Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #287765 |
Are you still seeing this? I can't reproduce now. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288858 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Show question title before community name in browser tab I think this is going to require more thought, because we need to do something that works for all instances, not just ours. Our browser titles have several elements: - favicon (this is configurable today) - network name ("Codidact"; I don't know where that's set) - community name (dynamic) ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288825 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288825 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288825 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Is corporate hosting of private Codidact sites permitted? Welcome! Not only is it permitted, but you won't be the first to run a private instance — there's already a university using the Codidact code (QPixel) on a private network. We're building this platform not just for our own public network but for others to use too. (I recommend the `develop`... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288816 |
Wow, I didn't know that was possible. I agree we don't want animation on by default. I favor the "disable now, add customization guardrails later" approach suggested in answers.
I assume by dynamic you mean specifically animated (as opposed to some other way of changing an avatar from use to use... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288797 |
Good idea. Done. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288797 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Clearer community proposals transition for skim readers Good point. Ideally that button just wouldn't be there at all if posting isn't allowed, but we never planned for that case. I don't know what it would take to either remove it or cause it to link to the new site, but one thing I can do right now is change its text. I've just changed the button tex... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288790 |
One of our core goals is that, however you acquire the ability to vote, you get upvotes and downvotes *at the same time*. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288762 |
It sounds like what you're looking for is an answer (with a special purpose) that is "pinned" to the top. But correctly using what you've described would require a lot of work and it would probably not always be used correctly. Another way to put a summary of answers before the full list is to edit... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288769 |
I added a status-completed tag to the question, but didn't want to bury what the change was in a revision comment, so I added this answer to explain. It can sit here at the bottom of the list; the answer with all the details is already voted up to the top. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288693 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288769 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: A feature-request status page I've updated the feature-request tag description to incorporate the suggestions in this answer. Thanks for putting that together, ArtOfCode! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288762 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: New post type: a recap table If I understand correctly, you'd like to have some sort of "summary table" covering all the answers for a question that has a lot of them. While this can't be manually curated (but wait, see below), we do have a table of contents that automatically appears when a post has more than a certain numbe... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288761 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Comments improvements to indicate assent or dissent with previously posted comments I like the idea of adding a way to "co-sign" a comment -- the "me too" part of this proposal. I don't think we should also add "disagree" using that mechanism, though. Disagreement should be explained, so instead of just clicking "I disagree", add a comment saying you disagree and explaining what... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288745 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288743 |
Hmm. I suspect that the text is coming from an ability check that isn't taking wiki status into account... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288609 |
I've just made the rounds of community Metas to offer this option. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #280058 |
We can set communities up with whatever combinations of categories and post types they want. Feel free to include that in a community proposal. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288714 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Feature request: Ability to edit title of comment thread This is on our roadmap. The current plan is to allow anybody involved in the thread to rename it, with an auto-comment to the thread recording the change: something like "title changed from (old) to (new) by (user)". This comment is owned by System, not the person making the change, so only moderato... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288713 |
Post edited: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/714 |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288713 |
Post edited: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/714 |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288675 |
Good catch, thanks. Merged now. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288675 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288707 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How to keep displayed usernames unique even if the user account is deleted? Every user already has an associated unique number (it's in your profile URL). The easiest way to distinguish user names for deleted users would be to use that number. This is what SE does. A consequence of this approach is that this means that anyone who knew your user number before you deleted... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288706 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Creating tags is much easier than adding description We currently have no way to suggest an edit for tag descriptions. This is a known gap and it's blocking the natural awarding of the Edit Tags ability. I think it probably also blocks doing something reasonable with creation, and I've just edited the GitHub issue to track this post. In broad stro... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #280058 |
So far no communities have taken us up on this, but it's an open offer. I had in mind categories of posts -- for example, Resources on Languages & Linguistics, not individual posts. In order to switch an individual question or article (for example) to the wiki, type, we would need to enable wiki po... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288194 |
If you post something without attribution, then you're representing that material
-- ChatGPT's output in this case, but the same principle applies if you copied from Wikipedia or a blog or product documentation -- as your own work and that's a problem of both ethics and theft (plagiarism). Things... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288624 |
Bug. It's in the site switcher but I guess the footer gets its info elsewhere. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288609 |
We should have disabled meta rep from the start but didn't. We can turn it off for any community that wants that. Rep would be recalculated. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288325 |
Sounds great. Thanks @#61308!
(more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288447 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288447 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288441 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288095 |
Hello! We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Could you please post this there so people can start asking and answering questions to flesh out the scope? Thank you, and I'm sorry you g... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #282240 |
Hello! We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Could you please post this there? It looks like this could really take off with a chance to actually start asking and answering questions.... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288292 |
Hello! Thanks to both of you for your interest in a GIS community here. We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Could you please post this there? Thank you, and I'm sorry you got caugh... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #280166 |
@#36347 I don't think the OP is still active, so I'm pinging you as the most recent editor. We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Would you be interested in starting this proposal ther... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288325 |
Hello! We've just [launched a new process for proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288447), one that we think will better support developing communities. Could you please post this there? Thank you, and I'm sorry you got caught in this change. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288156 |
Post edited: |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288447 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |