Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #291001 |
Post edited: |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291001 |
Post edited: |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291001 |
Post edited: |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291001 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Tables break words in first column Not necessarily the first column, but there's something wonky in that one: | X | Element | Description | |---|---------|-------------| |.| hydrogen | Fusce molestie nibh id tellus semper, at porta nisi rhoncus. Praesent malesuada odio a fringilla sollicitudin. | |-| helium | Curabitur malesuada... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290984 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What is the difference between the subdomain forum.codidact and the rest of the communities? As noted in Mithical's answer, the forum was for early bootstrapping, before we had this network up and running. It used `.org`, not `.com`, to try to make that distinction a little clearer. After we got our network up and running, we archived the forum -- it's still there, so you can browse those ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290983 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Display post titles instead of the URL for internal links A step toward this: if you choose "copy link" on a top-level post, you now have two options, the raw link and a Markdown version. The Markdown version uses the post title as the link text. So it's not automatic -- if you paste a URL in from your browser you'll get a naked link -- but it's possible ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290048 |
Post edited: fixed a few months ago but missed the tag |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290951 |
Post edited: status-norepro after discussion with the OP |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290888 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290506 |
Post edited: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/compare/e26a930...95bcd36 |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290867 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #287248 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290389 |
The bouncing "saved" marker has been fixed. Thanks Oleg! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290956 |
That's odd. I [temporarily trusted codidact.com](https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/8kytx244x8q99o39i9lpcqkrob9b) and refreshed, and `codiact.org` didn't show up for me. I did this in Firefox, in case that matters. I'm glad to hear that .org JS isn't required, though! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290941 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290941 |
It's a little unclear what you're asking or suggesting here. This is probably something better discussed informally in chat, with individual suggestions or feature requests as separate Meta questions. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290930 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290956 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: PSA: question tagging UI apparently now depends on JavaScript from codidact.org I am not able to reproduce this. I visited the "create post" page with NoScript turned on and this is what I see: NS shows codidact.com and a few others but not codidact.org Can you say more about where you saw `codidact.org`? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290951 |
I don't think that's intentional, no. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290929 |
Post edited: This had already been fixed in the repository but needed to be deployed. Fixed now. |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290947 |
I marked this as a duplicate of a bug about the same problem in comment threads, because I believe the root cause is the same. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290947 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290947 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290924 |
That's a good idea, thanks. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290924 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What is Codidact's policy regarding artificial intelligence-generated content? Due to a technical limitation (working on it...) I can't mark this as a duplicate of our network gen-AI policy, but see that link. To summarize: - Presenting non-original work as your own is a violation of our plagiarism policies, regardless of who or what wrote the material you used. To the ext... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290922 |
Duplicate, but currently we can't close a question in one category as a dupe of an article in another. Working on that, but in the meantime I'll leave a placeholder answer to point the way. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #74803 |
Post edited: closed as superseded instead of status-tagging it |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #74803 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290917 |
I don't have time for a proper answer right now (nor can I fully answer), but one link: [Co-Design framework](https://github.com/codidact/co-design). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290917 |
I think it's ok to have a general question here about the software platform. If people were asking lots of details we'd take it to Collab, but Meta is sort of the "commons" for our network. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290892 |
Post edited: fixed on meta; push to all communities pending |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #74803 |
Post edited: This question is about behavior that has since been changed. |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290910 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should we directly link to the proposals site for new proposals in the Help Center? Thanks for the report. I've updated this topic to link to How to propose a new community, which describes the process instead of just dropping the person on the Proposals site. Admins have an option when editing help to push the change to all sites (that haven't locally edited the topic). I chos... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #276479 |
Post edited: updated link for how to propose a community |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290739 | Question closed | — | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290867 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290867 |
I agree that's confusing. I submitted a pull request to fix it. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290860 |
I've updated that GitHub issue with a link here. Thanks for finding that, @#53890. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290860 |
Validating length after stripping unsupported HTML seems like a good idea to me. In contexts where the minimum length is longer, this would look like a post (not a blank page) and people would want to know why the length wasn't enforced. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290855 |
Hi meta guy, and I'm sorry about the experience you had when you were just trying to help. We'll get this figured out somehow -- I don't want that to drag you down either. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290855 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290855 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Minor suggested edits to old posts One of the linked questions, about not bumping minor edits, has a suggestion that would have helped in this case: allow edit reviewers to decide if an edit is minor. For that to happen, at last two people were involved, and the owner of the post is also notified of the edit suggestion. If we did ju... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #74925 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |