Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #279761 |
Yes, the post was deleted and yes, it would be good if notifications could be withdrawn in such cases but that doesn't work yet. The comment, from the OP a few minutes before deleting, was: "@Lundin Testing would seem (to me) often difficult without data, and I suspect that is often imported." This... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279758 |
Same here (Chrome, MacOS). I don't think this one is browser-dependent. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277007 |
@nalply glad to hear it! The community exists now, so no more need to register interest here -- you can head over to [Mathematics](https://math.codidact.com/) and ask and answer questions. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279753 |
Hmm, doesn't seem to be global now; did somebody else edit it? Do you see it in the list in the mod tools now? (You should not have been able to make it global, so if you did, that's a bug...) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279717 |
@Canina Art gets the kudos; the rest of us asked questions and found cases that helped him figure it out. He's planning to write a blog post about lessons learned from this upgrade, including this problem. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279719 |
Here's another pair with weird behavior: https://judaism.codidact.com/categories/43/tags/3061 (from Divrei Torah, includes a mislabeled one from Challenges but nothing from Q&A), and the same tag in Q&A with only Q&A hits: https://judaism.codidact.com/categories/32/tags/3061 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279669 |
The edit history on this post is strange. I see two edits from the same person within a minute or so. I reviewed and approved one of them (a tag-only edit). I'm puzzled by the other one. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279624 |
Another case here: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279669/history. I approved that edit, which added a tag. The diff does not show the tag addition anywhere. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279711 |
I have seen this too on another post -- blue highlighting indicating a vote (which I did cast), and reported votes of +0/-0 so clearly my vote isn't accounted for. Investigating. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279663 |
GH issue for the votes-received part: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/133 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279677 |
That's weird. It's you, not everyone. Hmm... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279670 |
Should be tag*s*, not tag*d*: https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/edit_tags. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279613 |
Starting at 0 is fine with me. But in that case new accounts should, too, and it appears that accounts with no posts have 1 rep. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279654 |
What browser are you using? I'm trying to reproduce, and I've struck out on Chrome, Firefox, and Safari (on MacOS). (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279638 |
Maybe a checkmark in parens to indicate that it's qualified? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279560 |
That's very bizarre @user8078. Since Judaism should *never* have redirected to Meta, I'm stumped. (It wasn't the meta category on Judaism, was it?) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279637 |
Oh, *sorting*! Yeah, that's a good point; we should think about how to sort the list. SE calls their review things queues, but I don't think they're actually ordered, which yes is confusing. They present you things to review one at a time, and you have to do something with the one you've got befor... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279637 |
@Moshi I mean we shouldn't make queues just because Someplace Else does them. Maybe we want something like that, that people step through one post at a time, or maybe we want something different, but as a first step we can meet the (I agree glaring) need by having a page of links. People can scan t... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279637 |
@luap42 yes, let's just do a list of posts with pending edits; from there people can click through to go to the posts themselves. No fancy queue stuff, extra buttons, etc, just an index. If we want to get fancy, two tabs -- one for posts and one for tags. We can add it to the widget currently call... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279560 |
@user8078 no repro for me. Is it still happening to you? Can you provide more details? Judaism -> Meta seems an odd redirect to me. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279623 |
I suspect it has to do with *when* it was asked, i.e. during the database upgrade. I've asked our DB person to check whether the sync for new changes missed this. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279622 |
Thanks. Looks like the source image is .PNG while all the others are .png, and I think case has caused problems with images before. (So we want to fix that *too*, but in the meantime, the fix here seems obvious.) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279615 |
I was thinking of just linking the word "abilities" in that heading. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279560 |
Answer(s) missing here: https://software.codidact.com/questions/279593 (reported [here](https://software.codidact.com/questions/279609), and I remember seeing one or two answers there too). (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279560 |
My user history shows edits that are now missing (example: on [this post](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279180)), so user histories might provide another way to find things, maybe? Unfortunately the user history doesn't show the edit diff, so I can't just reapply it -- we'll need to get that a... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279560 |
I posted a comment on https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279595 last night that is missing. (It was about trying to reproduce the problem, so would be good to get back.) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279560 |
@Canina thanks. Yes, I remember editing both of those. There might have also been some more interested users on Physics? Can't remember if any are missing now (their comments would be too). (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279560 |
I made updates to a few site proposals in the last week. I don't remember which ones, but newest activity is currently showing as 9 days ago and that's definitely wrong. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279504 |
@FoggyFinder I asked, and apparently the request isn't even reaching our servers; the caching is happening locally, so there's nothing we can do to force expiration on our end. :-( (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279180 |
@seth.wagenman proposals sometimes go for a while before solidifying; it's fine to leave this here. I didn't see your comments until now; sorry for the delay. I'm going to edit your examples into the post where they'll be more visible. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279504 |
@Zerotime Cooking is working for me. If it's not for you, try flushing browser cache, in case it cached the redirect to our "down" page? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279504 |
Discord and Twitter, @luap42... they'll be able to reach us. So we'd best get this right. :-) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279411 |
@mbomb007 the list on codidact.com is maintained in files checked in to git; the dashboard reads out of the database. The community descriptions shown on codidact.com aren't in the database. I don't know if there's a technical reason for codidact.com to not depend on the DB. (Descriptions could b... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279470 |
@fedorqui there might actually be some low-level conditions; not sure. The tooltip reports the same number for all buttons, though, so maybe not. I would have to ask the developer or try to find it in the code. Maybe in the future we could improve it, yes. We're also working on a design for *use... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279468 |
@OlinLathrop I'm puzzled too. Have you tried in incognito mode (assuming Edge has something like that)? On other browsers, I understand, incognito mode disables all extensions, so if there's some extension interfering that you wouldn't have thought would be related, that would be a way to catch it.... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279384 |
@Alexei we're working on getting a bank account set up so we can accept donations, thanks. (Needed a corporate identification number first in order to be able to open an account. And now, we have learned, everything is slower because of Covid. But as soon as we're set up we'll let folks know. :-) ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278340 |
Thank you Knight and @NaveenMishra for giving this proposal a boost, and welcome to Codidact! While we're waiting for a physics community I hope you'll take a look at our [other communities](https://codidact.com/) which you might also be interested in. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279390 |
When I hear literature I think of written material specifically (books etc), while I think the proposal here means to include movies, TV, etc. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279372 |
@Lundin would you be able to flesh that out into a scope proposal in an answer, so people can vote, comment (more easily), and edit? Thanks. (I wasn't active over there so I don't know what those pitfalls were.) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279371 |
This is one of the things we intended auto-save to mitigate, so if that's not working we'll want to look into that. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279372 |
I feel like there could be a useful partnership with [Scientific Speculation](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/), too -- this community for what exists, that one for what *could* exist (with a science ground). (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279292 |
That's strange; I've definitely seen tag-only edits. Can you link to the post you tried to edit so we can figure out what might be special about that case? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279279 |
We show the "close" link to people who can't use it? Oops. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278908 |
Would questions about configuring email, domains, and the like be on-topic? Just tonight I had an [issue with email forwarding and Gmail rejections](https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/2089825.html), which I posted about on my blog for lack of a better place to ask. Would this sort of thing be included? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278688 |
Definitely agree on the name -- let's banish "hot". (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279180 |
Could you add a few examples of questions (titles I mean) that you see people asking on this community? I think it'd help people not deeply involved in this area get a better understanding of the topic. Codidact is oriented more around *knowledge* (Q&A, blogs, resource collections, etc) than around... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279062 |
@1muflon1 thanks for explaining! It does sound like the two should not mingle, then. The idea is for each community to build *a* community, not multiple co-located ones that don't interact. :-) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279095 |
@KalleMP I don't see a comment from you (even deleted). Is it possible you clicked the "discard" button instead of the "post" button? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279064 |
I've closed this here, as it is a community-specific matter that is more properly discussed on Languages & Linguistics Meta. You are welcome to bring it up there, taking into account the feedback you got here. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279091 |
Do you mean on the question list? That does work here on the individual question, but it looks like it doesn't work there and I agree it ought to. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |