Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #281910 |
Hmm, yeah, that's not the behavior I expected either. I guess it's because of the "so-and-so has/you have earned this ability" bit, but I hope we can just skip that if there's no specific user being queried or logged in. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281907 |
That's a bug, yes. Answer state should derive from the state of the question (not true now, known issue), but in any case the attribution of the deletion shouldn't change. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281882 |
@JohnDoea that's a good idea, thanks! (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281898 |
Why do you need it on Physics? Do you want to *create* content with CC 3.0 there? If so, please make a request on Physics meta and we can add it there. I'm still not sure why you want it, but you can explain it there. We don't need 3.0 here to support using 3.0 content from elsewhere; we just nee... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281893 |
And if there's a larger issue about a particular question, one that requires more discussion, raising a question on the community's meta is a good next step. (That will also be more visible.) Usually if a closure is controversial it's because something about the community's scope or policies isn't ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281825 |
A PR to improve this text has been merged; it'll be in the next deployment. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281311 |
@Istiak I didn't apply the tag because of the multiple issues. The main issue, about duplicate votes, is still a concern. The author has updated the post to reflect that the bug is fixed. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278840 |
Update: we've launched Power Users. Scope is still a little fuzzy, but can be refined on meta there with the foundation from this proposal. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@paulocoghi launched - hope you can help out! (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@Ullallulloo launched. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@dessert launched - hope you can help out! (We have one question now, but I trust there will be more soon.) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@ploni launched. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@jrh launched now. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@ShowMeBillyJo launched. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@mbomb007 launched. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@. . launched. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281781 |
@celtschk agreed; that's important feedback that is currently missing. We plan to add information about voting activity (time-based) to the user profile, filling the same niche as SE's reputation tab, because it's important to know which posts are getting attention. Once we have that we can figure... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281761 |
This is an interesting idea; a creative community could build a different *kind* of Q&A community, with other types of content being first-class elements alongside it. When you have a chance, could you maybe add a few sample questions that you envision this community hosting? Subjective isn't autom... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281717 |
I guess that list is fed by the same JSON that feeds the list on codidact.com, which we haven't updated yet. They're in the site switcher and the dashboard, so I guess those get their info directly from the database. Thanks for letting me know. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280155 |
Hi @elemtilas - good to see you here. Scientific Speculation (which is narrower than Worldbuilding) launched after this proposal was made (I think), but yes, there's WB scope that wouldn't fit there. Anybody is welcome to help build out the scope for a community proposal or an existing community. ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281311 |
The issue with the flag errors is now fixed and deployed. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281651 |
@Istiak on that question, somebody posted and then deleted an answer, and that's the activity that showed as a modification on the question list. We need to distinguish among modifications; if we said "edited" or "answered" or "closed" or "answer deleted" then you'd know what the change was even if... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281651 |
@Lundin thanks for the information, and for pointing out that this case couldn't possibly have been a tag edit. We've had (and fixed) other history bugs, so while I don't know why this one doesn't show, I think we'll still need to wait to see if it happens again. Debugging single occurrences, espec... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281577 |
Related: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/485 (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281410 |
Related? https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/268 (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281610 |
Asking *reviewers* to decide if it's a minor edit is a nice approach. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281233 |
@Istiak you can always bring your own answers here; you wrote them, after all. For other people's answers, you would have to follow the attribution requirements in the license used by SE. It's usually better to write your own answer; you can cite the other and quote parts of it, like you would fro... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281650 |
Thanks for the detective work. I thought from this that the problem is that *added* tags don't get counted, but if so, then [status-planned on Site Proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/categories/10/tags/997) should return 0, because no proposal starts with that. Instead it correctly shows the one ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281623 |
Yeah, known problem that we really need to fix. Sorry for the inconvenience. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281617 |
Oh wait, I see what's going on -- if you *close* as a duplicate you have to supply a link, but if you *flag* you don't. That's an oversight. I don't know what it'll take to fix this. At the very least, we could add some text asking people to supply the link in the textbox. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281617 |
This is a bug. The duplicate close reason is supposed to require a link. I just checked the configuration here on meta and it's set to yes (required), but I was able to flag this as a dupe without supplying one. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281615 |
I would want major edits to still bump, because if somebody did a major overhaul of a (previously) poor post I probably want to change my vote, which means knowing about the change. But I don't want to be directly notified of every change (i.e. following posts doesn't solve this for me), because tha... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281577 |
I've sometimes seen the empty circle (like you reported here) and sometimes seen "0" as the notification count. Haven't worked out the characterization yet. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281576 |
Thinking out loud: could be another button at the top of the question list instead of a new category. Consider that more than one category could have this need, so we wouldn't want to spawn an extra category per, but we might be able to separate them another way. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276994 |
Second what Peter said. Some communities come together quickly, some slowly. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281554 |
@ r~~ links to related information, starting points for investigation (not an answer but maybe building blocks for an answer), comments/questions that are more tangential but still might be of interest (e.g. did you know there's a new version of that library that solves this problem?). These are th... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281554 |
@hkotsubo better contextual guidance is one of our goals, yes. We're not there yet, but it's a design goal. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281527 |
I forgot about this question; thanks for reminding me. We should post an update. Since I asked this, we've started asking communities to nominate people -- when a community first starts the load is low enough that staff can handle any issues that come up, and then the community can choose its initial... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276824 |
We'll draw a summary from the top-voted scope answer, something like "community for users of Linux and Unix-like operating systems". That can be tweaked farther, but no point in blocking a popular proposal on a minor thing. Similarly, we can start with the scope that's been discussed here and refin... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281507 |
@Moshi fair point, and maybe the meta context is enough. I'm asking, not asserting. :-) As for discussion etc, while those are a different aspect than things like "comments" or "editing", they're still the "original context" of the question rather than a disposition from the staff, so that feels di... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281507 |
@Moshi I worry that it becomes more of a "for those who know" thing at that point. If you know there are status tags, you'll probably figure out what "planned" means. On the other hand, if you're on a databases community where questions could be about query plans, maybe less clear. Or "declined" on a... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281458 |
@Istiakshovon sorry for the confusion. I wasn't suggesting that you change anything, just taking your suggestion and talking about how we might address it along with a related problem. Feature requests can attract that kind of response sometimes as people think through how the feature might work. ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281438 |
Your English is fine, don't worry! If something's unclear, people can ask about it. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280056 |
@Istiakshovon new users who haven't earned other abilities yet are limited to a few posts a day. The "Participate Everywhere" ability lifts those restrictions and is earned by having enough well-received posts. In principle, if you had that ability and then had a run of poor posts, you could lose it... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281449 |
BTW, the privilege thresholds can be changed for individual communities. We probably should have rolled out lower levels to start with rather than the "mature, active site" levels that we designed for. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281446 |
I find those "in"s suspicious -- "in 10 hours", vs. "4 hours ago" etc (what I see for my read notifications). Hmm... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281411 |
The team creates GitHub issues for things raised on Meta (main or per-site). FRs are good to bring up on Meta so the community can discuss them first. Whether you call it a bug or an FR, improving this tooltip doesn't seem controversial, so consider this to be on our radar now. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281407 |
Hasn't been ruled out, for sure. We want an API; we just haven't gotten there. Which means yes, there's opportunity to be involved. I'll defer further elaboration to the devs (I can't say anything about timing). (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281383 |
I have a bunch of rep on Writing from technical-writing questions. People shouldn't assume I have special standing if I answer a question about poetry. In fact, if I thought people would judge all my answers based on my rep, that might push me to *not answer* other questions (that I can also answer... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281238 |
This is not the place to discuss the Judaism community. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |