Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@ploni launched. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@jrh launched now. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@ShowMeBillyJo launched. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@mbomb007 launched. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
@. . launched. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281781 |
@celtschk agreed; that's important feedback that is currently missing. We plan to add information about voting activity (time-based) to the user profile, filling the same niche as SE's reputation tab, because it's important to know which posts are getting attention. Once we have that we can figure... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281761 |
This is an interesting idea; a creative community could build a different *kind* of Q&A community, with other types of content being first-class elements alongside it. When you have a chance, could you maybe add a few sample questions that you envision this community hosting? Subjective isn't autom... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281717 |
I guess that list is fed by the same JSON that feeds the list on codidact.com, which we haven't updated yet. They're in the site switcher and the dashboard, so I guess those get their info directly from the database. Thanks for letting me know. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281717 |
Post edited: there was a bug, now fixed, that caused this not to show up when I posted it, so this trivial edit is to bump it |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281732 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Could "last activity" link to where it happened (e.g. specific answer)? Please ignore this answer (if you see it). We need to test a specific scenario involving, ironic, "last activity". (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281731 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: I can't post a comment to an answer ; jquery errors appear in (Chrome) browser console We believe this has been fixed by some other changes made since you reported this. I marked it status-completed based on that, not because I can point to a code change. If you see this again, please let us know. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280155 |
Hi @elemtilas - good to see you here. Scientific Speculation (which is narrower than Worldbuilding) launched after this proposal was made (I think), but yes, there's WB scope that wouldn't fit there. Anybody is welcome to help build out the scope for a community proposal or an existing community. ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281717 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How should we approach our (non-developer) software community proposals? We have just launched Linux Systems and Power Users. Both communities have some outstanding scope issues from their proposals, but that's fine: there's enough of a baseline to get started, and the communities can continue to work out details on their community metas. Welcome aboard everyone. We'... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278833 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276824 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281208 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281311 |
The issue with the flag errors is now fixed and deployed. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281409 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281651 |
@Istiak on that question, somebody posted and then deleted an answer, and that's the activity that showed as a modification on the question list. We need to distinguish among modifications; if we said "edited" or "answered" or "closed" or "answer deleted" then you'd know what the change was even if... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281651 |
@Lundin thanks for the information, and for pointing out that this case couldn't possibly have been a tag edit. We've had (and fixed) other history bugs, so while I don't know why this one doesn't show, I think we'll still need to wait to see if it happens again. Debugging single occurrences, espec... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281651 |
Post edited: this wasn't a tag edit (or a question edit even) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281577 |
Related: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/485 (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281410 |
Related? https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/268 (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281610 |
Asking *reviewers* to decide if it's a minor edit is a nice approach. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278833 |
Post edited: trivial edit to try to unstick a zombie tag |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281446 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281233 |
@Istiak you can always bring your own answers here; you wrote them, after all. For other people's answers, you would have to follow the attribution requirements in the license used by SE. It's usually better to write your own answer; you can cite the other and quote parts of it, like you would fro... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278833 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281650 |
Thanks for the detective work. I thought from this that the problem is that *added* tags don't get counted, but if so, then [status-planned on Site Proposals](https://meta.codidact.com/categories/10/tags/997) should return 0, because no proposal starts with that. Instead it correctly shows the one ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281651 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Post edited by a user but no changes visible We have had some bugs in edit history. Fixes for these bugs apply to future edits, but we don't have a good way to update events that predated the bug fixes. That edit was six months ago and I know we've fixed history bugs since then. If you see a new edit that doesn't show history correctly ple... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281641 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Could we have a way to edit without bumping posts? Speaking for myself and not the team (I haven't discussed this with anyone else), here are some things I'd like to consider: - We shouldn't try to programmatically determine what a "minor" edit is; in the right context, one character is a major edit. Designation as minor needs to be human-powered... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281623 |
Yeah, known problem that we really need to fix. Sorry for the inconvenience. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281617 |
Oh wait, I see what's going on -- if you *close* as a duplicate you have to supply a link, but if you *flag* you don't. That's an oversight. I don't know what it'll take to fix this. At the very least, we could add some text asking people to supply the link in the textbox. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281617 |
This is a bug. The duplicate close reason is supposed to require a link. I just checked the configuration here on meta and it's set to yes (required), but I was able to flag this as a dupe without supplying one. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281615 |
I would want major edits to still bump, because if somebody did a major overhaul of a (previously) poor post I probably want to change my vote, which means knowing about the change. But I don't want to be directly notified of every change (i.e. following posts doesn't solve this for me), because tha... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281611 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Understanding how posts were possibly received by the community --- network wide I think what you're asking for is (1) better information about votes you're receiving, so you know which posts are being up- or down-voted, and (2) for that information to be available in one place. For the first, we do want to provide this information on the user profile page. You should be able... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281577 |
I've sometimes seen the empty circle (like you reported here) and sometimes seen "0" as the notification count. Haven't worked out the characterization yet. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281576 |
Thinking out loud: could be another button at the top of the question list instead of a new category. Consider that more than one category could have this need, so we wouldn't want to spawn an extra category per, but we might be able to separate them another way. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276994 |
Second what Peter said. Some communities come together quickly, some slowly. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276994 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281554 |
@ r~~ links to related information, starting points for investigation (not an answer but maybe building blocks for an answer), comments/questions that are more tangential but still might be of interest (e.g. did you know there's a new version of that library that solves this problem?). These are th... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281554 |
@hkotsubo better contextual guidance is one of our goals, yes. We're not there yet, but it's a design goal. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281554 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Giving question feedback in private - a moderating system to reduce conflicts I'd like to propose a different way of thinking about the problem (and I agree there are problems here). Some premises: - New users don't know how things work, so we need to keep it simple. - Many non-veteran users are deterred by bad "people" experiences -- if your question is off-topic the... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |