Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Monica Cellio‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Edit Post #288825 Post edited:
10 months ago
Edit Post #288825 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: Is corporate hosting of private Codidact sites permitted?
Welcome! Not only is it permitted, but you won't be the first to run a private instance &mdash; there's already a university using the Codidact code (QPixel) on a private network. We're building this platform not just for our own public network but for others to use too. (I recommend the `develop`...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288816 Wow, I didn't know that was possible. I agree we don't want animation on by default. I favor the "disable now, add customization guardrails later" approach suggested in answers. I assume by dynamic you mean specifically animated (as opposed to some other way of changing an avatar from use to use...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288797 Good idea. Done.
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288797 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: Clearer community proposals transition for skim readers
Good point. Ideally that button just wouldn't be there at all if posting isn't allowed, but we never planned for that case. I don't know what it would take to either remove it or cause it to link to the new site, but one thing I can do right now is change its text. I've just changed the button tex...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288790 One of our core goals is that, however you acquire the ability to vote, you get upvotes and downvotes *at the same time*.
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288762 It sounds like what you're looking for is an answer (with a special purpose) that is "pinned" to the top. But correctly using what you've described would require a lot of work and it would probably not always be used correctly. Another way to put a summary of answers before the full list is to edit...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288769 I added a status-completed tag to the question, but didn't want to bury what the change was in a revision comment, so I added this answer to explain. It can sit here at the bottom of the list; the answer with all the details is already voted up to the top.
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288693 Post edited:
10 months ago
Edit Post #288769 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: A feature-request status page
I've updated the feature-request tag description to incorporate the suggestions in this answer. Thanks for putting that together, ArtOfCode!
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288762 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: New post type: a recap table
If I understand correctly, you'd like to have some sort of "summary table" covering all the answers for a question that has a lot of them. While this can't be manually curated (but wait, see below), we do have a table of contents that automatically appears when a post has more than a certain numbe...
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288761 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: Comments improvements to indicate assent or dissent with previously posted comments
I like the idea of adding a way to "co-sign" a comment -- the "me too" part of this proposal. I don't think we should also add "disagree" using that mechanism, though. Disagreement should be explained, so instead of just clicking "I disagree", add a comment saying you disagree and explaining what...
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288745 Post edited:
10 months ago
Comment Post #288743 Hmm. I suspect that the text is coming from an ability check that isn't taking wiki status into account...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288609 I've just made the rounds of community Metas to offer this option.
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #280058 We can set communities up with whatever combinations of categories and post types they want. Feel free to include that in a community proposal.
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288714 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: Feature request: Ability to edit title of comment thread
This is on our roadmap. The current plan is to allow anybody involved in the thread to rename it, with an auto-comment to the thread recording the change: something like "title changed from (old) to (new) by (user)". This comment is owned by System, not the person making the change, so only moderato...
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288713 Post edited:
https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/714
10 months ago
Edit Post #288713 Post edited:
https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/714
10 months ago
Comment Post #288675 Good catch, thanks. Merged now.
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288675 Post edited:
10 months ago
Edit Post #288707 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: How to keep displayed usernames unique even if the user account is deleted?
Every user already has an associated unique number (it's in your profile URL). The easiest way to distinguish user names for deleted users would be to use that number. This is what SE does. A consequence of this approach is that this means that anyone who knew your user number before you deleted...
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288706 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: Creating tags is much easier than adding description
We currently have no way to suggest an edit for tag descriptions. This is a known gap and it's blocking the natural awarding of the Edit Tags ability. I think it probably also blocks doing something reasonable with creation, and I've just edited the GitHub issue to track this post. In broad stro...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #280058 So far no communities have taken us up on this, but it's an open offer. I had in mind categories of posts -- for example, Resources on Languages & Linguistics, not individual posts. In order to switch an individual question or article (for example) to the wiki, type, we would need to enable wiki po...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288194 If you post something without attribution, then you're representing that material -- ChatGPT's output in this case, but the same principle applies if you copied from Wikipedia or a blog or product documentation -- as your own work and that's a problem of both ethics and theft (plagiarism). Things...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288624 Bug. It's in the site switcher but I guess the footer gets its info elsewhere.
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288609 We should have disabled meta rep from the start but didn't. We can turn it off for any community that wants that. Rep would be recalculated.
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #288325 Sounds great. Thanks @#61308!
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #288447 Post edited:
11 months ago
Edit Post #288447 Post edited:
11 months ago
Edit Post #288441 Post edited:
11 months ago
Comment Post #288095 Hello! We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Could you please post this there so people can start asking and answering questions to flesh out the scope? Thank you, and I'm sorry you g...
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #282240 Hello! We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Could you please post this there? It looks like this could really take off with a chance to actually start asking and answering questions....
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #288292 Hello! Thanks to both of you for your interest in a GIS community here. We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Could you please post this there? Thank you, and I'm sorry you got caugh...
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #280166 @#36347 I don't think the OP is still active, so I'm pinging you as the most recent editor. We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Would you be interested in starting this proposal ther...
(more)
11 months ago
Comment Post #288325 Hello! We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Could you please post this there? Thank you, and I'm sorry you got caught in this change.
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #288156 Post edited:
11 months ago
Edit Post #288447 Initial revision 11 months ago
Article Introducing proposals.codidact.com, a new way to add communities to our network
A few weeks ago we asked for feedback on a new way of developing community proposals for our network. Thanks to your feedback we made some adjustments (and also a couple small code changes we realized we needed), and then asked the Webmasters proposal to try it out. We're now ready to make the switc...
(more)
11 months ago
Edit Post #287653 Post edited:
forgot to tag this when we made that fix
11 months ago
Edit Post #288421 Initial revision 11 months ago
Answer A: We need to talk about Abilities
I want moderators to be able to grant or suspend abilities at fairly granular levels, because sometimes that person who's answered a ton of questions well also has a tendency to make noisy edits or leave rude comments, and I want moderators to be able to take the smallest action that addresses a prob...
(more)
11 months ago