Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #284169 |
A "disagree" vote would start a new round of voting, and if the net score reaches the threshold it's un-duped. I see I described the notice but didn't include the voting buttons there, oops. (If someone disagrees, there's a notice about "might have been incorrectly marked...", which should get "it'... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #284169 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #284169 |
@#53196 re first comment: yes, people can agree or disagree while the suggestion is pending:
> Everybody else who has Participate Generally sees two buttons next to each suggested duplicate: "agree" and "disagree". Choosing either prompts for a comment to add to the thread (like the initial sugge... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #284169 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #284169 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
Question | — |
Let's improve how we handle duplicates Currently, marking a question as a duplicate is part of question closure. Duplicates are a little different from other close reasons, though -- often the question itself is clear, complete, and otherwise solid, but it happens to have been asked before. Question closure can leave people feeling j... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #284072 |
I don't think this is correct. As another answer says, the user-authentication system isn't tied to the Codidact network; you can set up your own, just as the users on our test server are separate from this network. While the Codidact team can't commit to debugging every problem that comes up, we a... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283998 |
That's a good point about positioning, @#8056. Maybe that expander (or those expanders, in the case of an answer, coming soon) should be below the title. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283998 |
@#8056 your last request is already there. The post is behind an expander so people looking for comments jump to comments, but you can expand to see the post. Coming soon: if the post is an answer, you'll also be able to see the question from the thread page. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283928 |
Code Golf might have a use case for this, though it would require cross-category duplicates too: they want to be able to mark sandbox posts, which are articles, as "finalized", meaning the challenge was posted. If you come across such a sandbox post, it'd sure be handy to be able to go straight to t... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283998 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Show more threaded comments after clicking the title of a threaded discussion I agree that someone who asks for the comments should see the comments, especially with the "collapse" control. Very occasionally here (so far; this happened often on some sites Someplace Else), there will be a very long comment thread, by which I mean 20+. Over there we sometimes saw 100+ commen... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283884 |
Thanks Mark! I'm looking forward to more growth too. We're a lot smaller than Some Other places, but I hope we distinguish ourselves in how we treat people and work together. It's going to take time to spread the word, but everybody who helps others have good experiences here helps us grow. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283884 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
Article | — |
Newsletter #8 (August 2021) Hello from the Codidact team! We're here with another update from our corner of the Internet. Platform ## We've made a lot of improvements large and small since our last newsletter. First, we finished threaded comments, and they are already helping people to organize conversations without bei... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #75053 |
This proposal has been merged into the linked one. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283745 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283668 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283668 |
Confirming a fix: @#53196 I just typed "@mosh", selected the popup, and got the correct behavior. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283348 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283348 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283623 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283611 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283692 |
Ironic example. :-) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283692 | Question closed | — | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283318 |
Sorry, I was slow to create the usual answer to collect interest, but now that we have threaded comments, I think this is better -- anybody can add a comment and you don't need to wait for someone with privileges to edit the post.
I am interested in this community and think it's an interesting exp... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283235 |
I had incorrectly marked this as status-complete, having misunderstood the timeline. Sorry about that! (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283235 |
This just happened to me on Power Users, posting on https://powerusers.codidact.com/comments/thread/4171 with this error code: 48bd593f-6bcf-402b-87e6-ce624c068a02. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283235 |
Post edited: just happened to me, so either not fixed or recurred |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283632 |
Also, when composing a post, the button is initially disabled, and when you type enough text in the body it's enabled -- even before you fill in a title. Once you start to type the title it's disabled again until it's long enough. We should check *all* requirements, not just the active field, befor... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283235 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283235 |
Has this happened again since you posted this report? (We've fixed some other things in the vicinity.) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #282410 |
Post edited: You have to start typing before it shows up, but it's there now. |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #283604 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Has anyone seen my unicorn? Alas, our unicorn herders have gone missing, and we don't know when they'll return. For now, we've just pushed a change to generate boring avatars for people who were using unicorns. We still hope to get our wandering unicorns back, either from the original server or by running our own, but in the ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283536 |
Welcome to Codidact! As you've seen, we have proposals for individual communities for economics, finance, and accounting, and this proposal for a combined community covering all three. We're not the experts; y'all are. Doe a combined community make sense? Are the people who are interested in one ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283537 |
Welcome to Codidact! As you've seen, we have proposals for individual communities for economics, finance, and accounting, and this proposal for a combined community covering all three. We're not the experts; y'all are. Doe a combined community make sense? Are the people who are interested in one ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #280160 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #278496 |
Post edited: added from new answer |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #280164 |
Post edited: added from new answer |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283531 |
That's the backend; does the client restrict it at all? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #276994 |
This community has just launched: https://rpg.codidact.com/posts/283503. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #74852 |
This community has been launched! Thanks for all the work to get to this point. Go forth and build. :-) https://rpg.codidact.com/posts/283503 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #74852 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #74852 |
Status-pending: we plan to launch this community. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #74852 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #280723 |
Post edited: clarification - the rep values are changes for the author of the post, not for the voter |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #283406 |
Sorry for the ambiguity. What's configurable is the rep change for the *recipient* of the vote. The voter's reputation doesn't change and we don't have a way to configure that. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #280723 |
@#53078 we don't currently have rep changes for *casting* votes, so that's not configurable right now. There's an interesting discussion to be had there, I think: is rep loss the best way to keep downvoting in check, or is it just what we're used to from Somewhere Else? Should voting be limited in s... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |