still get in the way for people who can see deleted comments), and there was a feeling that sometimes having the conversation...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #74822 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #277185 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278609 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278609 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278609 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278608 @Moshi from the discussion in 19th Byte it sounded like the community could have questions *about* golfing and related topics that aren't themselves challenges. They can tell us what they need; I'm in no position to judge.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278609 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278608 @Moshi it could be renamed.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278609 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278608 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278608 @Moshi or maybe it's all challenges and I misunderstood? The idea was one category for challenges, which have different rules from Q&A *about* golfing etc, and which are the only ones that use a leaderboard. Edited to just say "challenges".
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278609 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278608 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278608 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278609 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Site suggestion - Code Golf
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278608 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Site suggestion - Code Golf
Based on new comments here, I had a conversation with some folks in the Nineteenth Byte on Discord to ask them about their interests and needs. I pointed out the TopAnswers site, which some of them were not aware of, and pointed them to this proposal. There seems to be interest in having a communit...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #41993 Post edited:
see discussion in comments on my answer
3 months ago
Comment Post #74822 Thanks for bringing that up, @Razetime. I'm going to remove the status-declined tag, but we'll need to flesh out this proposal, gather a community, and *talk with the TopAnswers* folks. If TA is a good solution for golfing but folks just don't know about it, that's one class of problem. If there's so...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278542 Post edited:
"no repro" isn't quite right, but I didn't want to create "status-no-longer-an-issue" so I'm using that
3 months ago
Comment Post #278544 @10Rep check out our [list of communities](https://codidact.com/) and see if any of them fit your interests -- you should be able to get to 10 rep (and more) soon if so. :-)
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278340 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278340 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278544 Welcome aboard @Circuitfantasist‭! We're glad to have you and everyone else who's checking us out.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278496 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278505 Composition style: Markdown or HTML (which allows room to add some third thing that becomes popular later that we haven't thought about now).
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278504 The vote-time override has to be there too, but in some earlier discussion some brought up the hassle of having to click it every time, so there was a request for a default.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278493 I'm not convinced it's a good idea to advertise when somebody last visited the site. It feels kind of stalkerish. You can't tell when somebody else last looked at Twitter or Reddit or (AFAIK) Facebook, for instance. When somebody last *took an action* is public information, but just browsing feels...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278492 @Lundin we probably need some tag-referencing syntax that includes the set name. Gotta think about this. Aside from meta being its own thing we don't expect a lot of diverse tag sets, but we'll have to see what communities want to build.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278501 This is an interesting idea to talk about, but is a little beyond what preferences are needed. We've talked informally about customized views, filters, etc and I want to come back to that later.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278498 We can also change the default for the category on Outdoors (for new posts) if the Outdoors community requests it. Probably nobody thought about it.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278496 @‭1muflon1‭ we're going to be revising reputation, actually -- see [coming soon: abilities and changes to reputation](https://meta.codidact.com/articles/278234). We do have data import (so people can bring in Q&A from SE) but it's a little fragile and we want to make changes before doing more of that...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278496 @1muflon1‭ glad to have you! I suspected from your scope answer that you had some decent background in the field. :-) We do not see Codidact and SE as a zero-sum game; the platforms and the communities emphasize different things, and it's quite fine to participate on both. Our Judaism community ge...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278496 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278496 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Site for Economics
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278491 Thanks for these additions -- very helpful! This looks like a good starting point for other economics experts to weigh in on. (Oh, that reminds me -- "survey of interest" post coming right up.)
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278492 @Moshi a community can have multiple tag sets. A category within a community must use exactly one tag set. Tag sets contain only tags; they cannot contain other tag sets.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278490 No worries @Moshi; having one place to collect it is handy, and if something *has* been brought up elsewhere (or it's big enough to call for a separate discussion), it can just be linked.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278492 Tag sets are per-community, yes. Every community has two tag sets to start, called Main and Meta. Most of our communities that have other categories are using Main on them. Meta doesn't have meta but both Blog and Site Proposals have their own tag sets. Note that tag names are unique within tag s...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278492 Interesting edge case -- *technically* tags *aren't* per-category but, rather, tags are part of a tag set and each category uses a tag set, *which can be shared*. So, for example, if Software Dev had a Code Review category and it used the same tag set as Q&A, then we'd probably highlight that JavaSc...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278444 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278491 Thank you; this is helpful input. Would you perhaps be able to propose a high-level scope description -- what topics *should* be on-topic, as opposed to what shouldn't be? How do expert economists (of which set I am not a member) frame things?
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278490 Initial revision 3 months ago
Question Future planning: what user preferences would be useful?
I am starting to think about user preferences. This won't happen for a while, but I'd like to gather input so we can start thinking about a functional design. Currently a user has a single account across our network. When you edit your description or your display name or your blog link, those ch...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278488 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Allow licence change when there's only one contributor
I agree that authors should be able to make an immediate edit to change the license -- you post, only then notice the default license, and can't fix it. That's frustrating. The workaround of deleting and reposting is extra hassle -- and, for answers and for people who can see deleted posts, adds cl...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278487 @OlinLathrop actually no; if you started to edit a post, then your choices are your edit state or nothing, but "go back to the way it was before I touched it" isn't an option unless you copy it out of the post history. (Or open it in an incognito window, or probably other things we shouldn't make pe...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278476 @Dani I don't actually know what it's called, no. I just picked some words that seemed descriptive. :-) I've created a GitHub issue for this problem and somebody has already volunteered to work on it.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278487 I would think that "cancel" should mean "throw away my draft". But I see it doesn't currently; it just cancels the *session* while preserving the state.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278476 Thanks for the edit! I see it now. Just missing the header block with the title/link and score there, it looks like.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278444 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Should we have a community for Reviewing Code?
Should it be a separate community, or should Software Development also support code reviews (as a separate category)? It feels like there are natural affinities there, including linking to existing content and asking followup questions, but I didn't participate in CR over there so I don't know how r...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #276854 Sorry for the delayed status tag. This got fixed some time in the past (not sure when) but we failed to update here.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #276854 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278077 Well, it hasn't been *answered* before; it's an outstanding bug. But there's another bug report for this so I'm linking them together.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278077 Question closed 3 months ago
Comment Post #278004 We made some RTL-related fixes and I'm not seeing this any more, but I don't know if we (think we) fixed this. Are you still seeing it?
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #277475 Post edited:
3 months ago
Comment Post #278406 Yeah, if it's not visible from the start, we can't expect people to know about it. I see now -- this specific example is just short enough that the horizontal scroll is evident for me. But on https://software.codidact.com/questions/277881 the code block is longer and the scroll doesn't appear from ...
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278413 Post edited:
respond to comments
3 months ago
Edit Post #278413 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: What languages have syntax highlighting support?
Codidact uses highlight.js for syntax highlighting. We support whatever languages are enabled by default in that package; we haven't restricted them. As I write this, they list 189 languages with examples on their website as well as on a table on their GitHub. Syntax highlighting is enabled for ...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278412 @Moshi syntax highlighting is only enabled for communities where we expect code, because (like Mathjax) it adds some rendering time to every post and we don't want to slow down sites that wouldn't benefit. Sorry about your edge case; it's certainly reasonable to ask on Meta about the syntax highligh...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278406 Thanks for the screenshot. I'm not seeing it in Firefox 79.0 (or Chrome 84.0) but don't have ESR handy. There should definitely be a horizontal scrollbar there.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278404 This would be controlled per-community, yes. A community that doesn't want imports wouldn't have to allow them, but some communities *do* want imports and this would let them have them.
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278394 @Lundin not as part of the import process, no. But once the post is here, people can edit to merge answers, preserving attribution. This would be a good use case for the "community wiki" proposal, too, as it's truly a combined effort that no one person gets "credit" for.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278394 Post edited:
responding to an answer about edit history
3 months ago
Comment Post #278396 Oh, good point. I said that because the license doesn't require importing the entire edit history. And maybe we don't want to recreate the full edit history here, but for imported posts we could include the original edit history as a link in the post history. That way the information is available ...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278394 @Lundin agreed; people need to be judicious in using the tool. Sometimes some of the answers are good (or good starting points for edits) and others should be deleted, which the community could do here but can't do there.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278394 Initial revision 3 months ago
Question Proposal: tool for user-requested import of a single question and its answers from SE
We have a tool for doing bulk imports of questions (and answers) from SE. It has several limitations: - Running it requires direct DB access. - The resulting data is sometimes wrong in various ways -- duplicates, answers not getting wired up to the right questions, something that blocks voting som...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278391 Another use case: [resources on Languages & Linguistics](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/40).
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278387 Our planned workflow for duplicates is: anyone can propose a duplicate; if the author agrees it's marked (done); otherwise the author is invited to edit or can dispute the duplicate suggestion (this has nothing to do with that). So yes, an author who finds or agrees with a dupe target can just go ah...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278388 @manassehkatz I considered adding that (specifically if there've been no edits). I don't know how much that complicates the implementation (don't count this post for abilities, no do again / move it over to System, no move it back). Maybe only change ownership once there *is* an edit and the rest is...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278388 @Lundin on your last point, that's what I had in mind with setting the System user as the owner (in my "to be determined" paragraph). I don't know if there are better ways, but that's *a* way.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #278388 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278388 Initial revision 3 months ago
Answer A: Do we have/should we have community wikis?
Update: We didn't do what I proposed here, but we instead created a wiki post type. See there for details. I wrote a GH ticket based on this suggestion, with the following expansion: We should avoid the term "community wiki", which was sometimes confusing on Some Other platform too. If we ...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #278386 We don't have it yet. An "anyone can edit" option for the author is something I'd like to see us do. ("Anyone" to be further clarified; probably means anyone who's gained the Participate Generally ability?)
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
3 months ago
Edit Post #278340 Post edited:
4 months ago
Edit Post #278340 Post edited:
4 months ago
Edit Post #278340 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Why not have a physics community for physics enthusiasts?
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278304 We don't yet have the ability to lock posts, so if you edit that back in again we will have to delete the post again. Please find more appropriate ways to express yourself, and please stop pretending to be someone other than the author of the question.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #278304 Post edited:
Restoring the edit that allowed this post to not be deleted. See staff answers at https://meta.codidact.com/questions/278310.
4 months ago
Comment Post #278330 Huh, weird -- but not here on Meta.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #278319 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Post on Stack Exchange and Codidact
You own your posts and are free to do with them as you choose, including posting them in more than one place -- here, Stack Exchange, Quora, Reddit, etc. By posting on Codidact you grant us a license to use your posts, but it's not an exclusive license. Thank you for supporting Codidact! If you ...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #278313 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Why was this answer to the volunteer-discussion removed?
That answer (and this meta question) prompted a lot of discussion. This discussion is a good outcome. We are by the community, for the community, which means if the community questions what we're doing, we need to discuss that. We don't need to keep engaging if someone is clearly out to be disrupt...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278290 Not only *can* that mechanism be used for gathering feedback, but it *has* been -- at least the review panel, I know.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
4 months ago
Comment Post #278283 There have been a few cases of employees with no other activity on a site (i.e. they can only downvote because of their status) downvoting community ads, but I'm not aware of them outright deleting any yet. I haven't been tracking edits to posts like the ones you're talking about, but if those posts...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278282 @Mithical plus all the *other* challenges that come with paying people, conflicts of interest, resulting strife... Someday the Codidact project might have both the need and the means to hire people for certain roles (I'm guessing a role that keeps the servers running and happy would top the list), th...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277092 Oh wow. That missing sidebar is where the core of the tour -- that is, the explanations and instructions -- goes. A tour without that would be pretty cryptic. Is that still happening?
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278236 Saving the post as a draft in case the tour-taker wrote a real question is a good idea. Thanks for the suggestion.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278225 @ArtOfCode I ran into this on some community metas recently when adding the missing basic tags (like support). I couldn't characterize it at the time, so while I might have mentioned it in chat I didn't do anything more -- figured maybe it was a fluke.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #278205 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Orientation / Welcoming Committee
Welcome to Codidact! Codidact is very much a work in progress, and input is welcome. This network-wide Meta is the best place to find existing feature requests. Some also come in as GitHub issues (in the codidact/qpixel repository -- that's the main code repo). It's best to look around and get ...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277157 Reproduced the reappearance of this bug today.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #278183 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: To be constructive, or not to be constructive, that is the question.
No system of rules can run only on statutory rules. There is always case law, because no set of laws/rules that people can actually manage will ever include everything. We are trying to write a clear, succinct "statute" about what we expect on our network. We know that some things will require h...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278162 Comments are getting reworked (design work is happening now) and will be threaded. With the ability to separate threads (after people learn to reply instead of just adding to the end), comments will be more organized. With threading, I don't know if comments "rising to the top" still makes sense. I'd...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278132 Are you having problems with all uploads or just this one (or is this the only one you've tried so far)?
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277007 @DerekElkins [launched](https://math.codidact.com/questions/278124) (in case you didn't see).
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277007 @8063 [launched](https://math.codidact.com/questions/278124) (in case you didn't see).
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277007 @JoshuaTS [launched](https://math.codidact.com/questions/278124) (in case you didn't see).
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277007 @PeterTaylor [launched](https://math.codidact.com/questions/278124) (in case you didn't see).
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278110 I agree with both of you: communities should be able to set the norms that work for them, *and* these norms need to be communicated clearly so people don't stumble over the differences.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #277002 Post edited:
4 months ago
Edit Post #278097 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Community Rules
I agree; we need to help communities communicate clearly about their norms, particularly to newcomers. Each community has a "FAQ" or "introduction" topic in the help that moderators can edit, and moderators can create other help topics. Electrical Engineering has built out a body of site-specific h...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278086 @aCVn categories could change that, yes. But, fundamentally, the groups have enough important differences that I suspect they shouldn't share common infrastructure like reputation/abilities and a single meta. Federated communities like with my vague SoftwareDev subcommunities might work better. But...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
4 months ago
Edit Post #278086 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: How granular should network communities be?
A community with common interests is a part of it too. At Some Other place somebody wanted to combine all the Abrahamic religion sites into one, arguing that they share a lot of biblical books and tags could differentiate religious context. I argued against this because the three communities view t...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #276995 Post edited:
4 months ago
Comment Post #278074 I understand (some stuff about) web client code in the abstract. I think there's room to learn something from that question even if I'm not a C++ programmer.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #278073 Post edited:
4 months ago
Edit Post #278073 Initial revision 4 months ago
Question Should we show tags before the body, to provide context for reading the question?
Today I saw the following question on Software Dev (this is the beginning): title and first paragraph could apply to several languages (rest of post...) The title, "connect with SLOT/SIGNAL:QPushButton clicked signal not received by main window" sounds like it could be about one of several...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278050 Yeah, I'm not trying to play a *reductio ad absurdum* card; I'm just trying to tease out whether it's a small number of arbitrary links (and roughly how many), or whether it's "support more specific sites beyond Twitter and one free link".
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #278050 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Allow users to link more than one website in their profile.
Let's talk about design. Clearly we wouldn't want to allow any number of links, because having a thousand links would break the layout in some way. Unless we put it behind a "show more" control of some sort when we reach the "too many to lay out reasonably" point, wherever that is (and it's proba...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278036 @luap42 category, not site -- a place right here on Meta for people to congregate. But, needs assessment first.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278036 @luap42 or it could be a "fun" category off of Meta, or a place in Discord with different conventions, or a different Discourse forum to avoid conflating chit-chat with older planning, or something else... I'd like to better understand the need before we dive into setting something up. I think there'...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278036 The forum Moshi refers to was more focused than what this question describes, though. Zerotime, can you say more about what you imagine this looking like? For example, you mentioned new threads being bumped as a negative, I think, but the forums I've used have done that too. What would be the importa...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278030 We should do something non-destructive if the tag has a description, for those cases where someone did things in the wrong order with a tag re-org or the like. (SE did this badly; mods got a list of "orphan tag wikis" with no indication of where they'd come from.)
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278004 Also reproduced (Chrome, Mac) with no special language settings.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278006 Just last night I talked with somebody who found us but doesn't use SE, and I've seen some others. As we increase activity and visibility I would expect to see more of that. We don't have the Google rank and resulting visibility that they have, so we need to find other ways to (responsibly) get the...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #278010 Yes. **Communities first** is a key difference, and many other things follow from that.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277998 We should create a help topic for this, since many of our users will be coming from (or familiar with) SE. We can use answers here as input for that. For some high-level Codidact philosophy (not nuts and bolts of how things work), see [The Codidact Vision](https://meta.codidact.com/articles/276296)...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #276998 Post edited:
4 months ago
Edit Post #277993 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Should we use the Article type for bug reports?
I've sometimes seen bug reports be answered with workaround while awaiting a fix. I think I've seen that here on Codidact (though I haven't gone looking for examples). I know I saw it sometimes on Some Other site. I don't know how important it is, but it's something we would lose if we made this c...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277990 Good point. There are probably FAQs that medical professionals would prefer to link to rather than answering *again*, too.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277985 @Zerotime [done](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276933#answer-277990) (incorporated into a broader suggestion).
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #277990 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Medical science site
Resources This community should consider compiling and jointly curating a "resources" category (or something similar that serves the same purpose). This could include lists of good (= reliable, credible) references, perhaps broken up by medical sub-field. It could also include a list or lists o...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277985 My upvote is for the "good references"/"bad references" suggestion (however worded). I'd suggest that the community curate lists of known-credible and known-problematic references and that these reactions could be links to those lists. I'm concerned that one reaction per reference, or using answers...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #276994 Post edited:
4 months ago
Edit Post #277966 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Suggestion for allowing to mark answers as "accepted", "outdated" or "dangerous"
How should we handle possibly-outdated reactions? No, not by reactions to reactions. An edit to a post made after reactions were added could change the applicability of those reactions. Somebody might have edited to address a danger or update an out-of-date recommendation. Conversely, somebody ...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277958 @OlinLathrop I think signed votes could be displayed in a similar way, but I've been thinking of *casting* them as part of the *voting* process rather than a separate reaction. I'm imagining that a user can, as part of voting, say "make this public", UX to be determined.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277958 @Mithrandir24601 exactly. Reactions should *augment* votes, not *divert* or *duplicate* them.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #277958 Post edited:
4 months ago
Edit Post #277958 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Suggestion for allowing to mark answers as "accepted", "outdated" or "dangerous"
I was part of that conversation, so my input is mostly reflected in this proposal already. I want to add one thing, about community customization, which gets into philosophy. I don't want us to end up with gazillions of emoji decorating posts. That way lies madness and Discord. A reaction shoul...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #277950 Post edited 4 months ago
Edit Post #277007 Post edited:
4 months ago
Comment Post #277943 If we do this, I would suggest status-pending (for consistency with site proposals), and that it means the work is done or nearly done with very high probability of being done soon enough for the next deploy. It should mean "coming soon" rather than "somebody started a branch for that".
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277945 The Trello board contains everything that's been reported/requested that's neither done nor declined. Not everything there has been triaged, and prioritization is loose. After triage, bugs and FRs go to GitHub.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277941 If you see a question somewhere else -- Quora, SE, a coworker, whatever -- and you bring it here so you can answer, that's fine. (Of course the question might get other answers too, as is proper.) It's a kindness to share a link with the asker, sure, especially if you already have an active account t...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #277941 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: What is the policy on importing questions by simply quoting the question over here?
I haven't consulted with the rest of the team yet, so treat this as my personal opinion and not Codidact policy, please. Under the terms of the Creative Commons license used at SE (and here), quoting content from there is fine so long as you provide attribution and link. These questions do that (...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #277924 I see the other post has now been updated with status-planned. I think that's a good approach. We can move it to status-completed after deploy.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #277002 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277487 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277549 Post edited:
5 months ago
Comment Post #277841 @manassehkatz that JSON file is what we use to publish our community list beyond the sites -- the list on codidact.com, and if you look at TopAnswers you'll see that they include our list of communities just as we include theirs.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277863 Is *that* why some of my notifications don't seem to work right? Thanks for figuring this out. I consider this a bug.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277859 Yes we'll definitely enable Mathjax on this site. I can't imagine it working without that.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277007 @DonielF probably about a week out due to logistics stuff (not about this proposal but about dependencies and scarce resources).
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277854 Sometimes the answer to overlap can be different framing, e.g. taking the physics part of the math & physics proposal and forming a natural sciences proposal.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277854 @MathPhysics I don't want to speak in absolutes. We'll want to *discuss* it and make sure the overlap can be addressed. There can be more than one community for a topic; people just have to be able to tell where to go for what. For example, we wouldn't block a general engineering site because EE e...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277549 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277549 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277854 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Launching a new community with enough contributors even though disagreements exist
One of the things we look for in a new site is enough interested participants to make it viable. We now ask people to make their interest known, because votes don't necessarily correlate with intended participation. Sometimes an upvote means "I want this" and sometimes it means "yeah, that sounds l...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277848 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Add the ability to customize suspended user profile blurb
We don't have a custom reason yet, but there is now a third option: no public reason. This means you don't have to give a wrong reason, even if you can't customize a right reason.
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277578 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: I cannot understand the meaning of some downvotes
In an ideal world, bug reports and support requests would be a separate stream from discussions and feature requests. We work with the tools we have, while also working to improve them. (A few people have reported software bugs on GitHub, which is fine too but not something we'd want to require.) ...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277549 Post edited:
5 months ago
Comment Post #277569 To explain how it got there in this case: someone provided a link to an image in a comment, I wanted to incorporate the image into the answer, and I didn't want to save it just to upload it so I instead used the URL directly. When our image-upload process can accept a URL and not just a file, this p...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #275968 I think to move forward, this proposal needs a more fleshed-out scope proposal. Please review the comments and answers here and edit as you think appropriate. Thanks.
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #276933 Post edited:
5 months ago
Comment Post #276997 @Zerotime completely my fault; this has grown beyond an idea at this point, has people interested in building it, and needs to flesh out scope some including doing something about the issues raised here. (Scope can be worked out more on a live site, but getting a basic shape of it here is good.) I'...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277565 @FoggyFinder yes it's supposed to be +5 for questions, +10 for answers or articles, -2 for downvotes. I think there might be a bug; checking with folks.
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277549 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277565 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277565 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277565 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Was score system changed?
Various things, not all of them understood, affect the accuracy of the reported reputation number. For example, sometimes a post is deleted or undeleted but the reputation adjustments don't get made. A system-wide reputation recalculation updates rep numbers by recomputing all of them. An admin ...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277549 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277549 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277549 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Need a mathematics Q&A site
Needed: a logo. Thanks to everyone who's responded to the other answer about prospective participants. We plan to move forward with this community. Right now the person who's been designing our logos is very busy with other things, so to try to remove barriers, I'm here to ask for your help. ...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277502 Questions deleted by users can be deleted in error, so while it's *usually* spam or trolling, there could also be a misunderstanding, language barrier, overzealous deleter, or whatever.
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277503 Post edited:
updating to address edits to the question
5 months ago
Comment Post #277544 Our use cases/wireframes call for a pop-up that invites you to sign in; I guess we haven't gotten there yet with the code. (This should apply to any control that's visible but requires that you be signed in.)
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277538 Meta actually does have a Meta, because it's baked into the site-setup code, and it took a few days for us to get rid of it. While it was there it confused people, but I admit we never created Meta Meta Meta where people could ask questions about Meta Meta.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277518 Reproduced (Chrome, Mac).
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #276998 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277503 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Block adding answers and editing of question/answers of deleted questions.
I strongly agree that being able to add a new answer after a question has been deleted doesn't make sense, and that most people also shouldn't be able to add comments. (Moderators should be able to, and see the comments for another suggestion.) I think the author should be able to edit a deleted ...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277497 Initial revision 5 months ago
Question "recent deletions" moderator tool produces error
The "recent deletions" link under mod tools is consistently returning a 500 server error for me. One reference: `2ba998b1-84b1-4675-aeb8-bebcf3465b5f` I've tried this on two sites. It's been a few days since I last accessed this tool anywhere, so I can't pin down when this behavior might have st...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277185 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #276998 Post edited:
5 months ago
Comment Post #277454 @Olin I don't see how that's different from misapplied tags now. People sometimes use the wrong tag because they assumed from the name it was one thing when it's actually meant to be something else. I'm saying we shouldn't allow both "apple" and "Apple" to be tags on the same site; that'll just add...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277459 Interesting idea. We could extend the [use case for suggesting a duplicate](https://github.com/codidact/feature-development/blob/master/scoped/flag/duplicate.md) to add a checkbox for the supersede case; I don't know if there are better ways. Right *now* duplicate is part of the close flow like on ...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277454 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Should we allow capitalized tags?
I think tags should be case-preserving and also case-independent. By this I mean: I do not want us to have two tags that differ only in capitalization, because I think that will lead to errors and confusion. (If you need tags for "apple" the fruit and "Apple" the company on the same site, find some...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277007 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #276994 Post edited:
5 months ago
Comment Post #277383 @aCVn yeah, automated someday, but I think we're gambling that the load won't be so high as to preclude manual handling in the window between now and when we can implement that.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277379 No repro in Safari on a Mac (desktop). I don't have an iPad or iPhone to test with. (I think we've seen other iOS-only issues.)
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277356 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Community Wiki Posts
I think you're asking about what SE calls community wiki, as opposed to the community user. On SE, the Community user owns things that are otherwise ownerless, like posts from deleted users. Community wiki, on the other hand, is a status that an individual post has, meaning "make it easy for people...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277348 @Mithical that'd be a problem with the *user account*, though; it's not that we'd be saying "you can be here but can't be a mod" but, rather, we'd be saying "GDPR says you can't be here, sorry!". @ArtOfCode TOS violations would be problems; I wasn't thinking of that as a legal issue, but maybe I'm t...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277349 I remember writing something about this but need to track down where. We do want people to be able to search either globally (on a site) or just within a category.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277348 I want the community to be protected from rogue team members too. What's an example of a legal issue forcing the team's hand? I have guesses but don't know enough about law (especially on an international site) to know if they're reasonable.
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277208 Post edited:
5 months ago
Comment Post #277314 I don't know what that symbol is supposed to be. It looks like a bell to me. I often have trouble with emoji and uncommon Unicode symbols, though. Maybe Art can enlighten us. :-)
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277314 And the unfilled one is for moderators.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277296 Reproduced (desktop; didn't try mobile).
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #276997 @DonielF it's still pretty subjective, sorry. I see two enthusiastic people and several more casual. On the one hand it'd be nice to have another core user or two, but on the other hand, this list includes several people who are already active on Codidact, so more likely to "stick". I'm going to b...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277268 @JulioCezarSilva thanks for the feedback. (I'm new to Figma; can you tell? :-)) We've been planning to use the right column for other (supplementary) information, yes -- meaning if it drops out/down on a phone we haven't affected the core functionality, and it gives us a place to put things we'd like...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277270 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Is there a consensus on comment layouts for the MVP and beyond?
Thank you for raising this question. We've been a little vague in our plans for comments, aside from (irony alert) comment threads in some Figma wireframes that aren't the most visible. Speaking for myself and not for the team: I use TopAnswers too, and the sidebar chat works ok on a desktop ...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277268 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Is there a consensus on comment layouts for the MVP and beyond?
We have some early, crude wireframes showing our ideas on comment threading: collapsed threads under a post, expanded thread. Be sure to turn on the comments view. It looks like you need a Figma account to see comments (free, but it's still one more account to manage), so I've added some screenshot...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277245 @msh210 thanks for the edit, especially the yes/no examples for tools. Good call.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277253 Those are different votes. The community will elect the panel, through some process to be determined. The first election will seat seven members; the three who finish in positions 5, 6, and 7 will get one-year terms. It's not related to site activity, votes on posts, trust levels, etc.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277250 Is this something that could be addressed (by users who want it) with a little custom CSS (using a browser extension like Stylus)?
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277002 Post edited:
there's enough interest and emergent scope to move this to the proposal stage
5 months ago
Edit Post #277245 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Need a mathematics Q&A site
Scope Please edit this; I am not a mathematician and am deriving this from activity on this proposal. Scope for this site would include: - all branches of theoretical and applied math: algebra, category theory, arithmetic and number theory, combinatorics, topology, measure theory and probabi...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277007 Post edited:
5 months ago
Comment Post #277224 Medical professionals will generally not *diagnose* without seeing the patient anyway, for reasons of both liability and professional ethics. But they (and others) could still provide useful *information*. How much to do so is entirely up to the answerer. (By the way, we can give the site a "profe...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #276997 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277221 Initial revision 5 months ago
Question Could "last activity" link to where it happened (e.g. specific answer)?
On a list of questions or posts, each entry has a "last activity" indicator showing who last changed it and when. Would it be possible to have "last activity" be a link to the post that changed? Particularly on questions with many answers (like some meta and challenge posts), I'd really appreciate ...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277220 Do you want this info passively (like for skimming), or just actively (without clicking through, have I voted on this?)? We have a design (thus far not implemented) for an "expanded view in place" on the list page; its main purpose is to summarize answers, but maybe we could add this if that would m...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277208 Initial revision 5 months ago
Article Newsletter #3 (August 2020)
The following announcement was sent to subscribers of the Codidact announcements mailing list on August 10, 2020. It has been reformatted here. Hello from Codidact! We have a number of updates to share about our communities, platform, and project. Thank you for joining us in this venture to buil...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277186 @aCVn there's a spectrum, which is why I asked. "How do I get Quicken to..." is clearly too general; "how do I report royalty income in such-and-such tax jurisdiction" isn't *music*-specific but is more narrow so might be in; "how does Harry Fox (a music-specific agency for handling royalties) repor...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277186 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Music site, for both fans and musicians
Are questions about business aspects of music also in scope? Issues such as: - securing licenses & paying royalties when performing others' works - finding and negotiating for performance venues - managing your sales (accounting, taxes, etc) - agents I don't have an opinion for or against. ...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277185 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Music site, for both fans and musicians
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please either leave a comment or edit this post describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic wit...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277180 Maybe we should put it back at the top. This has come up a few times. I asked for it to come after the body because I've seen a *lot* of questions where the title doesn't match what the asker ended up asking about by the end of the body, but maybe we should instead just give newer posters a "please...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277177 Or auto-expand the box if the text gets too long for the original size.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277175 Reproduced (Chrome).
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277007 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #75033 Post edited:
5 months ago
Comment Post #277130 @Art repro. The featured link is different from the hot link.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277119 Reproduced (on Travel). Weird! Obviously *some* people can vote...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277101 @Olin the context of this discussion is privilege-enablement, which is currently done by rep and which it sounds like you agree *should not be*. Privileges should arise from trust earned by doing things on the site.
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277101 Post edited:
oops, I thought mods could change it themselves but they need an admin assist
5 months ago
Edit Post #277101 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: What's a relation between trust levels across various Co-communities?
The prerequisites for various site activities (currently reputation, to be replaced with trust levels) are configurable per site. The difference you're seeing for voting isn't so much intentional as an artifact. The default is to let even brand-new users have a few votes per day, and that's the set...
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277100 Initial revision 5 months ago
Answer A: Hide Deleted Comments
I, too, find that the deleted comments get in the way, but I'd propose a simpler structure. We mods and admins don't need to see the entire structure in an overview; we just need to know that there are deleted comments (and how many) and have a way to show them. I propose that there are three state...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #276701 @pnuts need a [tagline](https://languages.codidact.com/questions/277071) to use there; any suggestions, anyone? (Answer there please.)
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #277072 Maybe embedding a poll in another post would work better, so the poll can be part of a larger Q&A about a topic (site proposal, site policy discussion, choosing topics for challenges, whatever).
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #277094 Question closed 5 months ago
Edit Post #277007 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277072 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277072 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #277072 Initial revision 5 months ago
Article Help us help you: please show your support for site proposals
Our network now has eight sites (plus Meta), and we hope to see many more as we continue to develop both our platform and our communities. As we've worked with communities to build the sites we have now, we've found ourselves adjusting how we go about deciding when a site is ready. We are tryin...
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #276701 @Zerotime the site has just been launched.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #276701 @moonlight the site has just been launched.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #276701 @becky82 the site has just been launched.
(more)
5 months ago
Edit Post #276701 Post edited:
5 months ago
Edit Post #276997 Post edited:
6 months ago
Edit Post #277007 Post edited:
6 months ago
Comment Post #277052 No repro (but different OS & browser), *but* when I just tried the image did not appear in the preview until I clicked in the post box after uploading. I don't know if that's related.
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #277007 Post edited:
pulling in info from comments
6 months ago
Comment Post #277029 When we implement trust levels that will be explicitly allowed: even if you can't do anything else yet, you'll be able to vote and comment on stuff on your own questions. I'll see if adding that exception now, before trust levels, is straightforward.
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #277002 Post edited:
added the relevant part from the other post so it'll all be together here
6 months ago
Comment Post #277023 @pnuts that was more inertia and less intention. I don't think we explicitly talked about that.
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #277023 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Why does the title come after the body when writing a question?
I made that design decision. If it doesn't work we can of course change it, but the reasoning is pretty much what @pnuts said in another answer. On other sites I've seen a lot of bad titles, ones that didn't match the question that came out at the end of the question body, and I think that's becaus...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #277007 @MathPhysics ghost towns aren't a good look, for the network or for the individual site, so we'd like to have some indication that there will be activity. We're learning as we go, which is why we don't have hard-and-fast rules. I'm not very familiar with Math.SE, so I don't know how to answer your ...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #39539 Post edited:
6 months ago
Comment Post #277007 @ziggurism oh wow; I had not seen [Henning's profile](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/14366/hmakholm-left-over-monica). It looks like he contributed a ton there and was looking for another place to share, so it seems worth contacting him and letting him know about Codidact.
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #277007 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Need a mathematics Q&A site
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build a math site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this subtopic within the site's scope...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276994 I have spent a lot of time playing RPGs (mostly D&D through 3.5, with some misc mixed in) but don't currently play and am not up on the latest developments. I would participate in questions that are more "craft" and less rules-interpretation. If there is a blog that welcomes "craft" posts and/or re...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276997 I would participate casually, asking the occasional question but almost certainly unable to contribute useful answers.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276998 I'm interested as a casual user. I expect to have occasional questions (particularly about crafts and daily life in historical periods). I have some knowledge in some *very* niche areas.
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276999 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: What are the steps between community idea and community proposal?
One thing that's hard for us to gauge, and is important for a new community to get off the ground, is level of interest. People might upvote a proposal out of interest ("I'd read that") or because they think it's a good idea in the abstract ("a site like that should exist") or because they want to a...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276998 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Factual History Site
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please either edit or leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the si...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276997 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Medical science site
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276996 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Personal Productivity site
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276995 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Should there be a community here for Linux users?
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276994 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Tabletop Role Playing Games
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276993 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Single Board Microcontroller/Computer Codidact Site (Arduinos, RPi, etc.)
Right now we don't have a good way of identifying people who would help build a new community, so let's do this: if you are interested in helping to build this site, please leave a comment describing your level of interest (casual visitor, enthusiast, expert in this topic within the site's scope, som...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #275968 I hesitate over "debate"; could you clarify what you had in mind there?
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276675 Post edited:
6 months ago
Comment Post #276971 luap42's answer covers what I would have said.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276971 I'll write up a more general answer to this question later (it's something we need to document more clearly than we do), but on the specific example: we added a status-pending tag to the proposal recently to indicate it's moving forward. We haven't launched it yet because we figured syntax highligh...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276701 Post edited:
6 months ago
Edit Post #75033 Post edited:
6 months ago
Comment Post #276905 Templates should always be treated as starting points -- suggested text, but not a format enforced by the UI. That way if you need to adjust the presentation for a recipe, you can. For example, sometimes it makes sense to treat a thing and its sauce as two mini-recipes within a recipe. (@Mithra...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276905 I did say "optional". I'm asking whether it should be available, meaning whether it's useful in some places. Where it's not useful, don't use it.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276748 @Marco13 I don't think it's being worked on right now (though I wasn't online an hour ago when you left that comment). I have sometimes seen the bubble not disappear until I either click the inbox again or refresh the page (or go to a new page). Other times it responds immediately. I haven't been ...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276900 Initial revision 6 months ago
Question Do we need templates for new posts?
We have some posting tips on the "ask question" (or "create post" etc) pages, and we plan to add better contextual help in the future. Another way to guide people would be with templates, a "proto-question" (or proto-blog-post or proto-challenge etc) that you get in the editor. A template could be ...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276898 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Should bugs and feature requests go to local Metas or Meta.Codidact?
If you know that a bug or feature request is broader than just your site, it's better to post it on main meta if you can. (Things known to be specific to one site belong on the per-site meta.) Reporting bugs or requesting features on main meta should mean less duplication compared to reports on (po...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276884 @pnuts if people only participate on one site and there seems to be a place *right there* to report issues or make requests, it will seem natural to some to do so. The downside, as you say, is that fewer people will see it or know it's already been reported -- but we shouldn't assume that all users ...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276873 More direct interaction for the author is intentional, yes. Some things *only* the author can fix, so send that signal early so the author can address it and get an answer. Even when a site is large, any particular question probably has only a few people interacting on it, so my hope is that they'l...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276873 @Marco13 agreed; we might need to change things with scale, and push vs pull is an important factor. I think suggested edits are important enough to be called out as I suggested, because good edits actively improve quality *and* people who get prompt responses to their contributions are more likely t...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276873 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Moderation queues for questions and answers
By queues I assume you mean review queues like on SE. We haven't designed anything like that yet, though we've discussed the need specifically for a way to see pending suggested edits. (A lot of forum discussions were treating the SE interface as a starting point.) In general, I have been thinking...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276871 We'll need to consider edits, too. Consider a post that was originally fine and then was edited to add NSFW content. Also consider a post that was suspect, reviewed and approved (not NSFW) by moderators, and then edited. (I don't know if those two cases are the same.)
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276833 We've said before, and I'll say again, that we're going to show some other stats with users, something to indicate the volume of activity and overall scoring. No there will not be rep because rep as it exists (both here and on SE) is a flawed model. It'll be something more like "17 answers (15 well...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276844 You downvote *questions* because you disagree with a *site's* import policies? By the way, are you aware that imported questions are now labeled on the question list?
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #74961 Post edited:
some things have changed since I wrote this originally
6 months ago
Edit Post #276701 Post edited:
6 months ago
Edit Post #276838 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Professional coding
(Moving this here from another proposal; I forgot about this one and it fits better here.) Discussion here and elsewhere led me to ask How should we approach a programming site or sites?. It currently has 21 upvotes and several answers, which I'll take as interest. There's a lot of discussion ...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276819 I don't see a problem with the author of a deleted question being able to see all answers that were not explicitly deleted. That is, if something got deleted while the question was still live, the author wouldn't have been able to see that, so shouldn't gain that access through question deletion. B...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276808 Definitely a bug, and being looked into. This is affecting all sites.
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276808 Post edited:
6 months ago
Edit Post #276675 Post edited:
6 months ago
Edit Post #276675 Post edited:
6 months ago
Comment Post #276781 While the problems you list certainly exist, they also exist on other sites with varied backgrounds and topics that can be *very* detail-oriented and precise. There's only so much that tooling and configuration can do, so this is an area where community curators need to help guide people, edit, reta...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276785 Oops, yeah -- authors should be able to see that. I'll add it to our board. If you want a copy of the text so you can work on it offline, just let me know how to get it to you (or we can undelete and you can add a "work in progress" notice to the top if you prefer). Sorry about the inconvenience!
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276704 Another consideration: questions that compare more than one language. I think we want a single Q&A category, with strong tagging.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276704 My primary concern here is that if we end up with 10+ categories, that poses both UI and UX challenges we did not plan for when designing categories. I like this idea in principle but I'm not sure how to approach it. Do language *families* make sense as an organizing principle, or is that no better...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276701 @becky82 the basic Unicode support is there. On the Judaism site we ended up changing to a different font for legibility -- not a big deal; just had to find one. I don't know Arabic so I don't know if the default font is satisfactory.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276752 Thanks for the new example @manassehkatz. That's better.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276701 Hi @becky82 and thanks for commenting! Wow, I wonder what the problem is with the Arabic proposal. They're welcome to come here and join this proposal. (We'll need to add Arabic font support, but we added Hebrew for the Judaism site so we're not starting from square 1.)
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276754 We've sketched this out (i.e. our wireframes show it and no one's objected :-) ), but we haven't implemented it yet.
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276675 Post edited:
updated to respond to comments
6 months ago
Comment Post #276752 @ArtOfCode oh, neat! I never noticed that. :-) We should probably enhance that tooltip a bit to at least say "score:" or something and not just the number. :-)
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276701 Are you involved in that A51 proposal or in contact with the people who are working on it? If you can ask them (without being spammy) if they'd be interested in a site here, that'd help us understand if we have enough people interested enough to build it. I see 8 upvotes here (one of them is mine),...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276752 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Should we start displaying the score of a post instead of the raw votes?
If we show raw Wilson score I think we're going to see a lot of confusion and questions -- "is 0.65 good?" "what does it take to get to 0.8?" etc. Even if we explain that it's a value from 0 to 1 indicating some quality measure, I don't think it's all that meaningful to show that number to most peop...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276748 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Notification system improvements
I've encountered this too and agree that the current behavior leaves room for improvement. I wouldn't want to see an automatic "dismiss all" action when you look at your notifications. This is what SE does, and if you're active on several sites or just have a lot of stuff come in at once, it's to...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276593 If we build a general software-development site, I think having a careers category there would enhance it. It'd be software-specific, not like Workplace.SE, but Workplace.SE was pretty software-heavy and certainly assumed office jobs (as compared to, say, plumbers or teachers, which were supposed to...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276700 @Marco13 I think it would start with a meta discussion -- first consensus that it's time to spin off, then consensus on what tags to consider, and then (in my proposal) setting up a category where people can review that to see whether that set of questions is what people meant in the earlier discussi...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276700 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: How should we approach a programming site or sites?
Based on all the feedback here (and also on the related site proposals), I put forth this proposal: Create a single Software Development site, planning from the start for spinoffs. Here's how I see that working: First, I said "software development", not "programming", because we're not an SO c...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276693 Yes I asked for that too. We're going to add "include in ads?" as a configuration option for categories, so we can turn it off for meta and leave it up to communities whether to include other categories like contests. (And if a community doesn't want to have random-post ads at all, they can just tu...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276692 Just in case the question arises... the examples in the screenshot are from a test server. :-)
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276675 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: Scoring System for Trust Level Requirements
Update: Based on this question, this answer, feedback on both, the original spec for trust levels, and lots of discussion in chat, I've posted a new specification for privileges-(Take-2)) on the wiki. Key differences: - All privileges are derived from scores based on your posts, suggested edits, ...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276658 I upvoted for "we should make it clear", not to support the example of summary removal by staff. I agree that the process should apply no matter who appointed the mod. Mods should be able to do their jobs without feeling hindered by concerns about unjust removal.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276645 If we're concerned about noisy/nefarious appeals flooding the list and making it hard to find the real ones, they don't all have to be mingled on the same list -- deliberated appeals on one list, summary judgements on another. And it would be fine to aggregate them where applicable, e.g. "July 2020,...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276644 @luap42 I agree that we should give the panel *tools and guidance* but allow them to use their judgement here, as they can in the rest of their deliberations.
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #276626 Initial revision 6 months ago
Answer A: How to remove a given tag from all questions where it is used?
Our tag-management UI isn't that advanced yet. (We also don't yet have rename or merge.) Until we can fix that, please make a support request and an admin will make the change. You can make a meta "support" request or ping us in the moderators' chat pointing to the existing meta discussion. (In t...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276209 Related: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276618. This question has a lot of support; if no one else does it first I'll try to propose a reworking of trust levels along these lines, as an answer to this question. I think we can make trust "levels" more independent, and in fact we had already ide...
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276618 On the "gating", see [this post about rethinking how we structure trust levels](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276209). It proposes more independent measures, so editing has a path and posting has a path and closing has a path etc.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #276590 In our current spec for trust levels, trust for close votes is based on successful flagging. That could possibly be refined; on SE you wouldn't want the people running Smoke Detector auto-flaggers for spam to earn privileges on sites they're not otherwise on. But the basic idea is that they're both...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276537 Could you elaborate on why using the tag to see just bug reports doesn't address the problem? Thanks.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276141 I agree about exclusionary naming. I think we can address the very real concern raised by @Lundin with clear messaging both in the Q&A category description (the line you see at the top of the page) and in the guidance on the "ask" page, which can be customized per-site. These are tools that weren't...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276509 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: Post action links that cannot be used should be hidden
I'd like to move Close and Delete to the Tools menu (now that we have that menu). This menu is generated based on what you have the privilege to do, so that's a better place for these items. Doing this also reduces the number of options a user has to consider on each post. Flag should stay visib...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276452 Credit goes to ArtOfCode! I posted this so Art could get some sleep (because timezones).
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276452 Initial revision 7 months ago
Question Tag updates, including tag hierarchies
We have just pushed some updates related to tags. You will now see a "tags" link in the category bar (next to "posts"), which leads to a searchable list of all tags. Selecting an individual tag takes you to that tag's page, showing its description (if any) and the list of posts in that category wit...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276420 Maybe it should just include native posts (which can mean new, native answers to imported questions, too).
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276417 Yes, we want different kinds of guidance that are more targeted and thus (I hope) more useful for *that thing I'm trying to do right now*, alongside more general help. A new-user tour seems helpful if it shows the things one needs right away (and points out the help for more info). In time it will ...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276393 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: Hot Network Questions like feature?
I think a system where sites can somehow nominate questions for broader publicity would be helpful, but I don't think we want to repeat the mistakes SE made with hot network questions. We've talked about this some but haven't done anything about it -- there are other features that we think are highe...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276209 I think this approach would simplify things for all involved.
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276280 Post edited:
7 months ago
Edit Post #276280 Post edited:
7 months ago
Edit Post #276280 Post edited:
7 months ago
Comment Post #276330 Menorah? And I had the same thought about Jin over Shabbat! It'd be great if we could hire him to do a logo and banner for us. (Right now sites just have the small logos, but our design folks are exploring layouts that would give sites a full-width banner at the top, recognizing that we have to ac...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276334 We are planning to show user info (a la the "user card" on SE) that has better stats that just one number. Something like: number of posts of each type (or maybe just number of posts), approximate total score of answers (as a range not a precise number that people angst over when it goes down by 1), ...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276301 Thanks for the brainstorming! And also the suggestion for the platform; I agree we should explore this. I like your brand suggestions, especially the cheeky one. :-)
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276301 I agree in general, but I note that when *talking* about the site to prospective participants, a generic name doesn't work as well in phrases like "there's a great site that could help you with that, ..." or "I participate on ... and I think you'd really like it". Granted, this is a problem other Co...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276300 @binyomin yes, definitely tags! Tags are essential to organizing content. If you look at any of the sites in [our network](https://codidact.com/), you'll see tags in use. And for content we import, we'll import the original tags too.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276300 And SO *is* one programming site, with questions about Java and C# and PHP and Visual Basic and SQL and FranzLisp and... and most people ignore most of it. Sometimes there's critical mass for a specialization to spin off, but that doesn't mean those questions are no longer welcome on SO. SO is a bi...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276300 @binyomin yes there's a difference; not everybody is going to have the same level of interest in all questions. That applies within "groupings" too; maybe you're focused on that gemara and don't really care all that much about this zohar or that Ibn Ezra on an obscure point of grammar in Vayikra or ...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276292 @Harel13 if we put Purim Torah in a separate category, I think we can be a lot more flexible about timing. On Mi Yodeya we limited it because it sits alongside the serious Q&A; on Codidact we can do it differently if we want to.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276300 @binyomin text study, from the *pshat* from the *parsha* to understanding the *kal v'chomer* used in such-and-such place in the *g'mara* to the nuances of a Rambam etc -- that's all clearly Jewish. You expect to see it in a *beit midrash*. Questions about kashrut or Shabbat hospitality or *t'filah* o...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276300 We clearly want to support text and talmud questions; they're pretty core to Jewish study, as we've seen on Mi Yodeya. Could you say more about how narrowing the scope to only that helps? Is the concern that you can't find the content you want, that people will be distracted by other stuff and won't ...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276280 Post edited:
added status tag
7 months ago
Comment Post #276289 If the issue with the referencer is that it has a lot of SE-specific stuff -- i.e. it needs to be updated to run here -- then perhaps this is an area where the community could help? It's a userscript (on SE) now; if somebody can turn it into a userscript that runs here, that's no greater a burden fo...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276296 Initial revision 7 months ago
Article The Codidact Vision
This was previously posted on the forum and then the project wiki on 2020-02-02. Now that we have this blog, I'm reposting here for more, err, visibility. Codidact's goal is to enable communities of shared interests to come together and determine for themselves how they pool, share, and teach ...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276292 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: A new Judaism community
I think supporting divrei torah as a first-class feature alongside Q&A would be very helpful. On SE the only (on-site) mechanism for that is the self-answered question. Self-answered questions are useful when they are really questions that can thus invite additional answers, and we should continue ...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276260 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: how do we handle overlap
There is a community aspect to this that can be lost if we just think of questions as being things that fit into buckets (sites). A user might choose to ask a question on the "general" site instead of the specialized one because the person is part of the community on the "general" site. It's pretty...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276236 On your last paragraph, could you give an example? I'm trying to understand the granularity. Do you envision a question about, say, doing or faking multiple inheritance, with variations for C++, Java, Python, etc? Or do you mean something finer-grained, like a question about how to do something in...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276222 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: Network-wide sign in created accounts for me on all sites even though I had no accounts there beforehand
I don't think that visiting site A while logged in on site B should automatically create an account on site A, for at least two reasons: - Doing it inflates the list of users, making it harder to get a sense of how many people were actually interested enough to take that first step. For sites wit...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276214 @ArtOfCode I don't think we should be auto-creating per-site accounts; that should be an intentional action by the user. Adding an answer to elaborate.
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276183 Post edited:
more formatting caused by cut/paste from email...
7 months ago
Edit Post #276183 Post edited 7 months ago
Suggested Edit Post #276183 Suggested edit:

(more)
helpful 7 months ago
Edit Post #276183 Initial revision 7 months ago
Article Newsletter #2 (June 2020)
The following announcement was sent to subscribers of the Codidact announcements mailing list on June 17, 2020. It has been reformatted here. Hello! Thank you for following our project to build a place where communities can come together to share knowledge, a place that puts people first and emp...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276181 Post edited:
7 months ago
Edit Post #276181 Initial revision 7 months ago
Article Newsletter #1 (May 2020)
The following announcement was sent to subscribers of the Codidact announcements mailing list on May 4, 2020. It has been reformatted here. Codidact, the open-source Q&A platform: by the community, for the community. Hello! Thank you for following our project to build a place where communities...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276180 Post edited:
7 months ago
Edit Post #276180 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: The list of questions for a user should indicate the category the question is asked in
We have a design for this; it's just not implemented yet. The user profile will show selectors (tabs) for each category plus "all" (the default). In the "all" view, posts will be labeled by category. Each post will also show its type -- currently we have questions, answers, and articles. You migh...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276175 @Lundin there's a default license on all posts, which is what you get if you do nothing.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276175 Whoops, I thought we had that. Investigating.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #276168 On SE I once proposed something to help the OP re-ask the question without all the cut/paste -- basically, show the on-topic info, user says "yes ask there", and we open the "create post" interface on the other site with the existing content pre-populated. There are some complications that have to b...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276163 Post edited:
formatting
7 months ago
Edit Post #276163 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: An alternative approach to the view order of answers
The Codidact functional specification calls for changes to answer ordering; we just haven't gotten that far in implementation yet. (Scroll down to the "Votes and Scores" section.) > For each question and answer we display raw upvotes and downvotes. This makes controversy visible. > > For each a...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #276139 Initial revision 7 months ago
Question How should we approach a programming site or sites?
We have a suggestion for a site for professional coding, and software engineering and computer science also have some interest, and there are overlapping suggestions for cloud technologies and single-board microcontrollers. It seems likely that participants here have interests in other related are...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #275959 Post edited:
7 months ago
Comment Post #275959 That's weird; I edited a recipe last night. Investigating.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #275943 Thanks @Olin; I was in fact eyeing your formatting help. :-) Changes should all be there now; go ahead and try typing something into the "category" textbox and setting sequence numbers.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #275940 I think they'll all need to change to "/posts". A category can support more than one post type, and anyway these things could change over time as a site's use of a category evolves, so we shouldn't baking that into the external interface. Missed this in testing/code review, sorry.
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #275943 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: Help --> Site Information?
That topic was meant to be disabled, but we hit a bug. It's gone now. That topic is meant to be an example starting point for people setting up a new site. We'll be making some improvements to the template. On this site, where you've already built out other help, it's redundant. You can now ...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #275927 Post edited 7 months ago
Comment Post #275857 Oh, I didn't mean invite the inquisitive hordes now; you need to get set up first. I just meant that *alongside* developing that site introduction, also try to build some good *content* for them to see. Nobody wants to see an empty site on a first visit. That paragraph was addressed to the founder...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #275857 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: New site setup process?
We need to create some better "new community" documentation, but moderators will be able to do most of what you need, so first we have to identify the initial moderators. (Eventually each community will choose its own, but to get started we'll need to appoint two or three pro-tem moderators.) The d...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #74947 Post edited:
7 months ago
Edit Post #275776 Post edited:
7 months ago
Comment Post #275826 [Launched](https://cooking.codidact.com/), so we can now continue these important discussions on meta there. Looking forward to building the site!
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #74947 Post edited:
7 months ago
Edit Post #275842 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: What would I change on UX
I'm photosensitive and bright white backgrounds bother me too. Dark-mode themes tend to fail me in other ways, so I usually try to soften the bombardment of bright white pixels instead. In case it helps, I'll share my workaround. This is the CSS override I use, with the Stylus add-on, for Codidact...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #275836 On import, while there's no UI for it (and that's not planned soon), we can import questions selectively. The community could assemble a list of links to specific questions and we could pull those over, so you can cherry-pick those few valuable posts that would be a hassle to recreate here.
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #275825 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: How should Codidact "advertise" and gain community members?
We have to build awareness through word of mouth. And that's not about Codidact in general, and isn't always even about specific Codidact communities (though it can be). Sometimes tweeting a link to a specific, interesting question will get people to take a look who wouldn't have come to the such-a...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74947 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #275776 One more question: any suggestions for a logo? What graphical element(s) should we include? Or if somebody wants to propose an image, feel free -- aiming for an aspect ratio of about 3:1 width:height.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #275776 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #275776 Now that we've confirmed that Circuitlab integration isn't a blocker and it looks like the overlap with the general-engineering proposal has been addressed, I think we can proceed. What URL slug (the part before codidact.com) do y'all want? "electrical-engineering" is clear but also long; do you hav...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #275785 Changing a name is relatively easy. Once a site has been in use for a while, changing a URL has more dependencies (we'd have to either break links or have a redirect -- not hard, but something to think about). If the URL slug is "rpg" that's pretty flexible; if it's "tabletop-rpg" or "trpg" and you...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #275808 If we didn't have Circuitlab integration, what would people do? Use whatever tools they like and just upload images? Use some web-based tool and link to a project there so it could be edited? I'm guessing that site-specific tool integrations are a ways off, especially if there are licensing issues...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74991 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #275776 @KingDuken how did that work? Can you link to a question that uses it so we can see? Thanks.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #275776 Sounds promising! Do you need Mathjax? Any other non-standard features?
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #275785 My suggestion on categories is: use categories when the *base expectations* are different. For example, "Researched Q&A" on Speculative Science, "Gear Recommendations" on Photography, and the various contest categories have *different rules*. Blogs/wikis are also different, hence separate. (And, o...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #275797 Question on the site's meta; let's work it out there: https://speculative-science.codidact.com/questions/275801
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75058 Thomas, could you review the questions with both tags and make a proposal? We can import more data. If it turns out that most or all questions with both tags are fine then we can pull those in; if it's more selective, then if you can compile a list of URLs we can pull in those specific questions. ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #275784 I've run into this too when trying to do footnotes.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #275776 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #275785 I mostly agree, though I wonder if categories or tags serve the first three areas better. (And I wouldn't call that "fluff"; some players are there primarily for the roleplaying and storytelling, with mechanics being merely a means to serve that end.) I'm not concerned about overlap with worldbuild...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #75053 Sounds good Thomas! We can import more questions later, but wholesale import of that tag would have brought a lot of extra stuff, so let's discuss first. We might end up with a list of specific URLs or a better characterization.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75053 I think "what could happen, based purely on science/logic", fits Speculative Science. We're in the process of importing data there now, after which we'll write some custom scope help and meta posts and stuff (reflecting the discussions here). I think it will meet your needs -- and if not, please us...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74907 @HDE226868 a category name is easily changed once created, so please do think about it and see if you have better ideas. Thanks!
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75058 If the imaginary force can be fully-enough specified that one can apply scientific reasoning, I would think that would be fine. A lot of questions on WB about imaginary forces lack that foundation and answers end up being "well it's magic; do whatever you want", which I think you'd agree isn't very ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75033 I want to see Codidact serve this community; I'm asking questions so we can all, together, figure out how to do that.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75033 Thanks for explaining, @staticvoid. What you say about overlaps makes sense. Does the space logically divide into "themes", the way web dev does with front-end and back-end work? Do you see this as purely about code or also tools (IDEs, source control, etc)? If tools, what about process and design (s...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #75062 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Software Engineering && Mathematics && Computer Science
This post covers three different proposed sites and has several upvotes, indicating some level of interest -- but it's hard to tell which parts. See also the recent proposal for Professional Coding, which overlaps two of the three proposed here. I'd love to see some well-developed proposals for tec...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75053 @Thomas it started out as "WB, but without the magic complications". I see you've found that proposal now and I'm very interested in your input in shaping it. I think it does much of what you're looking for, though maybe not the "plotting" questions ("what would happen" can run quite a gamut).
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75061 Yeah, there's a wireframe floating around that includes "follow", but it's not on the must-have list for 1.0 aka MVP.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #75058 I'll update the proposal with something more specific about intended scope; thank you for calling out this deficiency. We don't mean "science" in the sense of "only stuff that's real today", but more that we're aiming for things where you can draw a line from science to the desired result. Faster-t...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75033 Related: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/74893
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74929 @aCVn I agree (and with the hyphen, for readability). Aliases are simple additions.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74823 @imsodin the site isn't about existing works or about writing that fiction, though; it's about getting the science as close to right as possible when dealing with life on other worlds, FTL travel, shapeshifters, autonomous robots, etc.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #75033 TopAnswers is doing some of this, but that doesn't mean we can't explore different approaches. How much of the content would be specific to particular languages versus general? That other site is humongous and I think that impedes forming a *community* there, so I wonder if several smaller sites wo...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74998 Related: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/74808
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74951 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74966 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74947 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #74991 For what my small reach is worth, I gave this proposal a bit of a nudge on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MonicaCellio/status/1264688391419035652. If you know people who might be interested (or people who might know people who...), please let them know about the proposal (without being spammy of cours...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74943 @Mithrandir24601 I've made another proposal for data import in a new answer.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #75012 Post edited:
clarified: magic is still a disqualifier
8 months ago
Comment Post #75014 @PeterTaylor I'm not sure off-hand, but I'm confident that we can do something there, even if it's a more manual process for a handful of meta posts.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #75015 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Cooking Codidact site
Target audience: explorers and experimenters A vibrant community around cooking will involve a lot of exploration and experimentation -- we're mostly going to be avid amateurs who are doing, or trying to do, great things in our kitchens at home. Sure, if restaurant chefs join us we'll welcome the...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #75014 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Cooking Codidact site
Fresh start I wasn't active on the SE site, so I don't know what the state of things is like there. But this site isn't being founded by SE people who want to emigrate; I see no discussion on their meta about moving, though there was some discussion of unhappiness a few months ago. Rather, this s...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #75013 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Cooking Codidact site
The comments indicate that we have a few people here who would be interested in participating. I think current events could make this a timely site -- more people are cooking more at home than previously and probably have questions. (I know I do, even though I'm an experienced cook.) To move for...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74943 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #75012 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Speculative Science
Alternate approach to data import The data-import code has now been improved, and it is now feasible to do multiple imports over time if we want to. I've also learned some lessons from the Writing site, which imported ten years' worth of content somewhat indiscriminately (my fault). I'm therefor...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74947 Just in the past week I have had questions about silken tofu (vs the other kind), cooking with tempeh, adjusting a cobbler recipe for a different type of fruit, and bread. In all cases I was able to find unstructured opinions via Google, but it was like going to the elves for counsel -- they say bot...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74852 I think we should be open to questions about game scenarios and not just plots, *but* they will have to be scoped well to be answerable. As a GM I would want to be able to ask about monster design, creating believable NPCs, planting clues effectively, designing puzzles for the players to solve, and ...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #75007 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Body preview of writing a question can appear differently than when posted...
This happens because the preview is being rendered client-side by a JavaScript library, while the actual post is being rendered server-side using a Rails library. I've been told it's not feasible to use the exact same library in both places, but finding a way to resolve these differences (so they be...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74991 Good job on focusing this! It sounds like a well-defined and rich-enough area to support lots of Q&A. Now we'll need to identify enough of a community to get it going (people who will be active here asking and answering questions).
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74998 Or on codidact.com because they apply to the whole network. (I thought we'd done that, but I guess we only discussed it? Hmm.)
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74996 @KingDuken do you agree with this answer's suggestion that it's more about hardware and less about open-source specifically? Or do you see open-source as a key factor? (You can edit your proposal if you want to adjust that.)
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74964 This is a critically-important question. We need to find and attract the people and sites with reach, without being spammy. Promoting on SE where practical is good, but we need to go beyond that too. Also, when those people come to check us out, they need to find active communities -- chicken and ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74953 @PeterCooperJr the same division could be done with just a set of status tags, yes. I was thinking that having the two stages would make it easier to see at a glance (on the list) which proposals are in the "idea" stage and which are undergoing more active development. I admit it can be fuzzy. Par...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74852 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #74947 @Sigma or maybe a blog category that can support both recipes and "technique" posts, with good use of tags? Or did you mean recipe requests? That could work if structured, sort of like Photo's gear recommendations. "I need a recipe for X" bad, "I need a recipe for X following these constraints" wo...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74961 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Bug reports: meta.codidact.com or codidact.org?
Please report bugs on Meta or GitHub, whichever you prefer. We monitor both. Bug reports all feed into a Trello board that we use to manage the work on the platform, so it doesn't matter all that much where they come from. (Ok, direct pings in chat aren't so good, but otherwise...) Before we ha...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74953 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74929 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74953 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: What should we do about tagging in Site Proposals?
This answer builds on Peter's answer (thanks!). I think we need to approach tags along two axes. One is tracking status of proposals, as suggested by Peter. We did this informally when I added "status-launched" to the Photography post, but we can and should track status through earlier stages to...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74929 @aCVn it's long, but maybe that isn't a problem after all. I guess most people don't *type* URLs; they find them via links or search, or they've been there before, type the first few characters, and the browser offers an auto-complete.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74950 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74950 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Tabletop Role Playing Games
I think this is a site that could do well here. RPGs are popular, numerous, and varied, and questions would also be varied -- questions about rules, questions about technique (playing a druid well, maintaining tension as a GM, designing resiliency to avoid TPKs, etc), questions about adventure desig...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74852 @Peter yes, that's a good question, and seems worthy of a broader exposure as a question in the Q&A category. We need to be able to build communities from the people *here*, and sometimes there are other communities (mailing lists, Discord servers, forums, gaming clubs, etc). My "do you know of oth...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74943 @Mithrandir24601 I agree that such questions can exist. I'd rather be more conservative on bulk import and then pull in additional, individual questions, which I assume will be possible (data-import is additive). I'm struggling a bit with how to do this; initially we were going to enumerate tags to...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74947 I am an amateur cook and, in the wake of current world events, have been doing even more cooking and have no place to ask my questions. I would participate in a cooking site if we had one. Do we have other interested participants?
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74823 @imsodin I meant "speculative" in the sense of "speculative fiction"; I hadn't thought about conspiracy theorists (who I don't think are very science-minded in general?). Do you have suggestions for a different name? Thanks.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74907 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74943 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Speculative Science
Data Import Update: alternate proposal We already know that the data import should exclude questions tagged "magic", of which there are about 1800 (it's the fifth-most-popular tag). Reviewing the tag list there, I spotted a few others that we might want to exclude (this is just based on th...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74907 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74907 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74907 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74907 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74907 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #74934 @MaskedMan, Codidact is building a lot more capabilities, including other post types beyond questions and answers. We're not there yet, but rather than waiting for everything to be done before launching anything, we decided to start with what we have, which is enough for immediate needs of communiti...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74934 Thanks for these suggestions! Eventually we might come up with a special post type for proposals, but if we use the question for the pitch and answers to identify and resolve issues, I think the tools we have now will work. Key to this is editing in updates as things get decided in those comment th...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74897 In every D&D campaign I've been part of, whether as player or GM, we've ended up making a lot of modifications to the rules. This will raise the question of "when is D&D not D&D any more?". I mean, *I* think we've stayed on-theme and stuck reasonably close, but if I describe house rules in the cont...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74929 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Speculative Science
What should the URL be? speculative-science.codidact.com is a bit of a mouthful. Is that ok? If not, what should we use instead? I'd be hesitant to make the main URL what-if.codidact.com, but that might be a reasonable redirect for whatever we come up with. Update: So far, consensus in c...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74833 The site is live (cc @MichaelC).
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74831 @Acquarius_Girl the site is now live (see edit to this post).
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74831 Post edited:
launched!
8 months ago
Edit Post #74925 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74893 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74925 Initial revision 8 months ago
Question What should we do about tagging in Site Proposals?
We need to figure out tags in the "Site Proposals" category. I noticed that some proposals were tagged "suggestion" and some "new-communities" and started to replace the former with the latter, and then I stopped and said "wait, everything here is a suggestion for a new community!". For technical...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74861 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #74907 @Mith those are good suggestions, thanks! "Research-level Q&A" sounds like it hits the right target; I hope others will weigh in (particularly those who've used that tag on SE).
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74907 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #74907 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Speculative Science
Category for (WB.SE) "hard science" questions The Worldbuilding community on SE has a hard-science tag. Use of this tag has special requirements for answerers, as described in a custom post notice: > This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equat...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
optional, not required
8 months ago
Comment Post #74890 Now that we've settled the URL, what do you want the name to be? "Photography" only (with video understood as a type of photography), or "Photography & Video"?
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74836 What do you want to call this category? I worry that "Canonical Q&A" is a little "insider-speak". What do you think about "Library", "References", or "Resources"? Or do you prefer "Guides"? I have the impression content won't always be "basic" or "FAQ", but maybe I misunderstand. Anyway, we need...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74836 @mattdm 1) yes. 2) working on a "change category" UI that can be trust-restricted, but in the meantime admins can move things manually for you. (I'm guessing you're not going to have a *ton* of those in the first couple weeks, so that should be fine.)
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74831 @Aquarius_Girl it'll be announced here on Meta first, and then since it's a new site I think we should give the founders a few days to build initial content via word of mouth, and then we'll announce it on the Codidact Announcements mailing list. (We want there to be content in place when we do that...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74887 Are you (plural) saying that minimalism is more of a philosophy that pervades all aspects of one's life, the way some religions might? So just like you'd expect to find all your Jewish Q&A on a Judaism site, rather than food (kosher) ones on Cooking and workplace accommodations on Workplace and educ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74900 I think the second, too. People coming from SE might interpret a green box as "has accepted answer, no need for me to go there to help", which actually we don't know anything about that answer (and we don't have "acceptance" here).
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74893 Welcome! We'll want to separate this into one post per proposed site to make discussion easier, but first, as Art said, we'll want to make sure we'll have users for any of these. All of these topics are rich and *should* have lots of interest; are you working with any others (whether from SE or els...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #39540 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #74889 I've added it to our "who needs what" list, thanks.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74889 Mathjax is on our "need soon" list for some other sites (right after we fix some issues with data import). If you don't need it on day 1 we can launch this site soon and add Mathjax support when it's ready.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74866 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #74831 What do you want for the name and URL? (And do you happen to have a logo in mind? We can give you something basic and you can replace it later if you like, but if you already have art ready, let us know.)
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74880 Post edited:
created the FR tag as requested
8 months ago
Comment Post #74866 @scottbb that seems doable to me, but I'll defer to @ArtOfCode. We already know we need to be able to change the category of a post (through the UI), so bulk-changing all questions in category X having tag Y *sounds* doable. (Dropping the tag in the process, presumably.)
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74866 Post edited:
8 months ago
Comment Post #74852 Sounds fine to me then. It sounds like tabletop games are going to be the focus, and if there are a few questions about LARPs the community will probably accept them too. Do you know of others (whether from SE or the broader gaming world) who'd be interested in helping to build this site? (I'm in ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74852 To *me*, role-playing games are inherently human-mediated, because role-playing allows pretty much anything to happen. But I don't play computer games and have no idea what terminology is in use there. What I'm wondering is whether we can drop the "tabletop" from the name here (to include the live-...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74832 Thanks @mattdm; good to know. About how many required tags do you anticipate? (For UI considerations.)
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #74866 Post edited:
fixed broken image link
8 months ago
Edit Post #74866 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Photo-Video Codidact Site
Here's where I think we are, based on my reading of all the answers and comments here. Please let me know if I've misunderstood anything. Categories would be basically as in this answer (noting that "blog" might actually be "resources" or something like that). For gear questions you can use the ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74861 SE has what I gather are successful sites for some other languages (German, French, Japanese...), where the sites are about the language itself. (I don't mean "SO in $language".) I don't know much about their successes and challenges, since I can't read a lot of the content. Do you have experience ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74852 Oh, I misunderstood too, thinking that LARPs would be off-topic as not tabletop games. I wonder if there's a term in the field for these human-mediated, broad-interpretation games as opposed to computer-mediated and thus less flexible?
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74853 I don't know if it's related, but yesterday I was writing a post with a multi-paragraph blockquote, and the preview showed me one block per paragraph instead of one big block no matter what I did. Eventually I ran out of ideas and decided to post and then file the bug report -- and the post was fine...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74832 @ArtOfCode, and an "all" button or way to turn off the filter, particularly if the tags being highlighted do not collectively cover all questions. This would give the site the freedom to highlight tags they want to promote without having to make sure that every question on the site could be reached ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74852 Welcome! Are there any features you would need that we don't already have? I can't think of any, but for example a science site would need Mathjax, so we'd want to know that. I used to love playing RPGs (alas, time...) and I agree there are rich opportunities here. You could end up with a blog ca...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74847 Hi and welcome! Is minimalism something that people form broad communities around? That is, is there a "minimalist" community out there, or are there instead minimalist communities *within* other fields? I'm trying to figure out whether minimalism is a top-level concept or a movement within other ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #74837 @mattdm somebody is actually working on templates for these blurbs now, though yours is probably going to be specialized enough that you'll need to override it. :-) But yes, the idea of a "post" page having a place to plug guidance (straight from the template, or modified for that category/site) is ...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74837 When people ask gear-recommendation questions and get answers recommending A, B, and C, how much overlap is there in those answers with answers to *other* questions where people recommended A, B, and C? Do you want straight Q&A, or do you maybe want a library of "gear" pages (features, strengths, we...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74837 We can customize the guidance on the "ask question" page per-category, so you could write a blurb about what makes a good question *in Gear Recommendations* and it'd show up there. If you have more to say than fits in that chunk of UI, you can write a help topic and link to it.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74832 @ArtOfCode, sounds like tag search within current category? That seems doable. We'll need to add the concept of sticky/pinned tags per category.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74834 Part of the issue, I think, is that "show more comments" remains even after you've clicked it and are seeing them all. Ultimately comments will be threaded, which should help -- you'll be able to expand or collapse threads rather than having to weave through conversations all at the top level.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74836 A category can support more than one post type, so if you had a resource library (or whatever you want to call it), you could have a mix of wiki-style articles and Q&A where each answer fully covers one approach.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74836 Instead of a blog you could have a resource library. Blog posts are usually individual people's work and can be opinionated and even somewhat tangential, while a resource library focuses more on objectivity and presumably has more community ownership (like a wiki). Or maybe you're looking for those ...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74832 @Mattdm, is it meaningful to have a site that covers both photo and video and that has categories like "technique", "art", "production", and "gear"? In each of those you'd see both photo and video questions, but it promotes the broad *types* you want to call out to categories. But there needs to be...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74832 @Mattdm, these are exactly the kinds of things we want to figure out *before* launching. You are not coming across as argumentative at all, and I hope you don't interpret the feedback you're getting that way either.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74833 And I agree with the goal of supporting artistic questions and not just technical ones. I think that broadens the site's appeal (at least to this rank beginner, who, granted, might not be your target audience).
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74833 Thank you both for explaining the background. If we have separate categories for photo/video/CV, then within the first two at least we'd still have a mix of technical and artistic, right? Will the former drown out the latter? Or is the idea that each of these categories would be small enough that the...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74833 What you said about categories matches our design intent. I don't know what the struggles were with video and CV alongside still photography on SE; was tagging not enough to handle that? We can give you mandatory tags (must choose at least one from this set); are there questions that wouldn't fit t...
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #74833 Post edited:
markdown hates me; let's try this
9 months ago
Edit Post #74833 Post edited:
9 months ago
Edit Post #74833 Post edited:
formatting for bulleted list
9 months ago
Comment Post #74831 Welcome! A question to help you think about categories (I have no domain expertise to apply). Think of *categories* as broad groupings; it sounds like still photography and video are different enough from each other for this, for instance. But you also have tags, and can even use the same tag set acr...
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
9 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
9 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Post edited:
9 months ago
Edit Post #74826 Initial revision 9 months ago
Question Error message contains a bad link for reporting the error
I got an error while subscribing to a category and clicked on the "report on meta" link in the message. The link produced another error: Image alt text The link in the first error message points to https://writing.codidact.com/meta/ask. The "ask" button on meta is https://meta.codidact.com/ca...
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #74825 Initial revision 9 months ago
Question Category subscription emits an error "must provide a valid category ID"
From the Meta category on Writing I clicked the "subscribe" button, filled out the form, submitted, and got this error: Image alt text Following the instructions there, I am reporting it here.
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #74823 Initial revision 9 months ago
Question Speculative Science
Update: launched; see this meta post. Renamed to Scientific Speculation based on feedback here and there. I'm copying this post from meta to keep the site suggestions together. The scope of Worldbuilding.SE is very broad, ranging from rigorous questions about orbital mechanics to questions...
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #74822 Initial revision 9 months ago
Answer A: Site suggestion - Code Golf
This answer has been superseded by new developments. Members of the Code Golf community have already created a site on TopAnswers. While this doesn't mean there can't be a site here, I would want to see a stronger show of support from members of the community. The golfers seem to be happy on...
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #74808 Initial revision 9 months ago
Question Can we make the TOS and COC links site-agnostic?
The terms of service and code of conduct linked in the footer of every page on every site point to pages on Writing. That's because Writing was first and a standalone site before we added network support to the software. Now that we have that, can we move these pages to codidact.com to be site-agno...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74804 Spec for trust levels -- needs some small updates yet: https://github.com/codidact/docs/wiki/User-Privileges.
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #74802 Initial revision 9 months ago
Question Please amend the terms of service to allow other licenses
The Codidact terms of service (example is from Writing) include: > You own the copyright to your content; by posting it here, you license it under the terms of CC BY-SA 4.0, including any media you upload as part of your Content. You represent and warrant that you own the rights to all content you...
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #39539 Post edited:
9 months ago
Edit Post #39539 Post edited:
9 months ago
Edit Post #74780 Post edited:
Meta is now configured to disable SE linking
9 months ago
Edit Post #74780 Post edited:
Meta is now configured to disable SE linking
9 months ago
Edit Post #74780 Post edited:
Meta is now configured to disable SE linking
9 months ago
Comment Post #74790 I do agree that we need to not offer the option on sites where there's nothing to connect to. Not all communities here will have associated SE sites.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74780 The "meta meta" page is going to go away, yes. We just need to make sure we've removed all the pre-category code that assumed that every site has a meta -- don't want to break this site in the process of yanking that out.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74790 What about cases where somebody has hidden specific site accounts on the network profile? If we could reliably get to all accounts I'd agree with you about just using the network profile; that would be much easier for everyone. Maybe the answer is to support both -- use the network profile in gener...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74782 If anybody with SEO know-how wants to join us and help with that, please speak up! The team we have now is focused on some critical-path features, but the current team doesn't have to be the only people working on it.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74780 @MaskedMan not your fault; we just added that "don't post here" language *because* the software made it too easy to end up here. Every *other* site we set up will have a meta, so it's baked in for now, but Meta doesn't need a meta...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74780 Are you doing this here on Meta, or on one of our other sites (Writing or Outdoors)? I'll have to check, but it might not work on Meta because we don't have an associated SE site that we want to import posts from -- but if that's the case then we should have a better response than this error, so tha...
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #74765 Initial revision 9 months ago
Answer A: Which communities have shown interest?
Speculative Science The scope of Worldbuilding.SE is very broad, ranging from hard-science questions about orbital mechanics to questions about the design of magical creatures. Some users from there have been discussing a more science-focused community here. It's still about worldbuilding, in th...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #74764 Related: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/39468. This was a couple months ago, so there's probably an update.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #39552 [Outdoors is live](https://outdoors.codidact.com/). See the [welcome message](https://outdoors.codidact.com/questions/74762) for more information on logistics.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #41993 Do members of the Code Golf communities (SE and/or TA) want to have one here too, like to be able to compare options? If the community is happy on TopAnswers then I wouldn't want to interfere with that, but we're happy to set up a community here if that's what the people involved want.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #41989 I'll leave the main part of your question for someone who can speak more authoritatively, but on your related question: yes, you will be able to link your Codidact Outdoors account to your SE Outdoors account and thus claim your content here.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #39552 @charlie still working on it; sorry for the delay.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #39552 @Charlie great, thanks. We're going to run your data import overnight; ArtOfCode or I should be in touch tomorrow with an update for you.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #39552 @Charlie working on it. What content do you want to import? From your meta discussion, looks like all non-closed questions (and their answers of course)?
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #39552 @Charlie, it looks like you've got enough buy-in there to give it a shot, and that the people supporting the idea also support appointing you as a moderator. So we can do that, and if any TGO mods come over we can add them (that's what we did on Writing), and later y'all can have an election or some...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #39552 Followup on TGO meta: https://outdoors.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1613
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #39447 Post edited:
9 months ago
Edit Post #39447 Post edited:
Now that we're evolving QPixel toward Codidact instead of doing a full cut-over to a new platform, updated explanation for communities.
9 months ago
Comment Post #39552 @Charlie sounds good! Could you share the link when you do? Thanks.
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #39552 Welcome! From the posts you linked, it sounds like several once-active users including one moderator would be interested in trying an alternative. We'd be happy to set up a site for you here, if you (or someone else you bring in) takes point on "rallying the troops" (so to speak) and talking with u...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #39450 @wrp I don't know if this is going to be a canonical source; I was trying to answer a challenge I've received once and I assume we'll receive again. I've added some details to the question; I'm also happy to see this turn into a true community Q&A, though I don't think we have a special status for t...
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #39450 Post edited:
attempting to flesh out in response to a comment
10 months ago
Comment Post #39445 @einpoklum, QPixel is the name of the software package currently running this site. It's hosted by the Codidact project and uses a Codidact URL; when the Codidact software is ready we'll move all sites that we're hosting using QPixel onto Codidact instead. The Codidact software doesn't exist yet bu...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #39469 But, more broadly, if you've got a group of users who want to build a community here, please let us know. We don't want to just create sites for the sake of creating sites, but if there are users waiting, let's talk!
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #39469 Welcome! We haven't worked out a formal process for requesting communities. In the short term, for QPixel, the focus is on communities that need something sooner than Codidact will be ready, since this is an interim solution. Some SE communities are in trouble after recent events; we want to help ...
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #39468 Initial revision 11 months ago
Question What kinds of data import can QPixel support?
How granular can data-import be for QPixel (I realize the answer might be different later for Codidact), and can it be done more than once? We know it's possible to import "everything", but which of the following would be possible, and which can be done incrementally? - All open questions on a ta...
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #39447 Post edited:
added a section to address people who are checking us out, too
11 months ago
Comment Post #39445 @Mithrandir24601 your comment pinged me. Looks like we don't have auto-complete but if you spell out a name it pings.
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #39450 I've posted the reply I sent as an answer here. I am very interested in seeing other responses.
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #39451 Initial revision 11 months ago
Answer A: How does Codidact avoid repeating Stack Exchange's mistakes?
You ask an important question. If Codidact just becomes Stack Exchange Inc. version 2 in several years, we've failed our communities and ourselves. We don't want to go down the path that SE took; we all saw where that led. So we're doing some things differently from the start. First, Codidact is ...
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #39450 Initial revision 11 months ago
Question How does Codidact avoid repeating Stack Exchange's mistakes?
I received an important question in private email, and I'm bringing it here so we can improve on the answer I sent. This won't be the last time we get this question; let's develop a clear, effective response. The question, slightly paraphrased, was: > How will you prevent Codidact from repeati...
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #39445 @mithrandir24601 I worry that that would add confusion. Meta is already "another place"; meta meta even more so. We can use a QPixel tag for questions that are specifically about this platform, and then when we migrate to the Codidact platform we can archive those. How does that sound?
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #39446 @Bhargav maybe just to handle the few flags that will be raised? (Writing has had flags, though maybe not a two-digit number of them.)
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #39447 Initial revision 11 months ago
Question Which communities have shown interest?
QPixel is not Codidact, yet, and so we're not yet trying to "build all the things" (communities). But some communities on SE seem eager to move even to a temporary site, and one already has. Which communities are looking to move, and what do we know about them? Are there particular users we should...
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #39446 Initial revision 11 months ago
Question Bootstrapping: who can speak for a community?
Our initial communities will almost certainly be groups of users from SE communities. A mature community should choose its own moderators and those are the people who can speak for the community when requesting things from the instance admins, but what should we do initially, before things are that ...
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #39445 Initial revision 11 months ago
Question What, another meta? What's this site for?
Codidact Meta is for questions about the instance that we will host. You can also request changes and report bugs in the software platform that runs it, though you're also welcome to use GitHub. But what does that leave, you ask? Use this meta site for questions about: - instance-level polici...
(more)
11 months ago