Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #291233 |
It shows them in score order, so deleted posts aren't necessarily at the bottom (but there is often correlation between low scores and deletions). (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291476 |
@#36396, what's the alternative? How do you combat irresponsible/unethical players without also hurting the people we serve -- who should be able to find us by search engines, access the sites without first having to create accounts, etc? We can't block all bad actors but we can block *some*; isn't... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291476 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292096 |
I'm still pondering question 2. I do want us to have a way for users to communicate with each other outside of comments, the only thing we have now is the Discord server _if_ both people have accounts there, and I want to do better. There's some tooling in development that I think could be part of ... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292096 | Initial revision | — | 4 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What do you do if you think a user is stalking/harassing you in comments? Please flag any individual post/comment that seems problematic. A flag doesn't mean "this is objectively delete-worthy" but rather "hey mods, please take a look at this". You can always use a custom flag to explain why you're raising it. The problem with just addressing individual occurrences is... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292057 |
Thanks. HTML sure is fussy. :-) Fixed now on-site; still need to fix in the repo. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292038 |
Post edited: fixed formatting problem that interfered with image example |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292057 |
Whoops. Thanks, will investigate.
(more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292057 |
Thanks for the feedback. I'll make sure Mith sees it. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292057 | Initial revision | — | 4 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Please review a new Accessibility Statement and Accessibility Policy Well, it was committed to GitHub by the target date, but then things happened... But finally, the accessibility statement and the detailed accessibility guidance are both live in the Help Center on all communities. The latter contains a lot of helpful tips for making posts more accessible, ranging ... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292018 |
Post edited: fixed duplicate title... |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292018 |
Post edited: replace generic slug with our network's policy |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291865 |
Post edited: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/1354 |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291590 |
Post edited: bug fixed; count is accurate now |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291946 |
I agree that consistency is important. Since the post/edit times that are nearby are fuzzed, I'm leaning toward fuzzing the close time too, but that's just one person's opinion. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291946 |
Seems like we should either fuzz the time (like the "36 minutes ago" elsewhere in your screenshot) or show exact time with timezone. Which would be better? (This is a question for everyone, not just the OP.) (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291943 | Question closed | — | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291619 |
Thanks for confirming the fix in prod. (We tested on the dev server where noisy edits don't get in anyone's way, but I didn't have a convenient test case here.) (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291590 |
Post edited: I thought we fixed this but there's a bug. Tagging this in part to let folks know we already know about the bug. We're working on it. |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #290506 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291619 |
The bug with blocking your previous suggested edits is now fixed. The main issue of why the ability wasn't recalculated remains. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291869 |
@#8049 I think that's the proposal in the question, if I'm understanding correctly. That would work too, but thinking about how to do that made me step back and ask if we should even be showing that *here* in the first place. I'm raising possibilities, not asserting a preference. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291869 |
I wonder if we should make all the tabs uniform by dropping that right panel -- keep it for *pages about community content*, but drop it from *pages about users*. Maybe? It's inconsistent now, because some of those pages are necessarily wide to begin with, but it makes me wonder if we should drop i... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291865 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What recourse is there for incorrect close/delete? The best place to raise concerns about any specific actions -- whether by mods or by the community -- is the per-community Meta category. Differences of opinion about closing questions might really be differences of opinion about scope or policy, or they might be rooted in differing knowledge. A co... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291860 |
Thanks for pointing out the lack of a reopen flag. If we had one, then curators would be able to see that flag and respond to it. I've generalized this in [this change request on GitHub](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/1354). (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291852 |
Thanks for the help with testing! I did get a notification when you pinged me, which is strange because by commenting in the thread I was automatically following it. (I was wondering if the code was only notifying non-followers on @-mentions but that code was broken. But if so, I shouldn't have go... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291852 |
Thanks. I'm now going to try one more (same thread), with an explicit ping this time. Please let me know if you get that one too. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291852 |
Debugging: I've left a new comment in that thread (without pinging you). Did that produce a notification? (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291852 |
I can confirm that you are following the thread, so you should have received a notification with or without the explicit ping. What's odd is that we haven't pushed any updates in that time window. We'll look into this -- thanks for the report. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #289330 |
Post edited: This was fixed at some point as explained in the answer. |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291242 |
Another report: https://electrical.codidact.com/posts/291745 (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291619 |
It looks like it's because it's your suggestion. I just checked the code, and two conditions must apply: (you have the edit ability or it's your post), and it's not your own suggested edit. I guess it would make sense to drop that last part? If you have the ability _now_, you'd be able to make tha... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291619 |
Looks like a bug. I can confirm that the threshold is not set differently on Code Golf. Thanks for the report, and sorry for the delayed empowerment. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291620 |
I vote for making their status more obvious rather than removing them. A consistent layout with the "you can't do this" signal for those elements seems friendlier, and also averts possible bugs with things incorrectly disappearing. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291622 |
Post edited: a fix for this is in progress (no ETA, sorry) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291600 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What is the policy for Codidact data use by other, especially for-profit organizations? We have just posted an official statement from the board of directors. Key part (click through for the whole thing): > Companies such as OpenAI and Google are forming partnerships with some organizations that host user-contributed content, for use of that content in for-profit ventures such as bu... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291599 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
| Article | — |
Statement from the board of the Codidact Foundation on commercial partnerships Our articles of incorporation state the following objectives for our foundation: > The objects of the Company are to carry on activities which benefit the community of people throughout the world who use virtual means to share and develop knowledge and understanding and in particular (without limi... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291592 |
Doing this would preclude selecting text from the question preview. Is that a problem? (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291591 |
A third way to get to a suggested edit is in response to a notification of an edit suggestion on one of your posts -- so you weren't viewing the post _or_ the list of edits before going there. "View posts" and "View suggested edits" is probably still the way to go, but mentioning it in case you have... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #287718 |
Post edited: |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287718 |
Off topic, but I've been having trouble with ImageMagick versions too... where is that answer? (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291587 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Seeing which moderator marked my flag as helpful (which should be hidden) We currently show who deleted a post -- regardless of whether anything was flagged -- to anybody who can see the post. This seems to me like a good thing for transparency. If it was your own post, you don't know whether there were any flags. Ditto if you were not involved (didn't flag, didn't de... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #287013 |
Post edited: fixed some time in the past; missed this update |
— | 6 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291526 | Initial revision | — | 6 months ago |