Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Monica Cellio‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #280143 Test comment to see if I can reproduce. (Answer: yes.)
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280111 This isn't just about duplicates. It looks like URLs in flag text are never links; the flag text is just text.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280116 Was it a suggested edit? That's a [known bug](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280086). I just tried notifications of various sorts in my inbox and I couldn't trigger it with anything else. If it wasn't an edit, could you say what it was so we can investigate? Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280107 Yes, we need to add a "suggest edit" link there. Sorry for the delay.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280095 Hiding, alas. Known issue; thanks for the nudge.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280086 Reproduced. Thanks for the report.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280058 "Follow" has been on the wishlist for a while, and I like the idea of the option (on by default) when editing.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280058 @OlinLathrop that's a good idea. We'd then want people to be able to opt out, so fixing a typo doesn't sign you up for notifications for years to come. We'll need to do some work on notifications and preferences before we can do that, or add "follow". Meanwhile, one person gets notified, which is ...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279989 @ArtOfCode are you saying that it'll work right going forward, but the existing data errors will remain? If you check the links you'll see that those posts aren't being reported correctly; does that mean that edits that predate the fix will remain broken (but it won't happen again), or that there's ...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280018 The bug has been fixed and new answers show up as new activity and bump posts again. Posts that got new answers during the bug's lifetime (a couple days I think) haven't been updated/bumped. In other words, it shouldn't happen again but there are residual mismatches. For example, the Code Golf Cha...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280018 Not the same. The root cause of that one appears to be a problem with how suggested edits are reported (or not, as it turns out, confusing the tracking). The present bug, which has now been fixed, was about new answers, specifically.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279989 I found the [unreported edit](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/213131/history) on Scientific Speculation. This seems to be the bug with suggested edits not being reported on the post. A *different* bug was marked as a dupe of this one; that other one was fixed but this wasn't.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279903 @Zerotime the answers from Mithical and James Jenkins on the [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276933), and especially the voting on them, make me think there are unresolved issues. But it's also been a while now, so maybe voters have changed their positions (but not updated votes) or aren'...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280021 It's now back in the hamburger menu (if the viewport is too small to display it in the header).
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280045 Ditto. I wonder if this has to do with the bug that luap42 characterized somewhere else as category view permissions being too aggressive.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280044 I agree that putting the rep number back in the header until we have those other feedback mechanisms would be a good idea. That number changing is currently the only indicator people have that people are voting on their posts. And particularly if there are downvotes, you want to know so you can try...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280038 I saw the problem before and can confirm it's working now.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280020 Yikes. Reproduced on Meta. Did not reproduce on Judaism or Writing. Hmm.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280011 @luap42 maybe put *both* the timestamp and the license over on the left, so the usercard area is *just* stuff about the user and the other area is *just* stuff about the post.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279986 @ArtOfCode it's clickable now, but it's the wrong URL. I just clicked, on Meta, on an L&L ad, and it took me to that post ID on Meta, which doesn't exist and thus gave a 404.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279887 @DonielF we're actually working on a community-editable post type right now, now that it's easier.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279897 Oh, you did say that and I missed it. Thanks. So when suggested edits get approved the message is getting dropped, it looks like. Drat.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279897 That's odd. I just made [this edit](https://languages.codidact.com/posts/279224/history) and the reason appears there. I wonder what the difference is.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279896 Confirmed. Investigating.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 Hey, at least we gave you "mark all as read"!
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 Yup, reproduced. When do you think collapsed comments should be auto-expanded: when you click "add a comment", or when you submit yours?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 I see five comments and am adding another one (#7). Let's see what happens.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 6.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 5.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 4. (Yeah, you did kind of volunteer for these pings. :-) )
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 3.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 2.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279862 Test comment number 1.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279861 Hmm. You should not see the Tools menu if you don't have any of the relevant abilities (i.e. if you can't do anything on that menu). I saw a change go in in this part of the code today (not live yet), so possibly this has already been noticed and fixed -- will check.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #276824 Could somebody add a draft scope (doesn't need to be long but should indicate what's in/out broadly) as an answer, so people can comment, vote, and refine? Please address *Linux* vs *Unix* (is it both? just the former?).
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #39451 @Jordan I'll give this more thought to flesh it out more, but I think the problem with SE's profit model is that it led them to pursue business that *bypasses* the communities -- they make money by selling private Teams/Enterprise instances or through their jobs business. Aside from SO, which they ne...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279809 Thank you! That helps. If I understand correctly: economics is more theory/academic and "systems", finance is business-level theory & practice, and accounting is the particular tools & methods used to implement the former. Is that about right?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279807 Thanks for the report. We're looking into it. We've seen cases of the attribution notices not going away before but never figured out if there were a more widespread problem. Apparently there is, so we'll need to look at what's going on in the database.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279809 Could you say more about the distinction between finance and economics, for those of us who are not experts in these fields? How does [accounting](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279062) factor in? Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279798 You're right; there are two deleted answers. This is a bug.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279801 Good point @Canina. I'll amend the suggestion on GH. As for articles, good question -- while the "no more answers" aspect of closing doesn't apply, can there be duplicate articles and should they be linked together through the system if so?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279801 In [this GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/193) I proposed "This question has been addressed at (link)". I think that covers all the cases -- answered before, asked before without answers, superseded (dupe of a newer question, where "before" is wrong).
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279764 Oh, sorting *answers*. Thanks; the question said that clearly and I missed it.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279764 I'm not seeing this. When I click on the "activity" button the URL is https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3?sort=activity.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279758 @Olin after my direct edit, the notice was updated correctly. (Should've logged that, sorry.) Then when I approved the suggested edit, it disappeared. It looks like it only manifests with suggested edits. I hope that, now that we know where to look, this won't be hard to fix.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279765 @msh210 this is why I did it openly, so all would know what I was doing and why. (Was going to put a smiley here to acknowledge your "kidding", but while I know we're just kidding around, the sentiment is real -- if I do something that would be an issue if done under other circumstances, I want to b...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279765 @Moshi confirmed -- answers too.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279758 Ok, it's not just third-party edits; mine showed up fine. New hypothesis: *suggested* edits produce this behavior. We need an edit suggestion from someone who can't edit directly. I have a sock; hang on.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279758 I saw another example on Judaism, and then checked [this recent edit of mine](https://meta.codidact.com/a/276824/276995) where it shows up. Two differences: the missing ones are on questions, and the missing ones (so far) are third-party edits (not by the authors). Can we find cases to isolate thos...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279758 Here's another (recent) example of this happening: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279760. Question list shows an edit by Moshi, question doesn't, but the history does. It also shows that the OP edited once, and that edit doesn't show either (though I don't know if it did before Moshi's edit).
(more)
over 3 years ago